You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
(39) |
Feb
(258) |
Mar
(396) |
Apr
(439) |
May
(337) |
Jun
(351) |
Jul
(296) |
Aug
(205) |
Sep
(328) |
Oct
(174) |
Nov
(252) |
Dec
(172) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(213) |
Feb
(194) |
Mar
(337) |
Apr
(314) |
May
(373) |
Jun
(522) |
Jul
(417) |
Aug
(471) |
Sep
(486) |
Oct
(422) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(299) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(354) |
Feb
(310) |
Mar
(379) |
Apr
(349) |
May
(388) |
Jun
(218) |
Jul
(368) |
Aug
(340) |
Sep
(222) |
Oct
(176) |
Nov
(214) |
Dec
(211) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(221) |
Feb
(187) |
Mar
(190) |
Apr
(211) |
May
(114) |
Jun
(136) |
Jul
(124) |
Aug
(178) |
Sep
(244) |
Oct
(203) |
Nov
(215) |
Dec
(156) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(334) |
Feb
(268) |
Mar
(302) |
Apr
(309) |
May
(192) |
Jun
(288) |
Jul
(273) |
Aug
(215) |
Sep
(318) |
Oct
(347) |
Nov
(226) |
Dec
(265) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(192) |
Feb
(227) |
Mar
(311) |
Apr
(197) |
May
(224) |
Jun
(213) |
Jul
(285) |
Aug
(227) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(209) |
Nov
(169) |
Dec
(174) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(149) |
Feb
(112) |
Mar
(144) |
Apr
(204) |
May
(178) |
Jun
(155) |
Jul
(246) |
Aug
(221) |
Sep
(187) |
Oct
(262) |
Nov
(163) |
Dec
(158) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(256) |
Feb
(318) |
Mar
(307) |
Apr
(237) |
May
(202) |
Jun
(105) |
Jul
(131) |
Aug
(107) |
Sep
(153) |
Oct
(165) |
Nov
(159) |
Dec
(189) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(202) |
Feb
(150) |
Mar
(151) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(56) |
Jun
(115) |
Jul
(103) |
Aug
(150) |
Sep
(141) |
Oct
(187) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(105) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(128) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(64) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(92) |
Jun
(91) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(145) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(69) |
Nov
(98) |
Dec
(149) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(44) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(78) |
May
(138) |
Jun
(132) |
Jul
(151) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(107) |
Oct
(168) |
Nov
(88) |
Dec
(94) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(51) |
Feb
(153) |
Mar
(141) |
Apr
(102) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(87) |
Aug
(39) |
Sep
(67) |
Oct
(84) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(55) |
Feb
(96) |
Mar
(79) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(57) |
Aug
(76) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(68) |
Dec
(61) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(98) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(57) |
May
(58) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(52) |
Dec
(48) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(67) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(92) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(34) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(68) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(63) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(26) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(98) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(62) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(20) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(25) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(36) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
|
Aug
(17) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(10) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2026 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Dale L. <li...@eh...> - 2005-12-21 18:27:39
|
Hello, There is an option on a zone by zone basis that lets you convert a slave zone to a master and a master to a slave zone. How difficult would this be to add when viewing all domains so one could convert a bunch of domains at once? The reason I am asking is we are moving from MS DNS (yes I know!) to Bind on a Webmin administrated box. Our plan for now is to set all the zones up as secondaries (using the import function) then we need to convert them all to master zones once we bring the MS DNS machine down. Any suggestions welcome. Dale |
