You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
(39) |
Feb
(258) |
Mar
(396) |
Apr
(439) |
May
(337) |
Jun
(351) |
Jul
(296) |
Aug
(205) |
Sep
(328) |
Oct
(174) |
Nov
(252) |
Dec
(172) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(213) |
Feb
(194) |
Mar
(337) |
Apr
(314) |
May
(373) |
Jun
(522) |
Jul
(417) |
Aug
(471) |
Sep
(486) |
Oct
(422) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(299) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(354) |
Feb
(310) |
Mar
(379) |
Apr
(349) |
May
(388) |
Jun
(218) |
Jul
(368) |
Aug
(340) |
Sep
(222) |
Oct
(176) |
Nov
(214) |
Dec
(211) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(221) |
Feb
(187) |
Mar
(190) |
Apr
(211) |
May
(114) |
Jun
(136) |
Jul
(124) |
Aug
(178) |
Sep
(244) |
Oct
(203) |
Nov
(215) |
Dec
(156) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(334) |
Feb
(268) |
Mar
(302) |
Apr
(309) |
May
(192) |
Jun
(288) |
Jul
(273) |
Aug
(215) |
Sep
(318) |
Oct
(347) |
Nov
(226) |
Dec
(265) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(192) |
Feb
(227) |
Mar
(311) |
Apr
(197) |
May
(224) |
Jun
(213) |
Jul
(285) |
Aug
(227) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(209) |
Nov
(169) |
Dec
(174) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(149) |
Feb
(112) |
Mar
(144) |
Apr
(204) |
May
(178) |
Jun
(155) |
Jul
(246) |
Aug
(221) |
Sep
(187) |
Oct
(262) |
Nov
(163) |
Dec
(158) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(256) |
Feb
(318) |
Mar
(307) |
Apr
(237) |
May
(202) |
Jun
(105) |
Jul
(131) |
Aug
(107) |
Sep
(153) |
Oct
(165) |
Nov
(159) |
Dec
(189) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(202) |
Feb
(150) |
Mar
(151) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(56) |
Jun
(115) |
Jul
(103) |
Aug
(150) |
Sep
(141) |
Oct
(187) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(105) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(128) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(64) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(92) |
Jun
(91) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(145) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(69) |
Nov
(98) |
Dec
(149) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(44) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(78) |
May
(138) |
Jun
(132) |
Jul
(151) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(107) |
Oct
(168) |
Nov
(88) |
Dec
(94) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(51) |
Feb
(153) |
Mar
(141) |
Apr
(102) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(87) |
Aug
(39) |
Sep
(67) |
Oct
(84) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(55) |
Feb
(96) |
Mar
(79) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(57) |
Aug
(76) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(68) |
Dec
(61) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(98) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(57) |
May
(58) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(52) |
Dec
(48) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(67) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(92) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(34) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(68) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(63) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(26) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(98) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(62) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(20) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(25) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(36) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
|
Aug
(17) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(10) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2026 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Vernon J. S. <ve...@ve...> - 2005-10-28 00:58:10
|
1. Check your firewall settings. 2. Make sure your ip route is setup correctly. 3. You can do an alternative down/upgrade by typing=20 rpm -Uvh http://kent.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/webadmin/webmin-1.240-1.noarch= .rp m 4. Or you can do a wget http://kent.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/webadmin/webmin-1.240-1.noarch= .rp m then type rpm -Uvh webadmin/webmin-1.240-1.noarch.rpm See if any of those methods can help you get the updated version. ------------------------------------------ Vernon J. Spangler http://www.vernonspangler.org/ (573) 221-5193 Home (573) 795-4217 Cell ve...@ve... ------------------------------------------ =A0 Powered by Windows XP Professional =A0=A0=A0 Sent by Microsoft Outlook 2003 ________________________________________ From: Cory [mailto:co...@di...]=20 Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 6:40 PM To: webmin Subject: [webmin-l] upgrade Hi all Why is it that when I try to do a webmin upgrade from with in webmin it always times out same thing with the update feature.=A0=20 I am using Mepis if that helps. Thanks for any help Cory |
