Menu
▾
▴
parade-developers — Mailing list of ParaDe developers
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(221) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 |
Jan
(134) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(36) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(82) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(101) |
Nov
(104) |
Dec
(246) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(47) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(45) |
Apr
(180) |
May
(279) |
Jun
(162) |
Jul
(213) |
Aug
(83) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(29) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
|
Mar
(61) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(61) |
Jun
(54) |
Jul
|
Aug
(6) |
Sep
|
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(34) |
May
(64) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(63) |
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(40) |
Nov
(36) |
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Magdalena R. <mag...@be...> - 2015-02-03 20:27:17
|
Witam, Zwracam się z zapytaniem w imieniu internetowego serwisu tłumaczeniowego. Polscy przedsiębiorcy szukają dobrych jakościowo tłumaczeń w związku z rosnącym eksportem i chęcią nawiązywania międzynarodowej współpracy. Chciałam zapytać czy mogę przedstawić ofertę na usługi tłumaczeń pisemnych? Pozdrawiam, Magdalena Rusek Business Development Manager beglobal.pl |
|
From: <bug...@ma...> - 2013-05-22 09:31:45
|
http://bugs.makumba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1244 Summary: test Product: ParaDe Version: parade2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Plugin-CVS AssignedTo: Par...@li... ReportedBy: mah...@gm... CC: mah...@gm... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.makumba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
From: Manuel B. <ber...@gm...> - 2013-03-29 08:08:54
|
Hi! I got a mail from someone wondering what the status of the "Nomad" organization on GitHub is. I had set this up with the ParaDe sources so that development could happen there: http://github.com/nomad But so far nothing has happened, I think the recent improvements to ParaDe are on some other repository. In the light of keeping the long CVS history of the codebase, I think it'd be good to stitch together the new commits and the old codebase. Anyone interested? Manuel |
|
From: Manuel B. <ber...@gm...> - 2012-10-31 08:22:04
|
http://eclipse.org/orion/ |
|
From: Manuel B. <ber...@gm...> - 2012-07-16 12:49:35
|
> So we should branch parade-nomad's parade2 repo and apply our changes > on it right? Not completely sure on how to do it. I'll read some > documentation to get more familiar with it :) Yes, that's the idea. Ping me if you need help, maybe I can provide some On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:41 PM, João Andrade <jja...@gm...> wrote: > Hey, > > Cool! Great to see this :) > > So we should branch parade-nomad's parade2 repo and apply our changes > on it right? Not completely sure on how to do it. I'll read some > documentation to get more familiar with it :) > > cheers, > João > > > On 9 June 2012 12:52, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just finished migrating the old ParaDe CVS repo to GitHub, so that >> the development history is conserved: https://github.com/parade-nomad/ >> >> Philipp and Joao, maybe you can branch the parade2 repo and apply your >> changes on top - either by cherry-picking them to the branch or by >> rebasing (ask if you need help). >> >> Cheers, >> >> manu >> |
|
From: Cristian B. <cr...@cs...> - 2012-06-18 13:31:22
|
Hi João, I want to get back to parade and try to revive Aether this summer. I'll be in touch on parade-developers. First question: how do I checkout? Never used git. cristi On 2012-06-13 22.14, Manuel Bernhardt wrote: > Great! > > For JNotify I don't have a clue how it behaves on osx these days. On > linux I had to recompile it against 64bit but that should be checked > in. It may be worth looking into using the finally available JVM 7 > support for that kind of file change tracking. Or maybe there's an > updated version of the JNotify project. I think I used to run parade > in a VirtualBox Ubuntu on my mac. > > manu > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 13.06.2012, at 21:59, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> Aether should be back on parade now. Next is Jnotify >> >> cheers, >> João >> >> >> On 11 June 2012 02:29, João Andrade<jja...@gm...> wrote: >>> # rebasing: http://learn.github.com/p/rebasing.html >>> >>> Hey, >>> >>> Alright :) >>> >>> Finally had the chance to learn a bit more about Git. >>> >>> I was looking into the experimental parade version we have and I >>> believe that before going for any rebasing on parade-nomad's parade >>> project, all the missing files (JNotify, Aether, etc) should be >>> included this experimental version or we'll end up with a non-working >>> version. >>> >>> I'll get this moving during the next few days. >>> >>> cheers, >>> João >>> >>> >>> On 9 June 2012 10:44, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>> Hmm, "parade" and "nomad" are already taken as organizations. I'll try >>>> to think about something else - I think it is possible to rename >>>> organizations >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Manuel Bernhardt >>>> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>> It's the organisation on github.com to host the source repository for parade >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>> On 08.06.2012, at 22:42, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I don't know exactly what you are naming but Nomad is a good name >>>>>> >>>>>> cristi >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2012-06-08 19.17, Manuel Bernhardt wrote: >>>>>>> Nomad sounds fun to me. Cristi, opinions? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'll see to migrate the rest of the users tomorrow. Creating an >>>>>>> organization is super fast so once we have decided on the name I can >>>>>>> do this in an instant and import the repo. Then you can branch and >>>>>>> import your changes on top of it, not sure yet what is the best method >>>>>>> but we'll figure something out >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Greetings from Helsinki >>>>>>> >>>>>>> manu >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 08.06.2012, at 17:00, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Back to this >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 6 June 2012 18:32, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Looked a bit into it, I'm now playing with >>>>>>>>> http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/cvs2git.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's really good to have a SSD for this kind of IO intensive operations :-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So Joao if you have time tomorrow maybe you could look at setting up a >>>>>>>>> github organization. The name is still something that'd be interesting >>>>>>>>> to figure out since it's mostly a BEST and KTH cooperation. Maybe >>>>>>>>> "nomad" would be a good name :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ok so shall we name it Nomad? :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Then you can make a branch there and cherry-pick all commits from your >>>>>>>>> repo or replay them on it otherwise. Keeping the history of the last 9 >>>>>>>>> or so years is a good idea I think. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I looked at the github repo, some quick comments: >>>>>>>>> - migration to maven: nice work! a lot more streamlined I suppose. >>>>>>>>> Though how do you run it now? I remember the tomcat configuration has >>>>>>>>> major tweaks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Currently, Maven's only used for dependency management. >>>>>>>> Hum that might explain why I'm having some issues starting STRUTS >>>>>>>> properly. Will have to look into it deeper :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - I saw that you commented out JNotify -- just as a warning, this >>>>>>>>> entirely breaks parade, unless you've found another way of watching >>>>>>>>> file system changes? the problem is that when people sync stuff via >>>>>>>>> unison, changes on the FS aren't updated in the cache unless they are >>>>>>>>> picked up on the FS. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Indeed. AFAIR I was getting some errors related to it, but I'll >>>>>>>> re-enable it for sure :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - maybe it's a good idea to comment in the Aether code since anyway it >>>>>>>>> is all wrapped in big IF statements so it won't hurt. and keeping it >>>>>>>>> compiling during refactoring rather than having to figure out after >>>>>>>>> the fact what on earth is going on is probably simpler >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> True. I've been thinking the same lately :) >>>>>>>> In the end, it'll prove easier to have the code uncommented. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> manu >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Manuel Bernhardt >>>>>>>>> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> It should be 30 min of work, if you list the cvsusers and we can provide >>>>>>>>>> emails for them >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> An interesting question would be hie to call the organization that will hold >>>>>>>>>> the repo >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 06.06.2012, at 18:21, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and >>>>>>>>>> enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on >>>>>>>>>> its importing capabilities. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why not move to git(hub) directly? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge >>>>>>>>>>> SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there >>>>>>>>>>> (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git >>>>>>>>>>> users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try& get the git emails of >>>>>>>>>>> all contributors but that should not be too hard). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade<jja...@gm...> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the >>>>>>>>>>>> structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We're currently using a Git repository. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework >>>>>>>>>>>> properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN >>>>>>>>>>>> repo. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN >>>>>>>>>>>> branch. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi João >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any >>>>>>>>>>>>> commit >>>>>>>>>>>>> mails. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with >>>>>>>>>>>>> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point >>>>>>>>>>>>> for me >>>>>>>>>>>>> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that >>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>> be awesome :) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cheers >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we have a normal base functionality working version. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> refactoring paraDe. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rewriting everywhere. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> host >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> malware >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>>>>>>> malware >>>>>>>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> |
|
From: Manuel B. <ma...@de...> - 2012-06-13 20:36:04
|
Managed to get the nomad name so now the organization is renamed from parade-nomad to nomad If you cloned a repo you need to fix the config in .git/config accordingly manu Sent from my iPhone |
|
From: Manuel B. <ber...@gm...> - 2012-06-13 20:14:22
|
Great! For JNotify I don't have a clue how it behaves on osx these days. On linux I had to recompile it against 64bit but that should be checked in. It may be worth looking into using the finally available JVM 7 support for that kind of file change tracking. Or maybe there's an updated version of the JNotify project. I think I used to run parade in a VirtualBox Ubuntu on my mac. manu Sent from my iPhone On 13.06.2012, at 21:59, "João Andrade" <jja...@gm...> wrote: > Hey, > > Aether should be back on parade now. Next is Jnotify > > cheers, > João > > > On 11 June 2012 02:29, João Andrade <jja...@gm...> wrote: >> # rebasing: http://learn.github.com/p/rebasing.html >> >> Hey, >> >> Alright :) >> >> Finally had the chance to learn a bit more about Git. >> >> I was looking into the experimental parade version we have and I >> believe that before going for any rebasing on parade-nomad's parade >> project, all the missing files (JNotify, Aether, etc) should be >> included this experimental version or we'll end up with a non-working >> version. >> >> I'll get this moving during the next few days. >> >> cheers, >> João >> >> >> On 9 June 2012 10:44, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>> Hmm, "parade" and "nomad" are already taken as organizations. I'll try >>> to think about something else - I think it is possible to rename >>> organizations >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Manuel Bernhardt >>> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>> It's the organisation on github.com to host the source repository for parade >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On 08.06.2012, at 22:42, Cristian Bogdan <cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I don't know exactly what you are naming but Nomad is a good name >>>>> >>>>> cristi >>>>> >>>>> On 2012-06-08 19.17, Manuel Bernhardt wrote: >>>>>> Nomad sounds fun to me. Cristi, opinions? >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll see to migrate the rest of the users tomorrow. Creating an >>>>>> organization is super fast so once we have decided on the name I can >>>>>> do this in an instant and import the repo. Then you can branch and >>>>>> import your changes on top of it, not sure yet what is the best method >>>>>> but we'll figure something out >>>>>> >>>>>> Greetings from Helsinki >>>>>> >>>>>> manu >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>> >>>>>> On 08.06.2012, at 17:00, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Back to this >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6 June 2012 18:32, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Looked a bit into it, I'm now playing with >>>>>>>> http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/cvs2git.