|
From: <and...@fr...> - 2005-12-21 15:18:26
|
I am trying to install webmin on a Windows box. I installed ActivePerl-5.8.7.815-MSWin32-x86-211909.msi nmake15 for Windows Process.exe sc.exe Then, via MCPAN: perl -MCPAN -e "install Win32::Daemon::Simple" Which requires other two modules (automatically downloaded and nmake processed.) Now if I run again perl -MCPAN -e "install Win32::Daemon::Simple" the answer is CPAN: Storable loaded ok Going to read \.cpan\Metadata Database was generated on Wed, 21 Dec 2005 08:08:29 GMT Win32::Daemon::Simple is up to date. If I run perl setup.pl, then choose d:\etc\webmin and d:\var\webmin, I see a lot of error (i think about 75, the number of OS available....) then in C:\temp I find the file 973876_1_ , containing C:\temp>type 973876_1_ os_type='windows' os_version='xp' real_os_type='Windows' real_os_version='XP' Everything is ok till now. and I see (very last lines of setup.pl output:) ...(omissis) Operating system name: Windows Operating system version: XP ERROR: The Perl module Win32::Daemon::Simple must be installed to run Webmin on Windows What can I try to do ???? thanks in advance, Andrea Chi ricevesse questa mail per errore e' gentilmente pregato di cancellarla. Visitate il sito http://www.frameweb.it |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2005-12-20 23:00:28
|
You can get an old version of the default theme (without any sponsor logos) from : http://www.webmin.com/download/modules/old-mscstyle3.wbm.gz - Jamie On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 03:38, SafelistSmart Support wrote: > I don't mean to sound unappreciative of any input they have had on the > Usermin/Webmin project, but is it possible to remove the OpenCountry > logo from the UserMin MSC.Linux theme? > > Regards, Mike Ingram > |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2005-12-20 22:59:18
|
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 03:33, SafelistSmart Support wrote: > The Read Mail module in Webmin allows the addition of a "delete all mail" > button for the account holder's use. I would really like to have that > option in UserMin, and can't seem to find it. I am on Usermin version 1.180 > and have the most recent Read Mail module installed as of today 12/20/2005. Unfortunately there is no way to do this at the moment .. however, the next release of Usermin will include a preferences page option to enable the 'Delete All' button, which will appear below the mail list. - Jamie |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2005-12-20 21:53:41
|
Yes, that is correct.. also, it removes the module from all user's access control lists.
- Jamie
-----Original Message-----
From: "Grant Peel" <gp...@th...>
Subj: [webmin-l] Deleting a Module
Date: Wed 21 Dec 2005 12:57 am
Size: 760 bytes
To: <web...@li...>
Hi all,
Simple question:
When deleting a module, and Webmin asks me if I want to remove the ACL
and config, is it really asking me if I want to remove the
/etc/webmin/modulename dir ? i.e. the local config files for that module?
-Grant
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
-
Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li...
To remove yourself from this list, go to
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list
|
|
From: SafelistSmart S. <saf...@co...> - 2005-12-20 16:38:22
|
I don't mean to sound unappreciative of any input they have had on the = Usermin/Webmin project, but is it possible to remove the OpenCountry = logo from the UserMin MSC.Linux theme? =20 Regards, Mike Ingram |
|
From: SafelistSmart S. <saf...@co...> - 2005-12-20 16:33:51
|
The Read Mail module in Webmin allows the addition of a "delete all mail" button for the account holder's use. I would really like to have that option in UserMin, and can't seem to find it. I am on Usermin version 1.180 and have the most recent Read Mail module installed as of today 12/20/2005. Regards, Mike Ingram |
|
From: Grant P. <gp...@th...> - 2005-12-20 13:56:52
|
Hi all,
Simple question:
When deleting a module, and Webmin asks me if I want to remove the ACL
and config, is it really asking me if I want to remove the
/etc/webmin/modulename dir ? i.e. the local config files for that module?
