webadmin-list — Webmin users mailing list

[webmin-l] Out of Office

[Marsha P. <mp...@na...>]

Out of the office from 4/6/17 to 4/16/17.  Also, I will not be checking email.  Marsha

[webmin-l] Webmin security issue

[Waleed A. <w....@gm...>]

Hello all,

I have just found a security issue in Webmin working under Ubuntu. People
with sudo access can access Webmin and then can view all the users' home
directories with their files. Even if the files are protected, they still
can be viewed by users with sudo access through webmin!

Is there any solution to this?

Regards,

Re: [webmin-l] Usermin: problem forwarding attachments in read mail module

[Jamie C. <jca...@we...>]

We hope to have a new release out within a week .. 

On 21/Apr/2017 23:58 Marcos Rubinstein <som...@gm...> wrote ..   thanks Jamie!!!!  any idea when that will be? (my client is asking me).  Thanks for soooooo many years of an incredible admin gui!!!!!      Peace, with Justice!Si, se puede!Marcos "For what can war, but endless war, still breed?" (John Milton)       On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 1:24 AM, Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote:  

Thanks for reporting this - turns out this is a bug in usermin that can trigger in some cases when forwarding muliple attachments. It will be fixed in the next release.  

On 20/Apr/2017 00:30 Marcos Rubinstein <ma...@al...> wrote ..      Strange problem...  usermin will *not* forward more than the first attachment when you forward mail with more than one attachment.   But... if I select the same email on the folder view.. .and click forward... then it will do it! (forward all attachments!).   any idea why I have this problem?    server (a virtual server... a container on an openVz) is centos 6.7 using sendmail and mbox (the old single file for each "mail folder") with INBOX in /var/spoo/mail/username and all other in /home/username/mail/ webmin/usermin up to date theme: virtualmin framed theme   Thanks :)  Peace, with Justice!Si, se puede!Marcos "For what can war, but endless war, still breed?" (John Milton)      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot- Forwarded by the Webmin ma
 iling list at web...@li... To remove yourself from this list, go to http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list      

[webmin-l] Out of Office

[Marsha P. <mp...@na...>]

Out of the office from 4/6/17 to 4/16/17.  Also, I will not be checking email.  Marsha

Re: [webmin-l] OrangeAssassin

[Marcos R. <som...@gm...>]

thanks all for the information!

obviously... I need to RTFM in detail ;)

and.. no more question about orange/spam assassin.. because it would be off
topic.

Peace, with Justice!
Si, se puede!
Marcos

"For what can war, but endless war, still breed?" (John Milton)



On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 8:41 PM, Dave Overton <da...@sy...> wrote:

