Menu
▾
▴
webadmin-list — Webmin users mailing list
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
(39) |
Feb
(258) |
Mar
(396) |
Apr
(439) |
May
(337) |
Jun
(351) |
Jul
(296) |
Aug
(205) |
Sep
(328) |
Oct
(174) |
Nov
(252) |
Dec
(172) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(213) |
Feb
(194) |
Mar
(337) |
Apr
(314) |
May
(373) |
Jun
(522) |
Jul
(417) |
Aug
(471) |
Sep
(486) |
Oct
(422) |
Nov
(274) |
Dec
(299) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(354) |
Feb
(310) |
Mar
(379) |
Apr
(349) |
May
(388) |
Jun
(218) |
Jul
(368) |
Aug
(340) |
Sep
(222) |
Oct
(176) |
Nov
(214) |
Dec
(211) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(221) |
Feb
(187) |
Mar
(190) |
Apr
(211) |
May
(114) |
Jun
(136) |
Jul
(124) |
Aug
(178) |
Sep
(244) |
Oct
(203) |
Nov
(215) |
Dec
(156) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(334) |
Feb
(268) |
Mar
(302) |
Apr
(309) |
May
(192) |
Jun
(288) |
Jul
(273) |
Aug
(215) |
Sep
(318) |
Oct
(347) |
Nov
(226) |
Dec
(265) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(192) |
Feb
(227) |
Mar
(311) |
Apr
(197) |
May
(224) |
Jun
(213) |
Jul
(285) |
Aug
(227) |
Sep
(190) |
Oct
(209) |
Nov
(169) |
Dec
(174) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(149) |
Feb
(112) |
Mar
(144) |
Apr
(204) |
May
(178) |
Jun
(155) |
Jul
(246) |
Aug
(221) |
Sep
(187) |
Oct
(262) |
Nov
(163) |
Dec
(158) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(256) |
Feb
(318) |
Mar
(307) |
Apr
(237) |
May
(202) |
Jun
(105) |
Jul
(131) |
Aug
(107) |
Sep
(153) |
Oct
(165) |
Nov
(159) |
Dec
(189) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(202) |
Feb
(150) |
Mar
(151) |
Apr
(132) |
May
(56) |
Jun
(115) |
Jul
(103) |
Aug
(150) |
Sep
(141) |
Oct
(187) |
Nov
(154) |
Dec
(105) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(128) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(64) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(92) |
Jun
(91) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(145) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(69) |
Nov
(98) |
Dec
(149) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(44) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(78) |
May
(138) |
Jun
(132) |
Jul
(151) |
Aug
(146) |
Sep
(107) |
Oct
(168) |
Nov
(88) |
Dec
(94) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(51) |
Feb
(153) |
Mar
(141) |
Apr
(102) |
May
(79) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(87) |
Aug
(39) |
Sep
(67) |
Oct
(84) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(31) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(55) |
Feb
(96) |
Mar
(79) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(57) |
Aug
(76) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(68) |
Dec
(61) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(98) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(57) |
May
(58) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(52) |
Dec
(48) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(67) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(92) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(34) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(49) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(68) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(35) |
Oct
(63) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(26) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(98) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(62) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(20) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(25) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(36) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
|
Aug
(17) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(10) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2026 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2006-07-15 23:55:52
|
On 15/Jul/2006 14:22 Dave . wrote .. <blockquote type=3D"cite"> <div><div> <div class=3D"RTE">How do you change which port webmin and usermin are on if you installed the pacakage thru the rpm's?</div></div></div></blockquote>Do you mean changing the port after the installation? If so, this can be done in Webmin in the Webmin Configuration<br />module on the Ports and Addresses page.<br /><br />If you want to change the port used by the RPM by default, this can be done by setting the WEBMIN_PORT environment<br />variable to something other than 10000 before running the rpm -i webmin-1.290-1.noarch.rpm command.<br /><br />=A0- Jamie<br /><br /> |
|
From: Doc S. <do...@ma...> - 2006-07-15 21:39:27
|
Dave . wrote: > How do you change which port webmin and usermin are on if you installed > the pacakage thru the rpm's? Stop webmin -- depends on your OS Edit /etc/webmin/miniserv.conf port=10000 restart webmin -- -Doc Lincoln, NE. http://www.genealogyforyou.com/ http://www.cairnproductions.com/ |