-Grant
|
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2005-12-20 11:26:57
|
On 20/Dec/2005 20:04 Unknown Questions wrote .. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jamie Cameron" <jca...@we...> > To: <web...@li...> > Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 1:36 AM > Subject: Re: [webmin-l] bind doesn't update slave & SPF > > > > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 09:43, Unknown Questions wrote: > >> Hi Jamie > >> > >> i just wanted to highlight the 2 Bind problems i've spotted & mentioned > >> in > >> my previous post > >> just in case you missed it when John was explaining the merits (or not) > >> of > >> using SPF records > >> > >> when i create or update a Master Bind record on server 1 and include > an > >> SFP > >> record > >> that SPF / TXT record does NOT get sent across to / updated on the Slave > >> Bind record on server 2 > > > > I didn't see that discussion, but I'm not sure how this could be caused > > by Webmin. The actual transfer of records from a master to slave is done > > completely by BIND, and in all the instanced I have seen it either > > transfers all records, or none of them. > > > > Hi Jamie > > my original post said > >>> > looking at the slave bind record via > https://slaveIP:10000/bind8/edit_slave.cgi?index=NNN > it only shows the TXT record field as being empty > > but looking at the slave bind record via > https://slaveIP:10000/bind8/view_text.cgi?index=NNN&view= > does show the line > TXT "v=spf1 a mx ~all" > <<< > > so it would appear - as you said - that the SPF record *is* beign transferd > across to the slave > > but Webmin *is not* showing it in the Bind module Ah .. you are right, that is definately a Webmin bug. I will fix this in the next release.. - Jamie |
|
From: <and...@fr...> - 2005-12-20 09:15:56
|
Thank you very much.
I installed the patch and everything is OK now.
Andrea
Jamie Cameron
<jcameron@webmin.
com> To
Sent by: web...@li...
webadmin-list-adm cc
in...@li...
rge.net Subject
Re: [webmin-l] apply configuration
button missing
19/12/2005 23.34
Please respond to
webadmin-list@lis
ts.sourceforge.ne
t
Thanks for pointing this out .. this is a bug in the module that only
effects SuSE 10.0. However, if you download the updated module from
http://www.webmin.com/updates.html the button should appear..
- Jamie
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 00:29, and...@fr... wrote:
> Hi all,
> I just installed webmin 1.250 on a newly installed Suse Linux 10 box.
>
> I installed the webmin-1.250-1.noarch.rpm package
>
> Everything is OK, as it ever was, but if I go to Network configuration,
> Network Interfaces, I cannot see the "Apply configuration" button.
>
> (I have 2 network cards configured, both static ip address and startup at
> boot time.)
>
> No problems with the same package on Suse Linux 8.1, 9.2 and 9.3 (but all
> of theme were updated, not fresh installed...)
>
> Any help will be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Andrea
>
> Chi ricevesse questa mail per errore e' gentilmente pregato di
cancellarla.
>
> Visitate il sito http://www.frameweb.it
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
files
> for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
> searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
> -
> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at
web...@li...
> To remove yourself from this list, go to
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
-
Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li...
To remove yourself from this list, go to
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list
|
|
From: Unknown Q. <web...@un...> - 2005-12-20 09:04:21
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jamie Cameron" <jca...@we...> To: <web...@li...> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 1:36 AM Subject: Re: [webmin-l] bind doesn't update slave & SPF > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 09:43, Unknown Questions wrote: >> Hi Jamie >> >> i just wanted to highlight the 2 Bind problems i've spotted & mentioned >> in >> my previous post >> just in case you missed it when John was explaining the merits (or not) >> of >> using SPF records >> >> when i create or update a Master Bind record on server 1 and include an >> SFP >> record >> that SPF / TXT record does NOT get sent across to / updated on the Slave >> Bind record on server 2 > > I didn't see that discussion, but I'm not sure how this could be caused > by Webmin. The actual transfer of records from a master to slave is done > completely by BIND, and in all the instanced I have seen it either > transfers all records, or none of them. > Hi Jamie my original post said >>> looking at the slave bind record via https://slaveIP:10000/bind8/edit_slave.cgi?index=NNN it only shows the TXT record field as being empty