You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(55) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(18) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(122) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(57) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(85) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2003 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2005 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(11) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(22) |
May
(75) |
Jun
(75) |
Jul
(44) |
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(31) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(65) |
Apr
(57) |
May
(72) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(55) |
Sep
(31) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Lark <lar...@un...> - 2000-12-23 04:27:27
|
> Apparently, successive breaking will annihilate previous amount of > successive chainings if any and be recognized as one breaking. Fixed it. Problem was when a chain broke on first use, it overwrote the stats for the previous chain (the chain counter was not updated). It's not in the CVS tree yet, I have some more things that I want to fix before I commit. I'll generate another (0.1.2) alpha this weekend, if you like any more bugs to be fixed before then, send mail :-) Lark -- Lark <lar...@un...> |
|
From: Ludovic N. <lni...@wa...> - 2000-12-23 02:52:58
|
Ok. Got at least a reproducible sample on my machine. May have to test it in case newer code changed but I doubt it. take that as your log file: 11/23/00 12:57:20a You start dragging Tish 12/9/00 3:33:25a The chain breaks as you try to use it. 11/23/00 12:57:20a You start dragging Tish 11/23/00 12:57:20a You start dragging Tish 12/7/00 3:34:25a The chain breaks as you try to use it. 11/23/00 12:57:20a You start dragging Tish 11/23/00 12:57:20a You start dragging Tish 11/23/00 12:57:20a You start dragging Tish 11/23/00 12:57:20a You start dragging Tish 11/23/00 12:57:20a You start dragging Tish 12/9/00 3:33:25a The chain breaks as you try to use it. 12/9/00 3:33:25a The chain breaks as you try to use it. 11/23/00 12:57:20a You start dragging Tish 12/9/00 3:33:25a The chain breaks as you try to use it. 12/9/00 3:33:28a The chain breaks as you try to use it. 12/9/00 3:33:35a The chain breaks as you try to use it. Scribia will see 4 chains with 1,2,0,0 chainings. Apparently, successive breaking will annihilate previous amount of successive chainings if any and be recognized as one breaking. I suppose the scanner actually creates a "chain element" and successive chainings somewhat distroy that overwrite that entry. That's my best guess so far. Geotzou |
|
From: Ludovic N. <lni...@wa...> - 2000-12-22 21:41:58
|
>Hmm. I'll have to look into that. Problem is, I only ever owned a few >chains, so while it seems to count correctly on my logs, that isn't really a >conclusive validation. > >One thing about chain counting: I start to count chain events for a "new" >chain, when I see one of these things in the log: > > 1. your chain breaking > 2. you selling your chain > 3. you giving your chain away (selling for 0 coins) > >i.e. if you give your chain away (and maybe get it back), that will start a >new series of counts. Could that explain what you see? Since chains are apparently undistinguishable from each other, I am not sure selling/giving/buying should be a trigger for that new chain thing. I would prefer to have a count from one break to the next, and that's it. But since in any case I am Scribing (Scribing is a registered trademark of the Great Zou ;-) ) 2 chains where there were in fact 3 chains, my problem is not overcounting but undercounting right now. I'll try to create a single fake log file showing up the problem. If I can, i'll try to debug or transmit it to you. Any idea for the time issue? Geotzou |
|
From: Lark <lar...@un...> - 2000-12-22 21:31:00
|
Bones (a new Scribia developer :-) sent me these instructions on compiling
Scribia on CW6. I'll make these changes to the CVS tree over the weekend,
but I'd like to post it here in case people would like to play with CW6
beforehand.
It looks like we could simply use a second project file for CW6, and our
code could compile under both 5.3 and 6. That'd be nice.
--
Lark <lar...@un...>
----------
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 02:57:03 -0800
To: lar...@un...
Subject: Scribia with CW6
First error with CW6 is:
Error : declaration syntax error
CScribiaDoc.h line 59 typedef map<string, UInt32> TCounter;
with "string" highlighted. CW6 wants std::string, so i added
using namespace std;
at line 58 of CScribiaDoc.h, which makes it happy. Or you could make
them all std::string. Same effect.
