Menu
▾
▴
rails-users — List for users of Rails. Discuss rules questions and playing 18xx here.
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
|
Dec
(6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(28) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(15) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Oliver H. <oli...@ok...> - 2011-02-16 19:40:07
|
Hi, are there any plans implementing 1853? Cheers, Oliver |
|
From: Bob A. <bo...@ar...> - 2011-02-12 16:31:39
|
Ok, thanks for the clarification guys... although 11 just seem so small. ;) On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Erik Vos <eri...@xs...> wrote: > I suppose this sufficiently clarifies it. I worked from the printed > document when developing 1856, and I conclude that has the correct numbers. > > > > Erik. > > > > *Van:* Chris Shaffer [mailto:chr...@gm...] > *Verzonden:* zaterdag 12 februari 2011 5:53 > *Aan:* Justin Rebelo > *CC:* rai...@li... > *Onderwerp:* Re: [Rails-users] 1845 cert limit > > > > The rules on the Mayfair site suffer from a font/layout/tabset error. The > rows with the number of players and the certs limits in phases 1-4 are > offset one column to the left. > > -- > Chris > > Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Justin Rebelo <jus...@gm...> > wrote: > > I was using the copy of the rules being offered by Mayfair Games on > their website which are marked as v1.0. > > http://mayfairgames.com/mfg-shop3/rules/MFG0472-Rules-V1_0.pdf > > I'll have to see if there's a version noted in physical rules and if > they are any different. > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Steve Undy <ste...@gm...> > wrote: > > Really? > > > > Mine show 11 (table of lent hand side of page 6). > > > > Steve Undy > > st...@ro... > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Justin Rebelo <jus...@gm...> > > wrote: > >> > >> The game rules seem to conflict with that player's aide. > >> > >> My copy of the rules say it should be 14. > >> > >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Chris Shaffer <chr...@gm... > > > >> wrote: > >> > The certificate limit goes down as companies close. This player aid > >> > shows 5 > >> > players, 7 surviving companies = 11 certs. > >> > > >> > > http://boardgamegeek.com/file/download/6azwnjssp9/1856_Player_Aid_v1.1.pdf > >> > -- > >> > Chris > >> > > >> > Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Bob Archer <bo...@ar...> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Why is the cert limit for 1856 showing so low? The docs I have show > >> >> with 5 > >> >> players and 7 companies the cert limit is 14... why is rails showing > >> >> 11? > >> >> That is the cert limit for 6 players with 7 companies? > >> >> I have attached our game file. > >> >> BOb > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> >> The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio > >> >> XE: > >> >> Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. > >> >> Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. > >> >> Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit > performance. > >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> Rails-users mailing list > >> >> Rai...@li... > >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio > >> > XE: > >> > Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. > >> > Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. > >> > Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. > >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Rails-users mailing list > >> > Rai...@li... > >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio > XE: > >> Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. > >> Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. > >> Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. > >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Rails-users mailing list > >> Rai...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: > Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. > Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. > Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb > _______________________________________________ > Rails-users mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users > > |
|
From: Erik V. <eri...@xs...> - 2011-02-12 14:49:25
|
I suppose this sufficiently clarifies it. I worked from the printed document when developing 1856, and I conclude that has the correct numbers. Erik. Van: Chris Shaffer [mailto:chr...@gm...] Verzonden: zaterdag 12 februari 2011 5:53 Aan: Justin Rebelo CC: rai...@li... Onderwerp: Re: [Rails-users] 1845 cert limit The rules on the Mayfair site suffer from a font/layout/tabset error. The rows with the number of players and the certs limits in phases 1-4 are offset one column to the left. -- Chris Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Justin Rebelo <jus...@gm...> wrote: I was using the copy of the rules being offered by Mayfair Games on their website which are marked as v1.0. http://mayfairgames.com/mfg-shop3/rules/MFG0472-Rules-V1_0.pdf I'll have to see if there's a version noted in physical rules and if they are any different. On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Steve Undy <ste...