but looking at the slave bind record via https://slaveIP:10000/bind8/view_text.cgi?index=NNN&view= does show the line TXT "v=spf1 a mx ~all" <<< so it would appear - as you said - that the SPF record *is* beign transferd across to the slave but Webmin *is not* showing it in the Bind module Martyn > Check the log file (usually /var/log/messages) on the slave server when > a transfer is done, to see if any error is logged for the problem zone.. > >> the 2nd thing i spotted was that the drop down box you use to create an >> SPF >> record >> https://MasterIP:10000/bind8/edit_recs.cgi?index=NNN&view=&type=SPF >> says >> Disallow (~all) >> i think this should say DISCOURAGE > > Thanks .. I will update that text in the next Webmin release. > > - Jamie > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log > files > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at > web...@li... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2005-12-20 03:06:32
|
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 11:25, Brian Case wrote: > Jamie Cameron wrote .. > > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 17:07, Brian Case wrote: > > > Bug 1: > > > > > > Mail spool files aren't created consistently. This may be an OS problem(FC2), > > but I'm not sure. > > > > > > Some files in /var/spool/mail are created as being owned by uid.gid and > > some are created as being owned by uid.gid-of-mail. > > > I can't seem to find a pattern to it... Some of each instance have been > > on the server fir a year plus and some have just been created recently... > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > My guess is that those owned by uid:gid were created by Webmin or > > Virtualmin, while those owned by the mail group were created by your > > mail server when mail for the account first arrives. Both should work > > fine though.. > > Are you seeing any problems caused by the different group ownerships? > > I'm not seeing any problems... I just thought it was odd... > But why would the mail file sometimes be created by Webmin/Virtualmin and other times be created by sendmail? Hard to say .. perhaps what happens is that Virtualmin sends out the new account email and then creates the mailbox, and it depends on whether Sendmail delivers the mail first, or Virtualmin creates the file. > > > Bug 2: > > > > > > When deleting a domain via Virtualmin, disk quota entries are not being > > removed. When you look at the quotas, any users or groups that have been > > deleted are still there but they are now listed by their uid or gid and > > cannot be removed via the Quota module. It has to be done from the command > > line... > > > > This isn't really a bug .. > > Unix disk quotas cannot actually be deleted - instead, they are just > > ignored if the UID does not own any files, and will be over-written when > > a new user is created with the same UID. > > Maybe I didn't delete them but I was able to get them to not show in the Quota module using: > > setquota -u 600 0 0 0 0 / > > Where 600 is the uid Ok, I didn't realize that .. well, in the next release of Virtualmin I will zero out quotas when deleting users. > > > Feature request: > > > > > > Would it be possible to have a Virtualmin module to install web site > > applications like OSCommerce or PHPBB? > > > I wouldn't think this would be hard to do but my Perl is weak and my > > knowledge of the inner workings of Webmin are straight from /dev/null :-) > > > > The Pro version of Virtualmin has this exact feature already :) > > I will be backported to the GPL version some time in future though, > > although I will need to cleanup and synchronize the code between the two > > versions first.. > > Any time frame to GPLing some of the "Pro" features? That all depends on when we release the 1.0 Pro version .. - Jamie |
|
From: Brian C. <we...@we...> - 2005-12-20 00:25:47
|
Jamie Cameron wrote .. > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 17:07, Brian Case wrote: > > Bug 1: > > > > Mail spool files aren't created consistently. This may be an OS problem(FC2), > but I'm not sure. > > > > Some files in /var/spool/mail are created as being owned by uid.gid and > some are created as being owned by uid.gid-of-mail. > > I can't seem to find a pattern to it... Some of each instance have been > on the server fir a year plus and some have just been created recently... > > > > Any ideas? > > My guess is that those owned by uid:gid were created by Webmin or > Virtualmin, while those owned by the mail group were created by your > mail server when mail for the account first arrives. Both should work > fine though.. > Are you seeing any problems caused by the different group ownerships? I'm not seeing any problems... I just thought it was odd... But why would the mail file sometimes be created by Webmin/Virtualmin and other times