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's really good to have a SSD for this kind of IO intensive operations :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So Joao if you have time tomorrow maybe you could look at setting up a >>>>>>>> github organization. The name is still something that'd be interesting >>>>>>>> to figure out since it's mostly a BEST and KTH cooperation. Maybe >>>>>>>> "nomad" would be a good name :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok so shall we name it Nomad? :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Then you can make a branch there and cherry-pick all commits from your >>>>>>>> repo or replay them on it otherwise. Keeping the history of the last 9 >>>>>>>> or so years is a good idea I think. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I looked at the github repo, some quick comments: >>>>>>>> - migration to maven: nice work! a lot more streamlined I suppose. >>>>>>>> Though how do you run it now? I remember the tomcat configuration has >>>>>>>> major tweaks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Currently, Maven's only used for dependency management. >>>>>>> Hum that might explain why I'm having some issues starting STRUTS >>>>>>> properly. Will have to look into it deeper :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - I saw that you commented out JNotify -- just as a warning, this >>>>>>>> entirely breaks parade, unless you've found another way of watching >>>>>>>> file system changes? the problem is that when people sync stuff via >>>>>>>> unison, changes on the FS aren't updated in the cache unless they are >>>>>>>> picked up on the FS. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Indeed. AFAIR I was getting some errors related to it, but I'll >>>>>>> re-enable it for sure :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - maybe it's a good idea to comment in the Aether code since anyway it >>>>>>>> is all wrapped in big IF statements so it won't hurt. and keeping it >>>>>>>> compiling during refactoring rather than having to figure out after >>>>>>>> the fact what on earth is going on is probably simpler >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> True. I've been thinking the same lately :) >>>>>>> In the end, it'll prove easier to have the code uncommented. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>> João >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> manu >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Manuel Bernhardt >>>>>>>> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>>>> It should be 30 min of work, if you list the cvsusers and we can provide >>>>>>>>> emails for them >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> An interesting question would be hie to call the organization that will hold >>>>>>>>> the repo >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 06.06.2012, at 18:21, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and >>>>>>>>> enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on >>>>>>>>> its importing capabilities. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why not move to git(hub) directly? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge >>>>>>>>>> SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there >>>>>>>>>> (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git >>>>>>>>>> users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try& get the git emails of >>>>>>>>>> all contributors but that should not be too hard). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade<jja...@gm...> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the >>>>>>>>>>> structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We're currently using a Git repository. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework >>>>>>>>>>> properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN >>>>>>>>>>> repo. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>> fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN >>>>>>>>>>> branch. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi João >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any >>>>>>>>>>>> commit >>>>>>>>>>>> mails. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with >>>>>>>>>>>> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point >>>>>>>>>>>> for me >>>>>>>>>>>> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that >>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>> be awesome :) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> cheers >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is >>>>>>>>>>>>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once >>>>>>>>>>>>> we have a normal base functionality working version. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping >>>>>>>>>>>>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on >>>>>>>>>>>>> refactoring paraDe. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe >>>>>>>>>>>>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rewriting everywhere. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> host >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> malware >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>>>>>> malware >>>>>>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> |
|
From: João A. <jja...@gm...> - 2012-06-13 18:59:37
|
Hey, Aether should be back on parade now. Next is Jnotify cheers, João On 11 June 2012 02:29, João Andrade <jja...@gm...> wrote: > # rebasing: http://learn.github.com/p/rebasing.html > > Hey, > > Alright :) > > Finally had the chance to learn a bit more about Git. > > I was looking into the experimental parade version we have and I > believe that before going for any rebasing on parade-nomad's parade > project, all the missing files (JNotify, Aether, etc) should be > included this experimental version or we'll end up with a non-working > version. > > I'll get this moving during the next few days. > > cheers, > João > > > On 9 June 2012 10:44, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: >> Hmm, "parade" and "nomad" are already taken as organizations. I'll try >> to think about something else - I think it is possible to rename >> organizations >> >> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Manuel Bernhardt >> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>> It's the organisation on github.com to host the source repository for parade >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 08.06.2012, at 22:42, Cristian Bogdan <cr...@cs...> wrote: >>> >>>> I don't know exactly what you are naming but Nomad is a good name >>>> >>>> cristi >>>> >>>> On 2012-06-08 19.17, Manuel Bernhardt wrote: >>>>> Nomad sounds fun to me. Cristi, opinions? >>>>> >>>>> I'll see to migrate the rest of the users tomorrow. Creating an >>>>> organization is super fast so once we have decided on the name I can >>>>> do this in an instant and import the repo. Then you can branch and >>>>> import your changes on top of it, not sure yet what is the best method >>>>> but we'll figure something out >>>>> >>>>> Greetings from Helsinki >>>>> >>>>> manu >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>> On 08.06.2012, at 17:00, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hey, >>>>>> >>>>>> Back to this >>>>>> >>>>>> On 6 June 2012 18:32, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Looked a bit into it, I'm now playing with >>>>>>> http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/cvs2git.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's really good to have a SSD for this kind of IO intensive operations :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So Joao if you have time tomorrow maybe you could look at setting up a >>>>>>> github organization. The name is still something that'd be interesting >>>>>>> to figure out since it's mostly a BEST and KTH cooperation. Maybe >>>>>>> "nomad" would be a good name :) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Ok so shall we name it Nomad? :) >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then you can make a branch there and cherry-pick all commits from your >>>>>>> repo or replay them on it otherwise. Keeping the history of the last 9 >>>>>>> or so years is a good idea I think. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I looked at the github repo, some quick comments: >>>>>>> - migration to maven: nice work! a lot more streamlined I suppose. >>>>>>> Though how do you run it now? I remember the tomcat configuration has >>>>>>> major tweaks >>>>>> >>>>>> Currently, Maven's only used for dependency management. >>>>>> Hum that might explain why I'm having some issues starting STRUTS >>>>>> properly. Will have to look into it deeper :) >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - I saw that you commented out JNotify -- just as a warning, this >>>>>>> entirely breaks parade, unless you've found another way of watching >>>>>>> file system changes? the problem is that when people sync stuff via >>>>>>> unison, changes on the FS aren't updated in the cache unless they are >>>>>>> picked up on the FS. >>>>>> >>>>>> Indeed. AFAIR I was getting some errors related to it, but I'll >>>>>> re-enable it for sure :) >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - maybe it's a good idea to comment in the Aether code since anyway it >>>>>>> is all wrapped in big IF statements so it won't hurt. and keeping it >>>>>>> compiling during refactoring rather than having to figure out after >>>>>>> the fact what on earth is going on is probably simpler >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> True. I've been thinking the same lately :) >>>>>> In the end, it'll prove easier to have the code uncommented. >>>>>> >>>>>> cheers, >>>>>> João >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> manu >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Manuel Bernhardt >>>>>>> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>>> It should be 30 min of work, if you list the cvsusers and we can provide >>>>>>>> emails for them >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> An interesting question would be hie to call the organization that will hold >>>>>>>> the repo >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 06.06.2012, at 18:21, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and >>>>>>>> enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on >>>>>>>> its importing capabilities. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why not move to git(hub) directly? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge >>>>>>>>> SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there >>>>>>>>> (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git >>>>>>>>> users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try& get the git emails of >>>>>>>>> all contributors but that should not be too hard). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade<jja...@gm...> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the >>>>>>>>>> structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We're currently using a Git repository. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework >>>>>>>>>> properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN >>>>>>>>>> repo. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time >>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN >>>>>>>>>> branch. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi João >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any >>>>>>>>>>> commit >>>>>>>>>>> mails. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with >>>>>>>>>>> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point >>>>>>>>>>> for me >>>>>>>>>>> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that >>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>> be awesome :) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> cheers >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is >>>>>>>>>>>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once >>>>>>>>>>>> we have a normal base functionality working version. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping >>>>>>>>>>>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on >>>>>>>>>>>> refactoring paraDe. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I >>>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe >>>>>>>>>>>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major >>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rewriting everywhere. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (new >>>>>>>>>>>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead >>>>>>>>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>>>>>>>> around). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other >>>>>>>>>>>>>> people >>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> host >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely >>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> malware >>>>>>>>>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>>>>> malware >>>>>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> |
|
From: João A. <jja...@gm...> - 2012-06-11 01:30:14
|