....
After that, the next error is:
Error : ambiguous access to overloaded function
'StResource::StResource(unsigned long, const unsigned char *,
unsigned char, unsigned char)'
'StResource::StResource(unsigned long, short, unsigned char, unsigned char)'
CTimeField.cp line 103 StResource timeFormat('itl0', 0);
so i changed CTimeField.cp line 103 from:
StResource timeFormat('itl0', 0);
to
StResource timeFormat('itl0', (ResIDT) 0);
....
To link with PP 2.1, I had to:
* Add
- UScrap.cp
- UPrinting.cp
- UProcessMgr.cp
- LAMImageWellImp.cp
to project, per 2.1 release notes.
Amm.. i think thats it...
So, what is needed - basically to make the interface work? :)
|
|
From: Lark <lar...@un...> - 2000-12-22 21:30:58
|
A few people asked me to hint on when to commit their local changes to the remote CVS repository. Here's what I've pulled from various earlier posts o= n the topic, FYI: ----------- If you're unsure, feel free to ask me before committing. Try to commit increments that work, i.e. don't go off for a half year with today's source= s and then do a huge commit. But don't commit things that crash (or don't eve= n compile), it pisses people off when they sync their tree and nothing works anymore. :-) ----------- > Hi Scribia developers! So what's the next step? I've subscribed to the ma= iling > list so now what? Do I register as a new user on the sourceforge site? Depends. If you just want to grab the source and compile it, you can get it via anonymous CVS, without the need to register with sourceforge. If you'd like to actively develop Scribia (i.e. make larger code changes you'd like to contribute back to me/us) I will add you as a developer. For that, you will need to do these steps: 1. sign up with sourceforge 2. tell me your sourceforge user name, so I can add you as a developer ****IMPORTANT**** 3. open a customer service item with sourceforge, and ask them to set up CV= S "pserver" access to the scribia CVS repository (SSH does not work on the Mac) ****IMPORTANT**** After that, you have read/write access to the CVS repository. Since I don't know if people have used CVS before, here are some short things you should know: =80 commit log entries are your friend, please take the time to describe changes made to the code =80 never check in code that has known bugs, or worse, does not compile (people will get angry if they'll have to fix your bugs after they have CVS updated your changes) =80 try to use the indentation style of the rest of the sources for new things/changes (I've tried to stick to the "Mac way" of indentation and naming things as much as I could figure it out; it's not perfect) =80 include the HEADER file (Documentation folder) at the top of each new source file, it has some magic CVS tags in it that auto-insert the commit log, current version, etc. (it also has the disclaimer) --=20 Lark <lar...@un...> |
|
From: Lark <lar...@un...> - 2000-12-22 17:01:00
|
> From what I see, the individual chain data isn't perfectly stored right now.
>
> In my case, it was seeing 3 broken chains before and now sees only 2 (or
> presents data for 2).
> It says 105 and 0 where it should be 105, 1, 0
Hmm. I'll have to look into that. Problem is, I only ever owned a few
chains, so while it seems to count correctly on my logs, that isn't really a
conclusive validation.
One thing about chain counting: I start to count chain events for a "new"
chain, when I see one of these things in the log:
1. your chain breaking
2. you selling your chain
3. you giving your chain away (selling for 0 coins)
i.e. if you give your chain away (and maybe get it back), that will start a
new series of counts. Could that explain what you see?