be created by sendmail? > > Bug 2: > > > > When deleting a domain via Virtualmin, disk quota entries are not being > removed. When you look at the quotas, any users or groups that have been > deleted are still there but they are now listed by their uid or gid and > cannot be removed via the Quota module. It has to be done from the command > line... > > This isn't really a bug .. > Unix disk quotas cannot actually be deleted - instead, they are just > ignored if the UID does not own any files, and will be over-written when > a new user is created with the same UID. Maybe I didn't delete them but I was able to get them to not show in the Quota module using: setquota -u 600 0 0 0 0 / Where 600 is the uid > > Feature request: > > > > Would it be possible to have a Virtualmin module to install web site > applications like OSCommerce or PHPBB? > > I wouldn't think this would be hard to do but my Perl is weak and my > knowledge of the inner workings of Webmin are straight from /dev/null :-) > > The Pro version of Virtualmin has this exact feature already :) > I will be backported to the GPL version some time in future though, > although I will need to cleanup and synchronize the code between the two > versions first.. Any time frame to GPLing some of the "Pro" features? Brian |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2005-12-19 22:35:13
|
Thanks for pointing this out .. this is a bug in the module that only effects SuSE 10.0. However, if you download the updated module from http://www.webmin.com/updates.html the button should appear.. - Jamie On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 00:29, and...@fr... wrote: > Hi all, > I just installed webmin 1.250 on a newly installed Suse Linux 10 box. > > I installed the webmin-1.250-1.noarch.rpm package > > Everything is OK, as it ever was, but if I go to Network configuration, > Network Interfaces, I cannot see the "Apply configuration" button. > > (I have 2 network cards configured, both static ip address and startup at > boot time.) > > No problems with the same package on Suse Linux 8.1, 9.2 and 9.3 (but all > of theme were updated, not fresh installed...) > > Any help will be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks in advance, > > Andrea > > Chi ricevesse questa mail per errore e' gentilmente pregato di cancellarla. > > Visitate il sito http://www.frameweb.it > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list |
|
From: John H. <web...@ew...> - 2005-12-19 17:39:23
|
Doc Schneider wrote: > > I never heard how your webinar did Jamie... I was not able to attend > had some other commitments. > It was informative and fun! As always, it's nice to put a face with a name.. in this case a voice with a name. Jamie's accent was pretty much just as I imagined... and to him, I'm sure, mine to me. It does seem there was a mention of it being saved for others to view. I'm not sure I've seen the link to this posted to the list? One of the main areas covered was ACLs. That's an area I've not spent a lot of time with... and long story there, but I can tell you to NOT switch RPM sources on a working Webmin system.... I still have a bit of a mess laying around, but doing this wrecked a lot of my settings, of which the ACLs I had done before... enough of that one. I don't remember if it was on this list on during the webinar, but someone mentioned setting the ACLs to minimal by default and then allowing additions, instead of setting them to a fairly broad access and having to trim them back. I think this was a great idea. During the question and answer portion, I was able to get some good answers to my wishes for usermin and the limits laid out for usermin. So I'm still thinking about a best way to deal with users and email while keeping it simple for the user. Beyond the presentation, several people were able to get questions answered.. ideas posed.. in a much faster medium than email. Best, John Hinton |
|
From: <and...@fr...> - 2005-12-19 13:30:11
|
Hi all, I just installed webmin 1.250 on a newly installed Suse Linux 10 box. I installed the webmin-1.250-1.noarch.rpm package Everything is OK, as it ever was, but if I go to Network configuration, Network Interfaces, I cannot see the "Apply configuration" button. (I have 2 network cards configured, both static ip address and startup at boot time.) No problems with the same package on Suse Linux 8.1, 9.2 and 9.3 (but all of theme were updated, not fresh installed...) Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Andrea Chi ricevesse questa mail per errore e' gentilmente pregato di cancellarla. Visitate il sito http://www.frameweb.it |
|
From: boricua <bo...@de...> - 2005-12-19 12:02:17
|