|
From: Cory <co...@di...> - 2005-10-28 00:43:36
|
Hi all =20 Why is it that when I try to do a webmin upgrade from with in webmin it = always times out same thing with the update feature. =20 I am using Mepis if that helps. Thanks for any help =20 =20 Cory |
|
From: Enrique T. <enr...@gm...> - 2005-10-27 15:44:55
|
Hi all: One easy question: When using the custom commands module and trying to make a sql command, I don't know how to introduce a parameter in the sql command. What I'm trying to do is: select * from $table or select * from :table Where "table" is the parameter. What am I doing wrong? Thanks |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2005-10-27 11:43:58
|
On 27/Oct/2005 20:57 Vern wrote .. > Just something I thought I should point out as I'm sure it was an oversite > but in > Virtualmin under "Backup Virtual Servers" > "Backup destination" under > both the FTP > and SSH passwords are showing while you type them and after you save them > and return. > Just a bad idea to have passwords showing ever, IMHO. Thanks for pointing that out .. I will fix this in the next release. - Jamie |
|
From: Vern <ve...@cw...> - 2005-10-27 10:58:14
|
Just something I thought I should point out as I'm sure it was an oversite but in Virtualmin under "Backup Virtual Servers" > "Backup destination" under both the FTP and SSH passwords are showing while you type them and after you save them and return. Just a bad idea to have passwords showing ever, IMHO. Vern |
|
From: Craig W. <cra...@az...> - 2005-10-27 04:20:16
|
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 13:58 +1000, Jamie Cameron wrote: > On 27/Oct/2005 10:42 Craig White wrote .. > > On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 09:34 +1000, Jamie Cameron wrote: > > > On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 04:19, Craig White wrote: > > > > Something changed in the last few versions of LDAP Users and Groups > > > > module and I can't figure out where it changed. > > > > > > > > I previously automatically added the sambaPrimaryGroupSID via config: > > > > LDAP properties for new Samba users > > > > > > > > If I create a new user now, that fails because... > > > > Failed to save user : Failed to add user to LDAP database : > > > > sambaprimarygroupsid: multiple values provided > > > > > > > > OK - so I remove the automatic entry from config but now the > > > > sambaPrimaryGroupSID is set to S-1-5....-2000 instead of S-1-5...-513 > > > > and I can't figure out where that is coming from. Any clues? > > > > > > In the current release of Webmin, that attribute is set automatically. > > > The value is always DOMAIN-XXX , where XXX is the Unix GID*2+1000 . > > > > > > Let me know if this doesn't seem correct, as I am not too familiar with > > > the real purpose of this attribute :-) > > ---- > > that's really bugging me - I don't know how other people handle > > this. > > > > Your concept is fine except for one thing...well known RID's > > > > Link to samba documentation > > http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO- > > Collection/groupmapping.html#WKURIDS > > > > The concept is if you want all new users to automatically be a > > member of "Domain Users" - their sambaPrimaryGroupSID, then it would > > have an RID (Relative ID) of 513 so the SID: > > S-1-5-21-XXXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXXX-513 > > ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ > > | | > > |------< RID > > | > > | > > | |--------< Unique to > > each domain > > | > > |-----< Domain Group (not local) > > > > since the 513 is the Well known RID for the Domain Group "Domain > > Users" - some people (if not most) would have the default > > sambaPrimaryGroupSID be that one. > > > > I can't answer for what other people do. Perhaps it would be best to > > have this configurable by the administrator (the value of > > sambaPrimaryGroupSID). > > > > Thanks > > > > Craig > Ah .. so should the sambaPrimaryGroupSID be the same for all users? > Because that is not what Webmin does currently .. and it sounds like I > should fix this. ---- that was my motivation for bringing it up. With samba group mapping, I could get that same thing done 2 different ways - the first being the extra properties automatically entered and the second being the POSIX group membership which is mapped to the same. I preferred to leave nothing to chance and insert it directly into LDAP since it is possible to change the primary POSIX group membership in an unthinking minute. As soon as you added this feature, you defeated both of them. If it makes sense to you, I would suggest that you either drop it (like it was a version or 3 ago in Webmin) or have it configurable in its own field in the module config. Either of these options is highly preferable to something that I can't configure which means that I have to create the user and then go back and fix it. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2005-10-27 03:58:50
