Re: [ParaDe-developers] [ITA][paraDe] testing paraDe

[Manuel B. <ber...@gm...>]

ok, playing around worked, i.e. I have locally a git repo with parade
in it, from 2003 onwards.

so now we have to fix the users:

manu-mac:parade.git manu$ git log --format='%aN' | sort -u
adler
adlerscout
cristi
cristian_bogdan
epure_radu
frent
joaosa
karamba
maarten12
manuel_gay
mile
parade
root
rosso_nero
stefanba


The git format is composed of name and email, e.g.

Manuel Bernhardt
ber...@gm...

so if I get those I can rewrite the users.


manu


On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Manuel Bernhardt
<ber...@gm...> wrote:
> Looked a bit into it, I'm now playing with
> http://cvs2svn.tigris.org/cvs2git.html
>
> It's really good to have a SSD for this kind of IO intensive operations :-)
>
> So Joao if you have time tomorrow maybe you could look at setting up a
> github organization. The name is still something that'd be interesting
> to figure out since it's mostly a BEST and KTH cooperation. Maybe
> "nomad" would be a good name :)
>
> Then you can make a branch there and cherry-pick all commits from your
> repo or replay them on it otherwise. Keeping the history of the last 9
> or so years is a good idea I think.
>
> I looked at the github repo, some quick comments:
> - migration to maven: nice work! a lot more streamlined I suppose.
> Though how do you run it now? I remember the tomcat configuration has
> major tweaks
> - I saw that you commented out JNotify -- just as a warning, this
> entirely breaks parade, unless you've found another way of watching
> file system changes? the problem is that when people sync stuff via
> unison, changes on the FS aren't updated in the cache unless they are
> picked up on the FS.
> - maybe it's a good idea to comment in the Aether code since anyway it
> is all wrapped in big IF statements so it won't hurt. and keeping it
> compiling during refactoring rather than having to figure out after
> the fact what on earth is going on is probably simpler
>
> cheers,
>
> manu
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Manuel Bernhardt
> <ber...@gm...> wrote:
>> It should be 30 min of work, if you list the cvsusers and we can provide
>> emails for them
>>
>> An interesting question would be hie to call the organization that will hold
>> the repo
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 06.06.2012, at 18:21, "João Andrade" <jja...@gm...> wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> Indeed. Right now we actually have it in Github.
>>
>> Manu's idea seems legit to me. Working with Github is certainly and
>> enjoyable experience, although currently I have no knowledge whatsoever on
>> its importing capabilities.
>>
>> cheers,
>> João
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6 June 2012 17:16, Manuel Bernhardt <ber...@gm...> wrote:
>>>
>>> Why not move to git(hub) directly?
>>>
>>> It's so much faster and nicer to use than the super-slow SourceForge
>>> SVN (or CVS??). And it should be easy to import from the source there
>>> (to keep commit history etc.), e.g. mapping of CVS users against git
>>> users is supported AFAIK (you'd need to try & get the git emails of
>>> all contributors but that should not be too hard).
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:43 PM, João Andrade <jja...@gm...>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hello Cristi,
>>> >
>>> > The reason there were no commits is because as we were changing the
>>> > structure a bit and adding maven for dependency management.
>>> >
>>> > We're currently using a Git repository.
>>> >
>>> > Also, we're having some problems with starting the struts framework
>>> > properly. So it'd be unthinkable to commit it to the main working repo.
>>> >
>>> > Once it gets stable, I intend to commit it back to the original SVN
>>> > repo.
>>> >
>>> > Tomorrow it's a national holiday here. I'll try to use some of my time
>>> > to
>>> > fix this issue and hopefully get a working version.
>>> >
>>> > p.s. now that I think about it we could've just created a new SVN
>>> > branch.
>>> >
>>> > cheers,
>>> > João
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 5 June 2012 19:08, Cristian Bogdan <cr...@cs...> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi João
>>> >>
>>> >> will you commit / are you committing parade code? I didn't see any
>>> >> commit
>>> >> mails.
>>> >>
>>> >> My concern is, when you are "done" I may be able to start working with
>>> >> aether again in the new structure. There doesn't seem to be any point
>>> >> for me
>>> >> doing anything before that. Plus after that you say you can help, that
>>> >> would
>>> >> be awesome :)
>>> >>
>>> >> cheers
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> cristi
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On 2012-05-10 01.32, João Andrade wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hello Cristi,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I'd never think of removing it :). At the moment, aether's code is
>>> >>> commented out in our working paraDe version. We'll bring it back once
>>> >>> we have a normal base functionality working version.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> As for helping with aether's reactivation, I wouldn't mind helping
>>> >>> with it in the future. However, at the moment, I'd like to focus on
>>> >>> refactoring paraDe.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> cheers,
>>> >>> João
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 7 May 2012 15:13, Cristian Bogdan<cr...@cs...>  wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Hi
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Whatever you do in revamping, please don't remove the aether code. I
>>> >>>> still
>>> >>>> hope to revive it and test it. Maybe you Joao want to help, or maybe
>>> >>>> somebody else needs an internship, a thesis or something?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> best
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> cristi
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On 2012-04-29 17.27, João Andrade wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Hey,
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> We are currently revamping paraDe. These changes will have a major
>>> >>>>> impact on the interface and backend. So lots of refactoring and code
>>> >>>>> rewriting everywhere.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> IMHO these changes are crucial, especially in terms of usability
>>> >>>>> (new
>>> >>>>> code editor for instance) and code maintainability (there is dead
>>> >>>>> code
>>> >>>>> around).
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> As these changes may lead to some instability and having other
>>> >>>>> people
>>> >>>>> testing is essential, we were considering if it'd be possible to
>>> >>>>> host
>>> >>>>> a testing paraDe version in one of our servers.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> I suppose zagreb would be fine as well, but anywhere else should be
>>> >>>>> fine (maybe Lisbon as it's not being used currently) :)
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Any thoughts/suggestions on this? Those will be extremely
>>> >>>>> appreciated.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Feel free to ask questions, as I can elaborate more :)
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> cheers,
>>> >>>>> João
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>>>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>>> >>>>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>>> >>>>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
>>> >>>>> Discussions
>>> >>>>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in
>>> >>>>> malware
>>> >>>>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>>> Parade-developers mailing list
>>> >>>>> Par...@li...
>>> >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > Live Security Virtual Conference
>>> > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>>> > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond.
>>> > Discussions
>>> > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in
>>> > malware
>>> > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Parade-developers mailing list
>>> > Par...@li...
>>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/parade-developers
>>> >
>>
>>