webadmin-list — Webmin users mailing list

Re: [webmin-l] Let's Encrypt Issue

[Kimberly <kim...@gm...>]

Let's Encrypt certificates are not updating on my server.  I am unsure 
how to manually updated them since they are on a Virtualmin setup.


On 5/19/2017 2:22 PM, John Hinton wrote:
> I'm suddenly getting a lot of failures on cert updates today. Maybe I
> created a lot of new ones 2 months ago which might be why 'today'.
> Anyway, I can't seem to get any of these to update. It's on 2 different
> systems, one CentOS 6 and CentOS 7. Here is the error I'm getting:
>
> Parsing account key...
> Parsing CSR...
> Registering account...
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>     File "/usr/libexec/webmin/webmin/acme_tiny.py", line 235, in <module>
>       main(sys.argv[1:])
>     File "/usr/libexec/webmin/webmin/acme_tiny.py", line 231, in main
>       signed_crt = get_crt(args.account_key, args.csr, args.acme_dir,
> args.dns_hook, args.cleanup_hook, log=LOGGER, CA=args.ca)
>     File "/usr/libexec/webmin/webmin/acme_tiny.py", line 99, in get_crt
>       "agreement":
> "https://letsencrypt.org/documents/LE-SA-v1.1.1-August-1-2016.pdf",
>     File "/usr/libexec/webmin/webmin/acme_tiny.py", line 56, in
> _send_signed_request
>       protected["nonce"] = urlopen(CA + "/directory").headers['Replay-Nonce']
>     File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 154, in urlopen
>       return opener.open(url, data, timeout)
>     File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 437, in open
>       response = meth(req, response)
>     File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 550, in http_response
>       'http', request, response, code, msg, hdrs)
>     File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 475, in error
>       return self._call_chain(*args)
>     File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 409, in _call_chain
>       result = func(*args)
>     File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 558, in http_error_default
>       raise HTTPError(req.get_full_url(), code, msg, hdrs, fp)
> urllib2.HTTPError: HTTP Error 504: Gateway Time-out
>
> As the domain owners have no idea what these failure messages mean nor
> what to do about them, I have just finished going through all of the SSL
> virtservers on all of our systems and set the administrator address to
> myself. Otherwise, folks were getting 1 failure email every 5 minutes
> which... well, I'll leave that for you to translate. :)
>
> I have a few of requests:
>
> 1. I would love it if a different notification address could be used, so
> that other features for the domain owner could still be used, such as
> resending the sign up email to them instead of me.
>
> 2. Perhaps set the cert request time down to every 15 minutes? I've had
> in one situation where Let's Encrypt started failing due to too many
> failed attempts.
>
> (and here my thought process was interrupted by a phone call from a
> domain owner that started getting in her words, spammed by something and
> was scared of a serious problem)
>
> 3. If possible, it would be nice to have error info that was a bit more
> human readable. This one isn't a biggy, but I'm not sure what the above
> really means... what gateway timed out? My system? Their system? Or
> maybe due to some other problem?
>
> But hey, in spite of this, I'm very happy that this ability exist! It
> has made the process painless, until it doesn't work for some reason.
>
> Best,
> John Hinton
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> -
> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li...
> To remove yourself from this list, go to
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list
>

[webmin-l] Let's Encrypt Issue

[John H. <web...@ew...>]

I'm suddenly getting a lot of failures on cert updates today. Maybe I 
created a lot of new ones 2 months ago which might be why 'today'. 
Anyway, I can't seem to get any of these to update. It's on 2 different 
systems, one CentOS 6 and CentOS 7. Here is the error I'm getting:

Parsing account key...
Parsing CSR...
Registering account...
Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "/usr/libexec/webmin/webmin/acme_tiny.py", line 235, in <module>
     main(sys.argv[1:])
   File "/usr/libexec/webmin/webmin/acme_tiny.py", line 231, in main
     signed_crt = get_crt(args.account_key, args.csr, args.acme_dir, 
args.dns_hook, args.cleanup_hook, log=LOGGER, CA=args.ca)
   File "/usr/libexec/webmin/webmin/acme_tiny.py", line 99, in get_crt
     "agreement": 
"https://letsencrypt.org/documents/LE-SA-v1.1.1-August-1-2016.pdf",
   File "/usr/libexec/webmin/webmin/acme_tiny.py", line 56, in 
_send_signed_request
     protected["nonce"] = urlopen(CA + "/directory").headers['Replay-Nonce']
   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 154, in urlopen
     return opener.open(url, data, timeout)
   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 437, in open
     response = meth(req, response)
   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 550, in http_response
     'http', request, response, code, msg, hdrs)
   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 475, in error
     return self._call_chain(*args)
   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 409, in _call_chain
     result = func(*args)
   File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/urllib2.py", line 558, in http_error_default
     raise HTTPError(req.get_full_url(), code, msg, hdrs, fp)
urllib2.HTTPError: HTTP Error 504: Gateway Time-out

As the domain owners have no idea what these failure messages mean nor 
what to do about them, I have just finished going through all of the SSL 
virtservers on all of our systems and set the administrator address to 
myself. Otherwise, folks were getting 1 failure email every 5 minutes 
which... well, I'll leave that for you to translate. :)

I have a few of requests:

1. I would love it if a different notification address could be used, so 
that other features for the domain owner could still be used, such as 
resending the sign up email to them instead of me.

2. Perhaps set the cert request time down to every 15 minutes? I've had 
in one situation where Let's Encrypt started failing due to too many 
failed attempts.

(and here my thought process was interrupted by a phone call from a 
domain owner that started getting in her words, spammed by something and 
was scared of a serious problem)

3. If possible, it would be nice to have error info that was a bit more 
human readable. This one isn't a biggy, but I'm not sure what the above 
really means... what gateway timed out? My system? Their system? Or 
maybe due to some other problem?

But hey, in spite of this, I'm very happy that this ability exist! It 
has made the process painless, until it doesn't work for some reason.

Best,
John Hinton

Re: [webmin-l] Virtualmin Nginx Server Block

[Andrey R. <anr...@ya...>]

Greetings, Kimberly!