> Also to throw this out, make sure you haven't limited "testing size" too
> small.  Traditionally spam was small, no too much anymore.  I fixed a lot
> of
> issues by cranking this number up.
>
> See here:  After logging into Virtualmin, click Email Messages -> Spam and
> Virus Scanning.
> There, you can set "Maximum message size to process for spamc".
>
> Mine is set for 1Mb now.  And still unchecked spam sneaks through.
>
> Check the mail headers, make sure the messages getting through are getting
> checked, it will guide you further.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kris Deugau [mailto:kd...@vi...]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 7:55 AM
> > To: Webmin users list
> > Subject: Re: [webmin-l] OrangeAssassin
> >
> > Marcos Rubinstein wrote:
> > > Thanks Kris and Dave for your feedback :)
> > >
> > > I was (actually I am) looking for a replacement of SpamAssassin
> > > because it's not working right :(
> >
> > You should probably ask the SA users list
> > (https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MailingLists) for help;  chances
> > are someone there can narrow down what's going wrong.
> >
> > A replacement like OrangeAssassin isn't likely to do you much good,
> > since it's relying on essentially the same actual filter rules and DNS
> > lookups.
> >
> > > for one of the domains that I use it in a virtual server, with less
> > > than
> > > 10 users, but with one of the users getting over 600 emails a day...
> > > with about 400 clearly marked as spam... but from the remaining 200
> > > about 130 should be spam, but not detected.. even though the client
> > > using usermin (with the virtualmin theme for email) religiously uses
> > > the "delete spam" button, it seems that SpamAssassin doesn't
> > > "learn"... :(
> >
> > A couple of questions to get you going before asking spamassassin-
> > users:
> >
> > 1) Does this machine run its own local DNS cache, configured *without*
> > upstream forwarding cache(s)?  Many "poor filter results" issues are
> > due to using a large central DNS cache (or something like the Google or
> > EasyDNS caches), and having queries for many DNSBLs blocked.  Look for
> > URIBL_BLOCKED in your SA logging or message headers - if you see this,
> > check your DNS server configuration to make sure you're using a local
> > cache (either directly on that machine, or one that's only shared with
> > a few other low-volume systems), and that it's not forwarding queries
> > to a more central cache.
> >
> > If you have a local cache on this machine, with no forwarding, and
> > you're seeing URIBL_BLOCKED, you may want to consider a datafeed
> > subscription to one or more DNSBLs.  The free public servers for lists
> > with usage limits (Spamhaus, uribl.com, surbl.com at least) are
> > suitable for a fairly high volume of mail;  several orders of magnitude
> > more than a couple of personal or small business domains.
> >
> > 2) If you retest some of those missed messages some time later, does SA
> > tag them as spam?  If your targeted user happens to be in the unlucky
> > position of "first target of the spam run", the DNSBLs may simply have
> > no data to match that message when first received, but easily score 20+
> > even five minutes later due to the DNSBL hits.
> >
> > 3) What does "sa-learn --dump magic" show when run in a shell under the
> > user account having trouble?  Look particularly at the nspam and nham
> > lines;  if one or both is less than 200, the Bayes subsystem won't be
> > used in scoring.  Ham in particular tends to be a bit tricky to learn
> > per-user, and unfortunately autolearning tends to learn low-scoring
> > spam as ham, leading to more spam hitting low-scoring BAYES_* rules.
> > Learning the entire Inbox as ham, after making sure it doesn't have any
> > spam in it, is a quick way to rebalance things.  Learning the Sent
> > folder is probably safer, but likely has less variety of ham.
> >
> > Those should help you get started on tuning SA;  if you have further
> > questions you should probably take them to the SA users list.
> >
> > -kgd
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------
> > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> > -
> > Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at webadmin-
> > li...@li...
> > To remove yourself from this list, go to
> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> -
> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at webadmin-list@lists.
> sourceforge.net
> To remove yourself from this list, go to
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list
>

Re: [webmin-l] Usermin: problem forwarding attachments in read mail module

[Marcos R. <som...@gm...>]

thanks Jamie!!!!

any idea when that will be? (my client is asking me).

Thanks for soooooo many years of an incredible admin gui!!!!!



Peace, with Justice!
Si, se puede!
Marcos

"For what can war, but endless war, still breed?" (John Milton)



On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 1:24 AM, Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...> wrote:

> Thanks for reporting this - turns out this is a bug in usermin that can
> trigger in some cases when forwarding muliple attachments. It will be fixed
> in the next release.
>
> On 20/Apr/2017 00:30 Marcos Rubinstein <ma...@al...> wrote ..
>
> Strange problem...
>
> usermin will *not* forward more than the first attachment when you forward
> mail with more than one attachment.
>
> But... if I select the same email on the folder view.. .and click
> forward... then it will do it! (forward all attachments!).
>
> any idea why I have this problem?
>
>
>    - server (a virtual server... a container on an openVz) is centos 6.7
>    - using sendmail and mbox (the old single file for each "mail folder")
>    with INBOX in /var/spoo/mail/username and all other in /home/username/mail/
>    - webmin/usermin up to date
>    - theme: virtualmin framed theme
>
> Thanks :)
>
> Peace, with Justice!
> Si, se puede!
> Marcos
>
> "For what can war, but endless war, still breed?" (John Milton)
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> -
> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at webadmin-list@lists.
> sourceforge.net
> To remove yourself from this list, go to
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list
>
>

[webmin-l] Out of Office

[Marsha P. <mp...@na...>]

Out of the office from 4/6/17 to 4/16/17.  Also, I will not be checking email.  Marsha

Re: [webmin-l] Usermin: problem forwarding attachments in read mail module

[Jamie C. <jca...@we...>]

Thanks for reporting this - turns out this is a bug in usermin that can trigger in some cases when forwarding muliple attachments. It will be fixed in the next release.  