|
From: Dave . <dav...@ho...> - 2006-07-15 21:22:32
|
<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV> <DIV class=RTE>How do you change which port webmin and usermin are on if you installed the pacakage thru the rpm's?</DIV></DIV></div></html> |
|
From: Dave . <dav...@ho...> - 2006-07-15 21:22:29
|
<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV class=RTE>How do you change which port webmin and usermin are on if you installed the pacakage thru the rpm's?</DIV></div></html> |
|
From: Doc S. <do...@ma...> - 2006-07-15 18:31:20
|
Jamie Cameron wrote: > On 14/Jul/2006 14:38 Doc Schneider wrote .. >> I have several servers in a cluster and it seems to be working ok except >> when I do a cluster upgrade. Then each server returns that it failed to >> upgrade (but it actually doesn't) is this just "one of those things >> (tm)" or something I have configured incorrectly? >> >> Not really a bug, since they all do upgrade, but just an oddity. > > This is actually a bug in Webmin. However, it is almost impossible to debug > and doesn't actually prevent the upgrade from working, so I have pushed it > to the back-burner at the moment .. sorry. > > - Jamie Thanks for the confirmation, Jamie. Was really weird the other day when I did a mass-upgrade of all my webmin/usermin servers. I did check each one afterwards and found it had done the upgrades. Whew. I might go poking through the code and see if I can spot what is happening. Never know, maybe a fresh pair of glasses will spot something. I hear you too, sometimes minor annoying things need to be put on the back burner. What else are back burners good for? HAR! -- -Doc Lincoln, NE. http://www.genealogyforyou.com/ http://www.cairnproductions.com/ |
|
From: Dave . <dav...@ho...> - 2006-07-15 03:42:59
|
Nope, just wondering what will happend when I bind more the 1 IP, thanks, I got the answer from Jamie. Thanks for the help. >From: "Greg Moeller" <Moe...@ge...> >Reply-To: Webmin users list <web...@li...> >To: web...@li... >Subject: Re: [webmin-l] multiple IP's to one computer. >Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:32:12 -0500 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from lists-outbound.sourceforge.net ([66.35.250.225]) by >bay0-mc8-f4.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Fri, 14 >Jul 2006 14:32:55 -0700 >Received: from sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net (unknown [10.3.1.93])by >sc8-sf-spam2.sourceforge.net (Postfix) with ESMTPid 897CD12551; Fri, 14 Jul >2006 14:32:54 -0700 (PDT) >Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net >([10.3.1.92]helo=mail.sourceforge.net)by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net >with esmtp (Exim 4.43)id 1G1VHI-0000nE-H5for >web...@li...; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:32:52 -0700 >Received: from 65-125-109-18.dia.static.qwest.net >([65.125.109.18]helo=mail1.genesishealth.com)by mail.sourceforge.net with >esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1G1VHH-0004Gw-6Hfor >web...@li...; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:32:52 -0700 >Received: from 10.20.20.9 (mithril@localhost)by mail1.genesishealth.com >with ESMTP id k6ELWhM98936for <web...@li...>;Fri, 14 >Jul 2006 16:32:43 -0500 (CDT)(envelope-from Moe...@ge...) >Received: from mail.genesishealth.com (10.20.20.9 [10.20.20.9]) >bymail1.genesishealth.com ([10.20.20.27]);14 Jul 2006 16:32:43 -0500 (CDT) >Received: from Unknown [172.19.34.10] by mail.genesishealth.com - >SurfControlE-mail Filter (5.0); Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:32:47 -0500 >Received: from GENESIS-MTA by nw303-1 with Novell_GroupWise;Fri, 14 Jul >2006 16:32:30 -0500 >X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt25qKuvwwjQIWKF8t3LOct9aO0m1sONoWc= >X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.4 >X-SEF-468EE69C-3A86-47D4-A41-A35B874A75D: 1 >X-SEF-Processed: 5_0_0_713__2006_07_14_16_32_50 >X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) >X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by sourceforge.net.See >http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.Report problems >tohttp://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=2000011.0 >FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO >X-BeenThere: web...@li... >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 >Precedence: list >List-Id: Webmin users list <webadmin-list.lists.sourceforge.net> >List-Unsubscribe: ><https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list>, ><mailto:web...@li...?subject=unsubscribe> >List-Archive: ><http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=webadmin-list> >List-Post: <mailto:web...@li...> >List-Help: ><mailto:web...@li...?subject=help> >List-Subscribe: ><https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list>, ><mailto:web...