VeraCrypt Activity
Open source disk encryption with strong security for the Paranoid
Brought to you by:
idrassi
Activity for VeraCrypt
-
jsmoe modified a comment on discussion General Discussion
I have recently encountered a problem mounting a (VC Ver. 1.25.9(64-bit)) encrypted volume on my Win10 machine. It is a large AES Volume using up half of the space on the HDD. The only thing that I can think of which may have caused this, is that I mistakenly ran a Optimize and defragmentation on the HDD with the encrypted volume in a unmounted or in its encrypted state. I may even have run an Error checking test, both from the 'tools' tab from the properties option. This all happened before the...
-
I have recently encountered a problem mounting a (VC Ver. 1.25.9(64-bit)) encrypted volume on my Win10 machine. It is a large AES Volume using up half of the space on the HDD. The only thing that I can think of which may have caused this, is that I mistakenly ran a Optimize and defragmentation on the HDD with the encrypted volume in a unmounted or in its encrypted state. I may even have run an Error checking test, both from the 'tools' tab from the properties option. This all happened before the...
-
Erik posted a comment on ticket #617
Some more information. After leaving overnight (power mode set to no sleep or hibernate, just screen saver activated), the issue reappeared. Several folders were showing as empty, even though they do contain files. I tried dismounting the drive (had to force dismount even though I thought all processes accessing the drive were shut down), and re-mounting, but after selecting the device (disk0) and entering the password, I received the error VeraCrypt --------------------------- A device which does...
-
Veracrypt full-device volume on Win11 25H2 produces read & write errors
-
I have a 4TB M.2 NVMe drive that I mount as a device volume in VeraCrypt. I am currently running 1.26.24, but the volume was created using an earlier version of VeraCrypt. The problems are recent and started happening months after upgrading VeraCrypt. When initially-mounted, the drive functions normally, but after a period of time (hours, days, maybe after a few hibernations/sleeps) accessing the drive begins to throw errors. This only started happening a few days ago, and may be associated with...
-
Dave Cambell posted a comment on discussion Technical Topics
Is it normal for a container using Argon2 (default settings) to mount about 7 times faster than a container using SHA-512 PBKDF2 (default settings)? I thought Argon was supposed to be slower.
-
hiddengod posted a comment on discussion Technical Topics
any news regarding this? With the help of AI things should work faster, is 2026 the year veracrypt finally fixes speed problems? Happy holidays Mounir and thank you for everything.
-
RichardH posted a comment on discussion Technical Topics
There is a small detail wrt the security of the defaults, as those tend to weaken over time. A good example is the 2.000 iterations default set by TrueCrypt, which was apparently considered secure at the time. That means, setting a secure default now probably means that it will not be considered secure 10 years from now. Yet you cannot change the defaults as that would impact non-technical users not being able to mount their containers/disks anymore. So over time, all users likely need to use non-default...
-
John R posted a comment on discussion Technical Topics
I would prefer it if PIM was abandoned entirely and instead we could choose the actual parameters for both PBKDF2 and Argon2id, with secure default values for anyone (most people) who doesn't want to change them. I think PIM worked fine when there was only one KDF, but now using PIM for all KDFs is confusing, since it means different things for different algorithms. But it also removes the ability of the user to choose the parameters they prefer. With PBKDF2, PIM allows you to choose almost exactly...
-
Jim posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
I take it using VeraCrypt for full encryption with a low memory Windows 10 PC still has r/w issues thus making it unusable? Or was it fixed in one of the newer versions?
-
Alexander modified a comment on discussion General Discussion
1.26.24 - 1.26.27 W11 25H2 Legacy Boot Same problem. During the test, the password verification process occurs, the "boot" message appears, and nothing happens. This state can be exited by rebooting and pressing ESC.
-
1.26.24 W11 25H2 Legacy Boot Same problem. During the test, the password verification process occurs, the "boot" message appears, and nothing happens. This state can be exited by rebooting and pressing ESC.
-
Thank you for this new version. I also hope for Argon2 support for Linux.
-
Ben posted a comment on discussion Technical Topics
I have a Veracrypt container that allows writing and reading after mounting. After a few write operations, the entire container becomes “read only.” I'm at a loss! What could be the reason for this? Please help. Ben
-
Riscy00 modified a comment on discussion General Discussion
I have partitioned drive and deleted the protected container file/folder by mistake. Is there way to restore this file/folder back in. I have not touched the partition drive in hope for recovery
-
Alex R posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
I'm just curious if the Linux build will be receiving the argon2 support soon? Windows has been my primary OS for years but I'm in the process of moving to Linux so just curious on timeline. Thanks!