> Where can I edit the template?

Virtualmin -> Server templates.

> I am setting up a server for someone
> else; if for me I would just manually create the server blocks but the 
> person this is for knows little about Nginx.

> When I tried to do the http to https, I see that the module does a 
> rewrite;

Worst possible solution.

> I used Services ->  Configure Nginx Website.  I usually do a
> return in the listen 80 block

> return 301 https://$host$request_uri;

I just make a single server template that incorporate two vhosts with same
name.
One port 80 return 301 https://$host$request_uri and one port 443 ssl.


-- 
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Thursday, May 18, 2017 21:14:59

Sorry for my terrible english...

Re: [webmin-l] Virtualmin Nginx Server Block

[Kimberly <kim...@gm...>]

Where can I edit the template?  I am setting up a server for someone 
else; if for me I would just manually create the server blocks but the 
person this is for knows little about Nginx.

When I tried to do the http to https, I see that the module does a 
rewrite; I used Services ->  Configure Nginx Website.  I usually do a 
return in the listen 80 block

return 301 https://$host$request_uri;

Thanks.

On 5/18/2017 9:18 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Kimberly!
>
>> I don't understand the way Virtualmin is creating Nginx server blocks.
>> When I do an SSL site, I write two blocks, one for port 80, one for port
>> 443 and in the port 80.
> Eh? An example please?
>
>> Virtualmin is not.  The other question is how is
>> Virtualmin handling http to https?
> It does not, everything is under your control. You can edit templates to your
> heart's content.
>
>

Re: [webmin-l] Virtualmin Nginx Server Block

[Andrey R. <anr...@ya...>]

Greetings, Kimberly!

> I don't understand the way Virtualmin is creating Nginx server blocks.  
> When I do an SSL site, I write two blocks, one for port 80, one for port 
> 443 and in the port 80.

Eh? An example please?

> Virtualmin is not.  The other question is how is
> Virtualmin handling http to https?

It does not, everything is under your control. You can edit templates to your
heart's content.


-- 
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Thursday, May 18, 2017 16:17:35

Sorry for my terrible english...

Re: [webmin-l] Virtualmin Nginx Server Block

[Kimberly <kim...@gm...>]

I don't understand the way Virtualmin is creating Nginx server blocks.  
When I do an SSL site, I write two blocks, one for port 80, one for port 
443 and in the port 80. Virtualmin is not.  The other question is how is 
Virtualmin handling http to https?

On 5/17/2017 2:29 PM, Kimberly wrote:
> I figured out the error; for some reason multiple server blocks had
> "default_server" under the SSL entry for the server block.
>
> On 5/17/2017 1:01 PM, Kimberly wrote:
>> I am not happy with the way the script writes the config for the server
>> blocks when a new Virtual Server is created; with Nginx of course.
>>
>> Also, when SSL was enabled testing the config with Nginx returns the
>> error message that a duplicate default sever for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:443
>> exists where the xxxs are the actual IP.
>>
>> Is the Nginx module for Virtualmin production ready or is there a
>> problem elsewhere?  What is the script that creates the server blocks?
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> -
>> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li...
>> To remove yourself from this list, go to
>> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> -
> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li...
> To remove yourself from this list, go to
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list
>

Re: [webmin-l] Virtualmin Nginx Server Block

[Kimberly <kim...@gm...>]

I figured out the error; for some reason multiple server blocks had 
"default_server" under the SSL entry for the server block.

On 5/17/2017 1:01 PM, Kimberly wrote:
> I am not happy with the way the script writes the config for the server
> blocks when a new Virtual Server is created; with Nginx of course.
>
> Also, when SSL was enabled testing the config with Nginx returns the
> error message that a duplicate default sever for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:443
> exists where the xxxs are the actual IP.
>
> Is the Nginx module for Virtualmin production ready or is there a
> problem elsewhere?  What is the script that creates the server blocks?
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> -
> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li...
> To remove yourself from this list, go to
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list
>

[webmin-l] Virtualmin Nginx Server Block

[Kimberly <kim...@gm...>]

I am not happy with the way the script writes the config for the server 
blocks when a new Virtual Server is created; with Nginx of course.

Also, when SSL was enabled testing the config with Nginx returns the 
error message that a duplicate default sever for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:443 
exists where the xxxs are the actual IP.

Is the Nginx module for Virtualmin production ready or is there a 
problem elsewhere?  What is the script that creates the server blocks?

Re: [webmin-l] Website/downloads not secure?

[Jamie C. <jca...@we...>]

Hi Greg,The actual package downloads are GPG signed, and Webmin will verify updates done from within the  UI by checking the signature before installing. Also, the downloads from sourceforge are protected by SSL. 

On 15/May/2017 11:02 lis...@sl... wrote ..   I'm quite surprised that the webmin site and downloads aren't SSL/TLS secure. [And that you're still using MD5 for hashes?]  I know time is valuable and things get put off, but I'm exceptionally wary about downloading and/or installing from sources that aren't secure! How is it that webmin isn't doing this now?  [And I guess I should ask, is the update mechanism secure? It would be pretty trivial for someone to take over servers with a MITM "update" and download that wasn't secure.]  Could someone describe the update process, if you consider it secure?  -Greg 

[webmin-l] Website/downloads not secure?

[<lis...@sl...>]

I'm quite surprised that the webmin site and downloads aren't SSL/TLS secure. [And that you're still using MD5 for hashes?]

I know time is valuable and things get put off, but I'm exceptionally wary about downloading and/or installing from sources that aren't secure! How is it that webmin isn't doing this now?

[And I guess I should ask, is the update mechanism secure? It would be pretty trivial for someone to take over servers with a MITM "update" and download that wasn't secure.] 
Could someone describe the update process, if you consider it secure?

-Greg

[webmin-l] upgrading from 1.8.31 to 1.8.40 hangs

[Ethy H. B. <eth...@in...>]

Hi

Today i tried to upgrade from 1.8.31 to 1.8.40 and apt "freezed" at 93% running 
"Setting up webmin (1.840) ..."