@li...?subject=subscribe> >Errors-To: web...@li... >Return-Path: web...@li... >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jul 2006 21:32:55.0578 (UTC) >FILETIME=[11B28FA0:01C6A78D] > >I believe it should show up for each one. Are you seeing something >different? > > >>> dav...@ho... 7/14/2006 4:17:10 PM >>> >If I have multiple IP's assigned to one server using virtual network >interfaces like eth0, eth0:1, eth0:2 etc. does webmin/usermin automatically >showup on all of those IP's or is it only bound to the standard one such as >eth0? > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? >Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job >easier >Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 >- >Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li... >To remove yourself from this list, go to >http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2006-07-15 00:43:38
|
On 14/Jul/2006 14:38 Doc Schneider wrote .. > I have several servers in a cluster and it seems to be working ok except > when I do a cluster upgrade. Then each server returns that it failed to > upgrade (but it actually doesn't) is this just "one of those things > (tm)" or something I have configured incorrectly? > > Not really a bug, since they all do upgrade, but just an oddity. This is actually a bug in Webmin. However, it is almost impossible to debug and doesn't actually prevent the upgrade from working, so I have pushed it to the back-burner at the moment .. sorry. - Jamie |
|
From: Doc S. <do...@ma...> - 2006-07-14 21:39:16
|
I have several servers in a cluster and it seems to be working ok except when I do a cluster upgrade. Then each server returns that it failed to upgrade (but it actually doesn't) is this just "one of those things (tm)" or something I have configured incorrectly? Not really a bug, since they all do upgrade, but just an oddity. -- -Doc Lincoln, NE. http://www.genealogyforyou.com/ http://www.cairnproductions.com/ |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2006-07-14 21:33:25
|
On 14/Jul/2006 14:17 Dave . wrote .. <blockquote type=3D"cite"> <div><div class=3D"RTE">If I have multiple IP's assigned to one server using virtual network interfaces like eth0, eth0:1, eth0:2 etc. does webmin/usermin automatically showup on all of those IP's or is it only bound to the standard one such as eth0?<br /> </div></div></blockquote>It will automatically show up on all of them - unless you configure it otherwise in the Webmin/Usermin Configuration modules.<br /><br />=A0- Jamie<br /><br /> |
|
From: Greg M. <Moe...@ge...> - 2006-07-14 21:32:52
|
I believe it should show up for each one. Are you seeing something = different? >>> dav...@ho... 7/14/2006 4:17:10 PM >>> If I have multiple IP's assigned to one server using virtual network = interfaces like eth0, eth0:1, eth0:2 etc. does webmin/usermin automatically= showup on all of those IP's or is it only bound to the standard one such = as eth0?=20 |
|
From: Dave . <dav...@ho...> - 2006-07-14 21:18:08
|
<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV class=RTE>If I have multiple IP's assigned to one server using virtual network interfaces like eth0, eth0:1, eth0:2 etc. does webmin/usermin automatically showup on all of those IP's or is it only bound to the standard one such as eth0? </DIV></div></html> |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2006-07-14 20:23:17
|
On 14/Jul/2006 12:28 Tim Carr wrote ..
> Here's a snippet of my mon config (posted below).
>
>
>
> The man output for the redistribute option is:
>
>
>
> redistribute alert [arg...]
>
> A service may have one redistribute option, which is a special form
> of an alert definition.
>
> This alert will be called on every service status update, even
> sequential success status
>
> updates. This can be used to integrate Mon with another monitoring
> system, or to link together
>
> multiple Mon servers via an alert script that generates Mon traps.
> See the "ALERT PROGRAMS"
>
> section above for a list of the parameters mon will pass
> automatically to alert programs.
>
>
>
> So basically, I'm using the command "redistribute trap.alert
> mainmonitor" to send whatever the
>
> latest status check (via trap.alert) is for each of my services to my
> main monitoring server
>
> (with a hostname of mainmonitor).
>
>
>
>
>
> Config file:
>
>
>
> #
>
> # Global Options
>
> #
>
>
>
> alertdir= /opt/mon/alert.d
>
> mondir = /opt/mon/mon.d
>
> logdir = /var/log/mon
>
> historicfile = /var/log/mon/history
>
> maxprocs = 20
>
> histlength = 100
>
> randstart = 60s
>
>
>
> #
>
> # Downtime logging
>
> #
>
>
>
> dtlogging = yes
>
> dtlogfile = /var/log/mon/mondtlog
>
>
>
> #
>
> # define groups of hosts to monitor
>
> #
>
>
>
> hostgroup Store13-1 myip
>
>
>
>
>
> watch Store13-1
>
> service Ping_Myself
>
> interval 1m
>
> monitor fping.monitor
>
> description Can I ping myself?