On Sunday 18 December 2005 08:00 pm, Doc Schneider wrote: > Jamie Cameron wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 09:54, boricua wrote: > >> On 05 Dec 2005 09:44:11 +1100 > >> > >> Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote: > >>> Hi Everyone, > >>> > >>> Open Country, with myself, is sponsoring a webminar on 'Webmin Future > >>> Directions'. Two sessions will be held: the first at 1:00 - 2:00 PM PST > >>> and the other 4:00-5:00 PM PST. > >> > >> the press release and this email fail to say location, where is this > >> being held? > > > > On the web, at www.webex.com :-) > > It's not an actual physical seminar .. i enjoyed it .. |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2005-12-19 11:16:38
|
That error should usually only happen if the slave is running an old version of Webmin. Try going to the Webmin Servers Index module on the master server, clicking on the (edit) links for each of the slaves, and making sure their versions are displayed properly .. - Jamie On 19/Dec/2005 21:14 ax...@ax... wrote .. > Hello > > I am running webmin 1.250 on my 3 name servers. This morning I have tried > to > add a new domain and have it synced to the cluster slave servers. > > I Have an error message that my one slave is not running webmin .. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > "This server was restarted OK, but the following errors occurred on slaves > : > > ns2.xxx.xxx : Slave server ns2.xxx.xxx is not running Webmin version 1.14 > or > above." > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > As mentioned above, all servers are running the same verion of webmin. > Has > anyone encountered this message before?? > > Thanks > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log > files > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=CCk > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list |
|
From: <ax...@ax...> - 2005-12-19 10:15:04
|
Hello I am running webmin 1.250 on my 3 name servers. This morning I have tried= to add a new domain and have it synced to the cluster slave servers. I Have an error message that my one slave is not running webmin .. -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---- "This server was restarted OK, but the following errors occurred on slave= s : ns2.xxx.xxx : Slave server ns2.xxx.xxx is not running Webmin version 1.14= or above." -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---------------- As mentioned above, all servers are running the same verion of webmin. Ha= s anyone encountered this message before?? Thanks |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2005-12-19 06:16:00
|
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 17:07, Brian Case wrote: > Bug 1: > > Mail spool files aren't created consistently. This may be an OS problem(FC2), but I'm not sure. > > Some files in /var/spool/mail are created as being owned by uid.gid and some are created as being owned by uid.gid-of-mail. > I can't seem to find a pattern to it... Some of each instance have been on the server fir a year plus and some have just been created recently... > > Any ideas? My guess is that those owned by uid:gid were created by Webmin or Virtualmin, while those owned by the mail group were created by your mail server when mail for the account first arrives. Both should work fine though.. Are you seeing any problems caused by the different group ownerships? > Bug 2: > > When deleting a domain via Virtualmin, disk quota entries are not being removed. When you look at the quotas, any users or groups that have been deleted are still there but they are now listed by their uid or gid and cannot be removed via the Quota module. It has to be done from the command line... This isn't really a bug .. Unix disk quotas cannot actually be deleted - instead, they are just ignored if the UID does not own any files, and will be over-written when a new user is created with the same UID. > Feature request: > > Would it be possible to have a Virtualmin module to install web site applications like OSCommerce or PHPBB? > I wouldn't think this would be hard to do but my Perl is weak and my knowledge of the inner workings of Webmin are straight from /dev/null :-) The Pro version of Virtualmin has this exact feature already :) I will be backported to the GPL version some time in future though, although I will need to cleanup and synchronize the code between the two versions first.. - Jamie |
|
From: Brian C. <we...@we...> - 2005-12-19 06:07:41
|
Bug 1: Mail spool files aren't created consistently. This may be an OS problem(FC2), but I'm not sure. Some files in /var/spool/mail are created as being owned by uid.gid and some are created as being owned by uid.gid-of-mail. I can't seem to find a pattern to it... Some of each instance have been on the server fir a year plus and some have just been created recently... Any ideas? Bug 2: When deleting a domain via Virtualmin, disk quota entries are not being removed. When you look at the quotas, any users or groups that have been deleted are still there but they are now listed by their uid or gid and cannot be removed via the Quota module. It has to be done from the command line... Feature request: Would it be possible to have a Virtualmin module to install web site applications like OSCommerce or PHPBB? I wouldn't think this would be hard to do but my Perl is weak and my knowledge of the inner workings of Webmin are straight from /dev/null :-) Brian |