# rebasing: http://learn.github.com/p/rebasing.html Hey, Alright :) Finally had the chance to learn a bit more about Git. I was looking into the experimental parade version we have and I believe that before going for any rebasing on parade-nomad's parade project, all the missing files (JNotify, Aether, etc) should be included this experimental version or we'll end up with a non-working version. I'll get this moving during the next few days. cheers, João On 9 June 2012 10:44, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: > Hmm, "parade" and "nomad" are already taken as organizations. I'll try > to think about something else - I think it is possible to rename > organizations > > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Manuel Bernhardt > <ber...@gm...> wrote: >> It's the organisation on github.com to host the source repository for parade >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 08.06.2012, at 22:42, Cristian Bogdan <cr...@cs...> wrote: >> >>> I don't know exactly what you are naming but Nomad is a good name >>> >>> cristi >>> >>> On 2012-06-08 19.17, Manuel Bernhardt wrote: >>>> Nomad sounds fun to me. Cristi, opinions? >>>> >>>> I'll see to migrate the rest of the users tomorrow. Creating an >>>> organization is super fast so once we have decided on the name I can >>>> do this in an instant and import the repo. Then you can branch and >>>> import your changes on top of it, not sure yet what is the best method >>>> but we'll figure something out >>>> >>>> Greetings from Helsinki >>>> >>>> manu >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On 08.06.2012, at 17:00, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey, >>>>> >>>>> Back to this >>>>> >>>>> On 6 June 2012 18:32, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Looked a bit into it, I'm now playing with >>>>>> http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/cvs2git.html >>>>>> >>>>>> It's really good to have a SSD for this kind of IO intensive operations :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> So Joao if you have time tomorrow maybe you could look at setting up a >>>>>> github organization. The name is still something that'd be interesting >>>>>> to figure out since it's mostly a BEST and KTH cooperation. Maybe >>>>>> "nomad" would be a good name :) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ok so shall we name it Nomad? :) >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Then you can make a branch there and cherry-pick all commits from your >>>>>> repo or replay them on it otherwise. Keeping the history of the last 9 >>>>>> or so years is a good idea I think. >>>>>> >>>>>> I looked at the github repo, some quick comments: >>>>>> - migration to maven: nice work! a lot more streamlined I suppose. >>>>>> Though how do you run it now? I remember the tomcat configuration has >>>>>> major tweaks >>>>> >>>>> Currently, Maven's only used for dependency management. >>>>> Hum that might explain why I'm having some issues starting STRUTS >>>>> properly. Will have to look into it deeper :) >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - I saw that you commented out JNotify -- just as a warning, this >>>>>> entirely breaks parade, unless you've found another way of watching >>>>>> file system changes? the problem is that when people sync stuff via >>>>>> unison, changes on the FS aren't updated in the cache unless they are >>>>>> picked up on the FS. >>>>> >>>>> Indeed. AFAIR I was getting some errors related to it, but I'll >>>>> re-enable it for sure :) >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - maybe it's a good idea to comment in the Aether code since anyway it >>>>>> is all wrapped in big IF statements so it won't hurt. and keeping it >>>>>> compiling during refactoring rather than having to figure out after >>>>>> the fact what on earth is going on is probably simpler >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> True. I've been thinking the same lately :) >>>>> In the end, it'll prove easier to have the code uncommented. >>>>> >>>>> cheers, >>>>> João >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> manu >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Manuel Bernhardt >>>>>> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>> It should be 30 min of work, if you list the cvsusers and we can provide >>>>>>> emails for them >>>>>>> >>>>>>> An interesting question would be hie to call the organization that will hold >>>>>>> the repo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 06.06.2012, at 18:21, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and >>>>>>> enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on >>>>>>> its importing capabilities. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>> João >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why not move to git(hub) directly? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge >>>>>>>> SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there >>>>>>>> (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git >>>>>>>> users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try& get the git emails of >>>>>>>> all contributors but that should not be too hard). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade<jja...@gm...> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the >>>>>>>>> structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We're currently using a Git repository. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework >>>>>>>>> properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN >>>>>>>>> repo. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN >>>>>>>>> branch. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi João >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any >>>>>>>>>> commit >>>>>>>>>> mails. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with >>>>>>>>>> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point >>>>>>>>>> for me >>>>>>>>>> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that >>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>> be awesome :) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cheers >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is >>>>>>>>>>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once >>>>>>>>>>> we have a normal base functionality working version. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping >>>>>>>>>>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on >>>>>>>>>>> refactoring paraDe. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I >>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe >>>>>>>>>>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major >>>>>>>>>>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code >>>>>>>>>>>>> rewriting everywhere. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability >>>>>>>>>>>>> (new >>>>>>>>>>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead >>>>>>>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>>>>>>> around). >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other >>>>>>>>>>>>> people >>>>>>>>>>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to >>>>>>>>>>>>> host >>>>>>>>>>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be >>>>>>>>>>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely >>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>>>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>>>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>>>>>>>> malware >>>>>>>>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>>>> malware >>>>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>> |
|
From: João A. <jja...@gm...> - 2012-06-09 14:42:10
|
Hey, Cool! Great to see this :) So we should branch parade-nomad's parade2 repo and apply our changes on it right? Not completely sure on how to do it. I'll read some documentation to get more familiar with it :) cheers, João On 9 June 2012 12:52, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > I just finished migrating the old ParaDe CVS repo to GitHub, so that > the development history is conserved: https://github.com/parade-nomad/ > > Philipp and Joao, maybe you can branch the parade2 repo and apply your > changes on top - either by cherry-picking them to the branch or by > rebasing (ask if you need help). > > Cheers, > > manu > |
|
From: Manuel B. <ber...@gm...> - 2012-06-09 11:53:27
|
Hi, I just finished migrating the old ParaDe CVS repo to GitHub, so that the development history is conserved: https://github.com/parade-nomad/ Philipp and Joao, maybe you can branch the parade2 repo and apply your changes on top - either by cherry-picking them to the branch or by rebasing (ask if you need help). Cheers, manu |
|
From: Manuel B. <ber...@gm...> - 2012-06-09 09:45:08
|
Hmm, "parade" and "nomad" are already taken as organizations. I'll try to think about something else - I think it is possible to rename organizations On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: > It's the organisation on github.com to host the source repository for parade > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 08.06.2012, at 22:42, Cristian Bogdan <cr...@cs...> wrote: > >> I don't know exactly what you are naming but Nomad is a good name >> >> cristi >> >> On 2012-06-08 19.17, Manuel Bernhardt wrote: >>> Nomad sounds fun to me. Cristi, opinions? >>> >>> I'll see to migrate the rest of the users tomorrow. Creating an >>> organization is super fast so once we have decided on the name I can >>> do this in an instant and import the repo. Then you can branch and >>> import your changes on top of it, not sure yet what is the best method >>> but we'll figure something out >>> >>> Greetings from Helsinki >>> >>> manu >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 08.06.2012, at 17:00, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey, >>>> >>>> Back to this >>>> >>>> On 6 June 2012 18:32, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Looked a bit into it, I'm now playing with >>>>> http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/cvs2git.html >>>>> >>>>> It's really good to have a SSD for this kind of IO intensive operations :-) >>>>> >>>>> So Joao if you have time tomorrow maybe you could look at setting up a >>>>> github organization. The name is still something that'd be interesting >>>>> to figure out since it's mostly a BEST and KTH cooperation. Maybe >>>>> "nomad" would be a good name :) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ok so shall we name it Nomad? :) >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Then you can make a branch there and cherry-pick all commits from your >>>>> repo or replay them on it otherwise. Keeping the history of the last 9 >>>>> or so years is a good idea I think. >>>>> >>>>> I looked at the github repo, some quick comments: >>>>> - migration to maven: nice work! a lot more streamlined I suppose. >>>>> Though how do you run it now? I remember the tomcat configuration has >>>>> major tweaks >>>> >>>> Currently, Maven's only used for dependency management. >>>> Hum that might explain why I'm having some issues starting STRUTS >>>> properly. Will have to look into it deeper :) >>>> >>>>> >>>>> - I saw that you commented out JNotify -- just as a warning, this >>>>> entirely breaks parade, unless you've found another way of watching >>>>> file system changes? the problem is that when people sync stuff via >>>>> unison, changes on the FS aren't updated in the cache unless they are >>>>> picked up on the FS. >>>> >>>> Indeed. AFAIR I was getting some errors related to it, but I'll >>>> re-enable it for sure :) >>>> >>>>> >>>>> - maybe it's a good idea to comment in the Aether code since anyway it >>>>> is all wrapped in big IF statements so it won't hurt. and keeping it >>>>> compiling during refactoring rather than having to figure out after >>>>> the fact what on earth is going on is probably simpler >>>>> >>>> >>>> True. I've been thinking the same lately :) >>>> In the end, it'll prove easier to have the code uncommented. >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> João >>>> >>>>> >>>>> cheers, >>>>> >>>>> manu >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Manuel Bernhardt >>>>> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>> It should be 30 min of work, if you list the cvsusers and we can provide >>>>>> emails for them >>>>>> >>>>>> An interesting question would be hie to call the organization that will hold >>>>>> the repo >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>> >>>>>> On 06.06.2012, at 18:21, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hey, >>>>>> >>>>>> Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github. >>>>>> >>>>>> Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and >>>>>> enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on >>>>>> its importing capabilities. >>>>>> >>>>>> cheers, >>>>>> João >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why not move to git(hub) directly? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge >>>>>>> SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there >>>>>>> (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git >>>>>>> users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try& get the git emails of >>>>>>> all contributors but that should not be too hard). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade<jja...@gm...> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the >>>>>>>> structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We're currently using a Git repository. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework >>>>>>>> properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN >>>>>>>> repo. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN >>>>>>>> branch. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi João >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any >>>>>>>>> commit >>>>>>>>> mails. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with >>>>>>>>> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point >>>>>>>>> for me >>>>>>>>> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that >>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>> be awesome :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> cheers >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is >>>>>>>>>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once >>>>>>>>>> we have a normal base functionality working version. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping >>>>>>>>>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on >>>>>>>>>> refactoring paraDe. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I >>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe >>>>>>>>>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major >>>>>>>>>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code >>>>>>>>>>>> rewriting everywhere. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability >>>>>>>>>>>> (new >>>>>>>>>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead >>>>>>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>>>>>> around). >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other >>>>>>>>>>>> people >>>>>>>>>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to >>>>>>>>>>>> host >>>>>>>>>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be >>>>>>>>>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely >>>>>>>>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>>>>>>> malware >>>>>>>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>>> malware >>>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >> |
|
From: Manuel B. <ber...@gm...> - 2012-06-09 05:39:38
|
It's the organisation on github.com to host the source repository for parade Sent from my iPhone On 08.06.2012, at 22:42, Cristian Bogdan <cr...@cs...> wrote: > I don't know exactly what you are naming but Nomad is a good name > > cristi > > On 2012-06-08 19.17, Manuel Bernhardt wrote: >> Nomad sounds fun to me. Cristi, opinions? >> >> I'll see to migrate the rest of the users tomorrow. Creating an >> organization is super fast so once we have decided on the name I can >> do this in an instant and import the repo. Then you can branch and >> import your changes on top of it, not sure yet what is the best method >> but we'll figure something out >> >> Greetings from Helsinki >> >> manu >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 08.06.2012, at 17:00, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: >> >>> Hey, >>> >>> Back to this >>> >>> On 6 June 2012 18:32, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>> >>>> Looked a bit into it, I'm now playing with >>>> http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/cvs2git.html >>>> >>>> It's really good to have a SSD for this kind of IO intensive operations :-) >>>> >>>> So Joao if you have time tomorrow maybe you could look at setting up a >>>> github organization. The name is still something that'd be interesting >>>> to figure out since it's mostly a BEST and KTH cooperation. Maybe >>>> "nomad" would be a good name :) >>>> >>> >>> Ok so shall we name it Nomad? :) >>> >>>> >>>> Then you can make a branch there and cherry-pick all commits from your >>>> repo or replay them on it otherwise. Keeping the history of the last 9 >>>> or so years is a good idea I think. >>>> >>>> I looked at the github repo, some quick comments: >>>> - migration to maven: nice work! a lot more streamlined I suppose. >>>> Though how do you run it now? I remember the tomcat configuration has >>>> major tweaks >>> >>> Currently, Maven's only used for dependency management. >>> Hum that might explain why I'm having some issues starting STRUTS >>> properly. Will have to look into it deeper :) >>> >>>> >>>> - I saw that you commented out JNotify -- just as a warning, this >>>> entirely breaks parade, unless you've found another way of watching >>>> file system changes? the problem is that when people sync stuff via >>>> unison, changes on the FS aren't updated in the cache unless they are >>>> picked up on the FS. >>> >>> Indeed. AFAIR I was getting some errors related to it, but I'll >>> re-enable it for sure :) >>> >>>> >>>> - maybe it's a good idea to comment in the Aether code since anyway it >>>> is all wrapped in big IF statements so it won't hurt. and keeping it >>>> compiling during refactoring rather than having to figure out after >>>> the fact what on earth is going on is probably simpler >>>> >>> >>> True. I've been thinking the same lately :) >>> In the end, it'll prove easier to have the code uncommented. >>> >>> cheers, >>> João >>> >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> >>>> manu >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Manuel Bernhardt >>>> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>> It should be 30 min of work, if you list the cvsusers and we can provide >>>>> emails for them >>>>> >>>>> An interesting question would be hie to call the organization that will hold >>>>> the repo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>> On 06.06.2012, at 18:21, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hey, >>>>> >>>>> Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github. >>>>> >>>>> Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and >>>>> enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on >>>>> its importing capabilities. >>>>> >>>>> cheers, >>>>> João >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Why not move to git(hub) directly? >>>>>> >>>>>> It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge >>>>>> SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there >>>>>> (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git >>>>>> users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try& get the git emails of >>>>>> all contributors but that should not be too hard). >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade<jja...@gm...> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the >>>>>>> structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We're currently using a Git repository. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework >>>>>>> properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN >>>>>>> repo. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN >>>>>>> branch. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>> João >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi João >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any >>>>>>>> commit >>>>>>>> mails. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with >>>>>>>> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point >>>>>>>> for me >>>>>>>> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that >>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>> be awesome :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cheers >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is >>>>>>>>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once >>>>>>>>> we have a normal base functionality working version. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping >>>>>>>>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on >>>>>>>>> refactoring paraDe. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I >>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe >>>>>>>>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major >>>>>>>>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code >>>>>>>>>>> rewriting everywhere. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability >>>>>>>>>>> (new >>>>>>>>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead >>>>>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>>>>> around). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other >>>>>>>>>>> people >>>>>>>>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to >>>>>>>>>>> host >>>>>>>>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be >>>>>>>>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely >>>>>>>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>>>>>> malware >>>>>>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>> malware >>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > |
|
From: Cristian B. <cr...@cs...> - 2012-06-08 19:43:02
|
I don't know exactly what you are naming but Nomad is a good name cristi On 2012-06-08 19.17, Manuel Bernhardt wrote: > Nomad sounds fun to me. Cristi, opinions? > > I'll see to migrate the rest of the users tomorrow. Creating an > organization is super fast so once we have decided on the name I can > do this in an instant and import the repo. Then you can branch and > import your changes on top of it, not sure yet what is the best method > but we'll figure something out > > Greetings from Helsinki > > manu > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 08.06.2012, at 17:00, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> Back to this >> >> On 6 June 2012 18:32, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>> >>> Looked a bit into it, I'm now playing with >>> http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/cvs2git.html >>> >>> It's really good to have a SSD for this kind of IO intensive operations :-) >>> >>> So Joao if you have time tomorrow maybe you could look at setting up a >>> github organization. The name is still something that'd be interesting >>> to figure out since it's mostly a BEST and KTH cooperation. Maybe >>> "nomad" would be a good name :) >>> >> >> Ok so shall we name it Nomad? :) >> >>> >>> Then you can make a branch there and cherry-pick all commits from your >>> repo or replay them on it otherwise. Keeping the history of the last 9 >>> or so years is a good idea I think. >>> >>> I looked at the github repo, some quick comments: >>> - migration to maven: nice work! a lot more streamlined I suppose. >>> Though how do you run it now? I remember the tomcat configuration has >>> major tweaks >> >> Currently, Maven's only used for dependency management. >> Hum that might explain why I'm having some issues starting STRUTS >> properly. Will have to look into it deeper :) >> >>> >>> - I saw that you commented out JNotify -- just as a warning, this >>> entirely breaks parade, unless you've found another way of watching >>> file system changes? the problem is that when people sync stuff via >>> unison, changes on the FS aren't updated in the cache unless they are >>> picked up on the FS. >> >> Indeed. AFAIR I was getting some errors related to it, but I'll >> re-enable it for sure :) >> >>> >>> - maybe it's a good idea to comment in the Aether code since anyway it >>> is all wrapped in big IF statements so it won't hurt. and keeping it >>> compiling during refactoring rather than having to figure out after >>> the fact what on earth is going on is probably simpler >>> >> >> True. I've been thinking the same lately :) >> In the end, it'll prove easier to have the code uncommented. >> >> cheers, >> João >> >>> >>> cheers, >>> >>> manu >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Manuel Bernhardt >>> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>> It should be 30 min of work, if you list the cvsusers and we can provide >>>> emails for them >>>> >>>> An interesting question would be hie to call the organization that will hold >>>> the repo >>>> >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On 06.06.2012, at 18:21, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey, >>>> >>>> Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github. >>>> >>>> Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and >>>> enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on >>>> its importing capabilities. >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> João >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Why not move to git(hub) directly? >>>>> >>>>> It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge >>>>> SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there >>>>> (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git >>>>> users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try& get the git emails of >>>>> all contributors but that should not be too hard). >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade<jja...@gm...> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>> >>>>>> The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the >>>>>> structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. >>>>>> >>>>>> We're currently using a Git repository. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework >>>>>> properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. >>>>>> >>>>>> Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN >>>>>> repo. >>>>>> >>>>>> Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time >>>>>> to >>>>>> fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. >>>>>> >>>>>> p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN >>>>>> branch. >>>>>> >>>>>> cheers, >>>>>> João >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi João >>>>>>> >>>>>>> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any >>>>>>> commit >>>>>>> mails. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with >>>>>>> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point >>>>>>> for me >>>>>>> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that >>>>>>> would >>>>>>> be awesome :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cheers >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is >>>>>>>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once >>>>>>>> we have a normal base functionality working version. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping >>>>>>>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on >>>>>>>> refactoring paraDe. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I >>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe >>>>>>>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major >>>>>>>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code >>>>>>>>>> rewriting everywhere. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability >>>>>>>>>> (new >>>>>>>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead >>>>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>>>> around). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other >>>>>>>>>> people >>>>>>>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to >>>>>>>>>> host >>>>>>>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be >>>>>>>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely >>>>>>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>>>>> malware >>>>>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>> Discussions >>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>> malware >>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>> >>>> >>>> |
|
From: Manuel B. <ber...@gm...> - 2012-06-08 17:17:13
|