I interrupted it. After running "dpkg --configure -a" to correct things I get
the same behavior.

Purging webmin and reinstalling it hits the same problem.

Environment is Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS.

How can I debug it?

Regards

Ethy

Re: [webmin-l] Apache2 down after package update

[Andrey R. <anr...@ya...>]

Greetings, Teknoskillz!

> I talked to a youngster I know from the gaming community and he recommended
> I go with Debian and use Nginx.

On another note, I would suggest to roll out a new system with Apache and PHP
and re-test your setup in a clear environment. It should work out of the box.


-- 
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Saturday, May 6, 2017 21:01:51

Sorry for my terrible english...

Re: [webmin-l] Apache2 down after package update

[Andrey R. <anr...@ya...>]

Greetings, Teknoskillz!

Please keep list mails within the list.

> I talked to a youngster I know from the gaming community and he recommended
> I go with Debian and use Nginx.

> I was curious if everything is configured via bash command line with that 
> setup or is there a gui for Nginx?

I don't know how complete nginx support in Webmin, sorry.
Last I recall was that Webmin/Virtualmin lacking PHP-FPM support which impedes
deployment of webservers using it as a preferred way of communicating with CGI
daemon.

> I use the Webmin portal interface alot, as you know being I am on its 
> support list with you, and Webmin likes to push
> Virtualmin for its web management stuff, so was wondering is it easier to 
> just install Debian, then install Webmin and
> merely look for Nginx in the packages options or is Nginx only offered as a 
> free trial?

nginx is open-source and free web server. There's a nginx+ commercial offer,
but you would hardly need it unless you have specific needs, like streaming
video and such.


-- 
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Saturday, May 6, 2017 20:58:17

Sorry for my terrible english...

Re: [webmin-l] Issues when installing Webmin 1.831

[Maxwell S. <cj...@yo...>]

Post your named.config.

On 05/05/2017 06:42 AM, Seb...@cp... wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> You are right, my named wasn’t running but if I start named, it 
> doesn’t look like it load my zone…
>
> # service named status
>
> Redirecting to /bin/systemctl status named.service
>
> â—named.service - Berkeley Internet Name Domain (DNS)
>
>    Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/named.service; enabled; 
> vendor preset: disabled)
>
>    Active: active (running) since Thu 2017-05-04 17:12:27 EDT; 8s ago
>
>   Process: 1841 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/named -u named $OPTIONS 
> (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
>
>   Process: 888 ExecStartPre=/bin/bash -c if [ ! 
> "$DISABLE_ZONE_CHECKING" == "yes" ]; then /usr/sbin/named-checkconf -z 
> /etc/named.conf; else echo "Checking of zone files is disabled"; fi 
> (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
>
> Main PID: 1865 (named)
>
>    CGroup: /system.slice/named.service
>
>            └─1865 /usr/sbin/named -u named
>
> May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: managed-keys-zone: journal 
> file is out of date: removing journal file
>
> May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: managed-keys-zone: loaded 
> serial 2
>
> May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: zone 0.in-addr.arpa/IN: 
> loaded serial 0
>
> May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: zone 
> 1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arpa/IN: 
> loaded serial 0
>
> May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: zone localhost/IN: loaded 
> serial 0
>
> May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: zone 
> 1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa/IN: loaded serial 0
>
> May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: zone 
> localhost.localdomain/IN: loaded serial 0
>
> May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: all zones loaded
>
> May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: running
>
> May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca systemd[1]: Started Berkeley Internet 
> Name Domain (DNS).
>
> Do I need to modify the named config ?
>
> Also, when I try to test transfer zone, it didn’t work.
>
> Testing transfer of slave zone from 172.22.2.50 ..
> .. from 172.22.2.50 : Failed : ;; Connection to 
> 172.22.2.50#53(172.22.2.50) for cpu.ca failed: connection refused.
>
> Do you have more hints for me please ?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Sébastien
>
> *De :*Maxwell Smart [mailto:cj...@yo...]
> *Envoyé :* 4 mai 2017 17:07
> *À :* Webmin users list <web...@li...>
> *Objet :* Re: [webmin-l] Issues when installing Webmin 1.831
>
> Start here:
>
> Is named running?  You should see port 53 answering for Bind
>
> If it's running you need to find out why NMAP is not showing that port 
> open
>
> The latest version of Bind needs to have the master server listed in 
> each zone and not globally on your slave server.
>
>
>
>
> On 05/04/2017 01:12 PM, Seb...@cp... 
> <mailto:Seb...@cp...> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I successfully install the latest webmin 1.831 on a RedHat
>     Entreprise Linux server.
>
>     I added my second server in Webmin Server Index then I added it in
>     the cluster section in the bind dns server.
>
>     I also added the ip on my second host in the appropriate place… (I
>     think)
>
>     I started to create master zones and A records.
>
>     I have 2 issues.
>
>     1.My hosts are not sync to my second host.
>
>     2.If I nslookup my master server, I don’t get any answer… Only a
>     timeout.
>
>     There is no iptables or firewalld services.
>
>     bind-9.9.4-38.el7_3.3.x86_64 is installed.
>
>     # nmap 127.0.0.1
>
>     Starting Nmap 6.40 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2017-05-04 16:10 EDT
>
>     Nmap scan report for localhost (127.0.0.1)
>
>     Host is up (0.0000090s latency).
>
>     Not shown: 997 closed ports
>
>     PORT      STATE SERVICE
>
>     22/tcp    open  ssh
>
>     111/tcp   open  rpcbind
>
>     10000/tcp open  snet-sensor-mgmt
>
>     Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.12 seconds
>
>     I will appreciate if someone can give me a hint.
>
>     Thanks in advance.
>
>     Sébastien Boulianne
>
>
>
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>
>     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!http://sdm.link/slashdot
>
>
>
>
>     -
>
>     Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list atw...@li...
>     <mailto:web...@li...>
>
>     To remove yourself from this list, go to
>
>     http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list
>
> -- 
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>
>
> -
> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li...
> To remove yourself from this list, go to
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list

-- 

Re: [webmin-l] Issues when installing Webmin 1.831

[Maxwell S. <cj...@yo...>]

It says it's running now.  Your connection refused is likely a 
firewall.  172.22.2.50 is blocking port # 53  run nmap on 172.22.2.50 
and see what ports are open.