Lark
--
Lark <lar...@un...>
|
|
From: Lark <lar...@un...> - 2000-12-22 16:55:46
|
> Hi, just checked out the alpha and had it scan every one of my log files. > The scanner isn't picking up Rodnus training. Lark, if you need the message > again, let me know. I'll dig it up. Here's what I scan for, is this correct for these "new" trainers? ANGILSA "*You notice your balance recovering much more quickly" KNOX "* You notice yourself doing much more damage" RODNUS "*You feel more receptive to healing" Maybe there's a space between the star and the first letter for other messages, not only Knox? Also: I need the training messages and names of the languange trainers. So far, I think I only have Sylvan and Dwarven. > I think there may have been a change in some of the trainer messages between > now and the war. I have a bunch of undercounts and even an over count. I > know a few of the under counts are due to me not having my logs of the first > couple days. But the number they're off is to large and some of them are > with upper circle trainers. I'm going to rescan later tonight with scribus > to see what he counts. Hopefully it'll show something. One problem that was fixed shortly after 0.1.1 was that the scanner would pick up things in exiles' actions. That could be reason for some over-counts. I'll generate another alpha (0.1.2) this weekend that has some other fixes as well, let me know what that one does, ok? In general you can help with this by scanning your log files for the phrase from Scribia.l that was over-counted. Both CW and BBEdit can search for text in multiple files. If you see something that should not be matched but is, email me the line(s). (This is exactly what I do if you send me your miscounted logs :-) Lark -- Lark <lar...@un...> |
|
From: Ludovic N. <lni...@wa...> - 2000-12-22 06:43:54
|
Hi, Seems to me that the share times are wrong with the build i have in some cases. (Not the most recent version, i have to do the update and verify again. My current guess is that the time difference behaves badly when one sharea acroos day boundaries or 12hours cycles. But the bug doesn't seem to be universal so I can'T provide specific guidleines right now. I have a case here where an hour an 17 minutes is reported as 13:17 by scribia. And i am scanning a single file, it's not an addition problem. I'll proceed to some more testing before investigating the code for that. I'll be away from main dev machine for about 10 days also, so no hurry on that bug. ;-) Ludo |
|
From: Lark <lar...@un...> - 2000-12-21 16:48:38
|
It seems that iName (which manages my email address) had some problems last
week, so I'm just now getting all the mails that were sent.
I'll work on Scribia over the weekend and respond to your mails, too. (Busy
at work.)
For people who sent me mail privately: Please send to
scr...@li... - reasons:
- it's archived, some questions have been answered before
- other subscribers can help with questions
- it's filtered into my Scribia folder, so I don't miss mails (normally)
Thanks,
Lark
PS: We have two new developers: Geotzou and Bones.
--
Lark <lar...@un...>
|
|
From: Ludovic N. <lni...@wa...> - 2000-12-19 03:27:47
|
From what I see, the individual chain data isn't perfectly stored right now. In my case, it was seeing 3 broken chains before and now sees only 2 (or presents data for 2). It says 105 and 0 where it should be 105, 1, 0 I have not traced in the code to look for the error yet so I can't really tell you what happened. Geotzou |
|
From: Brad M. <bm...@as...> - 2000-12-18 07:46:05
|
Hi, just checked out the alpha and had it scan every one of my log files. The scanner isn't picking up Rodnus training. Lark, if you need the message again, let me know. I'll dig it up. I think there may have been a change in some of the trainer messages between now and the war. I have a bunch of undercounts and even an over count. I know a few of the under counts are due to me not having my logs of the first couple days. But the number they're off is to large and some of them are with upper circle trainers. I'm going to rescan later tonight with scribus to see what he counts. Hopefully it'll show something. I'll let you know what I can find. Brad (aka Cygnus) cy...@po... _________________________________________________________________ Oh the words that he spoke Seemed the wisest of philosophies There's nothing ever gained By a wet thing called a tear When the world is too dark And I need the light inside of me I'll walk into a bar And drink fifteen pints of beer - Shane MacGowen |
|
From: Lark <lar...@un...> - 2000-12-18 07:38:00
|
I've just committed a fix to a small bug in 0.1.1 that caused text in \action lines to not be ignored. This could lead to garbage text being matched for item/beast names, or other things. I've also included some initial support for consistently counting items for which DT has changes names over time (wood, berry clusters). -- Lark <lar...@un...> |
|
From: Lark <lar...@un...> - 2000-12-18 01:46:29
|
I've committed and tagged all my recent changes. The sources are now in sync with the just-released scribia-0.1.1-alpha. -- Lark <lar...@un...> |
|
From: Lark <lar...@un...> - 2000-12-18 01:43:55
|
Please grab the first public release of Scribia at http://download.sourceforge.net/scribia/scribia-0.1.1-alpha.sea.hqx This is alpha-quality software. The user interface is ugly, and most document functionality isn't there yet. However, the log scanner works (fast!), so please run it over your logs and give use some feedback. Send suggestions for future improvements to scr...@li... File bug reports at http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?group_id=6424 (Please don't send bugs by email, use the database at the URL above.) Feel free to forward/repost this announcement as appropriate. -- Lark <lar...@un...> |
|
From: Brad M. <bm...@as...> - 2000-12-10 21:51:00
|
On 12/10/00 11:22 AM, "Lark" <lar...@un...> wrote:
> Updated Scribia:
> * counting drags per chain
> * counting jury duty events
> * counting ruined furs
> * counting bank fees
> * fixed a timestamp scanner bug (messed up some share times before)
>
> I'll upload a binary to the FTP area so people can play with it without
> having to compile it. Problem is that sourceforge's FTP is down right now.