-
I have partitioned drive and deleted the protected folder by mistake. Is there way to restore this folder back in. I have not touched the partition in hope for recovery
-
风之暇想 posted a comment on discussion Technical Topics
@idrassi Since TrueCrypt compatibility has already been abandoned, now that the Argon2 algorithm is being added, the key mixing steps should be optimized to achieve equivalent security more simply and cleanly. https://veracrypt.io/en/Keyfiles.html
-
- Wanderer - modified a comment on discussion Technical Topics
I decided to upgrade from 1.25.9 to 1.26.24, hoping there would not be any problems. Unfortunately there was a problem though. I could not mount a disk i have. While playing around to see what happens though, i noticed that in the Secure Desktop i use for mounting the disk, there was a difference. In 1.25.9, the Windows Language Selector toolbar was visible, while in 1.26.24 was not. This is an issue for me since i'm using characters in languages other than English. After removing the Secure Desktop...
-
[1.26.24] Language bar not visible in Secure Desktop mode
-
For anyone interested, after searching around for several days i reached the conclusion that the underlying file system had somehow become corrupted, so i backed-up everything i could and recreated the disk. I'm still not sure how it happened though (if it was caused by VC or not).
-
Bert Cuzeau posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
I still have the problem. I'm not sure what I did to recover the capability to preview, but the problem came back, and I can't find the way to unlock. The entire drive is affected. The property (right-click) on a file doesn't show the locking and therefore doesn't offer to unblock the file. The powershell command in admin mode : Get-ChildItem -Path "T:\myMainDir" -Recurse | Unblock-File has no effect. -sigh-
-
I just noticed a minor error in this page; https://veracrypt.io/en/Random%20Number%20Generator.html Pool Mixing Function step 3, l should be 32 for BLAKE2S-256.
-
Paxton Polar posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
I tested the exact same VeraCrypt volume on another machine: * MacBook Air M1 (2020) * macOS Sequoia 15.6.1 * VeraCrypt 1.25.9 On this system the volume opens normally using the password that contains the “ä” character. This confirms several things: * The volume itself is intact and not corrupted. * The password is correct and unchanged. * The issue is not reproducible on macOS Sequoia 15.6.1, only on macOS Tahoe 26.1. * This strongly suggests the regression occurs specifically in macOS 26.1’s keyboard/input...
-
coomi posted a comment on discussion Technical Topics
is your encrypted volume ntfs? because i think i have the same problem because of ntfs
-
i have the following problem that a couple of used old encrypted disks and containers cannot show wrong pw. They are on different media such as, sdxc, usb, external hdd, and ssd and they are all suddenly showing the same problem. Also the encryption was made in different times on different devices for e.g. transporting them. i just wanted to look if there is any old important stuff on it. The last time i mounted some volumes was between 2022 and 2023 perhaps on debian 11. I tried also older veracrypt...
-
Halim Şibay Tuğsavul posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
I have created a VeraCrypt Vault in my hard disk. It was working last week, but now when I put in my passwond, I am met with: "Operation failed due to one or more off the following: - Incorrect password. ........... - Volume uses an old algorithm that has been removed. - TrueCrypt format volumes are no longer supported." But my password is correct and I have not removed an algorithm consciously. So how an I change TrueCrypt ormat volumes to the presently correct one ? Please help. Halim
-
Carlos Sosa posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
Hi, I would like to jump on this thread as it seems to pertain to my problem. Please let me know if I am not allowed to do this. I am trying to access an encrypted Truecrypt drive that has a hidden os. Can I do it with veracrypt (It has been opened with veracrypt in the past) The problem is thet the hidden os seems to be corrupted. I am thinking of accessing it without booting to it using veracrypt. Is that possible?
-
Hi, did I post in the wrong section?
-
Environment: * Hardware: Mac mini M4 Pro (2024) * OS: macOS Tahoe 26.1 (problem started immediately after this update) * VeraCrypt version: 1.26.24 (FUSE-T build) Summary: After updating to macOS Tahoe 26.1, VeraCrypt can no longer open volumes whose passwords contain the Scandinavian character “ä”. VeraCrypt rejects the password and shows the usual list of mismatch hints. Immediately before the update the same volumes opened normally. Details: * Passwords without Scandinavian characters still work...