@gm...> wrote: > Really? > > Mine show 11 (table of lent hand side of page 6). > > Steve Undy > st...@ro... > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Justin Rebelo <jus...@gm...> > wrote: >> >> The game rules seem to conflict with that player's aide. >> >> My copy of the rules say it should be 14. >> >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Chris Shaffer <chr...@gm...> >> wrote: >> > The certificate limit goes down as companies close. This player aid >> > shows 5 >> > players, 7 surviving companies = 11 certs. >> > >> > http://boardgamegeek.com/file/download/6azwnjssp9/1856_Player_Aid_v1.1.pdf >> > -- >> > Chris >> > >> > Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Bob Archer <bo...@ar...> wrote: >> >> >> >> Why is the cert limit for 1856 showing so low? The docs I have show >> >> with 5 >> >> players and 7 companies the cert limit is 14... why is rails showing >> >> 11? >> >> That is the cert limit for 6 players with 7 companies? >> >> I have attached our game file. >> >> BOb >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- >> >> The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio >> >> XE: >> >> Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. >> >> Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. >> >> Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Rails-users mailing list >> >> Rai...@li... >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- >> > The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio >> > XE: >> > Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. >> > Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. >> > Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Rails-users mailing list >> > Rai...@li... >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users >> > >> > >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- >> The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: >> Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. >> Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. >> Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb >> _______________________________________________ >> Rails-users mailing list >> Rai...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users > > |
|
From: Erik V. <eri...@xs...> - 2011-02-12 14:46:23
|
Stefan Frey has clarified this omission in a message sent 2010-08-28 17:15 to this list, as follows: "Thus the only remaining fully implemented game without noMapMode is 1856. I know which issues have to be considered (CGR merger and tokens and special tokens), but this will have to wait for the next release." In other words, 1856 has complexities that preclude releasing a NoMap mode without further development work. I can't tell when (if ever) that will happen - Stefan doesn't seems to be active these days. Erik. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Stefan Filonardi [mailto:jk...@gm...] > Verzonden: zaterdag 12 februari 2011 12:39 > Aan: rai...@li... > Onderwerp: [Rails-users] curiosity about 1856 + no "No Map Mode" > > Hello, > > rails has eight variants that are labeled as fully or almost fully playable. Seven > of this variants offer the option "No map mode (for ftf play", 1856 is the only > one without this option. > > How does it come? > > ciao stefan > > PS > Should I report bugs that I can document with a file but I am not able to > replicate (within a short amout of time)? > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: > Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. > Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. > Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb > _______________________________________________ > Rails-users mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users |
|
From: Stefan F. <jk...@gm...> - 2011-02-12 11:39:03
|
Hello, rails has eight variants that are labeled as fully or almost fully playable. Seven of this variants offer the option "No map mode (for ftf play", 1856 is the only one without this option. How does it come? ciao stefan PS Should I report bugs that I can document with a file but I am not able to replicate (within a short amout of time)? |
|
From: Chris S. <chr...@gm...> - 2011-02-12 04:53:06
|
The rules on the Mayfair site suffer from a font/layout/tabset error. The rows with the number of players and the certs limits in phases 1-4 are offset one column to the left. -- Chris Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Justin Rebelo <jus...@gm...>wrote: > I was using the copy of the rules being offered by Mayfair Games on > their website which are marked as v1.0. > > http://mayfairgames.com/mfg-shop3/rules/MFG0472-Rules-V1_0.pdf > > I'll have to see if there's a version noted in physical rules and if > they are any different. > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Steve Undy <ste...@gm...> > wrote: > > Really? > > > > Mine show 11 (table of lent hand side of page 6). > > > > Steve Undy > > st...@ro... > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Justin Rebelo <jus...