> I'll be back in town by Tuesday night, I'll try again then...
My semester ends this week, so I'll probably be able to start learning power
plant again. Was the project moved to CW6? I remember something being said
about it awhile back.
Brad
bm...@as...
_________________________________________________________________
The trouble with the world is that
the stupid are cocksure and the
intelligent are full of doubt.
- Bertrand Russell
|
|
From: Lark <lar...@un...> - 2000-12-10 18:22:16
|
Updated Scribia:
* counting drags per chain
* counting jury duty events
* counting ruined furs
* counting bank fees
* fixed a timestamp scanner bug (messed up some share times before)
I'll upload a binary to the FTP area so people can play with it without
having to compile it. Problem is that sourceforge's FTP is down right now.
I'll be back in town by Tuesday night, I'll try again then...
--
Lark <lar...@un...>
|
|
From: Lark <lar...@un...> - 2000-12-09 17:18:54
|
> I have another friend who pkayed pre-ripture who just bought back the game > a couple days back and will start playing by christmas time that may > actually take a look at Scribia too. He downloaded the source tonight after > i talked to him and toyed with it like me. He was Yaruhl pre-ripture, but i > doubt you remember him. Great! Have him send me email so I can set him up as a developer. > About chaining events, the new scanner is perfectly accurate with my recent > test sample, which is real cool. I never thought about the being chained, > neat ;-) I'll see later on how to handle the fine detail of what i want by > adding to your chain callback function (if i am not mistaken, you can give > a handler to lex for any given token). Basically, what needs to be added is a TChainingsPerChain counter, and then just add mChainingsPerChain["Chain 1"] = 15; or whatever the current counter is when one breaks. I'll look into it when I lie fallen later on :-) > At first, I may actually commit changes within #ifdef for you to look but > without them being effective in standard builds. Only major changes will > have that. Good idea. > Except that it crashes my machine almost all the time, i agree. If i ever > get into a major problem, i'll revert to asking someone else. Still? That's bad. I can keep sending you binaries per email, just ask me when the import doesn't work. > I may actually change the layout for the "non-UI" window slightly. I like > to keep that window around as a summary window. It may be a bit long, but > it can display a lot. Go ahead :-) PS: We should move this exchange over to scribia-developers, so the others see it. -- Lark <lar...@un...> |
|
From: Lark <lar...@un...> - 2000-12-08 17:04:27
|
Hi, I've added support for some events related to chaining and jury duty to the scanner. (No Geotzou, not "full" stats yet, just some :-) Lark PS: We still need a real GUI! -- Lark <lar...@un...> |
|
From: Lark <la...@fe...> - 2000-11-10 19:09:06
|
Hi, has anyone compiled Scribia with C6 yet? Any problems? I'm still using CW5.3, but there are two new people who may work on the GUI; both would rather use CW6. Since we really need that GUI, I'm willing to do almost anything to accommodate whoever will build one. :-) In the meantime: Any new trainers/items/etcs. in the lands that need counting support from the scanner? -- Lark <la...@fe...> |
|
From: Tim D. <fe...@xt...> - 2000-10-29 01:09:34
|
|
From: Lark <la...@fe...> - 2000-10-22 16:55:03
|
