Menu
▾
▴
jflight-dev
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(7) |
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(4) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Andreas R. \(OLC\) <an...@on...> - 2003-09-02 17:40:39
|
Hi developer of OLC Software, please be aware of a "new" feature at flight claim for the pilots. It's not realy new. see Reglement. :-) At HG/PG Onlinecontest it's no longer possible to claim flights if they have large timegaps at track. It means for OLC > 300sec. It means for HG/PG HOLC > 900sec. is not longer allowed to submit flights. This is a *must* that a tracklog must contain every 60sec at minimum 1 position fix. Timegaps are acceptable if we have altitude recorded. Please help your end users, that they cannot optimize such these flights with timegaps. That they have maybe to read again this track from GPS or Logger. Best Regards, Andreas Rieck --------------------------------------------------------------------------- You are wondering about Timegaps, why they are exist ? Some HG/PG GPS examples: 1) - At the morning switch on you gps at Landing field, track some points, switch off. - Go to take of ... some miles far from Landing field. - Start and turn your flight ... land home at landing field at the evening. - You have a 100% closed track, triangle. And some hours timegap from the morning travel to takeoff. 2) - Same prozedure but Competition and evening. - Land anywhere ... switch off your GPS. - Call your Car retrieval driver for picking up. - Go back to Meet Director, switch on GPS again under clear sky for read competition track - optimize later same flight (including car travel) for OLC 3) - MLR read problems like this at BRecords B115455 B115505... B115510... B115515... B105500... B115525... ... will produce a timegap from 10:55:00 to 11:55:25 3.625seconds 4) A GPS Track like this B165555... B165600... B165605... B090020... B090025... B090030... It means, there exist Pilots who will "optimize" more than one day and realy claim these flights. No problem to store these Multi-Day flights to server but allow to optimize best points from more then one day ... hmmm. So that's why we do not accept flight claims with timegaps any longer. And if your Software will detect timegaps too ... it will help your Endusers. |
|
From: <rue...@we...> - 2001-07-26 19:19:00
|
Hi folks, I have just released the "final beta" v0.5.0. This version has implemented every important thing I initially wanted to=20 implement in the first step. It was a really long step ;-). Some details = are=20 still missing, and it's still beta-quality, but quite stable.=20 I like it.=20 You can download it from the project page http://www.sf.net/projects/jflight Time for holidays! Have fun R=FCdiger |
|
From: <rue...@we...> - 2001-07-10 21:09:29
|
Hi everyone, I have just commited and uploaded a new release to the sourceforge=20 project-page. The major new feature is a playbackmode for tracks. Up to 5= =20 fligfhts can be viewed at the same time. R=FCdiger |
|
From: <rue...@we...> - 2001-05-17 16:51:25
|
Hi everyone, I have just tried to port the current JFlight code for the Psion serial l= ine=20 library that already worked last year (and fails when ported to javax.com= m).=20 It works! And the good thing is that I maybe have found the bug with the=20 javax.comm port. Good motivation to go on! I will go to Greifenburg next week for the "hessische" championships as e= very=20 year.=20 Tomas: Can you maybe provide the new interface-code after that? Happy landings R=FCdiger |
|
From: <rue...@we...> - 2001-05-09 20:28:20
|
Hi Guido, > Am Mon, 23. Apr 2001 um 21:17:54 +0200 schrieb Ruediger Bien: > > Hi everyone, > > Hi Rüdiger, > > > I have made further tests with JBuilder4 and Forte. I have big problems > > with JB4 to get the existing GUI-parts shown in the GUI-builder > > correctly. In fact only the "about-box" works quite fine. What are your > > experiences? > > Also "FlightBookDialog" does, because it loads its own (private, double) > String-Ressources. "AboutBox" is shown correct because it does not use > any (translated) String-Ressources. The other Dialogs load their > translated String-Ressources over the construct: > > strRes = ((jFlightFrame) owner).strRes; > > Obviously JBuilder can not handle that at design time. > > > I have added another GUI-window now with Forte. Here the window-design > > is stored in a additionally XML-coded file. This seems to be much more > > reliable for me for the future. > > .... but is not Java2 compliant? good point; I have compiled it successfully with jdk 1.1.8; fine ;-) > > > The GUI-builder, especially the layout > > manager usage is handled much better by Forte compared with JB4. The only > > drawback of Forte is that it crashes occasionally. Save often! It also > > takes a little time to understand the usage and concepts which are a bit > > different than in JB4. > > > > What do you think? Is it possible to go on designing GUIs with Forte? Or > > maybe both tools? Any experiences on Forte? > > No experiences with Forte but no time either to get engaged with it. > > Gruß > Guido Rüdiger |