|
On 27/Oct/2005 10:42 Craig White wrote .. <blockquote type=3D"cite"> On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 09:34 +1000, Jamie Cameron wrote: <blockquote type=3D"CITE"> <pre><font color=3D"#000000">On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 04:19, Craig White wrote:</font> <font color=3D"#000000">> Something changed in the last few versions of LDAP Users and Groups</font> <font color=3D"#000000">> module and I can't figure out where it changed.</font> <font color=3D"#000000">> </font> <font color=3D"#000000">> I previously automatically added the sambaPrimaryGroupSID via config:</font> <font color=3D"#000000">> LDAP properties for new Samba users</font> <font color=3D"#000000">> </font> <font color=3D"#000000">> If I create a new user now, that fails because...</font> <font color=3D"#000000">> Failed to save user : Failed to add user to LDAP database :</font> <font color=3D"#000000">> sambaprimarygroupsid: multiple values provided</font> <font color=3D"#000000">> </font> <font color=3D"#000000">> OK - so I remove the automatic entry from config but now the</font> <font color=3D"#000000">> sambaPrimaryGroupSID is set to S-1-5....-2000 instead of S-1-5...-513</font> <font color=3D"#000000">> and I can't figure out where that is coming from. Any clues?</font> <font color=3D"#000000">In the current release of Webmin, that attribute is set automatically.</font> <font color=3D"#000000">The value is always DOMAIN-XXX , where XXX is the Unix GID*2+1000 .</font> <font color=3D"#000000">Let me know if this doesn't seem correct, as I am not too familiar with</font> <font color=3D"#000000">the real purpose of this attribute :-)</font> </pre> </blockquote> ----<br /> that's really bugging me - I don't know how other people handle this.<br /> <br /> Your concept is fine except for one thing...well known RID's<br /> <br /> Link to samba documentation<br /> <a href=3D"http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/groupmapping.html#WKURIDS">http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/groupmapping.html#WKURIDS</a><br /> <br /> The concept is if you want all new users to automatically be a member of "Domain Users" - their sambaPrimaryGroupSID, then it would have an RID (Relative ID) of 513 so the SID:<br /> S-1-5-21-XXXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXXX-513<br /> ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^<br /> =A0=A0=A0=A0 |=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 |=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 |------< RID<br /> =A0=A0=A0=A0 |=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 |=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 <br /> =A0=A0=A0=A0 |=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 |--------< Unique to each domain<br /> =A0=A0=A0=A0 |<br /> =A0=A0=A0=A0 |-----< Domain Group (not local)<br /> <br /> since the 513 is the Well known RID for the Domain Group "Domain Users" - some people (if not most) would have the default sambaPrimaryGroupSID be that one.<br /> <br /> I can't answer for what other people do. Perhaps it would be best to have this configurable by the administrator (the value of sambaPrimaryGroupSID).<br /> <br /> Thanks<br /> <br /> Craig </blockquote>Ah .. so should the sambaPrimaryGroupSID be the same for all users? Because that is not what Webmin does currently .. and it sounds like I should fix this.<br /><br />=A0- Jamie<br /><br /> |
|
From: Craig W. <cra...@az...> - 2005-10-27 00:42:26
|