On 05/05/2017 06:42 AM, Seb...@cp... wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> You are right, my named wasn’t running but if I start named, it 
> doesn’t look like it load my zone…
>
> # service named status
>
> Redirecting to /bin/systemctl status named.service
>
> â—named.service - Berkeley Internet Name Domain (DNS)
>
>    Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/named.service; enabled; 
> vendor preset: disabled)
>
>    Active: active (running) since Thu 2017-05-04 17:12:27 EDT; 8s ago
>
>   Process: 1841 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/named -u named $OPTIONS 
> (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
>
>   Process: 888 ExecStartPre=/bin/bash -c if [ ! 
> "$DISABLE_ZONE_CHECKING" == "yes" ]; then /usr/sbin/named-checkconf -z 
> /etc/named.conf; else echo "Checking of zone files is disabled"; fi 
> (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
>
> Main PID: 1865 (named)
>
>    CGroup: /system.slice/named.service
>
>            └─1865 /usr/sbin/named -u named
>
> May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: managed-keys-zone: journal 
> file is out of date: removing journal file
>
> May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: managed-keys-zone: loaded 
> serial 2
>
> May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: zone 0.in-addr.arpa/IN: 
> loaded serial 0
>
> May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: zone 
> 1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arpa/IN: 
> loaded serial 0
>
> May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: zone localhost/IN: loaded 
> serial 0
>
> May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: zone 
> 1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa/IN: loaded serial 0
>
> May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: zone 
> localhost.localdomain/IN: loaded serial 0
>
> May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: all zones loaded
>
> May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: running
>
> May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca systemd[1]: Started Berkeley Internet 
> Name Domain (DNS).
>
> Do I need to modify the named config ?
>
> Also, when I try to test transfer zone, it didn’t work.
>
> Testing transfer of slave zone from 172.22.2.50 ..
> .. from 172.22.2.50 : Failed : ;; Connection to 
> 172.22.2.50#53(172.22.2.50) for cpu.ca failed: connection refused.
>
> Do you have more hints for me please ?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Sébastien
>
> *De :*Maxwell Smart [mailto:cj...@yo...]
> *Envoyé :* 4 mai 2017 17:07
> *À :* Webmin users list <web...@li...>
> *Objet :* Re: [webmin-l] Issues when installing Webmin 1.831
>
> Start here:
>
> Is named running?  You should see port 53 answering for Bind
>
> If it's running you need to find out why NMAP is not showing that port 
> open
>
> The latest version of Bind needs to have the master server listed in 
> each zone and not globally on your slave server.
>
>
>
>
> On 05/04/2017 01:12 PM, Seb...@cp... 
> <mailto:Seb...@cp...> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I successfully install the latest webmin 1.831 on a RedHat
>     Entreprise Linux server.
>
>     I added my second server in Webmin Server Index then I added it in
>     the cluster section in the bind dns server.
>
>     I also added the ip on my second host in the appropriate place… (I
>     think)
>
>     I started to create master zones and A records.
>
>     I have 2 issues.
>
>     1.My hosts are not sync to my second host.
>
>     2.If I nslookup my master server, I don’t get any answer… Only a
>     timeout.
>
>     There is no iptables or firewalld services.
>
>     bind-9.9.4-38.el7_3.3.x86_64 is installed.
>
>     # nmap 127.0.0.1
>
>     Starting Nmap 6.40 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2017-05-04 16:10 EDT
>
>     Nmap scan report for localhost (127.0.0.1)
>
>     Host is up (0.0000090s latency).
>
>     Not shown: 997 closed ports
>
>     PORT      STATE SERVICE
>
>     22/tcp    open  ssh
>
>     111/tcp   open  rpcbind
>
>     10000/tcp open  snet-sensor-mgmt
>
>     Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.12 seconds
>
>     I will appreciate if someone can give me a hint.
>
>     Thanks in advance.
>
>     Sébastien Boulianne
>
>
>
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>
>     engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!http://sdm.link/slashdot
>
>
>
>
>     -
>
>     Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list atw...@li...
>     <mailto:web...@li...>
>
>     To remove yourself from this list, go to
>
>     http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list
>
> -- 
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>
>
> -
> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li...
> To remove yourself from this list, go to
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list

-- 

Re: [webmin-l] Issues when installing Webmin 1.831

[<Seb...@cp...>]

Hi,

You are right, my named wasn’t running but if I start named, it doesn’t look like it load my zone…

# service named status
Redirecting to /bin/systemctl status  named.service
● named.service - Berkeley Internet Name Domain (DNS)
   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/named.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled)
   Active: active (running) since Thu 2017-05-04 17:12:27 EDT; 8s ago
  Process: 1841 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/named -u named $OPTIONS (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
  Process: 888 ExecStartPre=/bin/bash -c if [ ! "$DISABLE_ZONE_CHECKING" == "yes" ]; then /usr/sbin/named-checkconf -z /etc/named.conf; else echo "Checking of zone files is disabled"; fi (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
Main PID: 1865 (named)
   CGroup: /system.slice/named.service
           └─1865 /usr/sbin/named -u named

May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: managed-keys-zone: journal file is out of date: removing journal file
May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: managed-keys-zone: loaded serial 2
May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: zone 0.in-addr.arpa/IN: loaded serial 0
May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: zone 1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.ip6.arpa/IN: loaded serial 0
May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: zone localhost/IN: loaded serial 0
May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: zone 1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa/IN: loaded serial 0
May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: zone localhost.localdomain/IN: loaded serial 0
May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: all zones loaded
May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca named[1865]: running
May 04 17:12:27 ns1.cpu.qc.ca systemd[1]: Started Berkeley Internet Name Domain (DNS).

Do I need to modify the named config ?

