Menu
▾
▴
Re: [ParaDe-developers] [ITA][paraDe] testing paraDe
|
From: Manuel B. <ber...@gm...> - 2012-06-13 20:14:22
|
Great! For JNotify I don't have a clue how it behaves on osx these days. On linux I had to recompile it against 64bit but that should be checked in. It may be worth looking into using the finally available JVM 7 support for that kind of file change tracking. Or maybe there's an updated version of the JNotify project. I think I used to run parade in a VirtualBox Ubuntu on my mac. manu Sent from my iPhone On 13.06.2012, at 21:59, "João Andrade" <jja...@gm...> wrote: > Hey, > > Aether should be back on parade now. Next is Jnotify > > cheers, > João > > > On 11 June 2012 02:29, João Andrade <jja...@gm...> wrote: >> # rebasing: http://learn.github.com/p/rebasing.html >> >> Hey, >> >> Alright :) >> >> Finally had the chance to learn a bit more about Git. >> >> I was looking into the experimental parade version we have and I >> believe that before going for any rebasing on parade-nomad's parade >> project, all the missing files (JNotify, Aether, etc) should be >> included this experimental version or we'll end up with a non-working >> version. >> >> I'll get this moving during the next few days. >> >> cheers, >> João >> >> >> On 9 June 2012 10:44, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>> Hmm, "parade" and "nomad" are already taken as organizations. I'll try >>> to think about something else - I think it is possible to rename >>> organizations >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Manuel Bernhardt >>> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>> It's the organisation on github.com to host the source repository for parade >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On 08.06.2012, at 22:42, Cristian Bogdan <cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I don't know exactly what you are naming but Nomad is a good name >>>>> >>>>> cristi >>>>> >>>>> On 2012-06-08 19.17, Manuel Bernhardt wrote: >>>>>> Nomad sounds fun to me. Cristi, opinions? >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll see to migrate the rest of the users tomorrow. Creating an >>>>>> organization is super fast so once we have decided on the name I can >>>>>> do this in an instant and import the repo. Then you can branch and >>>>>> import your changes on top of it, not sure yet what is the best method >>>>>> but we'll figure something out >>>>>> >>>>>> Greetings from Helsinki >>>>>> >>>>>> manu >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>> >>>>>> On 08.06.2012, at 17:00, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Back to this >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 6 June 2012 18:32, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Looked a bit into it, I'm now playing with >>>>>>>> http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/cvs2git.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's really good to have a SSD for this kind of IO intensive operations :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So Joao if you have time tomorrow maybe you could look at setting up a >>>>>>>> github organization. The name is still something that'd be interesting >>>>>>>> to figure out since it's mostly a BEST and KTH cooperation. Maybe >>>>>>>> "nomad" would be a good name :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok so shall we name it Nomad? :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Then you can make a branch there and cherry-pick all commits from your >>>>>>>> repo or replay them on it otherwise. Keeping the history of the last 9 >>>>>>>> or so years is a good idea I think. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I looked at the github repo, some quick comments: >>>>>>>> - migration to maven: nice work! a lot more streamlined I suppose. >>>>>>>> Though how do you run it now? I remember the tomcat configuration has >>>>>>>> major tweaks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Currently, Maven's only used for dependency management. >>>>>>> Hum that might explain why I'm having some issues starting STRUTS >>>>>>> properly. Will have to look into it deeper :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - I saw that you commented out JNotify -- just as a warning, this >>>>>>>> entirely breaks parade, unless you've found another way of watching >>>>>>>> file system changes? the problem is that when people sync stuff via >>>>>>>> unison, changes on the FS aren't updated in the cache unless they are >>>>>>>> picked up on the FS. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Indeed. AFAIR I was getting some errors related to it, but I'll >>>>>>> re-enable it for sure :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - maybe it's a good idea to comment in the Aether code since anyway it >>>>>>>> is all wrapped in big IF statements so it won't hurt. and keeping it >>>>>>>> compiling during refactoring rather than having to figure out after >>>>>>>> the fact what on earth is going on is probably simpler >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> True. I've been thinking the same lately :) >>>>>>> In the end, it'll prove easier to have the code uncommented. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>> João >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> manu >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Manuel Bernhardt >>>>>>>> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>>>> It should be 30 min of work, if you list the cvsusers and we can provide >>>>>>>>> emails for them >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> An interesting question would be hie to call the organization that will hold >>>>>>>>> the repo >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 06.06.2012, at 18:21, "João Andrade"<jja...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and >>>>>>>>> enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on >>>>>>>>> its importing capabilities. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt<ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why not move to git(hub) directly? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge >>>>>>>>>> SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there >>>>>>>>>> (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git >>>>>>>>>> users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try& get the git emails of >>>>>>>>>> all contributors but that should not be too hard). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade<jja...@gm...> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the >>>>>>>>>>> structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We're currently using a Git repository. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework >>>>>>>>>>> properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN >>>>>>>>>>> repo. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>> fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN >>>>>>>>>>> branch. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi João >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any >>>>>>>>>>>> commit >>>>>>>>>>>> mails. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with >>>>>>>>>>>> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point >>>>>>>>>>>> for me >>>>>>>>>>>> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that >>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>> be awesome :) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> cheers >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Cristi, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is >>>>>>>>>>>>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once >>>>>>>>>>>>> we have a normal base functionality working version. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping >>>>>>>>>>>>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on >>>>>>>>>>>>> refactoring paraDe. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> still >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe >>>>>>>>>>>>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> best >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cristi >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rewriting everywhere. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> host >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> João >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> malware >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>>>>>>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>>>>>>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>>>>>>>>> Discussions >>>>>>>>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>>>>>>>>> malware >>>>>>>>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Par...@li... >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> |