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 09:34 +1000, Jamie Cameron wrote: > On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 04:19, Craig White wrote: > > Something changed in the last few versions of LDAP Users and Groups > > module and I can't figure out where it changed. > > > > I previously automatically added the sambaPrimaryGroupSID via config: > > LDAP properties for new Samba users > > > > If I create a new user now, that fails because... > > Failed to save user : Failed to add user to LDAP database : > > sambaprimarygroupsid: multiple values provided > > > > OK - so I remove the automatic entry from config but now the > > sambaPrimaryGroupSID is set to S-1-5....-2000 instead of S-1-5...-513 > > and I can't figure out where that is coming from. Any clues? > > In the current release of Webmin, that attribute is set automatically. > The value is always DOMAIN-XXX , where XXX is the Unix GID*2+1000 . > > Let me know if this doesn't seem correct, as I am not too familiar with > the real purpose of this attribute :-) ---- that's really bugging me - I don't know how other people handle this. Your concept is fine except for one thing...well known RID's Link to samba documentation http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO- Collection/groupmapping.html#WKURIDS The concept is if you want all new users to automatically be a member of "Domain Users" - their sambaPrimaryGroupSID, then it would have an RID (Relative ID) of 513 so the SID: S-1-5-21-XXXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXXX-513 ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^ | | |------< RID | | | |--------< Unique to each domain | |-----< Domain Group (not local) since the 513 is the Well known RID for the Domain Group "Domain Users" - some people (if not most) would have the default sambaPrimaryGroupSID be that one. I can't answer for what other people do. Perhaps it would be best to have this configurable by the administrator (the value of sambaPrimaryGroupSID). Thanks Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2005-10-26 23:35:15
|
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 04:19, Craig White wrote: > Something changed in the last few versions of LDAP Users and Groups > module and I can't figure out where it changed. > > I previously automatically added the sambaPrimaryGroupSID via config: > LDAP properties for new Samba users > > If I create a new user now, that fails because... > Failed to save user : Failed to add user to LDAP database : > sambaprimarygroupsid: multiple values provided > > OK - so I remove the automatic entry from config but now the > sambaPrimaryGroupSID is set to S-1-5....-2000 instead of S-1-5...-513 > and I can't figure out where that is coming from. Any clues? In the current release of Webmin, that attribute is set automatically. The value is always DOMAIN-XXX , where XXX is the Unix GID*2+1000 . Let me know if this doesn't seem correct, as I am not too familiar with the real purpose of this attribute :-) - Jamie |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2005-10-26 23:28:21
|
Hi Bradley, I had a look at the code, and I can see how this could happen.. If the monitor gets notified that it will receive a packet but doesn't actually, it will fail as you described. The work-around is to edit the file status/ping-monitor.pl and insert the following at line 114: next if (!$from_saddr); Let me know if that works.. - Jamie On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 01:46, Bradley Jonas wrote: > Hi all... > > I set up a ping monitor through the Server/System Status pages and due > to some glitches, the ping-monitor perl script is bombing with: > > > Error - Perl execution failed > > Bad arg length for Socket::unpack_sockaddr_in, length is 0, should be 16 at ping-monitor.pl line 114. > > > Anyway - I'm not sure how to fix it considering that the IP that I provided is def. not 0 length. > I figured I'd try to remove the monitor, but I can't find any record of it in the /status/services directory. > > I've grepped through all of the files in the webmin directory and I can't find any reference to it. > > Any ideas on how to fix or remove this monitor? > > Thanks > B > > > > -- > "Look at him.....he runs like a Welshman........doesn't he run like a > Welshman?" > -Stewart Gilligan Griffin |
|
From: Craig W. <cra...@az...> - 2005-10-26 18:19:55
|
Something changed in the last few versions of LDAP Users and Groups module and I can't figure out where it changed. I previously automatically added the sambaPrimaryGroupSID via config: LDAP properties for new Samba users If I create a new user now, that fails because... Failed to save user : Failed to add user to LDAP database : sambaprimarygroupsid: multiple values provided OK - so I remove the automatic entry from config but now the sambaPrimaryGroupSID is set to S-1-5....-2000 instead of S-1-5...-513 and I can't figure out where that is coming from. Any clues? Thanks Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. |
|
From: Vern <ve...@cw...> - 2005-10-26 17:45:19
|
> Dumb question, but did you restart bind after that change? I even restarted the computer! |
|
From: Bradley J. <big...@gm...> - 2005-10-26 16:36:51
|