On 20/Apr/2017 00:30 Marcos Rubinstein <ma...@al...> wrote ..    Strange problem...  usermin will *not* forward more than the first attachment when you forward mail with more than one attachment.   But... if I select the same email on the folder view.. .and click forward... then it will do it! (forward all attachments!).   any idea why I have this problem?    server (a virtual server... a container on an openVz) is centos 6.7 using sendmail and mbox (the old single file for each "mail folder") with INBOX in /var/spoo/mail/username and all other in /home/username/mail/ webmin/usermin up to date theme: virtualmin framed theme   Thanks :)  Peace, with Justice!Si, se puede!Marcos "For what can war, but endless war, still breed?" (John Milton)    

Re: [webmin-l] OrangeAssassin

[Dave O. <da...@sy...>]

Also to throw this out, make sure you haven't limited "testing size" too
small.  Traditionally spam was small, no too much anymore.  I fixed a lot of
issues by cranking this number up.

See here:  After logging into Virtualmin, click Email Messages -> Spam and
Virus Scanning.
There, you can set "Maximum message size to process for spamc".

Mine is set for 1Mb now.  And still unchecked spam sneaks through.

Check the mail headers, make sure the messages getting through are getting
checked, it will guide you further.

Dave



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kris Deugau [mailto:kd...@vi...]
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 7:55 AM
> To: Webmin users list
> Subject: Re: [webmin-l] OrangeAssassin
> 
> Marcos Rubinstein wrote:
> > Thanks Kris and Dave for your feedback :)
> >
> > I was (actually I am) looking for a replacement of SpamAssassin
> > because it's not working right :(
> 
> You should probably ask the SA users list
> (https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MailingLists) for help;  chances
> are someone there can narrow down what's going wrong.
> 
> A replacement like OrangeAssassin isn't likely to do you much good,
> since it's relying on essentially the same actual filter rules and DNS
> lookups.
> 
> > for one of the domains that I use it in a virtual server, with less
> > than
> > 10 users, but with one of the users getting over 600 emails a day...
> > with about 400 clearly marked as spam... but from the remaining 200
> > about 130 should be spam, but not detected.. even though the client
> > using usermin (with the virtualmin theme for email) religiously uses
> > the "delete spam" button, it seems that SpamAssassin doesn't
> > "learn"... :(
> 
> A couple of questions to get you going before asking spamassassin-
> users:
> 
> 1) Does this machine run its own local DNS cache, configured *without*
> upstream forwarding cache(s)?  Many "poor filter results" issues are
> due to using a large central DNS cache (or something like the Google or
> EasyDNS caches), and having queries for many DNSBLs blocked.  Look for
> URIBL_BLOCKED in your SA logging or message headers - if you see this,
> check your DNS server configuration to make sure you're using a local
> cache (either directly on that machine, or one that's only shared with
> a few other low-volume systems), and that it's not forwarding queries
> to a more central cache.
> 
> If you have a local cache on this machine, with no forwarding, and
> you're seeing URIBL_BLOCKED, you may want to consider a datafeed
> subscription to one or more DNSBLs.  The free public servers for lists
> with usage limits (Spamhaus, uribl.com, surbl.com at least) are
> suitable for a fairly high volume of mail;  several orders of magnitude
> more than a couple of personal or small business domains.
> 
> 2) If you retest some of those missed messages some time later, does SA
> tag them as spam?  If your targeted user happens to be in the unlucky
> position of "first target of the spam run", the DNSBLs may simply have
> no data to match that message when first received, but easily score 20+
> even five minutes later due to the DNSBL hits.
> 
> 3) What does "sa-learn --dump magic" show when run in a shell under the
> user account having trouble?  Look particularly at the nspam and nham
> lines;  if one or both is less than 200, the Bayes subsystem won't be
> used in scoring.  Ham in particular tends to be a bit tricky to learn
> per-user, and unfortunately autolearning tends to learn low-scoring
> spam as ham, leading to more spam hitting low-scoring BAYES_* rules.
> Learning the entire Inbox as ham, after making sure it doesn't have any
> spam in it, is a quick way to rebalance things.  Learning the Sent
> folder is probably safer, but likely has less variety of ham.
> 
> Those should help you get started on tuning SA;  if you have further
> questions you should probably take them to the SA users list.
> 
> -kgd
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> -
> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at webadmin-
> li...@li...
> To remove yourself from this list, go to
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list

