Menu
▾
▴
Re: [ParaDe-developers] [ITA][paraDe] testing paraDe
|
From: João A. <jja...@gm...> - 2012-06-11 01:30:14
|
# rebasing: http://learn.github.com/p/rebasing.html Hey, Alright :) Finally had the chance to learn a bit more about Git. I was looking into the experimental parade version we have and I believe that before going for any rebasing on parade-nomad's parade project, all the missing files (JNotify, Aether, etc) should be included this experimental version or we'll end up with a non-working version. I'll get this moving during the next few days. cheers, João On 9 June 2012 10:44, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: > Hmm, "parade" and "nomad" are already taken as organizations. I'll try > to think about something else - I think it is possible to rename > organizations > > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Manuel Bernhardt > <ber...@gm...> wrote: >> It's the organisation on github.com to host the source repository for parade >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 08.06.2012, at 22:42, Cristian Bogdan <cr...@cs...> wrote: >> >>> I don't know exactly what you are naming but Nomad is a good name >>> >>> cristi >>> >>> On 2012-06-08 19.17, Manuel Bernhardt wrote: >>>> Nomad sounds fun to me. Cristi, opinions? >>>> >>>> I'll see to migrate the rest of the users tomorrow. Creating an >>>> organization is super fast so once we have decided on the name I can >>>> do this in an instant and import the repo. Then you can branch and >>>> import your changes on top of it, not sure yet what is the best method >>>> but we'll figure something out >>>> >>>> Greetings from Helsinki >>>> >>>> manu >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On 08.06.2012, at 17:00, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey, >>>>> >>>>> Back to this >>>>> >>>>> On 6 June 2012 18:32, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Looked a bit into it, I'm now playing with >>>>>> http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/cvs2git.html >>>>>> >>>>>> It's really good to have a SSD for this kind of IO intensive operations :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> So Joao if you have time tomorrow maybe you could look at setting up a >>>>>> github organization. The name is still something that'd be interesting >>>>>> to figure out since it's mostly a BEST and KTH cooperation. Maybe >>>>>> "nomad" would be a good name :) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ok so shall we name it Nomad? :) >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Then you can make a branch there and cherry-pick all commits from your >>>>>> repo or replay them on it otherwise. Keeping the history of the last 9 >>>>>> or so years is a good idea I think. >>>>>> >>>>>> I looked at the github repo, some quick comments: >>>>>> - migration to maven: nice work! a lot more streamlined I suppose. >>>>>> Though how do you run it now? I remember the tomcat configuration has >>>>>> major tweaks >>>>> >>>>> Currently, Maven's only used for dependency management. >>>>> Hum that might explain why I'm having some issues starting STRUTS >>>>> properly. Will have to look into it deeper :) >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - I saw that you commented out JNotify -- just as a warning, this >>>>>> entirely breaks parade, unless you've found another way of watching >>>>>> file system changes? the problem is that when people sync stuff via >>>>>> unison, changes on the FS aren't updated in the cache unless they are >>>>>> picked up on the FS. >>>>> >>>>> Indeed. AFAIR I was getting some errors related to it, but I'll >>>>> re-enable it for sure :) >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - maybe it's a good idea to comment in the Aether code since anyway it >>>>>> is all wrapped in big IF statements so it won't hurt. and keeping it >>>>>> compiling during refactoring rather than having to figure out after >>>>>> the fact what on earth is going on is probably simpler >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> True. I've been thinking the same lately :) >>>>> In the end, it'll prove easier to have the code uncommented. >>>>> >>>>> cheers, >>>>> João >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> manu >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Manuel Bernhardt >>>>>> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>> It should be 30 min of work, if you list the cvsusers and we can provide >>>>>>> emails for them >>>>>>> >>>>>>> An interesting question would be hie to call the organization that will hold >>>>>>> the repo >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 06.06.2012, at 18:21, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and >>>>>>> enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on >>>>>>> its importing capabilities. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>> João >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why not move to git(hub) directly? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge >>>>>>>> SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there >>>>>>>> (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git >>>>>>>> users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try& get the git emails of >>>>>>>> all contributors but that should not be too hard). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade<jja...@gm...> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the >>>>>>>>> structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We're currently using a Git repository. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework >>>>>>>>> properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN >>>>>>>>> repo. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN >>>>>>>>> branch. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi João >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any >>>>>>>>>> commit >>>>>>>>>> mails. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with >>>>>>>>>> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point >>>>>>>>>> for me >>>>>>>>>> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that >>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>> be awesome :) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cheers >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is >>>>>>>>>>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once >>>>>>>>>>> we have a normal base functionality working version. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping >>>>>>>>>>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on >>>>>>>>>>> refactoring paraDe. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I >>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe >>>>>>>>>>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major >>>>>>>>>>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code >>>>>>>>>>>>> rewriting everywhere. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability >>>>>>>>>>>>> (new >>>>>>>>>>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead >>>>>>>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>>>>>>> around). >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other >>>>>>>>>>>>> people >>>>>>>>>>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to >>>>>>>>>>>>> host >>>>>>>>>>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be >>>>>>>>>>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely >>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>>>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>>>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>>>>>>>> malware >>>>>>>>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>>>> malware >>>>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>> |
