Menu
▾
▴
Re: [ParaDe-developers] [ITA][paraDe] testing paraDe
|
From: Manuel B. <ber...@gm...> - 2012-06-06 19:31:59
|
The only implication is that you get emails from github to that address if you then register with it. Basically it is a way to match your Github account against the imported code. On 06.06.2012, at 20:31, Cristian Bogdan <cr...@cs...> wrote: > On 2012-06-06 20.17, Manuel Bernhardt wrote: >> Ok, last email for today, I promise: >> >> I ported Stefan, Joao and myself so far. Cristi, Rudi, and basically >> anyone else - I'd need an email address that you'd consider using with >> github.com. > > what are the implications of that? what if I use my normal kth.se email address? > > cristi > >> >> Cristi, do you have the email addresses of: >> >>> frent >>> maarten12 >> >> For the rest I'll just lookup the address on PA >> >> manu >> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Manuel Bernhardt >> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>> ok, playing around worked, i.e. I have locally a git repo with parade >>> in it, from 2003 onwards. >>> >>> so now we have to fix the users: >>> >>> manu-mac:parade.git manu$ git log --format='%aN' | sort -u >>> adler >>> adlerscout >>> cristi >>> cristian_bogdan >>> epure_radu >>> joaosa >>> frent >>> maarten12 >>> manuel_gay >>> mile >>> rosso_nero >>> stefanba >>> >>> >>> The git format is composed of name and email, e.g. >>> >>> Manuel Bernhardt >>> ber...@gm... >>> >>> so if I get those I can rewrite the users. >>> >>> >>> manu >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Manuel Bernhardt >>> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>> Looked a bit into it, I'm now playing with >>>> http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/cvs2git.html >>>> >>>> It's really good to have a SSD for this kind of IO intensive operations :-) >>>> >>>> So Joao if you have time tomorrow maybe you could look at setting up a >>>> github organization. The name is still something that'd be interesting >>>> to figure out since it's mostly a BEST and KTH cooperation. Maybe >>>> "nomad" would be a good name :) >>>> >>>> Then you can make a branch there and cherry-pick all commits from your >>>> repo or replay them on it otherwise. Keeping the history of the last 9 >>>> or so years is a good idea I think. >>>> >>>> I looked at the github repo, some quick comments: >>>> - migration to maven: nice work! a lot more streamlined I suppose. >>>> Though how do you run it now? I remember the tomcat configuration has >>>> major tweaks >>>> - I saw that you commented out JNotify -- just as a warning, this >>>> entirely breaks parade, unless you've found another way of watching >>>> file system changes? the problem is that when people sync stuff via >>>> unison, changes on the FS aren't updated in the cache unless they are >>>> picked up on the FS. >>>> - maybe it's a good idea to comment in the Aether code since anyway it >>>> is all wrapped in big IF statements so it won't hurt. and keeping it >>>> compiling during refactoring rather than having to figure out after >>>> the fact what on earth is going on is probably simpler >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> >>>> manu >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Manuel Bernhardt >>>> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>> It should be 30 min of work, if you list the cvsusers and we can provide >>>>> emails for them >>>>> >>>>> An interesting question would be hie to call the organization that will hold >>>>> the repo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>> On 06.06.2012, at 18:21, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hey, >>>>> >>>>> Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github. >>>>> >>>>> Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and >>>>> enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on >>>>> its importing capabilities. >>>>> >>>>> cheers, >>>>> João >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Why not move to git(hub) directly? >>>>>> >>>>>> It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge >>>>>> SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there >>>>>> (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git >>>>>> users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try& get the git emails of >>>>>> all contributors but that should not be too hard). >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade<jja...@gm...> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the >>>>>>> structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We're currently using a Git repository. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework >>>>>>> properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN >>>>>>> repo. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN >>>>>>> branch. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>> João >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi João >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any >>>>>>>> commit >>>>>>>> mails. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with >>>>>>>> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point >>>>>>>> for me >>>>>>>> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that >>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>> be awesome :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cheers >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is >>>>>>>>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once >>>>>>>>> we have a normal base functionality working version. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping >>>>>>>>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on >>>>>>>>> refactoring paraDe. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I >>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe >>>>>>>>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major >>>>>>>>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code >>>>>>>>>>> rewriting everywhere. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability >>>>>>>>>>> (new >>>>>>>>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead >>>>>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>>>>> around). >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other >>>>>>>>>>> people >>>>>>>>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to >>>>>>>>>>> host >>>>>>>>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be >>>>>>>>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely >>>>>>>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>>>>>> malware >>>>>>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>> malware >>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > |
