Menu
▾
▴
jedit-devel
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 1999 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(32) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 |
Jan
(452) |
Feb
(435) |
Mar
(117) |
Apr
(265) |
May
(161) |
Jun
(276) |
Jul
(409) |
Aug
(522) |
Sep
(139) |
Oct
(306) |
Nov
(406) |
Dec
(217) |
| 2001 |
Jan
(237) |
Feb
(194) |
Mar
(266) |
Apr
(298) |
May
(266) |
Jun
(195) |
Jul
(427) |
Aug
(660) |
Sep
(808) |
Oct
(465) |
Nov
(260) |
Dec
(226) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(255) |
Feb
(322) |
Mar
(440) |
Apr
(327) |
May
(271) |
Jun
(263) |
Jul
(122) |
Aug
(346) |
Sep
(172) |
Oct
(282) |
Nov
(184) |
Dec
(166) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(325) |
Feb
(431) |
Mar
(431) |
Apr
(238) |
May
(320) |
Jun
(331) |
Jul
(289) |
Aug
(277) |
Sep
(223) |
Oct
(273) |
Nov
(218) |
Dec
(223) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(203) |
Feb
(321) |
Mar
(316) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(44) |
Jun
(149) |
Jul
(83) |
Aug
(216) |
Sep
(188) |
Oct
(136) |
Nov
(73) |
Dec
(117) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(101) |
Feb
(208) |
Mar
(153) |
Apr
(81) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(87) |
Jul
(100) |
Aug
(145) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(123) |
Nov
(73) |
Dec
(105) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(211) |
Feb
(134) |
Mar
(299) |
Apr
(223) |
May
(292) |
Jun
(426) |
Jul
(477) |
Aug
(415) |
Sep
(501) |
Oct
(460) |
Nov
(427) |
Dec
(302) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(467) |
Feb
(423) |
Mar
(356) |
Apr
(241) |
May
(357) |
Jun
(342) |
Jul
(373) |
Aug
(421) |
Sep
(491) |
Oct
(266) |
Nov
(236) |
Dec
(310) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(228) |
Feb
(344) |
Mar
(466) |
Apr
(410) |
May
(437) |
Jun
(303) |
Jul
(255) |
Aug
(451) |
Sep
(520) |
Oct
(379) |
Nov
(430) |
Dec
(261) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(352) |
Feb
(394) |
Mar
(279) |
Apr
(534) |
May
(245) |
Jun
(392) |
Jul
(510) |
Aug
(392) |
Sep
(237) |
Oct
(332) |
Nov
(302) |
Dec
(590) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(723) |
Feb
(650) |
Mar
(530) |
Apr
(307) |
May
(300) |
Jun
(450) |
Jul
(196) |
Aug
(233) |
Sep
(270) |
Oct
(288) |
Nov
(284) |
Dec
(331) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(336) |
Feb
(277) |
Mar
(133) |
Apr
(102) |
May
(50) |
Jun
(234) |
Jul
(174) |
Aug
(274) |
Sep
(355) |
Oct
(273) |
Nov
(895) |
Dec
(749) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(744) |
Feb
(498) |
Mar
(767) |
Apr
(412) |
May
(513) |
Jun
(596) |
Jul
(372) |
Aug
(515) |
Sep
(373) |
Oct
(246) |
Nov
(210) |
Dec
(232) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(162) |
Feb
(226) |
Mar
(209) |
Apr
(162) |
May
(84) |
Jun
(153) |
Jul
(91) |
Aug
(142) |
Sep
(151) |
Oct
(220) |
Nov
(176) |
Dec
(131) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(61) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(93) |
Apr
(274) |
May
(83) |
Jun
(46) |
Jul
(149) |
Aug
(61) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(93) |
Nov
(100) |
Dec
(164) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(93) |
Feb
(130) |
Mar
(44) |
Apr
(31) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(47) |
Aug
(131) |
Sep
(117) |
Oct
(115) |
Nov
(73) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(106) |
Feb
(88) |
Mar
(116) |
Apr
(160) |
May
(121) |
Jun
(74) |
Jul
(126) |
Aug
(141) |
Sep
(101) |
Oct
(38) |
Nov
(32) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(60) |
Mar
(112) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(115) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
|
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(147) |
Nov
(166) |
Dec
(118) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(53) |
Feb
(51) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(28) |
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(18) |
Aug
(53) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(60) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(67) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(73) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(14) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
| 2022 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
|
| 2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(11) |
Apr
|
May
(13) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(50) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2024 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(35) |
Jun
|
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Miroslav H. <ha...@us...> - 2024-02-23 00:10:57
|
Hi, it seems it's available now, but that dependency libraries didn't get included in plugin zip file.
Could you please check? Or is it normal / I'm missing something?
---
**[plugin-central-submission:#1078] BinEd 0.2.1**
**Status:** closed-accepted
**Group:** None
**Created:** Mon Jan 15, 2024 05:39 PM UTC by Miroslav Hajda
**Last Updated:** Mon Feb 19, 2024 09:09 PM UTC
**Owner:** Eric Le Lay
{{{ BinEd 0.2.1
Source: https://github.com/exbin/bined-jedit-plugin tag v0.2.1
Announcement: initial Plugin Central release
Requires Java 1.8
Requires jEdit 04.05.00.00
Short Description: Binary/hex editor plugin based on BinEd library.
Long Description: <html>
<p>Binary/hex editor plugin based on BinEd library.</p>
</html>
}}}
Second release, but first time trying for central. Let me know if this is correct way how to do it.
Binary is here https://bined.exbin.org/jedit-plugin/ but I can add it to GitHub release if required...
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/plugin-central-submission/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/plugin-central-submission/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: Eric Le L. <ker...@us...> - 2024-02-19 21:09:36
|
- **status**: open --> closed-accepted
---
**[plugin-central-submission:#1078] BinEd 0.2.1**
**Status:** closed-accepted
**Group:** None
**Created:** Mon Jan 15, 2024 05:39 PM UTC by Miroslav Hajda
**Last Updated:** Mon Feb 19, 2024 09:09 PM UTC
**Owner:** Eric Le Lay
{{{ BinEd 0.2.1
Source: https://github.com/exbin/bined-jedit-plugin tag v0.2.1
Announcement: initial Plugin Central release
Requires Java 1.8
Requires jEdit 04.05.00.00
Short Description: Binary/hex editor plugin based on BinEd library.
Long Description: <html>
<p>Binary/hex editor plugin based on BinEd library.</p>
</html>
}}}
Second release, but first time trying for central. Let me know if this is correct way how to do it.
Binary is here https://bined.exbin.org/jedit-plugin/ but I can add it to GitHub release if required...
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/plugin-central-submission/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/plugin-central-submission/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: Eric Le L. <ker...@us...> - 2024-02-19 21:09:28
|
Thanks, version 0.2.1.1 has been released. It should appear on plugin central (http://plugins.jedit.org/list.php) soon. Please let me know if something doesn't look right there. --- **[plugin-central-submission:#1078] BinEd 0.2.1** **Status:** open **Group:** None **Created:** Mon Jan 15, 2024 05:39 PM UTC by Miroslav Hajda **Last Updated:** Sun Feb 04, 2024 11:33 PM UTC **Owner:** Eric Le Lay {{{ BinEd 0.2.1 Source: https://github.com/exbin/bined-jedit-plugin tag v0.2.1 Announcement: initial Plugin Central release Requires Java 1.8 Requires jEdit 04.05.00.00 Short Description: Binary/hex editor plugin based on BinEd library. Long Description: <html> <p>Binary/hex editor plugin based on BinEd library.</p> </html> }}} Second release, but first time trying for central. Let me know if this is correct way how to do it. Binary is here https://bined.exbin.org/jedit-plugin/ but I can add it to GitHub release if required... --- Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/plugin-central-submission/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/plugin-central-submission/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: Thiemo K. <th...@us...> - 2024-02-05 16:57:51
|
Well, the complete entry for the catalog file is
~~~xml
<MODE NAME="SPARQL"
FILE="sparql.xml"
FILE_NAME_GLOB="*.{rq,sparql}"
/>
~~~
---
**[feature-requests:#556] Mode for SPARQL file**
**Status:** open
**Group:** none
**Labels:** mode
**Created:** Mon Feb 05, 2024 04:57 PM UTC by Thiemo Kellner
**Last Updated:** Mon Feb 05, 2024 04:57 PM UTC
**Owner:** nobody
**Attachments:**
- [sparql.xml](https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/feature-requests/556/attachment/sparql.xml) (10.3 kB; text/xml)
Hi
I would appreciate if jEdit sported a mode for SPARQL files. A start could be my attached mode file and the following addition to the catalog file.