-
memiker tmper modified a comment on discussion General Discussion
Suggested update to add function: When the computer is turned on, the system partition password or PIM is entered without relying on the computer keyboard input? Suggested update to add function: When the computer is turned on, the system partition password or PIM is entered without relying on the computer keyboard input? It is estimated that some computer motherboards come with a keyboard recorder at the factory, so even the most complex passwords lose their meaning. It can be designed like this:...
-
Suggested update to add function: When the computer is turned on, the system partition password or PIM is entered without relying on the computer keyboard input? Suggested update to add function: When the computer is turned on, the system partition password or PIM is entered without relying on the computer keyboard input? It is estimated that some computer motherboards come with a keyboard recorder at the factory, so even the most complex passwords lose their meaning. It can be designed like this:...
-
Hello all, My first post. I have an old drive encrypted be Truecrypt, usually not a problem. I have the Os withing an os setup. it seems like the "inner" os (windows xp) is no longer working so every time I un-encrypt it, it goes into error and reboots. Is there a way to access it externally and un-encrypt the whole drive without having to boot to it? Thanks in advance. Carlos
-
这叫一个地道 posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
CRL (Certificate Revocation list),As far as I know,Since LetsEncrypt does not provide a CRL, VeraCrypt cannot configure a CRL; this feature is not important.
-
CAA can prevent incorrect CAs from issuing VeraCrypt domains and prevent HTTPS man-in-the-middle attacks. Assuming idrassi has always used "LetsEncrypt" as the CA for Veracrypt's SSL, configuring the CAA will be straightforward, as it's a free feature. I also want idrassi to configure CAA, but this would cause additional trouble if they need to replace the CA in the future.
-
CAA can prevent incorrect CAs from issuing VeraCrypt domains and prevent HTTPS man-in-the-middle attacks. Assuming idrassi has always used "LetsEncrypt" as the CA for Veracrypt's SSL, configuring the CAA will be straightforward, as it's a free feature.
-
Looks like it gets an A rating from SSL labs; https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=veracrypt.jp Though it does mention the lack of HSTS as well. It also mentions revocation status and DNS CAA. I'm not an expert so I don't know if those are important in the context of TLS. It does only use ciphers with forward secrecy which is good! PS if you want nightmares go to the server test homepage and look at some of the F rated sites...some of them still support SSL 2.0 or 3.0, and support export...
-
Looks like it gets an A rating from SSL labs; https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=veracrypt.jp Though it does mention the lack of HSTS as well. It also mentions revocation status and DNS CAA. I'm not an expert so I don't know if those are important in the context of TLS. It does only use ciphers with forward secrecy which is good! PS if you want nightmares go to the homepage and look at some of the F rated sites...some of them still support SSL 2.0 or 3.0, and support export ciphers with...
-
Lajos Kovacs created ticket #615
Full OS encryption does not work with sector size 4096 bytes - Surface Go 4 tablet
-
Speaking of websites, it reminds me of https://bin.veracry.pt. It should have been updated too. @idrassi
-
It would be even better if the security of the veracrypt.io website could be improved at the same time.
-
（This topic is not about Veracrypt software） Hello, thank you for providing such excellent encryption software. When I was browsing veracrypt.jp, I found that the site was not configured with HSTS (This is a security configuration that forces the use of HTTPS after a user's first visit.). For the security of users accessing the site, have you considered configuring HSTS? Additionally, I scanned the site's security and gave it an F rating. https://securityheaders.com/?q=veracrypt.jp&followRedirects=on...
-
（This topic is not about Veracrypt software） Hello, thank you for providing such excellent encryption software. When I was browsing veracrypt.jp, I found that the site was not configured with HSTS (This is a security configuration that forces the use of HTTPS after a user's first visit.). For the security of users accessing the site, have you considered configuring HSTS? Additionally, I scanned the site's security and gave it an F rating. https://securityheaders.com/?q=veracrypt.jp&followRedirects=on...
-
I have more info on this. IIRC, i had created the disk using either Quick Format or Fast Create option (probably the 2nd). I have now discovered that the host disk is reportedly 3.000.591.446.016 bytes, the veracrypt file is reportedly 3.000.391.014.400 bytes but the disk also has 398.102.466.560 bytes free! Inside the encrypted disk, the free size is 381.412.470.784 bytes out of 3.000.390.750.208. All disks (both host and encrypted) are formatted as NTFS. From what i understand, the host drive may...