Sure: HTTP/1.0 500 Perl execution failed Server: MiniServ/0.01 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 15:38:56 GMT Content-type: text/html Connection: close Error - Perl execution failed Bad arg length for Socket::unpack_sockaddr_in, length is 0, should be 16 at ping-monitor.pl line 114. Now if I try to edit that monitor, I see the same thing. Thanks! On 10/26/05, Martin Mewes <mm...@me...> wrote: > > Hello, > > Bradley Jonas <big...@gm...> wrote: > > > Webmin Version 1.240 running on Fedora 3. > > > > > some glitches, the ping-monitor perl script is bombing with: > > > > Error - Perl execution failed > > Sorry I forgot, would it be possible for you to paste the entire error to > the audience? > > bis dahin/kind regards > > Martin Mewes > > -- > Webmin Translation Team -> http://webmin.mamemu.de/ > Translators wanted -> tra...@we... > Mailinglist mboxes -> http://mbox.mewes.tv/mbox/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. > Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course > Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 > Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at > web...@li... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > -- "Look at him.....he runs like a Welshman........doesn't he run like a Welshman?" -Stewart Gilligan Griffin |
|
From: Martin M. <mm...@me...> - 2005-10-26 16:30:09
|
Hello, Bradley Jonas <big...@gm...> wrote: > Webmin Version 1.240 running on Fedora 3. > > > some glitches, the ping-monitor perl script is bombing with: > > > Error - Perl execution failed Sorry I forgot, would it be possible for you to paste the entire error to the audience? bis dahin/kind regards Martin Mewes -- Webmin Translation Team -> http://webmin.mamemu.de/ Translators wanted -> tra...@we... Mailinglist mboxes -> http://mbox.mewes.tv/mbox/ |
|
From: Bradley J. <big...@gm...> - 2005-10-26 16:23:07
|
Sorry ;) Webmin Version 1.240 running on Fedora 3. Thanks On 10/26/05, Martin Mewes <mm...@me...> wrote: > > Hello, > > Bradley Jonas <big...@gm...> wrote: > > > I set up a ping monitor through the Server/System Status pages and due > to > > some glitches, the ping-monitor perl script is bombing with: > > Error - Perl execution failed > > Would you please be so kind and tell the audience which Webmin version an= d > which OS is affected here? > > > bis dahin/kind regards > > Martin Mewes > > -- > Sicherheitsmeldungen fuer SuSE Linux bekommt man hier: > sus...@su... > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. > Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course > Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 > Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at > web...@li... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > -- "Look at him.....he runs like a Welshman........doesn't he run like a Welshman?" -Stewart Gilligan Griffin |
|
From: Martin M. <mm...@me...> - 2005-10-26 16:19:45
|
Hi Jason, Jason Self <jas...@gm...> wrote: > setrgid() According to http://www.hmug.org/man/3/setrgid.php it is a standard C library, but [...] The setruid() and setrgid() syscalls appeared in 4.2BSD and were dropped in 4.4BSD. [...] whilst that page is coming from [...] Mac OS X 10.4 - Generated Fri Apr 29 07:43:29 CDT 2005 [...] so you may need to upgrade or wait for someone to understand http://www.osxfaq.com/man/1/perldiag.ws bis dahin/kind regards Martin Mewes -- FAQ fuer sus...@su... -> http://www.suse-faq.de.vu/ FAQ fuer deb...@li... -> http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ |
|
From: Martin M. <mm...@me...> - 2005-10-26 16:19:45
|
Hi Cory, "Cory" <co...@di...> wrote: > I have several servers setup either running Fedora Care 3 or Mepis > Migrationserver. When I go into webmin and try to upgrade to 1.240 from > either 1.210 or 1.230 previous. I get an error webmin cant downgrade. > No I am choosing to upgrade from www.webmin.com. Reach for http://webmin.mamemu.de/devel/tarballs/webmin-1.240.tar.gz and try to upgrade from the command line. bis dahin/kind regards Martin Mewes -- FAQ fuer sus...@su... -> http://www.suse-faq.de.vu/ FAQ fuer deb...@li... -> http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ |
|
From: Martin M. <mm...@me...> - 2005-10-26 16:19:44
|
Hello,
"Vern" <ve...@cw...> wrote:
> I keep getting the following message from Bind and am wondering if anyone
> knows anything about this:
>
> no more recursive clients: quota reached
>
> I'm running a Fedora Core 3 box with BIND version 9.2.5 and I have read
> that version 9 has limited queries and you need to modify Bind by adding
> the following:
>
> options {
> recursive-clients 5000;
> };
>
> I assume this goes in the /etc/named.conf file, but I am still getting
> the message. I even uped the value to 21000 and am still having the
> problem. Anyone?