Also, when I try to test transfer zone, it didn’t work.
Testing transfer of slave zone from 172.22.2.50 ..
.. from 172.22.2.50 : Failed : ;; Connection to 172.22.2.50#53(172.22.2.50) for cpu.ca failed: connection refused.

Do you have more hints for me please ?

Thanks in advance

Sébastien

De : Maxwell Smart [mailto:cj...@yo...]
Envoyé : 4 mai 2017 17:07
À : Webmin users list <web...@li...>
Objet : Re: [webmin-l] Issues when installing Webmin 1.831

Start here:

Is named running?  You should see port 53 answering for Bind

If it's running you need to find out why NMAP is not showing that port open

The latest version of Bind needs to have the master server listed in each zone and not globally on your slave server.




On 05/04/2017 01:12 PM, Seb...@cp...<mailto:Seb...@cp...> wrote:

Hi,



I successfully install the latest webmin 1.831 on a RedHat Entreprise Linux server.

I added my second server in Webmin Server Index then I added it in the cluster section in the bind dns server.

I also added the ip on my second host in the appropriate place… (I think)



I started to create master zones and A records.



I have 2 issues.

1.    My hosts are not sync to my second host.

2.    If I nslookup my master server, I don’t get any answer… Only a timeout.

There is no iptables or firewalld services.



bind-9.9.4-38.el7_3.3.x86_64 is installed.



# nmap 127.0.0.1

Starting Nmap 6.40 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2017-05-04 16:10 EDT

Nmap scan report for localhost (127.0.0.1)

Host is up (0.0000090s latency).

Not shown: 997 closed ports

PORT      STATE SERVICE

22/tcp    open  ssh

111/tcp   open  rpcbind

10000/tcp open  snet-sensor-mgmt

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.12 seconds



I will appreciate if someone can give me a hint.



Thanks in advance.



Sébastien Boulianne




------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most

engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot




-

Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li...<mailto:web...@li...>

To remove yourself from this list, go to

http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list

--

Re: [webmin-l] Issues when installing Webmin 1.831

[Maxwell S. <cj...@yo...>]

Start here:

Is named running?  You should see port 53 answering for Bind

If it's running you need to find out why NMAP is not showing that port open

The latest version of Bind needs to have the master server listed in 
each zone and not globally on your slave server.





On 05/04/2017 01:12 PM, Seb...@cp... wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I successfully install the latest webmin 1.831 on a RedHat Entreprise 
> Linux server.
>
> I added my second server in Webmin Server Index then I added it in the 
> cluster section in the bind dns server.
>
> I also added the ip on my second host in the appropriate place… (I think)
>
> I started to create master zones and A records.
>
> I have 2 issues.
>
> 1.My hosts are not sync to my second host.
>
> 2.If I nslookup my master server, I don’t get any answer… Only a timeout.
>
> There is no iptables or firewalld services.
>
> bind-9.9.4-38.el7_3.3.x86_64 is installed.
>
> # nmap 127.0.0.1
>
> Starting Nmap 6.40 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2017-05-04 16:10 EDT
>
> Nmap scan report for localhost (127.0.0.1)
>
> Host is up (0.0000090s latency).
>
> Not shown: 997 closed ports
>
> PORT      STATE SERVICE
>
> 22/tcp    open  ssh
>
> 111/tcp   open  rpcbind
>
> 10000/tcp open  snet-sensor-mgmt
>
> Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.12 seconds
>
> I will appreciate if someone can give me a hint.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Sébastien Boulianne
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>
>
> -
> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li...
> To remove yourself from this list, go to
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list

-- 

[webmin-l] Issues when installing Webmin 1.831

[<Seb...@cp...>]

Hi,



I successfully install the latest webmin 1.831 on a RedHat Entreprise Linux server.

I added my second server in Webmin Server Index then I added it in the cluster section in the bind dns server.

I also added the ip on my second host in the appropriate place... (I think)



I started to create master zones and A records.



I have 2 issues.

1.    My hosts are not sync to my second host.

2.    If I nslookup my master server, I don't get any answer... Only a timeout.

There is no iptables or firewalld services.



bind-9.9.4-38.el7_3.3.x86_64 is installed.



# nmap 127.0.0.1

Starting Nmap 6.40 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2017-05-04 16:10 EDT

Nmap scan report for localhost (127.0.0.1)

Host is up (0.0000090s latency).

Not shown: 997 closed ports

PORT      STATE SERVICE

22/tcp    open  ssh

111/tcp   open  rpcbind

10000/tcp open  snet-sensor-mgmt

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 0.12 seconds



I will appreciate if someone can give me a hint.



Thanks in advance.



Sébastien Boulianne

Re: [webmin-l] Apache2 down after package update

[Andrey R. <anr...@ya...>]

Greetings, Teknoskillz!

> What a mess this is turning out to be. It looks like apache insists on 
> php7.x now

Apache HTTPD don't care about PHP version.

> and I cant use it, stuck with php5.6 because the sites php is using older code
> and developers say
> its not worth the time to update it to 7 compatability.

Then these developers are idiots.

> I have posted to the apache lounge saying it would be neat if there was a 
> "rollback" option
> so last known good configuration could be reverted to.

This makes very, very little sense.

> The way things are going now, what do you have to do ? Throw away otherwise 
> fine working websites because some php developers cant justify the time or
> inclination for you keeping the older stuff around?

I'm using co-installable PHP versions provided by Ondřej Surý.
With PHP-FPM SAPI, of course. And I'm no longer using Apache for my projects.
nginx offers way better configuration options.

> We should be able to set things up as we see fit for our own use, and not 
> have to necessarily jump on the newer
> stuff, just because its "new".

You can do that. You just made this worse for yourself with a lot of senseless
activity that I fail to track though your messages.
But I know for a fact that you can run Apache 2.4 with Apache 1.x PHP SAPI.


-- 
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Tuesday, May 2, 2017 04:19:38

Sorry for my terrible english...

Re: [webmin-l] Apache2 down after package update

[Teknoskillz <tek...@co...>]

What a mess this is turning out to be. It looks like apache insists on 
php7.x now and
I cant use it, stuck with php5.6 because the sites php is using older code 
and developers say
its not worth the time to update it to 7 compatability.