Nomad sounds fun to me. Cristi, opinions? I'll see to migrate the rest of the users tomorrow. Creating an organization is super fast so once we have decided on the name I can do this in an instant and import the repo. Then you can branch and import your changes on top of it, not sure yet what is the best method but we'll figure something out Greetings from Helsinki manu Sent from my iPhone On 08.06.2012, at 17:00, "João Andrade" <jja...@gm...> wrote: > Hey, > > Back to this > > On 6 June 2012 18:32, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: >> >> Looked a bit into it, I'm now playing with >> http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/cvs2git.html >> >> It's really good to have a SSD for this kind of IO intensive operations :-) >> >> So Joao if you have time tomorrow maybe you could look at setting up a >> github organization. The name is still something that'd be interesting >> to figure out since it's mostly a BEST and KTH cooperation. Maybe >> "nomad" would be a good name :) >> > > Ok so shall we name it Nomad? :) > >> >> Then you can make a branch there and cherry-pick all commits from your >> repo or replay them on it otherwise. Keeping the history of the last 9 >> or so years is a good idea I think. >> >> I looked at the github repo, some quick comments: >> - migration to maven: nice work! a lot more streamlined I suppose. >> Though how do you run it now? I remember the tomcat configuration has >> major tweaks > > Currently, Maven's only used for dependency management. > Hum that might explain why I'm having some issues starting STRUTS > properly. Will have to look into it deeper :) > >> >> - I saw that you commented out JNotify -- just as a warning, this >> entirely breaks parade, unless you've found another way of watching >> file system changes? the problem is that when people sync stuff via >> unison, changes on the FS aren't updated in the cache unless they are >> picked up on the FS. > > Indeed. AFAIR I was getting some errors related to it, but I'll > re-enable it for sure :) > >> >> - maybe it's a good idea to comment in the Aether code since anyway it >> is all wrapped in big IF statements so it won't hurt. and keeping it >> compiling during refactoring rather than having to figure out after >> the fact what on earth is going on is probably simpler >> > > True. I've been thinking the same lately :) > In the end, it'll prove easier to have the code uncommented. > > cheers, > João > >> >> cheers, >> >> manu >> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Manuel Bernhardt >> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>> It should be 30 min of work, if you list the cvsusers and we can provide >>> emails for them >>> >>> An interesting question would be hie to call the organization that will hold >>> the repo >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 06.06.2012, at 18:21, "João Andrade" <jja...@gm...> wrote: >>> >>> Hey, >>> >>> Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github. >>> >>> Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and >>> enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on >>> its importing capabilities. >>> >>> cheers, >>> João >>> >>> >>> >>> On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>> >>>> Why not move to git(hub) directly? >>>> >>>> It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge >>>> SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there >>>> (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git >>>> users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try & get the git emails of >>>> all contributors but that should not be too hard). >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade <jja...@gm...> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>> >>>>> The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the >>>>> structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. >>>>> >>>>> We're currently using a Git repository. >>>>> >>>>> Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework >>>>> properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. >>>>> >>>>> Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN >>>>> repo. >>>>> >>>>> Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time >>>>> to >>>>> fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. >>>>> >>>>> p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN >>>>> branch. >>>>> >>>>> cheers, >>>>> João >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan <cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi João >>>>>> >>>>>> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any >>>>>> commit >>>>>> mails. >>>>>> >>>>>> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with >>>>>> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point >>>>>> for me >>>>>> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that >>>>>> would >>>>>> be awesome :) >>>>>> >>>>>> cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> cristi >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is >>>>>>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once >>>>>>> we have a normal base functionality working version. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping >>>>>>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on >>>>>>> refactoring paraDe. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>> João >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I >>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe >>>>>>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major >>>>>>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code >>>>>>>>> rewriting everywhere. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability >>>>>>>>> (new >>>>>>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead >>>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>>> around). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other >>>>>>>>> people >>>>>>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to >>>>>>>>> host >>>>>>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be >>>>>>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely >>>>>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>>>> malware >>>>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>> Discussions >>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>> malware >>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>> Par...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>> >>> >>> |
|
From: João A. <jja...@gm...> - 2012-06-08 14:01:11
|
Hey, Back to this On 6 June 2012 18:32, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: > > Looked a bit into it, I'm now playing with > http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/cvs2git.html > > It's really good to have a SSD for this kind of IO intensive operations :-) > > So Joao if you have time tomorrow maybe you could look at setting up a > github organization. The name is still something that'd be interesting > to figure out since it's mostly a BEST and KTH cooperation. Maybe > "nomad" would be a good name :) > Ok so shall we name it Nomad? :) > > Then you can make a branch there and cherry-pick all commits from your > repo or replay them on it otherwise. Keeping the history of the last 9 > or so years is a good idea I think. > > I looked at the github repo, some quick comments: > - migration to maven: nice work! a lot more streamlined I suppose. > Though how do you run it now? I remember the tomcat configuration has > major tweaks Currently, Maven's only used for dependency management. Hum that might explain why I'm having some issues starting STRUTS properly. Will have to look into it deeper :) > > - I saw that you commented out JNotify -- just as a warning, this > entirely breaks parade, unless you've found another way of watching > file system changes? the problem is that when people sync stuff via > unison, changes on the FS aren't updated in the cache unless they are > picked up on the FS. Indeed. AFAIR I was getting some errors related to it, but I'll re-enable it for sure :) > > - maybe it's a good idea to comment in the Aether code since anyway it > is all wrapped in big IF statements so it won't hurt. and keeping it > compiling during refactoring rather than having to figure out after > the fact what on earth is going on is probably simpler > True. I've been thinking the same lately :) In the end, it'll prove easier to have the code uncommented. cheers, João > > cheers, > > manu > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Manuel Bernhardt > <ber...@gm...> wrote: > > It should be 30 min of work, if you list the cvsusers and we can provide > > emails for them > > > > An interesting question would be hie to call the organization that will hold > > the repo > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On 06.06.2012, at 18:21, "João Andrade" <jja...@gm...> wrote: > > > > Hey, > > > > Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github. > > > > Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and > > enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on > > its importing capabilities. > > > > cheers, > > João > > > > > > > > On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: > >> > >> Why not move to git(hub) directly? > >> > >> It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge > >> SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there > >> (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git > >> users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try & get the git emails of > >> all contributors but that should not be too hard). > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade <jja...@gm...> > >> wrote: > >> > Hello Cristi, > >> > > >> > The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the > >> > structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. > >> > > >> > We're currently using a Git repository. > >> > > >> > Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework > >> > properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. > >> > > >> > Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN > >> > repo. > >> > > >> > Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time > >> > to > >> > fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. > >> > > >> > p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN > >> > branch. > >> > > >> > cheers, > >> > João > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan <cr...@cs...> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hi João > >> >> > >> >> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any > >> >> commit > >> >> mails. > >> >> > >> >> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with > >> >> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point > >> >> for me > >> >> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that > >> >> would > >> >> be awesome :) > >> >> > >> >> cheers > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> cristi > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Hello Cristi, > >> >>> > >> >>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is > >> >>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once > >> >>> we have a normal base functionality working version. > >> >>> > >> >>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping > >> >>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on > >> >>> refactoring paraDe. > >> >>> > >> >>> cheers, > >> >>> João > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Hi > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I > >> >>>> still > >> >>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe > >> >>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> best > >> >>>> > >> >>>> cristi > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Hey, > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major > >> >>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code > >> >>>>> rewriting everywhere. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability > >> >>>>> (new > >> >>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead > >> >>>>> code > >> >>>>> around). > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other > >> >>>>> people > >> >>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to > >> >>>>> host > >> >>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be > >> >>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely > >> >>>>> appreciated. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> cheers, > >> >>>>> João > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> >>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference > >> >>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > >> >>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. > >> >>>>> Discussions > >> >>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in > >> >>>>> malware > >> >>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > >> >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>>>> Parade-developers mailing list > >> >>>>> Par...@li... > >> >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > Live Security Virtual Conference > >> > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > >> > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. > >> > Discussions > >> > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in > >> > malware > >> > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Parade-developers mailing list > >> > Par...@li... > >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers > >> > > > > > |
|
From: Manuel B. <ber...@gm...> - 2012-06-06 19:31:59
|