@gm...> > > wrote: > >> > >> The game rules seem to conflict with that player's aide. > >> > >> My copy of the rules say it should be 14. > >> > >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Chris Shaffer <chr...@gm... > > > >> wrote: > >> > The certificate limit goes down as companies close. This player aid > >> > shows 5 > >> > players, 7 surviving companies = 11 certs. > >> > > >> > > http://boardgamegeek.com/file/download/6azwnjssp9/1856_Player_Aid_v1.1.pdf > >> > -- > >> > Chris > >> > > >> > Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Bob Archer <bo...@ar...> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Why is the cert limit for 1856 showing so low? The docs I have show > >> >> with 5 > >> >> players and 7 companies the cert limit is 14... why is rails showing > >> >> 11? > >> >> That is the cert limit for 6 players with 7 companies? > >> >> I have attached our game file. > >> >> BOb > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> >> The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio > >> >> XE: > >> >> Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. > >> >> Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. > >> >> Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit > performance. > >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> Rails-users mailing list > >> >> Rai...@li... > >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio > >> > XE: > >> > Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. > >> > Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. > >> > Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. > >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Rails-users mailing list > >> > Rai...@li... > >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio > XE: > >> Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. > >> Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. > >> Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. > >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Rails-users mailing list > >> Rai...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users > > > > > |
|
From: Justin R. <jus...@gm...> - 2011-02-12 04:49:27
|
The last date I can find on the PDF rules (dubbed v1.0, but listed 2.2 or something inside) says that they are from 1994. The printed game rules don't state a version at all but does have a more recent date of 1995 in the credits. So, I'd say the printed rules should be the guide. On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Justin Rebelo <jus...@gm...> wrote: > I was using the copy of the rules being offered by Mayfair Games on > their website which are marked as v1.0. > > http://mayfairgames.com/mfg-shop3/rules/MFG0472-Rules-V1_0.pdf > > I'll have to see if there's a version noted in physical rules and if > they are any different. > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Steve Undy <ste...@gm...> wrote: >> Really? >> >> Mine show 11 (table of lent hand side of page 6). >> >> Steve Undy >> st...@ro... >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Justin Rebelo <jus...@gm...> >> wrote: >>> >>> The game rules seem to conflict with that player's aide. >>> >>> My copy of the rules say it should be 14. >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Chris Shaffer <chr...@gm...> >>> wrote: >>> > The certificate limit goes down as companies close. This player aid >>> > shows 5 >>> > players, 7 surviving companies = 11 certs. >>> > >>> > http://boardgamegeek.com/file/download/6azwnjssp9/1856_Player_Aid_v1.1.pdf >>> > -- >>> > Chris >>> > >>> > Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Bob Archer <bo...@ar...> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Why is the cert limit for 1856 showing so low? The docs I have show >>> >> with 5 >>> >> players and 7 companies the cert limit is 14... why is rails showing >>> >> 11? >>> >> That is the cert limit for 6 players with 7 companies? >>> >> I have attached our game file. >>> >> BOb >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >> The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio >>> >> XE: >>> >> Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. >>> >> Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. >>> >> Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. >>> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Rails-users mailing list >>> >> Rai...@li... >>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> > The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio >>> > XE: >>> > Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. >>> > Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. >>> > Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. >>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Rails-users mailing list >>> > Rai...@li... >>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: >>> Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. >>> Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. >>> Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Rails-users mailing list >>> Rai...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users >> >> > |