-
I have more info on this. IIRC, i had created the disk using either Quick Format or Fast Create option (probably the 2nd). I have now discovered that the host disk is reportedly 3.000.591.446.016 bytes, the veracrypt file is reportedly 3.000.391.014.400 bytes but the disk also has 398.102.466.560 bytes free! Inside the encrypted disk, the free size is 381.412.470.784 bytes out of 3.000.390.750.208. All disks (both host and encrypted) are formatted as NTFS. From what i understand, the host drive may...
-
John posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
Hello, For security reasons I installed a mobile copy of Telegram Desktop (win 10) on an empty 5Go Veracrypt disk. Disk is stored on a SSD HD Telegram is very long to open (15-20 seconds). Then, functions take also long to respond, for example clicking on a discusion will request to wait 5-10 seconds to open the discussion. I have no problem with other software installed on Veracrypt disks. The same copy of Telegram Desktop (same teleg accounts etc) runs normally on an usual (non Vera disk). Any...
-
To add a bit more info, VeraCrypt by default makes it "hard" for a computer to calculate the key to open the volume from your password (uses what's called a key derivation function, KDF). This serves to limit the rate that a computer can guess passwords, but doesn't stop a person from trying as many passwords as they want. More tech details. https://veracrypt.jp/en/Key%20Derivation%20Algorithms.html
-
Enigma2Illusion posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
In the future, you can review or search the Release Notes since any limit on the number of password attempts would be listed in the Release Notes. There is no limit to password attempts since VeraCrypt is an open source software which would be easily defeated by simply removing the password login limit code.
-
Hi Tevfik, Great insights The MVP approach you outlined is spot on for efficient XR development. I often find feature creep to be a major hurdle, so I recommend a strict MVP checklist to prioritize core functionality. Testing early with low-fidelity prototypes helps to quickly validate ideas before committing to full development. Additionally, adopting modular design ensures the game remains Forever Updatable, allowing easy content additions without overhauling the entire system. This method keeps...
-
Hi everybody, here I live in Italy and work as software engineer and developer, I faced a similar issue when upgrading from a legacy BIOS system (AMD Phenom) to a newer platform. Here's how I solved the problem: 1-Legacy Boot vs. UEFI: I initially wanted to keep using legacy BIOS booting for compatibility, but after checking my motherboard's manual, I realized that the newer AM5 platforms do support legacy boot in some cases. However, I quickly realized that modern systems, especially with Windows...
-
Hi Tevfik, Great insights The MVP approach you outlined is spot on for efficient XR development. I often find feature creep to be a major hurdle, so I recommend a strict MVP checklist to prioritize core functionality. Testing early with low-fidelity prototypes helps to quickly validate ideas before committing to full development. Additionally, adopting modular design ensures the game remains Forever Updatable, allowing easy content additions without overhauling the entire system. This method keeps...
-
Hi everybody, here I live in Italy and work as software engineer and developer, I faced a similar issue when upgrading from a legacy BIOS system (AMD Phenom) to a newer platform. Here's how I solved the problem: 1-Legacy Boot vs. UEFI: I initially wanted to keep using legacy BIOS booting for compatibility, but after checking my motherboard's manual, I realized that the newer AM5 platforms do support legacy boot in some cases. However, I quickly realized that modern systems, especially with Windows...
-
Atesa Tatjana modified a comment on discussion Technical Topics
Hi everybody, here I live in Italy and work as software engineer and developer, I faced a similar issue when upgrading from a legacy BIOS system (AMD Phenom) to a newer platform. Here's how I solved the problem: 1-Legacy Boot vs. UEFI: I initially wanted to keep using legacy BIOS booting for compatibility, but after checking my motherboard's manual, I realized that the newer AM5 platforms do support legacy boot in some cases. However, I quickly realized that modern systems, especially with Windows...
-
Hi everybody, here I live in Italy and work as software engineer and developer, I faced a similar issue when upgrading from a legacy BIOS system (AMD Phenom) to a newer platform. Here's how I solved the problem: 1-Legacy Boot vs. UEFI: I initially wanted to keep using legacy BIOS booting for compatibility, but after checking my motherboard's manual, I realized that the newer AM5 platforms do support legacy boot in some cases. However, I quickly realized that modern systems, especially with Windows...