I have posted to the apache lounge saying it would be neat if there was a 
"rollback" option
so last known good configuration could be reverted to.

The way things are going now, what do you have to do ? Throw away otherwise 
fine working websites
because some php developers cant justify the time or inclination for you 
keeping the older stuff around?

We should be able to set things up as we see fit for our own use, and not 
have to necessarily jump on the newer
stuff, just because its "new".

Re: [webmin-l] Apache2 down after package update

[Teknoskillz <tek...@co...>]

Thought I would try a rollback by doing:

apt-get install apache2=2.4.18-2ubuntu3.1

Turns out there are dependencies missing, so someone on another list 
sugguested:

> The missing dependencies are probably apache2-data apache2-utils . Try
> "apt-get install apache2 apache2-data apache2-utils"


Tried that, seems like those go in and still it tries to put in apache
2.4.25 even after its purged? Like we arent allowed to use previous Apache 
versions anymore? Or is maybe the auto updater locking something
so the new version is always referenced?

=====================================================================================
sudo apt-get --purge remove apache2
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer
required:
  apache2-data apache2-utils
Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove them.
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  apache2*
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
After this operation, 514 kB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
(Reading database ... 70372 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing apache2 (2.4.25-3+deb.sury.org~xenial+1) ...
Purging configuration files for apache2 (2.4.25-3+deb.sury.org~xenial+1) ...
dpkg: warning: while removing apache2, directory '/var/www/html' not empty
so no
t removed
dpkg: warning: while removing apache2, directory
'/etc/apache2/sites-enabled' no
t empty so not removed
dpkg: warning: while removing apache2, directory '/etc/apache2/conf-enabled'
not
 empty so not removed
Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.5-1) ...
:~# sudo apt-get autoremove
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  apache2-data apache2-utils
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
After this operation, 1,203 kB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
(Reading database ... 70164 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing apache2-data (2.4.25-3+deb.sury.org~xenial+1) ...
Removing apache2-utils (2.4.25-3+deb.sury.org~xenial+1) ...
Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.5-1) ...
~# apt-get install apache2 apache2-data apache2-utils
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Suggested packages:
  www-browser apache2-doc
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  apache2 apache2-data apache2-utils
0 upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/462 kB of archives.
After this operation, 1,717 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Selecting previously unselected package apache2-utils.
(Reading database ... 69850 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack
.../apache2-utils_2.4.25-3+deb.sury.org~xenial+1_amd64.deb .
..
Unpacking apache2-utils (2.4.25-3+deb.sury.org~xenial+1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package apache2-data.
Preparing to unpack .../apache2-data_2.4.25-3+deb.sury.org~xenial+1_all.deb
...
Unpacking apache2-data (2.4.25-3+deb.sury.org~xenial+1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package apache2.
Preparing to unpack .../apache2_2.4.25-3+deb.sury.org~xenial+1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking apache2 (2.4.25-3+deb.sury.org~xenial+1) ...
Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.5-1) ...
Processing triggers for systemd (229-4ubuntu17) ...
Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-19) ...
Setting up apache2-utils (2.4.25-3+deb.sury.org~xenial+1) ...
Setting up apache2-data (2.4.25-3+deb.sury.org~xenial+1) ...
Setting up apache2 (2.4.25-3+deb.sury.org~xenial+1) ...
Enabling module mpm_event.
Enabling module authz_core.
Enabling module authz_host.
Enabling module authn_core.
Enabling module auth_basic.
Enabling module access_compat.
Enabling module authn_file.
Enabling module authz_user.
Enabling module alias.
Enabling module dir.
Enabling module autoindex.
Enabling module env.
Enabling module mime.
Enabling module negotiation.
Enabling module setenvif.
Enabling module filter.
Enabling module deflate.
Enabling module status.
Enabling module reqtimeout.
Enabling conf charset.
Enabling conf localized-error-pages.
Enabling conf other-vhosts-access-log.
Enabling conf security.
Enabling conf serve-cgi-bin.
Enabling site 000-default.
Job for apache2.service failed because the control process exited with error
cod
e. See "systemctl status apache2.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details.
invoke-rc.d: initscript apache2, action "start" failed.
? apache2.service - LSB: Apache2 web server
   Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/apache2; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
   Active: activating (auto-restart) (Result: exit-code) since Sun
2017-04-30 17
:39:08 UTC; 5ms ago
     Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8)
  Process: 8747 ExecStart=/etc/init.d/apache2 start (code=exited,
status=1/FAILU
RE)

Apr 30 17:39:08 systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB: Apache...
Apr 30 17:39:08 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Unit enter...
Apr 30 17:39:08 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Failed wit...
Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full.
insserv: warning: current start runlevel(s) (empty) of script
`apache-htcachecle
an' overrides LSB defaults (2 3 4 5).
insserv: warning: current stop runlevel(s) (0 1 2 3 4 5 6) of script
`apache-htc
acheclean' overrides LSB defaults (0 1 6).
Processing triggers for systemd (229-4ubuntu17) ...
Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-19) ...
:~# apt-get install apache2=2.4.18-2ubuntu3.1
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 apache2 : Depends: apache2-bin (= 2.4.18-2ubuntu3.1) but
2.4.25-3+deb.sury.org~
xenial+1 is to be installed
======================================================================================

Re: [webmin-l] Apache2 down after package update

[Maxwell S. <cj...@yo...>]

Ah, thanks for the tip.  I thought it was because it was a different OS 
than I'm using.