|
From: Justin R. <jus...@gm...> - 2011-02-12 04:45:22
|
I was using the copy of the rules being offered by Mayfair Games on their website which are marked as v1.0. http://mayfairgames.com/mfg-shop3/rules/MFG0472-Rules-V1_0.pdf I'll have to see if there's a version noted in physical rules and if they are any different. On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Steve Undy <ste...@gm...> wrote: > Really? > > Mine show 11 (table of lent hand side of page 6). > > Steve Undy > st...@ro... > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Justin Rebelo <jus...@gm...> > wrote: >> >> The game rules seem to conflict with that player's aide. >> >> My copy of the rules say it should be 14. >> >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Chris Shaffer <chr...@gm...> >> wrote: >> > The certificate limit goes down as companies close. This player aid >> > shows 5 >> > players, 7 surviving companies = 11 certs. >> > >> > http://boardgamegeek.com/file/download/6azwnjssp9/1856_Player_Aid_v1.1.pdf >> > -- >> > Chris >> > >> > Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Bob Archer <bo...@ar...> wrote: >> >> >> >> Why is the cert limit for 1856 showing so low? The docs I have show >> >> with 5 >> >> players and 7 companies the cert limit is 14... why is rails showing >> >> 11? >> >> That is the cert limit for 6 players with 7 companies? >> >> I have attached our game file. >> >> BOb >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio >> >> XE: >> >> Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. >> >> Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. >> >> Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Rails-users mailing list >> >> Rai...@li... >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio >> > XE: >> > Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. >> > Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. >> > Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Rails-users mailing list >> > Rai...@li... >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users >> > >> > >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: >> Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. >> Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. >> Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb >> _______________________________________________ >> Rails-users mailing list >> Rai...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users > > |
|
From: Steve U. <ste...@gm...> - 2011-02-12 04:23:11
|
Really? Mine show 11 (table of lent hand side of page 6). Steve Undy st...@ro... On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Justin Rebelo <jus...@gm...>wrote: > The game rules seem to conflict with that player's aide. > > My copy of the rules say it should be 14. > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Chris Shaffer <chr...@gm...> > wrote: > > The certificate limit goes down as companies close. This player aid > shows 5 > > players, 7 surviving companies = 11 certs. > > > http://boardgamegeek.com/file/download/6azwnjssp9/1856_Player_Aid_v1.1.pdf > > -- > > Chris > > > > Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Bob Archer <bo...@ar...> wrote: > >> > >> Why is the cert limit for 1856 showing so low? The docs I have show with > 5 > >> players and 7 companies the cert limit is 14... why is rails showing 11? > >> That is the cert limit for 6 players with 7 companies? > >> I have attached our game file. > >> BOb > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio > XE: > >> Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. > >> Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. > >> Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. > >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Rails-users mailing list > >> Rai...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users > >> > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: > > Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. > > Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. > > Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb > > _______________________________________________ > > Rails-users mailing list > > Rai...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: > Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. > Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. > Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb > _______________________________________________ > Rails-users mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users > |
|
From: Justin R. <jus...@gm...> - 2011-02-12 04:19:58
|