|
From: Doc S. <do...@ma...> - 2005-12-19 03:49:19
|
Jamie Cameron wrote: > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 12:00, Doc Schneider wrote: >> Jamie Cameron wrote: >>> On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 09:54, boricua wrote: >>>> On 05 Dec 2005 09:44:11 +1100 >>>> Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>> >>>>> Open Country, with myself, is sponsoring a webminar on 'Webmin Future >>>>> Directions'. Two sessions will be held: the first at 1:00 - 2:00 PM PST >>>>> and the other 4:00-5:00 PM PST. >>>> the press release and this email fail to say location, where is this being held? >>> On the web, at www.webex.com :-) >>> It's not an actual physical seminar .. >>> >>> - Jamie >> I never heard how your webinar did Jamie... I was not able to attend had >> some other commitments. > > It went OK .. it would have been nicer to have more attendees, but it > was an interesting proof of concept for the future. > > - Jamie > Well it was during the middle of the U.S. work week and also for the most part during normal business hours. Glad to hear it went OK. And Proof of Concept is always important. -- -Doc Lincoln, NE. |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2005-12-19 03:29:40
|
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 12:00, Doc Schneider wrote: > Jamie Cameron wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 09:54, boricua wrote: > >> On 05 Dec 2005 09:44:11 +1100 > >> Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Everyone, > >>> > >>> Open Country, with myself, is sponsoring a webminar on 'Webmin Future > >>> Directions'. Two sessions will be held: the first at 1:00 - 2:00 PM PST > >>> and the other 4:00-5:00 PM PST. > >> > >> the press release and this email fail to say location, where is this being held? > > > > On the web, at www.webex.com :-) > > It's not an actual physical seminar .. > > > > - Jamie > > I never heard how your webinar did Jamie... I was not able to attend had > some other commitments. It went OK .. it would have been nicer to have more attendees, but it was an interesting proof of concept for the future. - Jamie |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2005-12-19 01:36:43
|
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 09:43, Unknown Questions wrote: > Hi Jamie > > i just wanted to highlight the 2 Bind problems i've spotted & mentioned in > my previous post > just in case you missed it when John was explaining the merits (or not) of > using SPF records > > when i create or update a Master Bind record on server 1 and include an SFP > record > that SPF / TXT record does NOT get sent across to / updated on the Slave > Bind record on server 2 I didn't see that discussion, but I'm not sure how this could be caused by Webmin. The actual transfer of records from a master to slave is done completely by BIND, and in all the instanced I have seen it either transfers all records, or none of them. Check the log file (usually /var/log/messages) on the slave server when a transfer is done, to see if any error is logged for the problem zone.. > the 2nd thing i spotted was that the drop down box you use to create an SPF > record > https://MasterIP:10000/bind8/edit_recs.cgi?index=NNN&view=&type=SPF > says > Disallow (~all) > i think this should say DISCOURAGE Thanks .. I will update that text in the next Webmin release. - Jamie |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2005-12-19 01:04:22
|
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 11:52, Freddie Cash wrote: > > when i create i user via webmin/user mdoule it is not createting the > > file in /var/spool/mail/ for the user's mailbox. > > > any hints if there is a config option > > Every Unix-like system I've used over the past 5 years, and every MTA > I've used, will auto-create that file for you when the first e-mail > arrives. > > Depending on the MTA you use, that file may not even be needed (for > instance, any MTA that uses Maildir style mailboxes won't touch > /var/spool/mail or /var/mail). > > IOW, this really isn't an issue. :) I have run into a few that cannot create the mail file automatically, particularly those that use ~/Maildir ... what's why I added the option in Webmin to create it automatically. However, when using Sendmail and delivering to /var/mail/USERNAME, the file will be created for the user when mail arrives.. - Jamie |