Hello, a while ago, I started the free open-source Scribus replacement "Scribia", implemented in C++/flex/PowerPlant. At this time, the log scanner engine is relatively complete (i.e. does most things Scribus did), and is much faster. However, I don't know much about Mac GUI programming, and I don't have the time to learn it. The GUI is the one critical piece that is missing before we can release an alpha version of Scribia for wide-spread testing. If you have experience with Metrowerks PowerPlant, please consider helping us out! The initial GUI can be very simple, just enough so people can start testing Scribia. Scribia development is hosted on SourceForge.com (http://sourceforge.net/projects/scribia/). You can obtain the sources from there. I will gladly give CVS write access to new developers. All developers (and everybody interested in keeping up with Scribia development) are encouraged to subscribe to the "scribia-developers" mailing list. This can also be done from the above web page. Please help train Scribia! Eternal fame and glory are up for grabs! :-) Lark |
|
From: Lark <la...@fe...> - 2000-10-22 16:39:18
|
> There was a recent post on the newsgroup about ways to record ranks. > Someone mentioned Scribia... > > There was also a request for Scribia: > >> If someone is working on the Scribus Open Source project and reads >> this, I have a request: >> >> Please allow me to drag multiple files onto the Scribus icon and >> read them all. Well, drag&drop isn't there just yet, but you already can add all files in a folder, which is somewhat similar. I'm back from my trip, by the way. :-) -- Lark <la...@fe...> |
|
From: Pugwash <pu...@ac...> - 2000-10-10 02:16:35
|
Hi There was a recent post on the newsgroup about ways to record ranks. Someone mentioned Scribia... There was also a request for Scribia: >If someone is working on the Scribus Open Source project and reads >this, I have a request: > > Please allow me to drag multiple files onto the Scribus icon and >read them all. > > I have every log made with Merlisk since the Rip War and I don't >want to add each one individually. :) > > -- > Best regards, > HWC for Merlisk bye Pugwash -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Pugwash Dwarven Militia: http://www.dwarvenmilitia.com/ Puddleby Mailbox: 1027 mailto:pu...@ac... ICQ: 11524889 Clan Lord: http://www.deltatao.com/clanlord.html Hotline: 24.72.12.31 |
|
From: Ludovic N. <lni...@wa...> - 2000-09-15 18:04:17
|
>I got a message about "the language of the trees" recently, and got >experience for it. I wonder if it's worth counting, and if so, what it >means... It's the orga camp equivalent of the free rank you get the first time you go to the old cemetary (fromd ead tree in marsh). Everyone gets it once and is done after that. Limited interest for the parser except for completeness purposes. geotzou |
|
From: Lark <la...@fe...> - 2000-09-15 15:29:44
|
>> By the way, I noticed the other trainers have that little circle-thingy (, >> option-8) in front of them with no space between it and the "You". These >> seem to have stars instead, and Knox has an extra space. Are you sure this >> is correct? > > As far as I know it is correct. I have not trained with either Knox or > Angilsa yet. I asked someone who was training with them (I think it was > Kojiro) to give me the exact line from their log. Gotta love how inconsistent DT is with their messages. Good thing we use flex, I'll just pattern match for all possible combinations (star/option-8, with/without spaces). Soon. > As far as I know, that is all that has been added that will effect the > scanner. I'll let you know if I think of or come across anything else. I got a message about "the language of the trees" recently, and got experience for it. I wonder if it's worth counting, and if so, what it means... I'm also considering keeping track of which quests one has solved by scanning for e.g. the message you get when you get back to the rat challenge person. -- Lark <la...@fe...> |