On 04/29/2017 10:43 AM, Dave Overton wrote:
> My suggestion is to try this:
>
> systemctl start apache2.service
>
> Then after it fails, this:
>
> journalctl -xe
>
> That should provide the hints you need to make it happy again.  journalctl
> should dump what normally would be in the /var/log/message but isn't any
> more
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Teknoskillz [mailto:tek...@co...]
>> Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 7:13 AM
>> To: Webmin users list
>> Subject: Re: [webmin-l] Apache2 down after package update
>>
>> Did another purge and remove and reinstall and then I ran the
>> journalctrl command and it says:
>>
>> =======================================================================
>> =
>> --
>> -- Unit apache2.service has failed.
>> --
>> -- The result is failed.
>> Apr 29 14:07:13 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Unit entered failed state.
>> Apr 29 14:07:13 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Failed with result 'exit-
>> code'.
>> Apr 29 14:07:13 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Service hold-off time
>> over, scheduling restart.
>> Apr 29 14:07:13 systemd[1]: Stopped LSB: Apache2 web server.
>> -- Subject: Unit apache2.service has finished shutting down
>> -- Defined-By: systemd
>> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>> --
>> -- Unit apache2.service has finished shutting down.
>> Apr 29 14:07:13 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Start request repeated too
>> quickly.
>> Apr 29 14:07:13 systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB: Apache2 web server.
>> -- Subject: Unit apache2.service has failed
>> -- Defined-By: systemd
>> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
>> --
>> -- Unit apache2.service has failed.
>> =======================================================================
>> =
>>
>>
>> Not too sure what the "start request repeated too quickly" means.
>>
>>
>> ====
>> Steve
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> -
>> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at webadmin-
>> li...@li...
>> To remove yourself from this list, go to
>> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> -
> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li...
> To remove yourself from this list, go to
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list

-- 

Re: [webmin-l] Apache2 down after package update

[Dave O. <da...@sy...>]

My suggestion is to try this:

systemctl start apache2.service

Then after it fails, this:

journalctl -xe

That should provide the hints you need to make it happy again.  journalctl
should dump what normally would be in the /var/log/message but isn't any
more

Dave




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Teknoskillz [mailto:tek...@co...]
> Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2017 7:13 AM
> To: Webmin users list
> Subject: Re: [webmin-l] Apache2 down after package update
> 
> Did another purge and remove and reinstall and then I ran the
> journalctrl command and it says:
> 
> =======================================================================
> =
> --
> -- Unit apache2.service has failed.
> --
> -- The result is failed.
> Apr 29 14:07:13 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Unit entered failed state.
> Apr 29 14:07:13 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Failed with result 'exit-
> code'.
> Apr 29 14:07:13 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Service hold-off time
> over, scheduling restart.
> Apr 29 14:07:13 systemd[1]: Stopped LSB: Apache2 web server.
> -- Subject: Unit apache2.service has finished shutting down
> -- Defined-By: systemd
> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
> --
> -- Unit apache2.service has finished shutting down.
> Apr 29 14:07:13 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Start request repeated too
> quickly.
> Apr 29 14:07:13 systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB: Apache2 web server.
> -- Subject: Unit apache2.service has failed
> -- Defined-By: systemd
> -- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
> --
> -- Unit apache2.service has failed.
> =======================================================================
> =
> 
> 
> Not too sure what the "start request repeated too quickly" means.
> 
> 
> ====
> Steve
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> -
> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at webadmin-
> li...@li...
> To remove yourself from this list, go to
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list

Re: [webmin-l] Apache2 down after package update

[Cecil Y. Jr. <cj...@yo...>]

How about /var/log/messages?  There must be a log file indicating why 
it's failing.