Re: [webmin-l] OrangeAssassin

[Kris D. <kd...@vi...>]

Marcos Rubinstein wrote:
> Thanks Kris and Dave for your feedback :)
>
> I was (actually I am) looking for a replacement of SpamAssassin because
> it's not working right :(

You should probably ask the SA users list 
(https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MailingLists) for help;  chances 
are someone there can narrow down what's going wrong.

A replacement like OrangeAssassin isn't likely to do you much good, 
since it's relying on essentially the same actual filter rules and DNS 
lookups.

> for one of the domains that I use it in a virtual server, with less than
> 10 users, but with one of the users getting over 600 emails a day...
> with about 400 clearly marked as spam... but from the remaining 200
> about 130 should be spam, but not detected.. even though the client
> using usermin (with the virtualmin theme for email) religiously uses the
> "delete spam" button, it seems that SpamAssassin doesn't "learn"... :(

A couple of questions to get you going before asking spamassassin-users:

1) Does this machine run its own local DNS cache, configured *without* 
upstream forwarding cache(s)?  Many "poor filter results" issues are due 
to using a large central DNS cache (or something like the Google or 
EasyDNS caches), and having queries for many DNSBLs blocked.  Look for 
URIBL_BLOCKED in your SA logging or message headers - if you see this, 
check your DNS server configuration to make sure you're using a local 
cache (either directly on that machine, or one that's only shared with a 
few other low-volume systems), and that it's not forwarding queries to a 
more central cache.

If you have a local cache on this machine, with no forwarding, and 
you're seeing URIBL_BLOCKED, you may want to consider a datafeed 
subscription to one or more DNSBLs.  The free public servers for lists 
with usage limits (Spamhaus, uribl.com, surbl.com at least) are suitable 
for a fairly high volume of mail;  several orders of magnitude more than 
a couple of personal or small business domains.

2) If you retest some of those missed messages some time later, does SA 
tag them as spam?  If your targeted user happens to be in the unlucky 
position of "first target of the spam run", the DNSBLs may simply have 
no data to match that message when first received, but easily score 20+ 
even five minutes later due to the DNSBL hits.

3) What does "sa-learn --dump magic" show when run in a shell under the 
user account having trouble?  Look particularly at the nspam and nham 
lines;  if one or both is less than 200, the Bayes subsystem won't be 
used in scoring.  Ham in particular tends to be a bit tricky to learn 
per-user, and unfortunately autolearning tends to learn low-scoring spam 
as ham, leading to more spam hitting low-scoring BAYES_* rules. 
Learning the entire Inbox as ham, after making sure it doesn't have any 
spam in it, is a quick way to rebalance things.  Learning the Sent 
folder is probably safer, but likely has less variety of ham.

Those should help you get started on tuning SA;  if you have further 
questions you should probably take them to the SA users list.

-kgd

[webmin-l] Usermin: problem forwarding attachments in read mail module

[Marcos R. <ma...@al...>]

Strange problem...

usermin will *not* forward more than the first attachment when you forward
mail with more than one attachment.

But... if I select the same email on the folder view.. .and click
forward... then it will do it! (forward all attachments!).

any idea why I have this problem?


   - server (a virtual server... a container on an openVz) is centos 6.7
   - using sendmail and mbox (the old single file for each "mail folder")
   with INBOX in /var/spoo/mail/username and all other in /home/username/mail/
   - webmin/usermin up to date
   - theme: virtualmin framed theme

Thanks :)

Peace, with Justice!
Si, se puede!
Marcos

"For what can war, but endless war, still breed?" (John Milton)

[webmin-l] Out of Office

[Marsha P. <mp...@na...>]

Out of the office from 4/6/17 to 4/16/17.  Also, I will not be checking email.  Marsha

Re: [webmin-l] OrangeAssassin

[Marcos R. <ma...@al...>]

Thanks Kris and Dave for your feedback :)

I was (actually I am) looking for a replacement of SpamAssassin because
it's not working right :(

for one of the domains that I use it in a virtual server, with less than 10
users, but with one of the users getting over 600 emails a day... with
about 400 clearly marked as spam... but from the remaining 200 about 130
should be spam, but not detected.. even though the client using usermin
(with the virtualmin theme for email) religiously uses the "delete spam"
button, it seems that SpamAssassin doesn't "learn"... :(

I'm using sendmail and procmail, with the following /etc/procmailrc :

DEFAULT=/var/spool/mail/$LOGNAME
ORGMAIL=/var/spool/mail/$LOGNAME
VERBOSE=no
# Logging? (rotated once a week by a cronjob)
LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail
DROPPRIVS=yes
VERBOSE=yes
:0fw
| /usr/local/bin/clamassassin
:0:
* ^X-Virus-Status: Yes
$HOME/mail/viri
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamc
:0
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
$HOME/mail/spam


and spamassassin is started with "service spamassassin start" and shows in
a ps as:

root     29199  0.0  1.5 272840 65484 ?        Ss   Apr19   0:09
/usr/bin/spamd -d -c -m5 -H -r /var/run/spamd.pid



Netstat shows a "spamd child" running on tcp port 783 both on local host
and on all interfaces.

in any case.... the problem with spam with that person (that happens to be
my sister ;) ) is the reason I'm looking for a repleacement for
Spamassassin.

Thanks :)


Peace, with Justice!
Si, se puede!
Marcos

"For what can war, but endless war, still breed?" (John Milton)

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Kris Deugau <kd...@vi...> wrote:

> Marcos Rubinstein wrote:
> > Anybody working in an usermin/webmin module for OrangeAssassin?
> >
> > OrangeAssassin is a "drop in replacement" for SpamAssassin.
> > (https://www.orangeassassin.org)
>
> Well, first off, if it's written in Python it is fundamentally NOT a
> "drop-in replacement", because many setups use the SpamAssassin Perl
> libraries directly rather than the basic "spamassassin" command-line
> wrapper or spamc/spamd.
>
> For the same reason, the handful of third-party plugins (I think there
> are a few still around that haven't been integrated upstream) will also
> not work.
>
> On the configuration side, at a quick scan over their docs, it looks
> like it should be able to consume virtually any SpamAssassin
> configuration without change.  Options like bayes_sql_dsn will probably
> need tweaking depending on how hard they worked to Python-ize the
> exposed Perl DBI parameters, but basic settings and rules look to be
> substantially identical and it refers to standard SpamAssassin
> configuration paths.
>
> I briefly tried to install it, but it doesn't seem to understand how to
> do a per-user install in your own home directory, and I don't feel like
> polluting and possibly overwriting anything on a live system by
> installing to system paths as root.
>
> -kgd
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> -
> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at webadmin-list@lists.
> sourceforge.net
> To remove yourself from this list, go to
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>

Re: [webmin-l] OrangeAssassin

[Kris D. <kd...@vi...>]

Marcos Rubinstein wrote:
> Anybody working in an usermin/webmin module for OrangeAssassin?
>
> OrangeAssassin is a "drop in replacement" for SpamAssassin.
> (https://www.orangeassassin.org)

Well, first off, if it's written in Python it is fundamentally NOT a 
"drop-in replacement", because many setups use the SpamAssassin Perl 
libraries directly rather than the basic "spamassassin" command-line 
wrapper or spamc/spamd.

For the same reason, the handful of third-party plugins (I think there 
are a few still around that haven't been integrated upstream) will also 
not work.

On the configuration side, at a quick scan over their docs, it looks 
like it should be able to consume virtually any SpamAssassin 
configuration without change.  Options like bayes_sql_dsn will probably 
need tweaking depending on how hard they worked to Python-ize the 
exposed Perl DBI parameters, but basic settings and rules look to be 
substantially identical and it refers to standard SpamAssassin 
configuration paths.