>
> redistribute trap.alert mainmonitor
>
> period wd {Mon-Sun}
>
> alert trap.alert mainmonitor
>
> upalert trap.alert mainmonitor
>
> service Freespace_Root_80
>
> interval 1m
>
> monitor freespace.monitor /:20%
>
> description Check for at least 20% free space on the root
> partition
>
> redistribute trap.alert mainmonitor
>
> period wd {Mon-Sun}
>
> alert trap.alert mainmonitor
>
> upalert trap.alert mainmonitor
>
Thanks for the info - I will update the next Webmin release to
handle this format. In the short term, you can edit the file mon/mon-lib.pl
under the Webmin root directory, and change line 16 to :
'failure_interval', 'redistribute' ],
- Jamie
|
|
From: Pat E. <mai...@pa...> - 2006-07-14 19:42:42
|
hi, On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:24:28 +0200, Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote: > On 13/Jul/2006 22:53 Pat Erler wrote .. >> hi, >> >> since days now my servers try to Updating module mysql to version 1.292 >> but fail aftersome percentage download. all other modules >> download/upgrade >> fine, it's only the mysql module and it is on multiple servers. > Give it another try .. I have moved those updated modules to a new > webserver. great, works.. PAT |
|
From: Tim C. <TC...@Bu...> - 2006-07-14 19:28:27
|
Here's a snippet of my mon config (posted below).
=20
The man output for the redistribute option is:
=20
redistribute alert [arg...]
A service may have one redistribute option, which is a special form
of an alert definition.
This alert will be called on every service status update, even
sequential success status
updates. This can be used to integrate Mon with another monitoring
system, or to link together
multiple Mon servers via an alert script that generates Mon traps.
See the "ALERT PROGRAMS"
section above for a list of the parameters mon will pass
automatically to alert programs.
=20
So basically, I'm using the command "redistribute trap.alert
mainmonitor" to send whatever the=20
latest status check (via trap.alert) is for each of my services to my
main monitoring server
(with a hostname of mainmonitor).
=20
=20
Config file:
=20
#
# Global Options
#
=20
alertdir=3D /opt/mon/alert.d
mondir =3D /opt/mon/mon.d
logdir =3D /var/log/mon
historicfile =3D /var/log/mon/history
maxprocs =3D 20
histlength =3D 100
randstart =3D 60s
=20
#
# Downtime logging
#
=20
dtlogging =3D yes
dtlogfile =3D /var/log/mon/mondtlog
=20
#
# define groups of hosts to monitor
#
=20
hostgroup Store13-1 myip
=20
=20
watch Store13-1
service Ping_Myself
interval 1m
monitor fping.monitor
description Can I ping myself?
redistribute trap.alert mainmonitor
period wd {Mon-Sun}
alert trap.alert mainmonitor
upalert trap.alert mainmonitor
service Freespace_Root_80
interval 1m
monitor freespace.monitor /:20%
description Check for at least 20% free space on the root
partition
redistribute trap.alert mainmonitor
period wd {Mon-Sun}
alert trap.alert mainmonitor
upalert trap.alert mainmonitor
=20
Thanks,
Tim
________________________________
From: web...@li...
[mailto:web...@li...] On Behalf Of Jamie
Cameron
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 2:11 PM
To: Webmin users list
Subject: Re: [webmin-l] Question about the MON monitoring component
=20
Hi Tim,
This looks like a bug in Webmin, caused by a new directive in the mon
configuration file that it cannot handle yet. If you could send me your
mon.cf file, I'd be glad to update Webmin to fix it..