The game rules seem to conflict with that player's aide. My copy of the rules say it should be 14. On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Chris Shaffer <chr...@gm...> wrote: > The certificate limit goes down as companies close. This player aid shows 5 > players, 7 surviving companies = 11 certs. > http://boardgamegeek.com/file/download/6azwnjssp9/1856_Player_Aid_v1.1.pdf > -- > Chris > > Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Bob Archer <bo...@ar...> wrote: >> >> Why is the cert limit for 1856 showing so low? The docs I have show with 5 >> players and 7 companies the cert limit is 14... why is rails showing 11? >> That is the cert limit for 6 players with 7 companies? >> I have attached our game file. >> BOb >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: >> Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. >> Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. >> Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb >> _______________________________________________ >> Rails-users mailing list >> Rai...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: > Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. > Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. > Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb > _______________________________________________ > Rails-users mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users > > |
|
From: Chris S. <chr...@gm...> - 2011-02-12 04:12:42
|
The certificate limit goes down as companies close. This player aid shows 5 players, 7 surviving companies = 11 certs. http://boardgamegeek.com/file/download/6azwnjssp9/1856_Player_Aid_v1.1.pdf -- Chris Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Bob Archer <bo...@ar...> wrote: > Why is the cert limit for 1856 showing so low? The docs I have show with 5 > players and 7 companies the cert limit is 14... why is rails showing 11? > That is the cert limit for 6 players with 7 companies? > > I have attached our game file. > > BOb > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: > Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. > Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. > Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb > _______________________________________________ > Rails-users mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users > > |
|
From: Phil D. <de...@gm...> - 2011-02-10 08:27:19
|
There has always been the possibility of moving rails to a network based model where people could connect to a host to participate in the game, however this is currently quite a long way off. There are several screen sharing/conferencing applications available, perhaps using these to share your desktop with the other players would work? Personally I play with one of the PC's plugged into a large monitor and set to a low resolution so that it's visible from a distance but then that's a fairly low tech solution to the problem :) On 10 February 2011 07:11, Stefan Filonardi <jk...@gm...> wrote: > Hello, > > using rails as moderator while playing at the table has the > disadvantage that the font is quite small and not readable from far > away. > > Considering that I could give to every player a netbook, do we have > a possibility to setup a szenario with a central computer and the > netbooks as displays for the players? > > ciao stefan > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: > Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. > Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. > Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb > _______________________________________________ > Rails-users mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users > |
|
From: Stefan F. <jk...@gm...> - 2011-02-10 07:11:34
|
Hello, using rails as moderator while playing at the table has the disadvantage that the font is quite small and not readable from far away. Considering that I could give to every player a netbook, do we have a possibility to setup a szenario with a central computer and the netbooks as displays for the players? ciao stefan |
|
From: brett l. <bre...@gm...> - 2011-02-01 18:45:10
|
I'm pleased to announce the release of Rails 1.4.1. This is primarily a bug-fix release. Full changelog is available on our wiki: https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/rails/index.php?title=Change_Log Files are available via the sourceforge site: https://sourceforge.net/projects/rails/files/Rails/1.4.1/ In addition to the release, I've finally gotten around to including generating Javadoc as a part of the release process. The Javadoc is linked off of our main http://rails.sourceforge.net page. The direct link to the javadoc is http://rails.sourceforge.net/javadoc/index.html . My hope is that this helps existing and prospective developers navigate and understand the code. ---Brett. |
|
From: Games on t. B. <gam...@gm...> - 2011-01-31 15:35:53
|
That's good to hear. I would have checked, but I don't have a copy. Thanks! -Tim On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Phil Davies <de...@gm...> wrote: > A quick comparison shows that rails is using the tile manifest from > the Deepthoughtgames.com copy (you can find the manifest in the rules > on their site). I would imagine 18xx.net is maybe from an earlier > printing and this might explain the differences? > > Phil > > On 31 January 2011 15:18, Games on the Brain <gam...@gm...> wrote: >> I noticed that the Tile Manifest for 1889 is not the same as that listed here: >> >> http://www.18xx.net/tiles/1889.htm >> >> Tile #4 (2x) is not on Rails, but is on this list. >> >> Tile #19 and #20 are on Rails, but is *not* on this list. >> >> Do we know which one is correct? >> >> -Tim >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! >> Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! >> Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires >> February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d >> _______________________________________________ >> Rails-users mailing list >> Rai...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users >> > |