|
From: <rue...@we...> - 2001-04-23 19:23:07
|
Hi everyone, I have made further tests with JBuilder4 and Forte. I have big problems with JB4 to get the existing GUI-parts shown in the GUI-builder correctly. In fact only the "about-box" works quite fine. What are your experiences? I have added another GUI-window now with Forte. Here the window-design is stored in a additionally XML-coded file. This seems to be much more reliable for me for the future. The GUI-builder, especially the layout manager usage is handled much better by Forte compared with JB4. The only drawback of Forte is that it crashes occasionally. Save often! It also takes a little time to understand the usage and concepts which are a bit different than in JB4. What do you think? Is it possible to go on designing GUIs with Forte? Or maybe both tools? Any experiences on Forte? Rüdiger |
|
From: Vänersborgs H. <vh...@ho...> - 2001-04-04 20:47:26
|
Hello ! I have some code ready for you, I will clean up the files and mail them to you... Going to Italy next thursday for teen days of flying at Feltre, Monte Avena. >May be at Emberger in may. Emberger Alm ? Been there, done that ! Really nice site.. /ToS _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. |
|
From: Guido S. <gui...@ba...> - 2001-04-04 16:10:29
|
Am Sun, 01. Apr 2001 um 22:30:19 +0200 schrieb Ruediger Bien: > Hi Guido and Tomas and anyone else interested, Hi R=FCdiger, > After some weeks of rest for all of us I would like to get some suggest= ions=20 > from you when and how to continue. for the next two month I will be engaged with co-writing a Linux book, so no heavy work on Jflight will be done by me in this time period. > Personally I have now installed my new PC and most of the required SW. = I want=20 > to try it with Linux again (failed on my P133/32MB due to=20 > performance/memory). Looks fine so far. I have also installed JBuilder4= and=20 > Forte for Java (from sun) and played a little with both tools. Both hav= e=20 > strong and weak points. Powerful anyway. Yesterday I foud a new jdk-1.3 for Linux release (V 0.2) at the site of Sun an I downloaded it but had no time to install yet. I recognized that also the documentation for jdk-1.3 is now complete. > BTW: I did my first real nice flight this year today. The weather was=20 > exciting. Want to have some more ;-) Yes, I did a very nice mountainbike tour to the Chiemsee ;-). =20 > CU > R=FCdiger May be at Emberger in may. Gru=DF Guido --=20 mailto:gui...@ba... http://www.bayernline.de/~gscholz/ |
|
From: <rue...@we...> - 2001-04-01 20:32:25
|
Hi Guido and Tomas and anyone else interested, After some weeks of rest for all of us I would like to get some suggestions from you when and how to continue. Personally I have now installed my new PC and most of the required SW. I want to try it with Linux again (failed on my P133/32MB due to performance/memory). Looks fine so far. I have also installed JBuilder4 and Forte for Java (from sun) and played a little with both tools. Both have strong and weak points. Powerful anyway. I would like to start with the redesign of jflight. Tomas, when can we get some input from your side? Guido, when can you start again? Anyone else who wants to get active? Any other wishes or suggestionsfrom your side? BTW: I did my first real nice flight this year today. The weather was exciting. Want to have some more ;-) CU Rüdiger |
|
From: <rue...@we...> - 2001-01-31 16:16:36
|
Hi, I have just uploaded (and commited) a new version, as well as new screenshots. This versions fixes several bugs and has a much improved handling when loading data from the devices. Please test it. For me the next action is to get it running on my Psion again (serial access still is not compatible) until there is a framework from Tomas. Tomas, what's your plan / schedule for that? Regards Rüdiger |
|
From: <rue...@we...> - 2001-01-27 07:01:15
|