- Jamie
|
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2006-07-14 19:24:36
|
On 13/Jul/2006 22:53 Pat Erler wrote .. > hi, > > since days now my servers try to Updating module mysql to version 1.292 > but fail aftersome percentage download. all other modules download/upgrade > fine, it's only the mysql module and it is on multiple servers. > > it looks like this: > > pdating Webmin modules .. > > Updating module mailboxes to version 1.293. > Fixes problem : When a user is restricted to only a subset of > mailboxes and the system has more than 200 users, no users appear on the > module's main page. > Downloading mailboxes-1.290-3.wbm.gz (167263 bytes) .. > Received 1024 bytes (0 %) > Received 17408 bytes (10 %) > Received 33792 bytes (20 %) > Received 51200 bytes (30 %) > Received 67584 bytes (40 %) > Received 83968 bytes (50 %) > Received 101376 bytes (60 %) > Received 117760 bytes (70 %) > Received 134144 bytes (80 %) > Received 151552 bytes (90 %) > Received 167263 bytes (100 %) > .. download complete. > Installed module Read User Mail (984 Kb) > > Updating module mysql to version 1.292. > Fixes problem : When attempting to backup a MySQL database as > a > non-root user, the following error appears : Access denied for user > 'username'@'localhost' to database 'mysql' > Downloading mysql-1.290-2.wbm.gz (213039 bytes) .. > Received 1024 bytes (0 %) > Received 17408 bytes (8 %) > Received 21504 bytes (10 %) > Failed to update modules : Download incomplete > > > what can we do? Give it another try .. I have moved those updated modules to a new webserver. - Jamie |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2006-07-14 19:11:33
|
On 14/Jul/2006 06:17 Tim Carr wrote .. <blockquote type=3D"cite"> <div class=3D"Section1"> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial"><span style=3D"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">Hello, all.<o:p /></span></font></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial"><span style=3D"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial"><span style=3D"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">I=92m using the standard mon module to try to administer a configuration we=92ve setup here.=A0 One problem that I=92ve run into is that the webmin mon module does not like the =93redistribute=94 option currently implemented =96 I get the error :<o:p /></span></font></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial"><span style=3D"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial"><span style=3D"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 Unknown directive redistribute<o:p /></span></font></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial"><span style=3D"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial"><span style=3D"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">When I try to pull up of the config screens within webmin.<o:p /></span></font></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial"><span style=3D"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial"><span style=3D"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">Is there a maintainer for this module I can contact, or is that Jamie himself?=A0 If I open up the code in a hex editor, I see his name there, but I wanted to try this list first.<o:p /></span></font></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial"><span style=3D"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font size=3D"2" face=3D"Arial"><span style=3D"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">Thanks,</span></font><o:p /></p> <p class=3D"MsoNormal"><font size=3D"3" face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D"font-size: 12pt;">Tim<o:p /></span></font></p> </div> </blockquote>Hi Tim,<br />This looks like a bug in=A0 Webmin, caused by a new directive in the mon configuration file that it cannot handle yet. If you could send me your mon.cf file, I'd be glad to update Webmin to fix it..<br /><br />=A0- Jamie<br /><br /> |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2006-07-14 19:06:25
|
On 14/Jul/2006 03:21 Obantec Support wrote .. > Hi > > Usermin 1.220 on FC3 > > a user has come across a problem. see below > > customer part 1 > "since the 12th Select All.Delete does not work and all spam messages remain > in the folder." > > me "i need as much details step by step so i can contact the author. what > happens if you delete less mails" > > customer part 2 > "On either Page 1 or 2 (0-20 or 21-33 in this case), when I Select > all>Delete > I get a blank page. Going back, the selection remains, but nothing has > changed. If I select up to 5 individually, I get a confirmation dialogue > and > Delete button - all works fine. One or two more than 5 gets me a blue (page > background colour - not the MS blue screen!) screen and nothing changes > - > any more and it's a blank screen as before. Doing 5 at a time, I have > deleted all." > > me "is the blank page a white M$ page?" > > customer part 3 > "It was a blank within the frame of the usermin page." > > Any ideas Does the user still see this if using a different browser, like Firefox instead of IE? Some people have reported intermittant problems like this in Webmin, but only when using IE :( - Jamie |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2006-07-14 18:56:51
|
On 14/Jul/2006 01:27 Obantec Support wrote .. > Hi > > FC3 webmin 1.290 > > i am seeing non webmin error messages in /var/webmin/miniserv.error > > /bin/chmod: invalid mode string: `clamav.clamav' > /bin/chmod: invalid mode string: `clamav.clamav' This must be output from some Webmin module .. do you have any third-party modules installed that manage clamAV? > also the log output in general sometimes truncates a line even though its > been in the log a while > > example > > 13/Jul/2006:01:36:37 +0100] [216.22.56.5] /session_login.cgi : Access denied > for 216.22.56.5. The host has been blocked because of too many > authentication failures. > > seen as last line > > 13/Jul/2006:01:36:37 +0100] [216.22.56.5] /sess > > above IP now in firewall. Is your system perhaps low on disk space? That is the only way I can see for a log to be truncated like that.. - Jamie |
|
From: Tim C. <TC...@Bu...> - 2006-07-14 13:17:09
|
Hello, all.