-
Hi everybody, here I live in Italy and work as software engineer and developer, I faced a similar issue when upgrading from a legacy BIOS system (AMD Phenom) to a newer platform. Here's how I solved the problem: 1-Legacy Boot vs. UEFI: I initially wanted to keep using legacy BIOS booting for compatibility, but after checking my motherboard's manual, I realized that the newer AM5 platforms do support legacy boot in some cases. However, I quickly realized that modern systems, especially with Windows...
-
Pieter Tromp posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
I got it on the 6th attempt so i don't need an answer anymore, but for general information you can fail your password at least six times without getting locked. I hope that'll somewhat help anyone who passes by
-
Hello there I've managed to forgot the few last symbols of my 128-character password, though i've narrowed down to 50-ish the possibilities of combinations. My question is, will Veracrypt lock my drive if i fail too many attempts ? Or can i safely enter one by one the combinations until the correct one matches? I couldn't find any information about it on the official documentation. Browsing forums gave me answers from several years ago that such protections do not exist, but in case this changed...
-
Edit : This problem doesn't always hit ! It started with a relatively recent security update (that did also hit Win 10). BUT I have one colleague who doesn't have the problem though in very similar conditions. And in my current session (today) the problem seems gone ! (it still was here yesterday). Indeed, it's a Windows 11 problem but it's not even systematic. I will follow up later if I can find an explanation.
-
I understand perfectly the MOTW mechanism. However, this is not the problem here. None of my files located in my Veracrypt drive come from internet nor an outside (non local) location. They are all created and updated locally (office documents, pdfs, scripts etc). Win11 blocks all files from the encrypted (Veracrypt) drive. It's not a per file policy, it's global, so I can't apply any method to remove the MOTW mark : there is no mark involved. If I copy a file from the Veracrypt drive to C: (eg),...
-
I understand perfectly the MOTW mechanism. However, this is not the problem here. None of my files located in my Veracrypt drive come from internet nor an outside (non local) location. They areall createdand updated locally (office documents, pdfs, scripts etc). Win11 blocks all files from the encrypted (Veracrypt) drive. It's not a per file policy, it's global, so I can't apply any method to remove the MOTW mark : there is no mark involved. If I copy a file from the Veracrypt drive to C: (eg), then...
-
This is not a VeraCrypt issue. Windows 11 update is purposely blocking files that were/are downloaded from the internet. https://www.elevenforum.com/t/windows-11-file-explorer-now-automatically-disables-preview-feature-for-files-downloaded-from-internet.41231/ https://www.elevenforum.com/t/file-preview-blocked-after-update.41396/
-
According to the documentation for non-system VeraCrypt encryption, all drive, partition and file containers are virtual drives. https://veracrypt.jp/en/VeraCrypt%20Volume.html Note: In addition to creating the above types of virtual volumes...
-
All my files located in my veracrypt drive are considered unsafe by Windows 11, I get warnings all the time, preview is blocked etc... And I can't unblock them (remove MOTW). When I copy such a file to a local drive, I get a warning, but I can unblock the copied file (right-click property-safety). Is there a way to use Veracrypt on Windows 11 without this big problem ? There should be a way to declare my Veracrypt drive as "safe" or "local"... Thx a LOT in advance, it's horribly annoying.
-
All my files located in my veracrypt drive are considered unsafe by Windows 11, I ghet warnings all the times, preview is blocked etc... And I can't unblock them (remove MOTW). When I copy such a file to a local drive, I get a warning, but I can unblock the copied file (right-click property-safety). Is there a way to use Veracrypt on Windows 11 without this big problem ? There should be a way to declare my Veracrypt drive as "safe" or "local"... Thx a LOT in advance, it's horribly annoying.
-
According to the documentation for non-system VeraCrypt encryption, both drive, partition and file containers are virtual drives. https://veracrypt.jp/en/VeraCrypt%20Volume.html Note: In addition to creating the above types of virtual volumes...
-
Grzegorz Drozd posted a comment on discussion Feature requests
I am using fully encrypted volume, not containers. When it is mounted i think they detect that this is virtual device.