Hi Guido, recently I had an idea about synching GPS- and variodata (-> using marks) that might even be worth patenting it. I order to avoid problems with manufacturers that might want to do that (who knows, and shit happens) I would like to ask you to add the following paragraph to the spec - which should be some kind of public announcement - and commit it to the repository asap: ### Data synchronisation Data synchronisation between the Vario-barogram and the GPS-track is an essential feature of JFlight. It is done offline which causes some problems. This can be avoided by the following means: 1) The reliable way: Setting "marks" in both data-sets (nearly) at the same time. Mark setting is a device-dependent feature: - For the Bräuniger it is done by pressing the "marker" key. - For a Garmin-GPS the easiest way for later evaluation is pressing two-times "mark / enter" in a row which not only creates two new waypoints but also two track-coordinates. 2) If marks are not available checking height, speed and coordinates for significant changes and exeeding of certain threshholds can do the same, but is less reliable. The best approach would be a "best-of" of 1 and 2. ### Thanks! Rüdiger |
|
From: <rue...@we...> - 2001-01-27 07:01:13
|
Hi everyone, FYI: I have just created a new mailinglist: jfl...@li... It's for release announcements (users with Sourceforge-account can get info about new release by "monitoring" a certain package too). Some of you might want to switch to that list in order not to be bored by developing discussions. Rüdiger |
|
From: <rue...@we...> - 2000-11-16 20:36:43
|
Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: jfl...@li... > [mailto:jfl...@li...]On Behalf Of Guido > Scholz > Sent: Mittwoch, 15. November 2000 21:42 > To: JFlight Mailing List > Subject: Re: [Jflight-dev] Redesign and GUI > > > Am Mon, 13. Nov 2000 um 11:03:43 +0000 schrieb Vänersborgs Hängflygklubb: > > > Hello ! > > Hello Tomas, > > > Is it ok if the awt version of GUI contains the "Cardlayout > style" and the > > swing version the little more "space" demanding "new" style ? > > now that I digged a little around in Rüdigers code I have an other idea > about the GUI configuration of the awt version. How about keeping the > list views in the card layout and showing the graphics in separate > windows (but without own menues)? I do not know whether the Psion will > have enough space on its screen to display two windows like this, I don't think so but > may be this will work: > > > +-------------------------------------------+ +------------------+ > | File Flight View Options Help | | | > +-------------------------------------------+ | | > | Flight 1 | | | > | Flight 2 | | | > | Flight 3 | | Graphics | > | Flight 4 | | | > | Flight 5 | | | > | Flight 6 | | | > | Flight 7 | | | > | Flight 8 | | | > | Flight 9 | | | > +-------------------------------------------+ +------------------+ > > > Guido > > -- > mailto:gui...@ba... > http://www.bayernline.de/~gscholz/ > _______________________________________________ > Jflight-dev mailing list > Jfl...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/jflight-dev Graphics should be full-screen/window-size, i think I think the original window-layout was not bad for PDAs. Anyhow, if you make a configurable design I will optimize it for the Psion: Pseudo-code: if( System.getMachine() == PSION ) then place window CENTER else place window EAST or something like this. Maybe you can try with a screen-resolution of 320x240 (!) and you will see if the design is usable. For me that's the essential point: Usability on the target-machine. Not a special layout-manager. Rüdiger |
|
From: Guido S. <gui...@ba...> - 2000-11-15 20:52:25
|
Am Mon, 13. Nov 2000 um 11:03:43 +0000 schrieb Vänersborgs Hängflygklubb: > Hello ! Hello Tomas, > Is it ok if the awt version of GUI contains the "Cardlayout style" and the > swing version the little more "space" demanding "new" style ? now that I digged a little around in Rüdigers code I have an other idea about the GUI configuration of the awt version. How about keeping the list views in the card layout and showing the graphics in separate windows (but without own menues)? I do not know whether the Psion will have enough space on its screen to display two windows like this, but may be this will work: +-------------------------------------------+ +------------------+ | File Flight View Options Help | | | +-------------------------------------------+ | | | Flight 1 | | | | Flight 2 | | | | Flight 3 | | Graphics | | Flight 4 | | | | Flight 5 | | | | Flight 6 | | | | Flight 7 | | | | Flight 8 | | | | Flight 9 | | | +-------------------------------------------+ +------------------+ Guido -- mailto:gui...@ba... http://www.bayernline.de/~gscholz/ |