Dump question, but did you restart bind after that change?
bis dahin/kind regards
Martin Mewes
--
Webmin Translation Team -> http://webmin.mamemu.de/
Translators wanted -> tra...@we...
Mailinglist mboxes -> http://mbox.mewes.tv/mbox/
|
|
From: Martin M. <mm...@me...> - 2005-10-26 16:19:44
|
Hello, Bradley Jonas <big...@gm...> wrote: > I set up a ping monitor through the Server/System Status pages and due to > some glitches, the ping-monitor perl script is bombing with: > Error - Perl execution failed Would you please be so kind and tell the audience which Webmin version and which OS is affected here? bis dahin/kind regards Martin Mewes -- Sicherheitsmeldungen fuer SuSE Linux bekommt man hier: sus...@su... |
|
From: Bradley J. <big...@gm...> - 2005-10-26 15:46:20
|
Hi all... I set up a ping monitor through the Server/System Status pages and due to some glitches, the ping-monitor perl script is bombing with: Error - Perl execution failed Bad arg length for Socket::unpack_sockaddr_in, length is 0, should be 16 at ping-monitor.pl line 114. Anyway - I'm not sure how to fix it considering that the IP that I provided is def. not 0 length. I figured I'd try to remove the monitor, but I can't find any record of it in the /status/services directory. I've grepped through all of the files in the webmin directory and I can't find any reference to it. Any ideas on how to fix or remove this monitor? Thanks B -- "Look at him.....he runs like a Welshman........doesn't he run like a Welshman?" -Stewart Gilligan Griffin |
|
From: Jason S. <jas...@gm...> - 2005-10-26 15:26:09
|
Webmin 1.240 Mac OS X Server 10.3.9 If I access the module for scheduled cron jobs and click on the Run Now button, I get this: HTTP/1.0 500 Perl execution failed Server: MiniServ/0.01 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:42:16 GMT Content-type: text/html Connection: close Error - Perl execution failed setrgid() not implemented at /usr/local/webmin/cron/exec_cron.cgi line 41. Suggestions? |
|
From: E. K. \(D. ICT\) <e.k...@do...> - 2005-10-26 07:48:25
|
Hello everybody, =20 I have a question about the Bind Module. I have 1 Master Server en 1 Slave Server. I have setup Zone Defaults. It is working fine. But when i do a transfer to the slave, the record on the Slave looks more professional. How does this come? Also the mx record is very is different? This is the zone default for the mx record on the Master Server. =20 Recordname Type value @ Mail Server 10 mail =20 =20 =20 The Master file looks like this; =20 $ttl 38400 test.net. IN SOA ns.testing.net. postmaster.test.net. ( 1130312080 14400 3600 604800 38400 ) test.net. IN NS ns.testing.net. @ IN NS ns2.testing.net. @ IN MX 10 mail mail IN A 192.168.1.10 www IN A 192.168.1.11 =20 =20 The Slave looks like this; =20 =20 $ORIGIN . $TTL 38400 ; 10 hours 40 minutes test.net IN SOA ns.testing.net. postmaster.test.net. ( 1130312080 ; serial 14400 ; refresh (4 hours) 3600 ; retry (1 hour) 604800 ; expire (1 week) 38400 ; minimum (10 hours 40 minutes) ) NS ns.testing.net. NS ns2.testing.net. MX 10 mail.test.net. $ORIGIN test.net. mail A 192.168.1.10 www A 192.168.1.11 =20 Grtz Erwin =20 =20 ********* DISCLAIMER ********* De informatie verzonden met dit e-mail bericht is uitsluitend bestemd = voor de geadresseerde. Gebruik van deze informatie door anderen dan de = geadresseerde is verboden. Openbaarmaking, vermenigvuldiging, = verspreiding en/of verstrekking van deze informatie aan derden is niet = toegestaan. Domino ICT staat niet in voor de juiste en volledige = overbrenging van de inhoud, noch voor tijdige ontvangst daarvan. The information contained in this communication is confidential and may = be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the = individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorised to = receive it. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby = notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action = in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited = and may be unlawful. Domino ICT is neither liable for the proper and = complete transmission of the information, nor for any delay in its = receipt. |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2005-10-25 22:52:34
