Menu
▾
▴
Re: [ParaDe-developers] [ITA][paraDe] testing paraDe
|
From: Manuel B. <ber...@gm...> - 2012-06-06 18:17:53
|
Ok, last email for today, I promise: I ported Stefan, Joao and myself so far. Cristi, Rudi, and basically anyone else - I'd need an email address that you'd consider using with github.com. Cristi, do you have the email addresses of: > frent > maarten12 For the rest I'll just lookup the address on PA manu On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: > ok, playing around worked, i.e. I have locally a git repo with parade > in it, from 2003 onwards. > > so now we have to fix the users: > > manu-mac:parade.git manu$ git log --format='%aN' | sort -u > adler > adlerscout > cristi > cristian_bogdan > epure_radu > joaosa > frent > maarten12 > manuel_gay > mile > rosso_nero > stefanba > > > The git format is composed of name and email, e.g. > > Manuel Bernhardt > ber...@gm... > > so if I get those I can rewrite the users. > > > manu > > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Manuel Bernhardt > <ber...@gm...> wrote: >> Looked a bit into it, I'm now playing with >> http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/cvs2git.html >> >> It's really good to have a SSD for this kind of IO intensive operations :-) >> >> So Joao if you have time tomorrow maybe you could look at setting up a >> github organization. The name is still something that'd be interesting >> to figure out since it's mostly a BEST and KTH cooperation. Maybe >> "nomad" would be a good name :) >> >> Then you can make a branch there and cherry-pick all commits from your >> repo or replay them on it otherwise. Keeping the history of the last 9 >> or so years is a good idea I think. >> >> I looked at the github repo, some quick comments: >> - migration to maven: nice work! a lot more streamlined I suppose. >> Though how do you run it now? I remember the tomcat configuration has >> major tweaks >> - I saw that you commented out JNotify -- just as a warning, this >> entirely breaks parade, unless you've found another way of watching >> file system changes? the problem is that when people sync stuff via >> unison, changes on the FS aren't updated in the cache unless they are >> picked up on the FS. >> - maybe it's a good idea to comment in the Aether code since anyway it >> is all wrapped in big IF statements so it won't hurt. and keeping it >> compiling during refactoring rather than having to figure out after >> the fact what on earth is going on is probably simpler >> >> cheers, >> >> manu >> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Manuel Bernhardt >> <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>> It should be 30 min of work, if you list the cvsusers and we can provide >>> emails for them >>> >>> An interesting question would be hie to call the organization that will hold >>> the repo >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 06.06.2012, at 18:21, "João Andrade" <jja...@gm...> wrote: >>> >>> Hey, >>> >>> Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github. >>> >>> Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and >>> enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on >>> its importing capabilities. >>> >>> cheers, >>> João >>> >>> >>> >>> On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote: >>>> >>>> Why not move to git(hub) directly? >>>> >>>> It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge >>>> SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there >>>> (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git >>>> users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try & get the git emails of >>>> all contributors but that should not be too hard). >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade <jja...@gm...> >>>> wrote: >>>> > Hello Cristi, >>>> > >>>> > The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the >>>> > structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management. >>>> > >>>> > We're currently using a Git repository. >>>> > >>>> > Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework >>>> > properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo. >>>> > >>>> > Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN >>>> > repo. >>>> > >>>> > Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time >>>> > to >>>> > fix this issue and hopefully get a working version. >>>> > >>>> > p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN >>>> > branch. >>>> > >>>> > cheers, >>>> > João >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan <cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> Hi João >>>> >> >>>> >> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any >>>> >> commit >>>> >> mails. >>>> >> >>>> >> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with >>>> >> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point >>>> >> for me >>>> >> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that >>>> >> would >>>> >> be awesome :) >>>> >> >>>> >> cheers >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> cristi >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Hello Cristi, >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is >>>> >>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once >>>> >>> we have a normal base functionality working version. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping >>>> >>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on >>>> >>> refactoring paraDe. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> cheers, >>>> >>> João >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I >>>> >>>> still >>>> >>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe >>>> >>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> best >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> cristi >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Hey, >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major >>>> >>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code >>>> >>>>> rewriting everywhere. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability >>>> >>>>> (new >>>> >>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead >>>> >>>>> code >>>> >>>>> around). >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other >>>> >>>>> people >>>> >>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to >>>> >>>>> host >>>> >>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be >>>> >>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :) >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely >>>> >>>>> appreciated. >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :) >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> cheers, >>>> >>>>> João >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference >>>> >>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>> >>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>> >>>>> Discussions >>>> >>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>> >>>>> malware >>>> >>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>>>> Parade-developers mailing list >>>> >>>>> Par...@li... >>>> >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> > Live Security Virtual Conference >>>> > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >>>> > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. >>>> > Discussions >>>> > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in >>>> > malware >>>> > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Parade-developers mailing list >>>> > Par...@li... >>>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers >>>> > >>> >>> |