|
From: Guido S. <gui...@ba...> - 2000-11-15 20:52:23
|
Am Thu, 09. Nov 2000 um 22:37:50 +0100 schrieb Guido Scholz: Hello all, > At last let me explain what I am doing now. I concentrate on the old > ConfigurationPanel splitting/joining it into functional parts: > > ConfigurationPanel --+--- SerialSetupDialog done > | > +--- SerialAccess in progress > | > +--- JFlight done this has finished now and the changes are on the repository. I have done also some little work on cleaning the code and some files were renamed. Guido -- mailto:gui...@ba... http://www.bayernline.de/~gscholz/ |
|
From: <rue...@we...> - 2000-11-13 21:41:07
|
Hi Tomas,
I don't know what solutions are possible, but I would like to have a simple
one ("awt-solution") regarding performance- and memory-requirements and
display-size too (please refer to the JFlight-specification). This may imply
that it is a kind of dead-end street. On the other hand there may be a
sophisticated application for desktop PCs. These two application-variants
shall use the same classes for Vario and GPS access and share the basic
functionality.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jfl...@li...
> [mailto:jfl...@li...]On Behalf Of Vänersborgs
> Hängflygklubb
> Sent: Montag, 13. November 2000 12:04
> To: jfl...@li...
> Subject: [Jflight-dev] Redesign and GUI
>
>
> Hello !
> Ok I will work on a solution where we can have diffrent GUI's
> instanciated
> depending on configuration parameters.
> (Add sublevels to gui (awt/swing), maybee...)
>
> Is it ok if the awt version of GUI contains the "Cardlayout
> style" and the
> swing version the little more "space" demanding "new" style ?
For me it's ok. Please discuss such topics with Guido for the next time. We
have agreed to give you the job of the "GUI-designer", so you can decide in
the end.
>
> I have not got cvs working yet, will try to get it work asap...
>
> //ToS
>
> Btw....
> Have done some work on an other proj. this weekend, a variometer
> proj. Have
> publiced the work on [www.torget.se/users/v/vhf/] under the menu
> "reportage", and "variometer bygge". All text in swedish, but if you are
> intrested, have a look....
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> http://profiles.msn.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Jflight-dev mailing list
> Jfl...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/jflight-dev
Regards
Rüdiger
|
|
From: Guido S. <gui...@ba...> - 2000-11-13 21:17:25
|
Am Mon, 13. Nov 2000 um 11:03:43 +0000 schrieb Vänersborgs Hängflygklubb: > Hello ! Hello Tomas, > Is it ok if the awt version of GUI contains the "Cardlayout style" and the > swing version the little more "space" demanding "new" style ? What about using of "JInternalFrame" under the swing version? It should be a good choise to make a Multi Document Interface (MDI). > I have not got cvs working yet, will try to get it work asap... I will make an update of the repository as soon as my changes are aprooved by Rüdiger (I have no GPS for testing at this time). For me they seem to be OK now. > Btw.... > Have done some work on an other proj. this weekend, a variometer proj. Have > publiced the work on [www.torget.se/users/v/vhf/] under the menu > "reportage", and "variometer bygge". All text in swedish, but if you are > intrested, have a look.... I will try. Guido -- mailto:gui...@ba... http://www.bayernline.de/~gscholz/ |
|
From: Vänersborgs H. <vh...@ho...> - 2000-11-13 11:03:54
|
Hello ! Ok I will work on a solution where we can have diffrent GUI's instanciated depending on configuration parameters. (Add sublevels to gui (awt/swing), maybee...) Is it ok if the awt version of GUI contains the "Cardlayout style" and the swing version the little more "space" demanding "new" style ? I have not got cvs working yet, will try to get it work asap... //ToS Btw.... Have done some work on an other proj. this weekend, a variometer proj. Have publiced the work on [www.torget.se/users/v/vhf/] under the menu "reportage", and "variometer bygge". All text in swedish, but if you are intrested, have a look.... _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
|
From: Guido S. <gui...@ba...> - 2000-11-11 06:50:35
|
Hi all,
here is a further proposal for a more comfortable way to configure the
JFlight application. What about commandline switches:
-l Language. Set the locale to this value, when differing from
automatically configuration.