-
The cloud backup provider probably is using the file container's suffix of either .tc or .hc to consider the VeraCrypt file container as a virtual volume. You can rename the VeraCrypt file container's name to remove the suffix. Ex: my_vol.hc to my_vol
-
Hi, I am using windows 10, with latest version of VeraCrypt. I am using certain cloud backup provider - I don't want to mention them by name so they don't find this thread and feature and don't try to bypass this feature ;). In recent update their client marked my veracrypt volume as virtual volume. Please add option to mounting a volume to "clone" all info (except for UUID of course) from source drive. In this case volume should appear as a regular volume for OS. Thank you and keep up the great...
-
Baa-meh posted a comment on discussion Technical Topics
Hi, The build instructions use VS 2010. The latest VC version compiles on Visual Studio 2022. Are there newer instructions I can't find, or maybe it's the same as for the 2010 version?
-
VeraCrypt is not an Operating System. Hence, creating a "Windows 10" container will not magically fix using obsolete software that cannot run on Windows 11 OS.
-
SAG posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
I purchased a new Windows 11 pro PC. Unfortunately one of my legacy software programs will not work in Windows 11 and there is no longer support for this software. Is it possible to create a Windows 10 container using Veracrypt that has this program installed in the container? Hopefully, I could open the Windows 10 container to lauch this software. Not sure if this is possible or how it would work. Any ideas on how to accomplish this would be appreciated as this old software is very valuable to ...
-
ton jansen posted a comment on ticket #614
I tested with RustDesk, then I have the same problem: Veracrypt window is not visible downstairs.
-
TightVNC Viewer and PrintScreen dont show the Veracrypt window
-
Hi Tevfik, Great insights The MVP approach you outlined is spot on for efficient XR development. I often find feature creep to be a major hurdle, so I recommend a strict MVP checklist to prioritize core functionality. Testing early with low-fidelity prototypes helps to quickly validate ideas before committing to full development. Additionally, adopting modular design ensures the game remains Forever Updatable, allowing easy content additions without overhauling the entire system. This method keeps...
-
Hello there, I’ve encountered a similar issue before while automating tasks with VeraCrypt, and I completely understand the frustration. The problem you’re facing is most likely related to how Windows interprets command-line arguments, especially when there are special characters in the password. 1-Why This Happens Windows treats the & character as a command separator in the command line. When you use it in your password without enclosing it in quotes, it gets interpreted as two separate commands,...
-
LuzzD modified a comment on discussion Technical Topics
Ich erhalte die Fehlermeldung Gtk-Message: ...: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module" wenn ich vc im consolenbetrieb aufrufen möchte. Und wenn ich das modul nachinstallieren, gibt es den installationskandifáten nicht. »libcanberra-gtk-module« existiert kein Installationskandidat. Kann VC das in Ubuntu Questing (25.10) existierende canberra-gtk3-module benutzen?
-
Ich erhalte die Fehlermeldung Gtk-Message: ...: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module" wenn ich vc im consolenbetrieb aufrufen möchte. Und wenn ich das modul nachinstallieren, gibt es den installationskandifáten nicht. »libcanberra-gtk-module« existiert kein Installationskandidat. Kann VC das in Ubuntu-questing (25.10) existierende canberra-gtk3-module benutzen?
-
Ich erhalte die Fehlermeldung Gtk-Message: ...: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module" wenn ich vc im consolenbetrieb aufrufen möchte. Und wenn ich das modul nachinstallieren, gibt es den installationskandifáten nicht. »libcanberra-gtk-module« existiert kein Installationskandidat. Kann VC das existierende canberra-gtk3-module benutzen?
-
Ich erhalte die Fehlermeldung Gtk-Message: 20:29:24.487: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module" wenn ich vc im consolenbetrieb aufrufen möchte. Und wenn ich das modul nachinstallieren, gibt es den installationskandifáten nicht. »libcanberra-gtk-module« existiert kein Installationskandidat. Kann VC das existierende canberra-gtk3-module benutzen?
-
Ich erhalte die Fehlermeldung Gtk-Message: 20:29:24.487: Failed to load module "canberra-gtk-module" wenn ich vc im condolenbeztrieb aufrufen möchte. Und wenn ich das modul nachinstallieren will, gibt es den installationskandifáten nicht. »libcanberra-gtk-module« existiert kein Installationskandidat. Kann VC das existierende canberra-gtk3-module benutzen?
