|
From: Ludovic N. <lni...@wa...> - 2000-12-23 02:52:58
|
Ok. Got at least a reproducible sample on my machine. May have to test it in case newer code changed but I doubt it. take that as your log file: 11/23/00 12:57:20a You start dragging Tish 12/9/00 3:33:25a The chain breaks as you try to use it. 11/23/00 12:57:20a You start dragging Tish 11/23/00 12:57:20a You start dragging Tish 12/7/00 3:34:25a The chain breaks as you try to use it. 11/23/00 12:57:20a You start dragging Tish 11/23/00 12:57:20a You start dragging Tish 11/23/00 12:57:20a You start dragging Tish 11/23/00 12:57:20a You start dragging Tish 11/23/00 12:57:20a You start dragging Tish 12/9/00 3:33:25a The chain breaks as you try to use it. 12/9/00 3:33:25a The chain breaks as you try to use it. 11/23/00 12:57:20a You start dragging Tish 12/9/00 3:33:25a The chain breaks as you try to use it. 12/9/00 3:33:28a The chain breaks as you try to use it. 12/9/00 3:33:35a The chain breaks as you try to use it. Scribia will see 4 chains with 1,2,0,0 chainings. Apparently, successive breaking will annihilate previous amount of successive chainings if any and be recognized as one breaking. I suppose the scanner actually creates a "chain element" and successive chainings somewhat distroy that overwrite that entry. That's my best guess so far. Geotzou |