Example:
-l de_DE
-d Directory. Set the workingdirectory to this path.
Example:
-d /home/guido/src/java/jflight
-f Flightbook. Load this flightbook by default.
Examples:
-f /home/guido/src/java/jflight/data/Urlaub2000.fbk
-f server:database (?)
Any comments?
Guido
--
mailto:gui...@ba...
http://www.bayernline.de/~gscholz/
|
|
From: <rue...@we...> - 2000-11-09 21:57:01
|
Hi Tomas and Guido,
I couldn't resist in checking Tomas' sources. My results so far:
Note: I'm using JBuilder 2.0 with Java 1.1.x on WNT 4.0
Compiling and executing after changing the setup: no problem
Executing: It seems to me that this is a GUI-redesign which is not yet
complete, just a proposal. Other windows pop up, but nothing (or wrong data)
appears. Windows cannot be closed once opened. Flightbook is written with
false data.
I like that GUI-redesign, especially the splitted sources. Looks smarter
too.
Restructuring of the sources: Makes sense.
Guido also works on some parts of the GUI. Please synchronize your work
soon. I will keep my fingers out for the next time (at least coding). If you
two can find a common ground for the redesign it's ok for me. Please write
down your basic ideas about that ("light design-spec").
Bed is waiting, too tired for deep thoughts ;-)
Rüdiger
|
|
From: Guido S. <gui...@ba...> - 2000-11-09 21:40:43
|
Hi Tomas,
I have got your zip file from Rüdiger and first of all, I am impressed
by your Java coding style. But never the less I had to fix some issues
before JBuilder 3.5 was successfull under Linux to run the build:
1) The zip file unwraps to the following directory structure:
JFlight
JFlight/common
JFlight/database
JFlight/gps
JFlight/gui
JFlight/vario
Due to the case sensibility of Unix, JBuilder got in trouble with import
statements like "import jflight.gui.*" and some (?) files were not found.
After renaming the base directory to "jflight" it worked.
2) I was not able to guess were I have to place the FlightBook.fbk file
so the application can find it. I edited FlightBook.java and changed
line 549 to:
in = new BufferedReader(new FileReader(System.getProperty("user.dir") +
System.getProperty("file.separator") + "FlightBook.fbk"));
This was necessary because the application commandline arguments are not
handled yet.
3) I am not sure whether the lines 27 to 35 in GuiHandler.java make sense
because StringRes will contain the strings in the default language
en_US (-> typo in line 27). Line 33 should be replaced by an error
message to stdout, may be followed by an exit(1).
Concerning your design proposal I am not sure if it is to my taste,
because I would like more the old "one window style" with the
CardLayout. The old style is more common because it is often used in
other applocations. But I see also the advantage of your multi-window
style, because the overview may be better.
Your new directory/package strukture seems to be OK for me. How will
you take into account that we in future will have pure awt
frames/dialogs beside swing in the repository?
At last let me explain what I am doing now. I concentrate on the old
ConfigurationPanel splitting/joining it into functional parts:
ConfigurationPanel --+--- SerialSetupDialog done
|
+--- SerialAccess in progress
|
+--- JFlight done
Guido
--
mailto:gui...@ba...