|
Hi Dale, Have you tried using the Apply Configuration button on the main page of the BIND module instead? It should force a transfer of all slave zones .. When you click it, check for new entries in /var/log/messages from BIND to see if the zone transfer failed for any reason. - Jamie -----Original Message----- From: Dale-List <li...@eh...> Subj: [webmin-l] can't get bind within Webmin to do a zone transfer from DNS on Windows Date: Wed 26 Oct 2005 1:53 am Size: 1K To: web...@li... Hello, I have been pulling what is left of my hair out here :) Currently our primary DNS is running on a windows box using MS DNS. I am trying to get our secondary setup on a Linux box running BIND and Webmin. I have allowed the IP of our Linux box in the windows DNS setup to do a zone transfer, yet I get the following error when I do a force update from within the bind module in Webmin: NDC command failed: rndc: connect failed: connection refused No entries in the system logs. I am not sure where to check from here. I do not believe there are any firewall issues involved here (although I could be very wrong). Thanks ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information - Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li... To remove yourself from this list, go to http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list |
|
From: Cary R. <ca...@ca...> - 2005-10-25 20:29:41
|
At 12:53 PM 10/25/2005, you wrote: >----- Original Message ----- From: "Cary Robinson" <ca...@ca...> >To: <web...@li...> >Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 1:40 PM >Subject: Re: [webmin-l] Creating Samba Machine Account > > >>I'm re-posting this hoping for an answer. Figured it got lost in all the >>other excitement the first time I posted it. >> >>Thanks >> >> >>At 02:13 PM 10/21/2005, you wrote: >> >> >>>I've been playing around trying to manually add a machine account on a >>>RedHat Enterprise box. It used to work when I was using RedHat 9, but >>>now I get an invalid name error. >>> >>>Here is the command I am using, and the error it gives me. >>> >>>useradd -r -g trust -d /dev/null -s /dev/null 'test$' >>>Invalid User Name 'test$' >>> >>> >>>Does anybody know of a work around for this ? >>> >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Cary >>> >>> >>>ps... Sorry for the off topicness >> > >My system says that if you use the -r, you must use the -m option. >This is a RED HAT option, as stated in the man pages. > >Steve Campbell >cam...@cn... >Charleston Newspapers The -m option only must be used if you want to create a home directory for the machine account. I tried it anyway though.. Same error...... |
|
From: Steve C. <cam...@cn...> - 2005-10-25 17:53:49
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Cary Robinson" <ca...@ca...> To: <web...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 1:40 PM Subject: Re: [webmin-l] Creating Samba Machine Account > I'm re-posting this hoping for an answer. Figured it got lost in all the > other excitement the first time I posted it. > > Thanks > > > At 02:13 PM 10/21/2005, you wrote: > > >>I've been playing around trying to manually add a machine account on a >>RedHat Enterprise box. It used to work when I was using RedHat 9, but now >>I get an invalid name error. >> >>Here is the command I am using, and the error it gives me. >> >>useradd -r -g trust -d /dev/null -s /dev/null 'test$' >>Invalid User Name 'test$' >> >> >>Does anybody know of a work around for this ? >> >> >>Thanks, >>Cary >> >> >>ps... Sorry for the off topicness > > My system says that if you use the -r, you must use the -m option. This is a RED HAT option, as stated in the man pages. Steve Campbell cam...@cn... Charleston Newspapers |