The only implication is that you get emails from github to that address if you then register with it. Basically it is a way to match your Github account against the imported code. On 06.06.2012, at 20:31, Cristian Bogdan <cr...@cs...> wrote: > On 2012-06-06 20.17, Manuel Bernhardt wrote: >> Ok, last email for today, I promise: >> >> I ported Stefan, Joao and myself so far. Cristi, Rudi, and basically >> anyone else - I'd need an email address that you'd consider using with >> github.com. > > what are the implications of that? what if I use my normal kth.se email address? > > cristi > >> >> Cristi, do you have the email addresses of: >> >>> frent >>> maarten12 >> >> For the rest I'll just lookup the address on PA >> >> manu >> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Manuel Bernhardt >> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>> ok, playing around worked, i.e. I have locally a git repo with parade >>> in it, from 2003 onwards. >>> >>> so now we have to fix the users: >>> >>> manu-mac:parade.git manu$ git log --format='%aN' | sort -u >>> adler >>> adlerscout >>> cristi >>> cristian_bogdan >>> epure_radu >>> joaosa >>> frent >>> maarten12 >>> manuel_gay >>> mile >>> rosso_nero >>> stefanba >>> >>> >>> The git format is composed of name and email, e.g. >>> >>> Manuel Bernhardt >>> ber...@gm... >>> >>> so if I get those I can rewrite the users. >>> >>> >>> manu >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Manuel Bernhardt >>> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>> Looked a bit into it, I'm now playing with >>>> http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/cvs2git.html >>>> >>>> It's really good to have a SSD for this kind of IO intensive operations :-) >>>> >>>> So Joao if you have time tomorrow maybe you could look at setting up a >>>> github organization. The name is still something that'd be interesting >>>> to figure out since it's mostly a BEST and KTH cooperation. Maybe >>>> "nomad" would be a good name :) >>>> >>>> Then you can make a branch there and cherry-pick all commits from your >>>> repo or replay them on it otherwise. Keeping the history of the last 9 >>>> or so years is a good idea I think. >>>> >>>> I looked at the github repo, some quick comments: >>>> - migration to maven: nice work! a lot more streamlined I suppose. >>>> Though how do you run it now? I remember the tomcat configuration has >>>> major tweaks >>>> - I saw that you commented out JNotify -- just as a warning, this >>>> entirely breaks parade, unless you've found another way of watching >>>> file system changes? the problem is that when people sync stuff via >>>> unison, changes on the FS aren't updated in the cache unless they are >>>> picked up on the FS. >>>> - maybe it's a good idea to comment in the Aether code since anyway it >>>> is all wrapped in big IF statements so it won't hurt. and keeping it >>>> compiling during refactoring rather than having to figure out after >>>> the fact what on earth is going on is probably simpler >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> >>>> manu >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Manuel Bernhardt >>>> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>> It should be 30 min of work, if you list the cvsusers and we can provide >>>>> emails for them >>>>> >>>>> An interesting question would be hie to call the organization that will hold >>>>> the repo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>> On 06.06.2012, at 18:21, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hey, >>>>> >>>>> Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github. >>>>> >>>>> Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and >>>>> enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on >>>>> its importing capabilities. >>>>> >>>>> cheers, >>>>> João >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Why not move to git(hub) directly? >>>>>> >>>>>> It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge >>>>>> SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there >>>>>> (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git >>>>>> users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try& get the git emails of >>>>>> all contributors but that should not be too hard). >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade<jja...@gm...> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the >>>>>>> structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We're currently using a Git repository. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework >>>>>>> properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN >>>>>>> repo. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN >>>>>>> branch. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>> João >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi João >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any >>>>>>>> commit >>>>>>>> mails. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with >>>>>>>> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point >>>>>>>> for me >>>>>>>> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that >>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>> be awesome :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cheers >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is >>>>>>>>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once >>>>>>>>> we have a normal base functionality working version. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping >>>>>>>>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on >>>>>>>>> refactoring paraDe. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I >>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe >>>>>>>>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major >>>>>>>>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code >>>>>>>>>>> rewriting everywhere. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability >>>>>>>>>>> (new >>>>>>>>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead >>>>>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>>>>> around). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other >>>>>>>>>>> people >>>>>>>>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to >>>>>>>>>>> host >>>>>>>>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be >>>>>>>>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely >>>>>>>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>>>>>> malware >>>>>>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>> malware >>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > |
|
From: Cristian B. <cr...@cs...> - 2012-06-06 18:32:08
|
On 2012-06-06 20.17, Manuel Bernhardt wrote: > Ok, last email for today, I promise: > > I ported Stefan, Joao and myself so far. Cristi, Rudi, and basically > anyone else - I'd need an email address that you'd consider using with > github.com. what are the implications of that? what if I use my normal kth.se email address? cristi > > Cristi, do you have the email addresses of: > >> frent >> maarten12 > > For the rest I'll just lookup the address on PA > > manu > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Manuel Bernhardt > <ber...@gm...> wrote: >> ok, playing around worked, i.e. I have locally a git repo with parade >> in it, from 2003 onwards. >> >> so now we have to fix the users: >> >> manu-mac:parade.git manu$ git log --format='%aN' | sort -u >> adler >> adlerscout >> cristi >> cristian_bogdan >> epure_radu >> joaosa >> frent >> maarten12 >> manuel_gay >> mile >> rosso_nero >> stefanba >> >> >> The git format is composed of name and email, e.g. >> >> Manuel Bernhardt >> ber...@gm... >> >> so if I get those I can rewrite the users. >> >> >> manu >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Manuel Bernhardt >> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>> Looked a bit into it, I'm now playing with >>> http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/cvs2git.html >>> >>> It's really good to have a SSD for this kind of IO intensive operations :-) >>> >>> So Joao if you have time tomorrow maybe you could look at setting up a >>> github organization. The name is still something that'd be interesting >>> to figure out since it's mostly a BEST and KTH cooperation. Maybe >>> "nomad" would be a good name :) >>> >>> Then you can make a branch there and cherry-pick all commits from your >>> repo or replay them on it otherwise. Keeping the history of the last 9 >>> or so years is a good idea I think. >>> >>> I looked at the github repo, some quick comments: >>> - migration to maven: nice work! a lot more streamlined I suppose. >>> Though how do you run it now? I remember the tomcat configuration has >>> major tweaks >>> - I saw that you commented out JNotify -- just as a warning, this >>> entirely breaks parade, unless you've found another way of watching >>> file system changes? the problem is that when people sync stuff via >>> unison, changes on the FS aren't updated in the cache unless they are >>> picked up on the FS. >>> - maybe it's a good idea to comment in the Aether code since anyway it >>> is all wrapped in big IF statements so it won't hurt. and keeping it >>> compiling during refactoring rather than having to figure out after >>> the fact what on earth is going on is probably simpler >>> >>> cheers, >>> >>> manu >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Manuel Bernhardt >>> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>> It should be 30 min of work, if you list the cvsusers and we can provide >>>> emails for them >>>> >>>> An interesting question would be hie to call the organization that will hold >>>> the repo >>>> >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On 06.06.2012, at 18:21, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey, >>>> >>>> Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github. >>>> >>>> Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and >>>> enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on >>>> its importing capabilities. >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> João >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Why not move to git(hub) directly? >>>>> >>>>> It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge >>>>> SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there >>>>> (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git >>>>> users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try& get the git emails of >>>>> all contributors but that should not be too hard). >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade<jja...@gm...> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>> >>>>>> The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the >>>>>> structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. >>>>>> >>>>>> We're currently using a Git repository. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework >>>>>> properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. >>>>>> >>>>>> Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN >>>>>> repo. >>>>>> >>>>>> Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time >>>>>> to >>>>>> fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. >>>>>> >>>>>> p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN >>>>>> branch. >>>>>> >>>>>> cheers, >>>>>> João >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi João >>>>>>> >>>>>>> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any >>>>>>> commit >>>>>>> mails. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with >>>>>>> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point >>>>>>> for me >>>>>>> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that >>>>>>> would >>>>>>> be awesome :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cheers >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is >>>>>>>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once >>>>>>>> we have a normal base functionality working version. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping >>>>>>>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on >>>>>>>> refactoring paraDe. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I >>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe >>>>>>>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major >>>>>>>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code >>>>>>>>>> rewriting everywhere. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability >>>>>>>>>> (new >>>>>>>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead >>>>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>>>> around). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other >>>>>>>>>> people >>>>>>>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to >>>>>>>>>> host >>>>>>>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be >>>>>>>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely >>>>>>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>>>>> malware >>>>>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>> Discussions >>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>> malware >>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>> >>>> >>>> |
|
From: Manuel B. <ber...@gm...> - 2012-06-06 18:17:53
|
Ok, last email for today, I promise: I ported Stefan, Joao and myself so far. Cristi, Rudi, and basically anyone else - I'd need an email address that you'd consider using with github.com. Cristi, do you have the email addresses of: > frent > maarten12 For the rest I'll just lookup the address on PA manu On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: > ok, playing around worked, i.e. I have locally a git repo with parade > in it, from 2003 onwards. > > so now we have to fix the users: > > manu-mac:parade.git manu$ git log --format='%aN' | sort -u > adler > adlerscout > cristi > cristian_bogdan > epure_radu > joaosa > frent > maarten12 > manuel_gay > mile > rosso_nero > stefanba > > > The git format is composed of name and email, e.g. > > Manuel Bernhardt > ber...@gm... > > so if I get those I can rewrite the users. > > > manu > > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Manuel Bernhardt > <ber...@gm...> wrote: >> Looked a bit into it, I'm now playing with >> http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/cvs2git.html >> >> It's really good to have a SSD for this kind of IO intensive operations :-) >> >> So Joao if you have time tomorrow maybe you could look at setting up a >> github organization. The name is still something that'd be interesting >> to figure out since it's mostly a BEST and KTH cooperation. Maybe >> "nomad" would be a good name :) >> >> Then you can make a branch there and cherry-pick all commits from your >> repo or replay them on it otherwise. Keeping the history of the last 9 >> or so years is a good idea I think. >> >> I looked at the github repo, some quick comments: >> - migration to maven: nice work! a lot more streamlined I suppose. >> Though how do you run it now? I remember the tomcat configuration has >> major tweaks >> - I saw that you commented out JNotify -- just as a warning, this >> entirely breaks parade, unless you've found another way of watching >> file system changes? the problem is that when people sync stuff via >> unison, changes on the FS aren't updated in the cache unless they are >> picked up on the FS. >> - maybe it's a good idea to comment in the Aether code since anyway it >> is all wrapped in big IF statements so it won't hurt. and keeping it >> compiling during refactoring rather than having to figure out after >> the fact what on earth is going on is probably simpler >> >> cheers, >> >> manu >> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Manuel Bernhardt >> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>> It should be 30 min of work, if you list the cvsusers and we can provide >>> emails for them >>> >>> An interesting question would be hie to call the organization that will hold >>> the repo >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 06.06.2012, at 18:21, "João Andrade" <jja...@gm...