=20
I'm using the standard mon module to try to administer a configuration
we've setup here. One problem that I've run into is that the webmin mon
module does not like the "redistribute" option currently implemented - I
get the error :
=20
Unknown directive redistribute
=20
When I try to pull up of the config screens within webmin.
=20
Is there a maintainer for this module I can contact, or is that Jamie
himself? If I open up the code in a hex editor, I see his name there,
but I wanted to try this list first.
=20
Thanks,
Tim
|
|
From: Craig W. <cra...@az...> - 2006-07-14 12:49:48
|
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 23:22 -0700, Jamie Cameron wrote: > On 13/Jul/2006 22:28 Craig White wrote .. > > On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 12:51 +0800, Murray Trainer wrote: > > > > It used to work because I did set up a few users but I updated to 1.290 > > > > and now, I've got a problem. > > > > > > > > Saving a 'user', I get "Failed to save user : Failed to modify user > > in > > > > LDAP database : attribute "gn" not allowed > > > > > > > > which of course means that I am showing the givenName and sn fields > > and > > > > have entries in them (in fact, this entry was created with earlier > > > > version of webmin/ldap user admin) and I merely clicked on it to edit > > it > > > > and then clicked on save to produce the error. > > > > > > > > I've been fooling around with config and now have it set to > > > > 'inetOrgPerson' for 'Objectclass to add for givenName' but have tried > > > > person, organizationalPerson to no avail. > > > > > > > > I am using Fedora Directory Server > > > > > > > > The objectclasses of the record I am editing (for clarification > > > > purposes) are: > > > > person, organizationalPerson, inetOrgPerson, posixAccount, top, > > > > sambaSamAccount, ShadowAccount (in order per LDAP Attributes if that > > is > > > > significant) > > > > > > > > I have no problem using Fedora Directory console and adding the > > > > 'givenName' but I can never edit and save a user unless I completely > > > > remove all contents of the givenName field. > > > > > > > > I have the impression that there is no 'gn' alias to 'givenName' > > > > attribute - especially when I see things like this... > > > > > > > > http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Howto:phpLdapAdmin#How_to_create_a_posixUser_in_Fedora_DS > > > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > Hi Craig, > > > > > > Is an there an entry in your LDAP schema like the one in Openldap's > > > core.schema below? Maybe you can hack that to make it all work? > > > > > > Murray > > > > > > attributetype ( 2.5.4.42 NAME ( 'givenName' 'gn' ) > > > DESC 'RFC2256: first name(s) for which the entity is known by' > > > SUP name ) > > > > > ---- > > probably but it wouldn't be indexed. I think it best to leave core > > schema unaltered by dummies like me. Moreover, if Jamie intends to have > > it universal for LDAP, it would probably be better to just use givenName > > and not gn > > > > I could hack it myself by not using his simplifications but rather > > putting the givenname and sn attributes in the custom section but that > > isn't the point. > > > > I think Jamie will get where I am going with this. > > Hi Craig, > I think the cause of this problem is an in-consistency between LDAP schemas > on various systems as to the attribute used for the given name. I added code > that is supposed to handle either case, but from looking at it just now I found > a bug :( > > To fix it, you can edit the file file ldap-useradmin/save_user.cgi under the > Webmin root directory, and change lines 745 and 746 so that they use > "givenName" instead of "gn". ---- line 746 was already givenName but I changed line 745 and it made happy thanks Jamie Craig |
|
From: Mr W. <we...@ro...> - 2006-07-14 12:43:28
|
I have a few questions about this function in the Sendmail module (i.e. Spam Control). I thought I read somewhere, or perhaps someone told me, that MailScanner will also read from this module to remove or block spam, even when Sendmail is not "turned on" (it being run by MailScanner). Is this true? Thanks, MW |
|
From: Obantec S. <su...@ob...> - 2006-07-14 10:22:14
|
Hi Usermin 1.220 on FC3 a user has come across a problem. see below customer part 1 "since the 12th Select All.Delete does not work and all spam messages remain in the folder." me "i need as much details step by step so i can contact the author. what happens if you delete less mails" customer part 2 "On either Page 1 or 2 (0-20 or 21-33 in this case), when I Select all>Delete I get a blank page. Going back, the selection remains, but nothing has changed. If I select up to 5 individually, I get a confirmation dialogue and Delete button - all works fine. One or two more than 5 gets me a blue (page background colour - not the MS blue screen!) screen and nothing changes - any more and it's a blank screen as before. Doing 5 at a time, I have deleted all." me "is the blank page a white M$ page?" customer part 3 "It was a blank within the frame of the usermin page." Any ideas Mark |