I briefly tried to install it, but it doesn't seem to understand how to 
do a per-user install in your own home directory, and I don't feel like 
polluting and possibly overwriting anything on a live system by 
installing to system paths as root.

-kgd

Re: [webmin-l] OrangeAssassin

[Dave O. <da...@sy...>]

 

Anybody working in an usermin/webmin module for OrangeAssassin? 

 

OrangeAssassin is a "drop in replacement" for SpamAssassin. (https://www.orangeassassin.org)

 

Thanks :)

 

 

 

Just my opinion, but even though it looks interesting, I doubt its ready for prime time.  

Webmin seems best if it sticks to tried and true server platforms.

 

Dave

 

 

 

 

[webmin-l] Out of Office

[Marsha P. <mp...@na...>]

Out of the office from 4/6/17 to 4/16/17.  Also, I will not be checking email.  Marsha

[webmin-l] OrangeAssassin

[Marcos R. <ma...@al...>]

Anybody working in an usermin/webmin module for OrangeAssassin?

OrangeAssassin is a "drop in replacement" for SpamAssassin. (
https://www.orangeassassin.org)

Thanks :)

Peace, with Justice!
Si, se puede!
Marcos

"For what can war, but endless war, still breed?" (John Milton)

[webmin-l] where to download virtualmin

[Mátyás C. <cs...@gm...>]

Hello!

I think I am too affected by the bug described here:
https://www.virtualmin.com/node/51730

In the comments I have read that version 5.07-3 fixes it.

Currently I have 5.07 (8th March 2017) installed from http://download.webmin
.com/download/virtualmin/ , and there is no newer version available.

Trying to goolge-fu it i found out about this alternative repo at
https://www.virtualmin.com/node/42571
The problem is I need it in .wb.gz format.

Is there a repo where I can obtain the latest virtualmin module in wbm.gz
format?

Thank you
cserem

[webmin-l] Out of Office

[Marsha P. <mp...@na...>]

Out of the office from 4/6/17 to 4/16/17.  Also, I will not be checking email.  Marsha

[webmin-l] Freebsd 11: cpu and local disk space data missing in dashboard

[Oliver D. <oli...@gm...>]

Hi, what do i have to configure / install in order to see cpu and
local disk space data in the dashboard? Google didn't give me the
needed answers. :)

Screenshot:
http://up.picr.de/28944928no.jpg

Thx in advance
Oli Dietzel

Re: [webmin-l] virtualmin external quota command

[Jamie C. <jca...@we...>]

User quotas are only stored in aquota.user, sorry ... so there's no way to re-set them all from the UI or CLI.  

On 12/Apr/2017 05:13 Mátyás Csere <cs...@gm...> wrote ..    (I know the domain quotas are listed in virtualmin/domain/domain-id, but what about the user quotas, are they stored anywhere else besides aquota.user?) Is there a way to re-set all quotas eithre from GUI or the CLI? (I am thinking about something like the currently available Limits and validation > Fix permissions) If not, should I just parse repquota on the old fs and feed that to the new one?      2017-04-11 0:17 GMT+02:00 Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...>: On 10/Apr/2017 02:47 Mátyás Csere <cs...@gm...> wrote .. > Hello! > > I am toying with the idea of switching to ZFS from ext4 on our Virtualmin > server. > It's in plain sight, that ZFS uses it's own commands for managing quota, so > I will have to implement a wrapper script for it. > > I see that for example 'config_quota_set_user_command' (but the same goes > for the other quota commands too) requires 3 paramteres: username, so
 ft > quota, hard quota in 1kB blocks. > What is not clear to me, on what filesystem (mount point) is this executed? > Is there a 4th option passed, or its ment to be interpreted for all the > filesystems I want to manage quota settings on?  The filesystem is never passed as a parameter for these commands - Virtualmin just assumes that the command knows which filesystem users have their quotas on.  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot- Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li... To remove yourself from this list, go to http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list     

[webmin-l] Out of Office

[Marsha P. <mp...@na...>]

Out of the office from 4/6/17 to 4/16/17.  Also, I will not be checking email.  Marsha

Re: [webmin-l] virtualmin external quota command

[Mátyás C. <cs...@gm...>]

(I know the domain quotas are listed in virtualmin/domain/domain-id, but
what about the user quotas, are they stored anywhere else besides
aquota.user?)