On 04/29/2017 06:39 AM, Teknoskillz wrote:
> / var / log / apache2
>
> access.log , error.log and other_vhosts_access.log
>
> all are 0 bytes in file size.
>
>
> I found /etc/php/5.6/fpm/php.ini
>   and took a peek at it to see if it defines a path to the error log, but
> could not find anything.
> I didnt touch that file so I guess its ok.
>
>
> ==
> Steve
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cecil Yother, Jr." <cj...@yo...>
> To: "Teknoskillz" <tek...@co...>; "Webmin users list"
> <web...@li...>
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 11:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [webmin-l] Apache2 down after package update
>
>
>> Post the last 20 lines of the apache log file.
>>
>> On 04/28/2017 06:12 PM, Teknoskillz wrote:
>>> Did the usual package updates today from Webmin, all went ok except when
>>> upgrading Apache2. There was a timeout, and the service never restarted
>>> during the upgrade process.
>>>
>>> I did a purge and remove via bash, and a reinstall , but still no go.
>>>
>>> =========================================================
>>> Fri Apr 28 22:33:30 UTC 2017
>>> ~# sudo apt-get --purge remove apache2
>>> Reading package lists... Done
>>> Building dependency tree
>>> Reading state information... Done
>>> The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer
>>> required:
>>>     apache2-data apache2-utils
>>> Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove them.
>>> The following packages will be REMOVED:
>>>     apache2*
>>> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
>>> After this operation, 514 kB disk space will be freed.
>>> Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
>>> (Reading database ... 70372 files and directories currently installed.)
>>> Removing apache2 (2.4.25-3+deb.sury.org~xenial+1) ...
>>> Purging configuration files for apache2 (2.4.25-3+deb.sury.org~xenial+1)
>>> ...
>>> dpkg: warning: while removing apache2, directory '/var/www/html' not
>>> empty
>>> so no
>>> t removed
>>> dpkg: warning: while removing apache2, directory
>>> '/etc/apache2/sites-enabled' no
>>> t empty so not removed
>>> dpkg: warning: while removing apache2, directory
>>> '/etc/apache2/conf-enabled'
>>> not
>>>    empty so not removed
>>> Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.5-1) ...
>>> ~# sudo apt-get autoremove
>>> Reading package lists... Done
>>> Building dependency tree
>>> Reading state information... Done
>>> Job for apache2.service failed because the control process exited with
>>> error
>>> cod
>>> e. See "systemctl status apache2.service" and "journalctl -xe" for
>>> details.
>>> invoke-rc.d: initscript apache2, action "start" failed.
>>> ? apache2.service - LSB: Apache2 web server
>>>      Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/apache2; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
>>>      Active: activating (auto-restart) (Result: exit-code) since Fri
>>> 2017-04-28 22
>>> :36:45 UTC; 6ms ago
>>>        Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8)
>>>     Process: 22561 ExecStart=/etc/init.d/apache2 start (code=exited,
>>> status=1/FAIL
>>> URE)
>>>
>>> Apr 28 22:36:45 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Control
>>> pr...
>>> Apr 28 22:36:45 systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB:
>>> Apache...
>>> Apr 28 22:36:45 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Unit
>>> enter...
>>> Apr 28 22:36:45 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Failed
>>> wit...
>>> Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full.
>>> insserv: warning: current start runlevel(s) (empty) of script
>>> `apache-htcachecle
>>> an' overrides LSB defaults (2 3 4 5).
>>> insserv: warning: current stop runlevel(s) (0 1 2 3 4 5 6) of script
>>> `apache-htc
>>> acheclean' overrides LSB defaults (0 1 6).
>>> Processing triggers for systemd (229-4ubuntu17) ...
>>> Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-19) ...
>>>
>>> ======================================================================
>>>
>>> Im not sure if its because I enabled mod_rewrite and there is a new path
>>> or
>>> something, but thats
>>> the only change thata major I did with Apache after trying to get the
>>> sites
>>> more SEO friendly recetly.
>>> There may have been 1 other module enabled, but I cant remember what it
>>> was.
>>> I went in and turned on rewrite
>>> and we are still failing.  Any help or ideas out there?
>>>
>>>
>>> ===
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>> -
>>> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at
>>> web...@li...
>>> To remove yourself from this list, go to
>>> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list
>> -- 
>>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>> Post the last 20 lines of the apache log file.
>>
>>
>> On 04/28/2017 06:12 PM, Teknoskillz wrote:
>>
>> Did the usual package updates today from Webmin, all went ok except when
>> upgrading Apache2. There was a timeout, and the service never restarted
>> during the upgrade process.
>>
>> I did a purge and remove via bash, and a reinstall , but still no go.
>>
>> =========================================================
>> Fri Apr 28 22:33:30 UTC 2017
>> ~# sudo apt-get --purge remove apache2
>> Reading package lists... Done
>> Building dependency tree
>> Reading state information... Done
>> The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer
>> required:
>>   apache2-data apache2-utils
>> Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove them.
>> The following packages will be REMOVED:
>>   apache2*
>> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
>> After this operation, 514 kB disk space will be freed.
>> Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
>> (Reading database ... 70372 files and directories currently installed.)
>> Removing apache2 (2.4.25-3+deb.sury.org~xenial+1) ...
>> Purging configuration files for apache2 (2.4.25-3+deb.sury.org~xenial+1)
>> ...
>> dpkg: warning: while removing apache2, directory '/var/www/html' not empty
>> so no
>> t removed
>> dpkg: warning: while removing apache2, directory
>> '/etc/apache2/sites-enabled' no
>> t empty so not removed
>> dpkg: warning: while removing apache2, directory
>> '/etc/apache2/conf-enabled'
>> not
>> empty so not removed
>> Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.5-1) ...
>> ~# sudo apt-get autoremove
>> Reading package lists... Done
>> Building dependency tree
>> Reading state information... Done
>> Job for apache2.service failed because the control process exited with
>> error
>> cod
>> e. See "systemctl status apache2.service" and "journalctl -xe" for
>> details.
>> invoke-rc.d: initscript apache2, action "start" failed.
>> ? apache2.service - LSB: Apache2 web server
>>    Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/apache2; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
>>    Active: activating (auto-restart) (Result: exit-code) since Fri
>> 2017-04-28 22
>> :36:45 UTC; 6ms ago
>>      Docs: man:systemd-sysv-generator(8)
>>   Process: 22561 ExecStart=/etc/init.d/apache2 start (code=exited,
>> status=1/FAIL
>> URE)
>>
>> Apr 28 22:36:45 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Control
>> pr...
>> Apr 28 22:36:45 systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB:
>> Apache...
>> Apr 28 22:36:45 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Unit
>> enter...
>> Apr 28 22:36:45 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Failed
>> wit...
>> Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full.
>> insserv: warning: current start runlevel(s) (empty) of script
>> `apache-htcachecle
>> an' overrides LSB defaults (2 3 4 5).
>> insserv: warning: current stop runlevel(s) (0 1 2 3 4 5 6) of script
>> `apache-htc
>> acheclean' overrides LSB defaults (0 1 6).
>> Processing triggers for systemd (229-4ubuntu17) ...
>> Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-19) ...
>>
>> ======================================================================
>>
>> Im not sure if its because I enabled mod_rewrite and there is a new path
>> or
>> something, but thats
>> the only change thata major I did with Apache after trying to get the
>> sites
>> more SEO friendly recetly.
>> There may have been 1 other module enabled, but I cant remember what it
>> was.
>> I went in and turned on rewrite
>> and we are still failing.  Any help or ideas out there?
>>
>>
>> ===
>> Steve
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> -
>> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at
>> web...@li...
>> To remove yourself from this list, go to
>> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> -
> Forwarded by the Webmin mailing list at web...@li...
> To remove yourself from this list, go to
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webadmin-list

-- 

Re: [webmin-l] Apache2 down after package update

[Teknoskillz <tek...@co...>]

Did another purge and remove and reinstall and then I ran the journalctrl 
command and it says:

========================================================================
--
-- Unit apache2.service has failed.
--
-- The result is failed.
Apr 29 14:07:13 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Unit entered failed state.
Apr 29 14:07:13 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
Apr 29 14:07:13 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Service hold-off time over, 
scheduling restart.
Apr 29 14:07:13 systemd[1]: Stopped LSB: Apache2 web server.
-- Subject: Unit apache2.service has finished shutting down
-- Defined-By: systemd
-- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
--
-- Unit apache2.service has finished shutting down.
Apr 29 14:07:13 systemd[1]: apache2.service: Start request repeated too 
quickly.
Apr 29 14:07:13 systemd[1]: Failed to start LSB: Apache2 web server.
-- Subject: Unit apache2.service has failed
-- Defined-By: systemd
-- Support: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
--
-- Unit apache2.service has failed.
========================================================================


Not too sure what the "start request repeated too quickly" means.


====
Steve