|
From: Phil D. <de...@gm...> - 2011-01-31 15:25:10
|
A quick comparison shows that rails is using the tile manifest from the Deepthoughtgames.com copy (you can find the manifest in the rules on their site). I would imagine 18xx.net is maybe from an earlier printing and this might explain the differences? Phil On 31 January 2011 15:18, Games on the Brain <gam...@gm...> wrote: > I noticed that the Tile Manifest for 1889 is not the same as that listed here: > > http://www.18xx.net/tiles/1889.htm > > Tile #4 (2x) is not on Rails, but is on this list. > > Tile #19 and #20 are on Rails, but is *not* on this list. > > Do we know which one is correct? > > -Tim > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! > Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! > Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires > February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > Rails-users mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users > |
|
From: Games on t. B. <gam...@gm...> - 2011-01-31 15:19:18
|
I noticed that the Tile Manifest for 1889 is not the same as that listed here: http://www.18xx.net/tiles/1889.htm Tile #4 (2x) is not on Rails, but is on this list. Tile #19 and #20 are on Rails, but is *not* on this list. Do we know which one is correct? -Tim |
|
From: Chris S. <chr...@gm...> - 2011-01-31 04:51:33
|
Yes, it is the same bug. It has been fixed in the development code. Fortunately for you, it appears a new release of the production will happen very soon now, and you'll be able to play your game using the updated version. -- Chris Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Stefan Filonardi <jk...@gm...> wrote: > Hello, > > we had a problem today with the formation of the CGR. > > The CGR was formed by just one company (CA) that hadn't operated yet > (in OR 7.2). > > > Share Value > CV 150 The CV bought the first 6 Train triggering the > formation of the CGR > GT 150 > > THB 110 > > CA 100 > > So the CGR got immediatly an OR. After this the software started OR > 7.3. The result was that the GT and THB didn't get a chance to operate. > > Many thanks to all developers for this great aid to our playing group. > > ciao stefan > > PS > I have no idea if this is the same problem as in the bug tracker: > > 3122675 - 1856: Formation of CGR messes up Operating order > > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3122675&group_id=132173&atid=723360 > > since I am not able to open that link > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! > Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better > price-free! > Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires > February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > Rails-users mailing list > Rai...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users > |
|
From: Stefan F. <jk...@gm...> - 2011-01-30 23:08:36
|
Hello,
we had a problem today with the formation of the CGR.
The CGR was formed by just one company (CA) that hadn't operated yet
(in OR 7.2).
Share Value
CV 150 The CV bought the first 6 Train triggering the
formation of the CGR
GT 150
THB 110
CA 100
So the CGR got immediatly an OR. After this the software started OR
7.3. The result was that the GT and THB didn't get a chance to operate.
Many thanks to all developers for this great aid to our playing group.
ciao stefan
PS
I have no idea if this is the same problem as in the bug tracker:
3122675 - 1856: Formation of CGR messes up Operating order
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3122675&group_id=132173&atid=723360
since I am not able to open that link
|
|
From: Erik V. <eri...@xs...> - 2010-12-21 23:18:23
|
Dave, I suppose Berlin is still green as this happens? The new home station prompt should mention the tile edges to which track from the empty stations leads. So you might have seen something like Berlin (S,SE) and Berlin (N,NE), or Berlin (S,SW) and Berlin (NE,SE), depending on the tile orientation. I don't have a saved file where I can test this with Berlin, but with Vienna it works fine. If someone has a saved file from which the home station prompt can be shown to be wrong, please send it to me. Erik. -----Original Message----- From: Dave Berry [mailto:da...@be...] Sent: Sunday 12 December 2010 23:03 To: rai...@li... Subject: [Rails-users] An obscure 18EU bug In 18EU, players may start new companies from phase 5 onwards in any empty station circle. If Berlin has two empty circles and a player chooses to start a new company there, the list of possible stations includes "Berlin" and "Berlin SE" (or something like that - I'm writing this from memory of a game from a couple of months ago). I think these names map to the wrong station circles (although, since I canno longer verify this, it is possible that I just misunderstood the nomenclature at the time). Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Oracle to DB2 Conversion Guide: Learn learn about native support for PL/SQL, new data types, scalar functions, improved concurrency, built-in packages, OCI, SQL*Plus, data movement tools, best practices and more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Rails-users mailing list Rai...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users |