Is there a way to re-set all quotas eithre from GUI or the CLI? (I am
thinking about something like the currently available Limits and validation
> Fix permissions)
If not, should I just parse repquota on the old fs and feed that to the new
one?




2017-04-11 0:17 GMT+02:00 Jamie Cameron <jca...@we...>:

> On 10/Apr/2017 02:47 Mátyás Csere <cs...@gm...> wrote ..
> > Hello!
> >
> > I am toying with the idea of switching to ZFS from ext4 on our Virtualmin
> > server.
> > It's in plain sight, that ZFS uses it's own commands for managing quota,
> so
> > I will have to implement a wrapper script for it.
> >
> > I see that for example 'config_quota_set_user_command' (but the same
> goes
> > for the other quota commands too) requires 3 paramteres: username, soft
> > quota, hard quota in 1kB blocks.
> > What is not clear to me, on what filesystem (mount point) is this
> executed?
> > Is there a 4th option passed, or its ment to be interpreted for all the
> > filesystems I want to manage quota settings on?
>
> The filesystem is never passed as a parameter for these commands -
> Virtualmin just
> assumes that the command knows which filesystem users have their quotas on.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> -
> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at webadmin-list@lists.
> sourceforge.net
> To remove yourself from this list, go to
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list
>
>

Re: [webmin-l] Use spamc instead of sa-learn for spamtrap

[Michael H. <mi...@hu...>]

Yea!

On 2017-04-11 20:17, Jamie Cameron wrote:

> Oh wow, I didn't know about that. I'll look into adding support for this.  
> 
> On 11/Apr/2017 10:31 Michael Huntley <mi...@hu...> wrote .. 
> 
> I think this is relatively new.  spamc can now report -C or learn -L.  And with the spamd -Q -x options each user can have their own per-user whitelist, etc. within the db.  Roundcube with markasjunk2 using spamc has been a godsend, but not everyone uses it with email on every handheld device. 
> 
> Thoughts? 
> 
> Cheers, 
> 
> mph
> 
> On 2017-04-10 22:52, Jamie Cameron wrote: 
> On 10/Apr/2017 21:59 Michael Huntley <mi...@hu...> wrote .. Would it be possible to use spamc to learn spam instead of using
> sa-learn for spamtrap addresses? sa-learn has always been a CPU hog and
> using spamc makes it easy for one to off-load to another device.... 
> Are they really equivalent though - I thought spamc was just for
> processing spam with a remote spamd, and didn't have the ability to
> update the per-user data files for spam learning. 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> -
> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li...
> To remove yourself from this list, go to
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot 
-
Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at
web...@li...
To remove yourself from this list, go to
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list

Re: [webmin-l] Use spamc instead of sa-learn for spamtrap

[Jamie C. <jca...@we...>]

Oh wow, I didn't know about that. I'll look into adding support for this.  

On 11/Apr/2017 10:31 Michael Huntley <mi...@hu...> wrote ..    

I think this is relatively new.  spamc can now report -C or learn -L.  And with the spamd -Q -x options each user can have their own per-user whitelist, etc. within the db.  Roundcube with markasjunk2 using spamc has been a godsend, but not everyone uses it with email on every handheld device. 

Thoughts? 

Cheers, 

mph   

 

On 2017-04-10 22:52, Jamie Cameron wrote:  On 10/Apr/2017 21:59 Michael Huntley <mi...@hu...> wrote .. Would it be possible to use spamc to learn spam instead of using sa-learn for spamtrap addresses? sa-learn has always been a CPU hog and using spamc makes it easy for one to off-load to another device....  Are they really equivalent though - I thought spamc was just for processing spam with a remote spamd, and didn't have the ability to update the per-user data files for spam learning.         ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot - Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li... To remove yourself from this list, go to http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list