|
From: Obantec S. <su...@ob...> - 2006-07-14 08:27:42
|
Hi FC3 webmin 1.290 i am seeing non webmin error messages in /var/webmin/miniserv.error /bin/chmod: invalid mode string: `clamav.clamav' /bin/chmod: invalid mode string: `clamav.clamav' also the log output in general sometimes truncates a line even though its been in the log a while example 13/Jul/2006:01:36:37 +0100] [216.22.56.5] /session_login.cgi : Access denied for 216.22.56.5. The host has been blocked because of too many authentication failures. seen as last line 13/Jul/2006:01:36:37 +0100] [216.22.56.5] /sess above IP now in firewall. Mark |
|
From: Jamie C. <jca...@we...> - 2006-07-14 06:22:57
|
On 13/Jul/2006 22:28 Craig White wrote .. > On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 12:51 +0800, Murray Trainer wrote: > > > It used to work because I did set up a few users but I updated to 1.290 > > > and now, I've got a problem. > > > > > > Saving a 'user', I get "Failed to save user : Failed to modify user > in > > > LDAP database : attribute "gn" not allowed > > > > > > which of course means that I am showing the givenName and sn fields > and > > > have entries in them (in fact, this entry was created with earlier > > > version of webmin/ldap user admin) and I merely clicked on it to edit > it > > > and then clicked on save to produce the error. > > > > > > I've been fooling around with config and now have it set to > > > 'inetOrgPerson' for 'Objectclass to add for givenName' but have tried > > > person, organizationalPerson to no avail. > > > > > > I am using Fedora Directory Server > > > > > > The objectclasses of the record I am editing (for clarification > > > purposes) are: > > > person, organizationalPerson, inetOrgPerson, posixAccount, top, > > > sambaSamAccount, ShadowAccount (in order per LDAP Attributes if that > is > > > significant) > > > > > > I have no problem using Fedora Directory console and adding the > > > 'givenName' but I can never edit and save a user unless I completely > > > remove all contents of the givenName field. > > > > > > I have the impression that there is no 'gn' alias to 'givenName' > > > attribute - especially when I see things like this... > > > > > > http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Howto:phpLdapAdmin#How_to_create_a_posixUser_in_Fedora_DS > > > > > > Craig > > > > Hi Craig, > > > > Is an there an entry in your LDAP schema like the one in Openldap's > > core.schema below? Maybe you can hack that to make it all work? > > > > Murray > > > > attributetype ( 2.5.4.42 NAME ( 'givenName' 'gn' ) > > DESC 'RFC2256: first name(s) for which the entity is known by' > > SUP name ) > > > ---- > probably but it wouldn't be indexed. I think it best to leave core > schema unaltered by dummies like me. Moreover, if Jamie intends to have > it universal for LDAP, it would probably be better to just use givenName > and not gn > > I could hack it myself by not using his simplifications but rather > putting the givenname and sn attributes in the custom section but that > isn't the point. > > I think Jamie will get where I am going with this. Hi Craig, I think the cause of this problem is an in-consistency between LDAP schemas on various systems as to the attribute used for the given name. I added code that is supposed to handle either case, but from looking at it just now I found a bug :( To fix it, you can edit the file file ldap-useradmin/save_user.cgi under the Webmin root directory, and change lines 745 and 746 so that they use "givenName" instead of "gn". - Jamie |
|
From: Barry <we...@i1...> - 2006-07-14 06:19:32
|
Probably a router or some such between you and the site was down. If this happens again, you can try "traceroute www.sitename.com" to see where the last good hop is. Generally you can figure out just who is responsible with some judicious tracerouting. Best, Barry Galen Johnson wrote: > Galen Johnson wrote: > > >> Just me or is www.webmin.com down? >> >> >> >> > Now it's working...couldn't get in for about 20 minutes or so...wierd. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > - > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li... > To remove yourself from this list, go to > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list > > > |
860 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