|
From: Dave B. <da...@be...> - 2010-12-19 16:48:02
|
Thanks for the response, Erik! Dave. At 12:18 18/12/2010, Erik Vos wrote: >In 1889, I have replaced tile #440 and removed the optional 6-train. >Erik. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Erik Vos [mailto:eri...@xs...] >Sent: Wednesday 15 December 2010 22:58 >To: 'Dave Berry'; 'rai...@li...' >Cc: rai...@li... >Subject: RE: [Rails-users] Bugs in 1889 game > >See comments below. >Erik. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Dave Berry [mailto:da...@be...] >Sent: Sunday 12 December 2010 22:56 >To: rai...@li... >Subject: [Rails-users] Bugs in 1889 game > >Hi, > >We used Rails alongside a face-to-face game of 1889 today and noted a >couple of issues. In case it is relevant, we were using the DTG >edition of the game and playing the beginners' variant. > >The first was quite difficult to work around. One player, who has >132 cash, wanted to buy the director's share of the IR at 65 >par. When we clicked on the treasury shares, the pop-up dialog asked >if he wanted to start the IR with a par price of 0. If we cancelled >the dialog and tried again, we got the same result. If we clicked >OK, another dialog popped up to say that this wasn't a valid par >price! As an experiment, if that player sold another share first, >to get more cash in hand, and then tried to buy the director's share >of the IR, we got the usual dialog offering the full range of par prices. > >[EV] This is a bug: the UI doesn't correctly handle the case where there is >just enough cash available to start a company at the lowest price only. >This has been fixed in the code base. > >The second issue was that the green Takamatsu tile had only one >marker space in Rails. It should have two. > >[EV] Tile #440 should be replaced. I will look at that later. > >A less important issue was that the distribution of privates had to >be entered using the normal auction dialog, rather than being >randomly dealt. This was easy to work around. We just dealt the >physical certificates and bought them in the appropriate order. > >[EV] Random dealing has not yet been implemented in Rails. > >I also noticed that the set-up options for Rails listed an optional >3rd 6-train. I don't think this exists in 1889? > >[EV] I suppose this is caused by copy-and-pasting from 1830. Indeed the >rules don't mention an optional 6-train. >If nobody objects, I will remove this option. > > > >Best wishes, > >Dave Berry. > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >-- >Lotusphere 2011 >Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how >to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment >to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. >http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d >_______________________________________________ >Rails-users mailing list >Rai...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users |
|
From: Erik V. <eri...@xs...> - 2010-12-18 12:17:56
|
In 1889, I have replaced tile #440 and removed the optional 6-train. Erik. -----Original Message----- From: Erik Vos [mailto:eri...@xs...] Sent: Wednesday 15 December 2010 22:58 To: 'Dave Berry'; 'rai...@li...' Cc: rai...@li... Subject: RE: [Rails-users] Bugs in 1889 game See comments below. Erik. -----Original Message----- From: Dave Berry [mailto:da...@be...] Sent: Sunday 12 December 2010 22:56 To: rai...@li... Subject: [Rails-users] Bugs in 1889 game Hi, We used Rails alongside a face-to-face game of 1889 today and noted a couple of issues. In case it is relevant, we were using the DTG edition of the game and playing the beginners' variant. The first was quite difficult to work around. One player, who has 132 cash, wanted to buy the director's share of the IR at 65 par. When we clicked on the treasury shares, the pop-up dialog asked if he wanted to start the IR with a par price of 0. If we cancelled the dialog and tried again, we got the same result. If we clicked OK, another dialog popped up to say that this wasn't a valid par price! As an experiment, if that player sold another share first, to get more cash in hand, and then tried to buy the director's share of the IR, we got the usual dialog offering the full range of par prices. [EV] This is a bug: the UI doesn't correctly handle the case where there is just enough cash available to start a company at the lowest price only. This has been fixed in the code base. The second issue was that the green Takamatsu tile had only one marker space in Rails. It should have two. [EV] Tile #440 should be replaced. I will look at that later. A less important issue was that the distribution of privates had to be entered using the normal auction dialog, rather than being randomly dealt. This was easy to work around. We just dealt the physical certificates and bought them in the appropriate order. [EV] Random dealing has not yet been implemented in Rails. I also noticed that the set-up options for Rails listed an optional 3rd 6-train. I don't think this exists in 1889? [EV] I suppose this is caused by copy-and-pasting from 1830. Indeed the rules don't mention an optional 6-train. If nobody objects, I will remove this option. Best wishes, Dave Berry. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d _______________________________________________ Rails-users mailing list Rai...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users |
|
From: Erik V. <eri...@xs...> - 2010-12-15 21:58:00
|
See comments below. Erik. -----Original Message----- From: Dave Berry [mailto:da...@be...] Sent: Sunday 12 December 2010 22:56 To: rai...@li... Subject: [Rails-users] Bugs in 1889 game Hi, We used Rails alongside a face-to-face game of 1889 today and noted a couple of issues. In case it is relevant, we were using the DTG edition of the game and playing the beginners' variant. The first was quite difficult to work around. One player, who has 132 cash, wanted to buy the director's share of the IR at 65 par. When we clicked on the treasury shares, the pop-up dialog asked if he wanted to start the IR with a par price of 0. If we cancelled the dialog and tried again, we got the same result. If we clicked OK, another dialog popped up to say that this wasn't a valid par price! As an experiment, if that player sold another share first, to get more cash in hand, and then tried to buy the director's share of the IR, we got the usual dialog offering the full range of par prices. [EV] This is a bug: the UI doesn't correctly handle the case where there is just enough cash available to start a company at the lowest price only. This has been fixed in the code base. The second issue was that the green Takamatsu tile had only one marker space in Rails. It should have two. [EV] Tile #440 should be replaced. I will look at that later. A less important issue was that the distribution of privates had to be entered using the normal auction dialog, rather than being randomly dealt. This was easy to work around. We just dealt the physical certificates and bought them in the appropriate order. [EV] Random dealing has not yet been implemented in Rails. I also noticed that the set-up options for Rails listed an optional 3rd 6-train. I don't think this exists in 1889? [EV] I suppose this is caused by copy-and-pasting from 1830. Indeed the rules don't mention an optional 6-train. If nobody objects, I will remove this option. Best wishes, Dave Berry. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d _______________________________________________ Rails-users mailing list Rai...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rails-users |
|
From: Dave B. <da...@be...> - 2010-12-15 01:25:44
|
Hi, We used Rails alongside a face-to-face game of 1889 today and noted a couple of issues. In case it is relevant, we were using the DTG edition of the game and playing the beginners' variant. The first was quite difficult to work around. One player, who has 132 cash, wanted to buy the director's share of the IR at 65 par. When we clicked on the treasury shares, the pop-up dialog asked if he wanted to start the IR with a par price of 0. If we cancelled the dialog and tried again, we got the same result. If we clicked OK, another dialog popped up to say that this wasn't a valid par price! As an experiment, if that player sold another share first, to get more cash in hand, and then tried to buy the director's share of the IR, we got the usual dialog offering the full range of par prices. The second issue was that the green Takamatsu tile had only one marker space in Rails. It should have two. A less important issue was that the distribution of privates had to be entered using the normal auction dialog, rather than being randomly dealt. This was easy to work around. We just dealt the physical certificates and bought them in the appropriate order. I also noticed that the set-up options for Rails listed an optional 3rd 6-train. I don't think this exists in 1889? Best wishes, Dave Berry. |
|
From: Dave B. <da...@be...> - 2010-12-13 11:44:30
|
In 18EU, players may start new companies from phase 5 onwards in any empty station circle. If Berlin has two empty circles and a player chooses to start a new company there, the list of possible stations includes "Berlin" and "Berlin SE" (or something like that - I'm writing this from memory of a game from a couple of months ago). I think these names map to the wrong station circles (although, since I canno longer verify this, it is possible that I just misunderstood the nomenclature at the time). Dave. |
21 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