http://www.bayernline.de/~gscholz/
|
|
From: <rue...@we...> - 2000-11-08 20:28:05
|
Hi Tomas, great. I have passed the sources to Guido to check it, and I will try too until the weekend. Unfortunately Guido did some changes too, so there will be some confusiuon. So since we are working now with multiple developers on possibly the same code we all need some rules for the future to avoid such situations. Here are my suggestions: Changes / new code: - Minor changes and additions: Can be done without previous informations to the others. Update the documentation afterwards. - Major changes: Please specify what you want to do and synchronize with the others before starting (I hope there is some feedback). This specification and/or design-description will be used for the project documentation too. If it is a feature visible to users please write it in a way that normal users can understand, so we don't have to do the work twice. Guido maintains the spec. New design-doc should be added to the "doc" directory. I know that documentation is something every developer hates, but we really need it if we want to work together efficiently. CVS use: - Please make sure that you work on the newest code: cvs update / cvs update -d - Commit as soon as possible if the code is stable and tested as decribed below - Eventually it is helpful to create a branch on the CVS-tree for major changes and to merge the code later after some review. Testing: - Reference compilers are java 1.1.8 (a must) and 1.3.0 (if possible). - Compiling should be done with "-deprecated" flag too. If there is some deprecated code mark it in the source to show that this is intended / required for compatibility. Error-reporting: Use this simple standard-report scheme: Environment: Java 1.1.8 / 1.3 JFlight version: (!) Class(if possible): Description: Workaround: Fixed: yes/ Any ideas about all that? Tomas, which is the email-address to use for the jflight mailinglist? When you go on, please keep my suggestions from the previous mail in mind ;-) Please install CVS, if you haven't already done. Regards Rüdiger -----Original Message----- From: Vänersborgs Hängflygklubb [mailto:vh...@ho...] Sent: Dienstag, 7. November 2000 17:46 To: rue...@we... Subject: JFlight Hello ! I had some time today to try to rework the structure in JFlight. The focus are laid on trying to free the GUI parts from important code... I have also moved some of the classes that I suppose will be common to different GPS devices... to jflight.common I suggest that we have all data access through one class, so that migrating to a database solution some day just is a matter of exchanging that class. I have included a zip file with the files for you to check. If you like the work, I would like to continue with the GUI/Framework parts. /ToS ------------------------------------------------------------------ VÄNERSBORGS HÄNGFLYG KLUBB - PEGASUS [www.torget.se/users/v/vhfk] ------------------------------------------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. |
|
From: Guido S. <gui...@ba...> - 2000-11-01 13:10:56
|
Am Wed, 01. Nov 2000 um 13:36:05 +0100 schrieb Guido Scholz: Hi, changes of "jflight.jpr" are in repository. Please check. Guido -- mailto:gui...@ba... http://www.bayernline.de/~gscholz/ |
|
From: Guido S. <gui...@ba...> - 2000-11-01 12:37:20
|
Am Wed, 01. Nov 2000 um 11:39:54 +0100 schrieb Guido Scholz: [...] Hi, it is me again. Meanwhile I got things work doing the following steps: 1) Deleted "src/jflight/flightbook/FlightbookDialog.java". 2) Removed all files from the JBuilder project window (left side). 3) Added the package "jflight" to the project list. 4) Changed under "Project Properties" the main class to "jflight.main.Main" and added a path for "Application parameters". The build then ran propperly and the application started with some warnings about missing port setup and flightbook files. The bug with the missing german special charakters (äüö etc.) is still there, may be it is due to a bug in the jdk. I will try jdk-1.3 later. Guido -- mailto:gui...@ba... http://www.bayernline.de/~gscholz/ |
|
From: Guido S. <gui...@ba...> - 2000-11-01 10:41:56
|
Hi, after doing nothing for the project for month (I have to admit ;-), today I checked out the CVS to have a look to that Rüdiger has worked out. I tried to compile the project with JBuilder 3.5, jdk-1.2.2, Linux 2.2.17 and got a lot of errors. I do not know whether the project files of JBuilder 2.0 and 3.5 are fully compatible, but examining the "jflight.jpr" file I only found a poor list of files for the project. The whole list does only cover about 20 % of the current files. Rüdiger, do you really build jflight with this "jflight.jpr"? I am further wondering about "\jflight\awt\FlightbookDialog.java" which is not existing in this spelling. I found two files spelled similar: src/jflight/flightbook/FlightbookDialog.java src/jflight/awt/FlightBookDialog.java Do we need both? Guido -- mailto:gui...@ba... http://www.bayernline.de/~gscholz/ |