> wrote: >>> >>> Hey, >>> >>> Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github. >>> >>> Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and >>> enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on >>> its importing capabilities. >>> >>> cheers, >>> João >>> >>> >>> >>> On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>> >>>> Why not move to git(hub) directly? >>>> >>>> It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge >>>> SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there >>>> (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git >>>> users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try & get the git emails of >>>> all contributors but that should not be too hard). >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade <jja...@gm...> >>>> wrote: >>>> > Hello Cristi, >>>> > >>>> > The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the >>>> > structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. >>>> > >>>> > We're currently using a Git repository. >>>> > >>>> > Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework >>>> > properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. >>>> > >>>> > Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN >>>> > repo. >>>> > >>>> > Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time >>>> > to >>>> > fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. >>>> > >>>> > p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN >>>> > branch. >>>> > >>>> > cheers, >>>> > João >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan <cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> Hi João >>>> >> >>>> >> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any >>>> >> commit >>>> >> mails. >>>> >> >>>> >> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with >>>> >> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point >>>> >> for me >>>> >> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that >>>> >> would >>>> >> be awesome :) >>>> >> >>>> >> cheers >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> cristi >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Hello Cristi, >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is >>>> >>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once >>>> >>> we have a normal base functionality working version. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping >>>> >>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on >>>> >>> refactoring paraDe. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> cheers, >>>> >>> João >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I >>>> >>>> still >>>> >>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe >>>> >>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> best >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> cristi >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Hey, >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major >>>> >>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code >>>> >>>>> rewriting everywhere. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability >>>> >>>>> (new >>>> >>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead >>>> >>>>> code >>>> >>>>> around). >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other >>>> >>>>> people >>>> >>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to >>>> >>>>> host >>>> >>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be >>>> >>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely >>>> >>>>> appreciated. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> cheers, >>>> >>>>> João >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>> >>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>> >>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>> >>>>> Discussions >>>> >>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>> >>>>> malware >>>> >>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>> >>>>> Par...@li... >>>> >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> > Live Security Virtual Conference >>>> > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>> > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>> > Discussions >>>> > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>> > malware >>>> > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Parade-developers mailing list >>>> > Par...@li... >>>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>> > >>> >>> |
|
From: Manuel B. <ber...@gm...> - 2012-06-06 17:43:31
|
ok, playing around worked, i.e. I have locally a git repo with parade in it, from 2003 onwards. so now we have to fix the users: manu-mac:parade.git manu$ git log --format='%aN' | sort -u adler adlerscout cristi cristian_bogdan epure_radu frent joaosa karamba maarten12 manuel_gay mile parade root rosso_nero stefanba The git format is composed of name and email, e.g. Manuel Bernhardt ber...@gm... so if I get those I can rewrite the users. manu On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: > Looked a bit into it, I'm now playing with > http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/cvs2git.html > > It's really good to have a SSD for this kind of IO intensive operations :-) > > So Joao if you have time tomorrow maybe you could look at setting up a > github organization. The name is still something that'd be interesting > to figure out since it's mostly a BEST and KTH cooperation. Maybe > "nomad" would be a good name :) > > Then you can make a branch there and cherry-pick all commits from your > repo or replay them on it otherwise. Keeping the history of the last 9 > or so years is a good idea I think. > > I looked at the github repo, some quick comments: > - migration to maven: nice work! a lot more streamlined I suppose. > Though how do you run it now? I remember the tomcat configuration has > major tweaks > - I saw that you commented out JNotify -- just as a warning, this > entirely breaks parade, unless you've found another way of watching > file system changes? the problem is that when people sync stuff via > unison, changes on the FS aren't updated in the cache unless they are > picked up on the FS. > - maybe it's a good idea to comment in the Aether code since anyway it > is all wrapped in big IF statements so it won't hurt. and keeping it > compiling during refactoring rather than having to figure out after > the fact what on earth is going on is probably simpler > > cheers, > > manu > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Manuel Bernhardt > <ber...@gm...> wrote: >> It should be 30 min of work, if you list the cvsusers and we can provide >> emails for them >> >> An interesting question would be hie to call the organization that will hold >> the repo >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 06.06.2012, at 18:21, "João Andrade" <jja...@gm...> wrote: >> >> Hey, >> >> Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github. >> >> Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and >> enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on >> its importing capabilities. >> >> cheers, >> João >> >> >> >> On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>> >>> Why not move to git(hub) directly? >>> >>> It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge >>> SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there >>> (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git >>> users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try & get the git emails of >>> all contributors but that should not be too hard). >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade <jja...@gm...> >>> wrote: >>> > Hello Cristi, >>> > >>> > The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the >>> > structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. >>> > >>> > We're currently using a Git repository. >>> > >>> > Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework >>> > properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. >>> > >>> > Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN >>> > repo. >>> > >>> > Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time >>> > to >>> > fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. >>> > >>> > p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN >>> > branch. >>> > >>> > cheers, >>> > João >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan <cr...@cs...> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Hi João >>> >> >>> >> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any >>> >> commit >>> >> mails. >>> >> >>> >> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with >>> >> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point >>> >> for me >>> >> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that >>> >> would >>> >> be awesome :) >>> >> >>> >> cheers >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> cristi >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Hello Cristi, >>> >>> >>> >>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is >>> >>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once >>> >>> we have a normal base functionality working version. >>> >>> >>> >>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping >>> >>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on >>> >>> refactoring paraDe. >>> >>> >>> >>> cheers, >>> >>> João >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Hi >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I >>> >>>> still >>> >>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe >>> >>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? >>> >>>> >>> >>>> best >>> >>>> >>> >>>> cristi >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Hey, >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major >>> >>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code >>> >>>>> rewriting everywhere. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability >>> >>>>> (new >>> >>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead >>> >>>>> code >>> >>>>> around). >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other >>> >>>>> people >>> >>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to >>> >>>>> host >>> >>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be >>> >>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely >>> >>>>> appreciated. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> cheers, >>> >>>>> João >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>> >>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>> >>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>> >>>>> Discussions >>> >>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>> >>>>> malware >>> >>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>> >>>>> Par...@li... >>> >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> > Live Security Virtual Conference >>> > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>> > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>> > Discussions >>> > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>> > malware >>> > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Parade-developers mailing list >>> > Par...@li... >>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>> > >> >> |
|
From: Manuel B. <ber...@gm...> - 2012-06-06 17:33:03
|
Looked a bit into it, I'm now playing with http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/cvs2git.html It's really good to have a SSD for this kind of IO intensive operations :-) So Joao if you have time tomorrow maybe you could look at setting up a github organization. The name is still something that'd be interesting to figure out since it's mostly a BEST and KTH cooperation. Maybe "nomad" would be a good name :) Then you can make a branch there and cherry-pick all commits from your repo or replay them on it otherwise. Keeping the history of the last 9 or so years is a good idea I think. I looked at the github repo, some quick comments: - migration to maven: nice work! a lot more streamlined I suppose. Though how do you run it now? I remember the tomcat configuration has major tweaks - I saw that you commented out JNotify -- just as a warning, this entirely breaks parade, unless you've found another way of watching file system changes? the problem is that when people sync stuff via unison, changes on the FS aren't updated in the cache unless they are picked up on the FS. - maybe it's a good idea to comment in the Aether code since anyway it is all wrapped in big IF statements so it won't hurt. and keeping it compiling during refactoring rather than having to figure out after the fact what on earth is going on is probably simpler cheers, manu On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: > It should be 30 min of work, if you list the cvsusers and we can provide > emails for them > > An interesting question would be hie to call the organization that will hold > the repo > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 06.06.2012, at 18:21, "João Andrade" <jja...@gm...> wrote: > > Hey, > > Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github. > > Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and > enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on > its importing capabilities. > > cheers, > João > > > > On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: >> >> Why not move to git(hub) directly? >> >> It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge >> SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there >> (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git >> users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try & get the git emails of >> all contributors but that should not be too hard). >> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade <jja...@gm...> >> wrote: >> > Hello Cristi, >> > >> > The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the >> > structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. >> > >> > We're currently using a Git repository. >> > >> > Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework >> > properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. >> > >> > Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN >> > repo. >> > >> > Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time >> > to >> > fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. >> > >> > p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN >> > branch. >> > >> > cheers, >> > João >> > >> > >> > >> > On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan <cr...@cs...> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi João >> >> >> >> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any >> >> commit >> >> mails. >> >> >> >> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with >> >> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point >> >> for me >> >> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that >> >> would >> >> be awesome :) >> >> >> >> cheers >> >> >> >> >> >> cristi >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hello Cristi, >> >>> >> >>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is >> >>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once >> >>> we have a normal base functionality working version. >> >>> >> >>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping >> >>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on >> >>> refactoring paraDe. >> >>> >> >>> cheers, >> >>> João >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> Hi >> >>>> >> >>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I >> >>>> still >> >>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe >> >>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? >> >>>> >> >>>> best >> >>>> >> >>>> cristi >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Hey, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major >> >>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code >> >>>>> rewriting everywhere. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability >> >>>>> (new >> >>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead >> >>>>> code >> >>>>> around). >> >>>>> >> >>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other >> >>>>> people >> >>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to >> >>>>> host >> >>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be >> >>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely >> >>>>> appreciated. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) >> >>>>> >> >>>>> cheers, >> >>>>> João >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >> >>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >> >>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >> >>>>> Discussions >> >>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >> >>>>> malware >> >>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >> >>>>> Par...@li... >> >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > Live Security Virtual Conference >> > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >> > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >> > Discussions >> > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >> > malware >> > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Parade-developers mailing list >> > Par...@li... >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >> > > > |
|
From: Manuel B. <ber...@gm...> - 2012-06-06 16:41:51
|
It should be 30 min of work, if you list the cvsusers and we can provide emails for them An interesting question would be hie to call the organization that will hold the repo Sent from my iPhone On 06.06.2012, at 18:21, "João Andrade" <jja...@gm...> wrote: Hey, Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github. Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on its importing capabilities. cheers, João On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: > Why not move to git(hub) directly? > > It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge > SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there > (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git > users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try & get the git emails of > all contributors but that should not be too hard). > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade <jja...@gm...> > wrote: > > Hello Cristi, > > > > The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the > > structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. > > > > We're currently using a Git repository. > > > > Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework > > properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. > > > > Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN repo. > > > > Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time to > > fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. > > > > p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN branch. > > > > cheers, > > João > > > > > > > > On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan <cr...@cs...> wrote: > >> > >> Hi João > >> > >> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any > commit > >> mails. > >> > >> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with > >> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point > for me > >> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that > would > >> be awesome :) > >> > >> cheers > >> > >> > >> cristi > >> > >> > >> > >> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: > >>> > >>> Hello Cristi, > >>> > >>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is > >>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once > >>> we have a normal base functionality working version. > >>> > >>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping > >>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on > >>> refactoring paraDe. > >>> > >>> cheers, > >>> João > >>> > >>> > >>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi > >>>> > >>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I > >>>> still > >>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe > >>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? > >>>> > >>>> best > >>>> > >>>> cristi > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Hey, > >>>>> > >>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major > >>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code > >>>>> rewriting everywhere. > >>>>> > >>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability (new > >>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead > code > >>>>> around). > >>>>> > >>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other people > >>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to host > >>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. > >>>>> > >>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be > >>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) > >>>>> > >>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely > appreciated. > >>>>> > >>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) > >>>>> > >>>>> cheers, > >>>>> João > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference > >>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > >>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. > >>>>> Discussions > >>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in > >>>>> malware > >>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Parade-developers mailing list > >>>>> Par...@li... > >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Live Security Virtual Conference > > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Parade-developers mailing list > > Par...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers > > > |
|
From: João A. <jja...@gm...> - 2012-06-06 16:22:09
|
Hey, Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github. Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on its importing capabilities. cheers, João On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: > Why not move to git(hub) directly? > > It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge > SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there > (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git > users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try & get the git emails of > all contributors but that should not be too hard). > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade <jja...@gm...> > wrote: > > Hello Cristi, > > > > The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the > > structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. > > > > We're currently using a Git repository. > > > > Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework > > properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. > > > > Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN repo. > > > > Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time to > > fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. > > > > p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN branch. > > > > cheers, > > João > > > > > > > > On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan <cr...@cs...> wrote: > >> > >> Hi João > >> > >> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any > commit > >> mails. > >> > >> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with > >> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point > for me > >> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that > would > >> be awesome :) > >> > >> cheers > >> > >> > >> cristi > >> > >> > >> > >> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: > >>> > >>> Hello Cristi, > >>> > >>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is > >>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once > >>> we have a normal base functionality working version. > >>> > >>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping > >>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on > >>> refactoring paraDe. > >>> > >>> cheers, > >>> João > >>> > >>> > >>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi > >>>> > >>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I > >>>> still > >>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe > >>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? > >>>> > >>>> best > >>>> > >>>> cristi > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Hey, > >>>>> > >>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major > >>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code > >>>>> rewriting everywhere. > >>>>> > >>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability (new > >>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead > code > >>>>> around). > >>>>> > >>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other people > >>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to host > >>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. > >>>>> > >>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be > >>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) > >>>>> > >>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely > appreciated. > >>>>> > >>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) > >>>>> > >>>>> cheers, > >>>>> João > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference > >>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > >>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. > >>>>> Discussions > >>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in > >>>>> malware > >>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Parade-developers mailing list > >>>>> Par...@li... > >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Live Security Virtual Conference > > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Parade-developers mailing list > > Par...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers > > > |
|
From: Manuel B. <ber...@gm...> - 2012-06-06 16:16:32
|
Why not move to git(hub) directly? It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try & get the git emails of all contributors but that should not be too hard). On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade <jja...@gm...> wrote: > Hello Cristi, > > The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the > structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. > > We're currently using a Git repository. > > Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework > properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. > > Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN repo. > > Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time to > fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. > > p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN branch. > > cheers, > João > > > > On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan <cr...@cs...> wrote: >> >> Hi João >> >> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any commit >> mails. >> >> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with >> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point for me >> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that would >> be awesome :) >> >> cheers >> >> >> cristi >> >> >> >> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: >>> >>> Hello Cristi, >>> >>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is >>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once >>> we have a normal base functionality working version. >>> >>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping >>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on >>> refactoring paraDe. >>> >>> cheers, >>> João >>> >>> >>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I >>>> still >>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe >>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? >>>> >>>> best >>>> >>>> cristi >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hey, >>>>> >>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major >>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code >>>>> rewriting everywhere. >>>>> >>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability (new >>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead code >>>>> around). >>>>> >>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other people >>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to host >>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. >>>>> >>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be >>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) >>>>> >>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely appreciated. >>>>> >>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) >>>>> >>>>> cheers, >>>>> João >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>> Discussions >>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>> malware >>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>> Par...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>> >>>> >>>> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Parade-developers mailing list > Par...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers > |
14 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