-
Hi Tevfik, Great insights The MVP approach you outlined is spot on for efficient XR development. I often find feature creep to be a major hurdle, so I recommend a strict MVP checklist to prioritize core functionality. Testing early with low-fidelity prototypes helps to quickly validate ideas before committing to full development. Additionally, adopting modular design ensures the game remains Forever Updatable, allowing easy content additions without overhauling the entire system. This method keeps...
-
VeraCrypt does not support system encryption for ARM64. Only non-system volumes. https://sourceforge.net/p/veracrypt/discussion/technical/thread/ac009c5af1/?limit=25#b614
-
VeraCrypt does not support system encryption support for ARM64. Only non-system volumes. https://sourceforge.net/p/veracrypt/discussion/technical/thread/ac009c5af1/?limit=25#b614
-
VeraCrypt System Encryption is not available for ARM64. Only non-system encryption volumes. https://sourceforge.net/p/veracrypt/discussion/technical/thread/07df76c55b/?limit=25#a68a Based on the posts below, I would not expect development of system encryption for ARM64. https://sourceforge.net/p/veracrypt/discussion/technical/thread/07df76c55b/?limit=25#a68a https://sourceforge.net/p/veracrypt/discussion/technical/thread/709a1b2939/?limit=25#0af7
-
abc posted a comment on discussion Technical Topics
Hello VeraCrypt Team, I am writing to report a critical issue when attempting to encrypt the system partition on my new Surface Pro 11 (Snapdragon X Elite). The Problem: I am running the latest version of VeraCrypt on a clean install of Windows 11 Pro (ARM64), fully updated with the latest Surface firmware and drivers. BitLocker is fully disabled (verified via manage-bde -status). The VeraCrypt Pre-Test works perfectly. My keyboard (via Dongle+Adapter) is recognized, I can enter my password, and...
-
Subject: Re: Error installing VeraCrypt on Surface Pro 11 with Snapdragon X Plus I am writing to confirm that I am experiencing the exact same issue on my device, but with the Snapdragon X Elite processor. Device: Microsoft Surface Pro 11 (Snapdragon X Elite, 16GB RAM) OS: Windows 11 Pro (ARM64), fully updated as of November 2025. Error: VeraCrypt::BootEncryption::CheckRequirements:5108 Context: The error occurs when attempting to encrypt the Windows system partition, exactly as the original poster...
-
What is the maximum disk size VC can support? I have created a 3TB container on an external (USB) 3TB disk but when i try to write more than ~2.6 GB, i get a message saying "The requested operation could not be completed due to a file system limitation". The host disk is NTFS, so is the container (no hidden volume). I have VC 1.26.24 but the disk was created with 1.25.9.
-
I decided to upgrade from 1.25.9 to 1.26.24, hoping there would not be any problems. Unfortunately there was a problem though. I could not mount a disk i have. While playing around to see what happens though, i noticed that in the Secure Desktop i use for mounting the disk, there was a difference. In 1.25.9, the Windows Language Selector toolbar was visible, while in 1.26.24 was not. This is an issue for me since i'm using characters in languages other than English. After removing the Secure Desktop...
-
Hi Mounir I just wanted to mention I've been using the new argon2 KDF and it has been working great, including using a custom PIM. I'm on Windows 11 and the container is 500GB with AES(Twofish(Serpent)).
-
Adnan Baig posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
Guys, I am working on a project where we create on the go secure C level collaboration rooms, using Veracrypt. I am trying to figure out if Container stored on the cloud could be sync realtime with local container? in other words no manual intervention to backup data to the cloud. Using cloud to sync in progress projects on local machine then moving them to storage after completion. I heard Veracrypt is not an efficient tech for cloud backups because it takes the whole file rather than updated blocks...
-
Hello, I recently joined the forum and kinda working on this angle. Was wondering if you were able to get this addressed? Veracrypt secure container backed up to the cloud is what iam working where we use block level sync to address Veracrypt's shortcoming of syncing the whole container. Any feedback would be most appreciated.
-
Neil - posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
Yes, I'm using the latest version of Windows 11. But now it looks like I'm going to have to give up on using a portable browser inside of a very crypt container. I just tried to open the container that contains my portable Firefox browser, and I'm not able to do so anymore. I'm entering the correct password for the container but it's being rejected every single time. Looks like I'm going to have to start from scratch once again. Either that or I'm just going to have to use a regular browser in the...
-
Jeff Stanat posted a comment on discussion General Discussion
Has anyone ever used the hidden file attribute in Windows on their Veracrypt volume file? Any concerns?
1 >