~~~xml
<MODE NAME="SPARQL"
FILE="sparql.xml"
FILE_NAME_GLOB="*.{rq,sparql}"
~~~
Kind regards
Thiemo
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/feature-requests/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/feature-requests/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: Thiemo K. <th...@us...> - 2024-02-05 16:57:01
|
--- **[feature-requests:#556] Mode for SPARQL file** **Status:** open **Group:** none **Labels:** mode **Created:** Mon Feb 05, 2024 04:57 PM UTC by Thiemo Kellner **Last Updated:** Mon Feb 05, 2024 04:57 PM UTC **Owner:** nobody **Attachments:** - [sparql.xml](https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/feature-requests/556/attachment/sparql.xml) (10.3 kB; text/xml) Hi I would appreciate if jEdit sported a mode for SPARQL files. A start could be my attached mode file and the following addition to the catalog file. ~~~xml <MODE NAME="SPARQL" FILE="sparql.xml" FILE_NAME_GLOB="*.{rq,sparql}" ~~~ Kind regards Thiemo --- Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/feature-requests/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/feature-requests/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: Miroslav H. <ha...@us...> - 2024-02-04 23:33:45
|
Plugin was using merged jar (fat-jar) before, so there were no jar dependencies before... I tried to create build.xml in https://github.com/exbin/bined-jedit-plugin but it seems I have some issues with paths or something. I have only limited experiences with ant, so I would be grateful for any advice how to pass jars into target jar. Thanks. --- **[plugin-central-submission:#1078] BinEd 0.2.1** **Status:** open **Group:** None **Created:** Mon Jan 15, 2024 05:39 PM UTC by Miroslav Hajda **Last Updated:** Sun Feb 04, 2024 04:39 PM UTC **Owner:** Eric Le Lay {{{ BinEd 0.2.1 Source: https://github.com/exbin/bined-jedit-plugin tag v0.2.1 Announcement: initial Plugin Central release Requires Java 1.8 Requires jEdit 04.05.00.00 Short Description: Binary/hex editor plugin based on BinEd library. Long Description: <html> <p>Binary/hex editor plugin based on BinEd library.</p> </html> }}} Second release, but first time trying for central. Let me know if this is correct way how to do it. Binary is here https://bined.exbin.org/jedit-plugin/ but I can add it to GitHub release if required... --- Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/plugin-central-submission/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/plugin-central-submission/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: Eric Le L. <ker...@us...> - 2024-02-04 16:41:03
|
- **status**: open --> closed-remind
- **Comment**:
Dale, do you still intend to release a new version with a new tag?
Cheers,
---
**[plugin-central-submission:#1077] Beauty 1.1**
**Status:** closed-remind
**Group:** None
**Created:** Mon Jul 10, 2023 05:41 PM UTC by Dale Anson
**Last Updated:** Mon Aug 21, 2023 12:47 AM UTC
**Owner:** nobody
{{{ Beauty 1.1
Source: Source code is in SVN with the tag beauty-1.1
Announcement:
Major update to java beautifier to be able to correctly beautify Java 17 and below. Should work with Java 20 and below as no language changes were made to Java 18, 19, or 20.
Added CSV formatter.
Quite a few bug fixes.
Requires Java 11
Requires jEdit 05.06.00.00
Required plugins:
antlr.AntlrPlugin 4.10
CommonControlsPlugin 1.7.5
Short Description: The Beauty plugin is a general framework for code beautifiers and provides several built-in beautifiers.
Long Description: The Beauty plugin is a general
framework for code beautifiers and provides several
built-in beautifiers. While there are several existing
plugins for beautifying/formatting various source file
formats, this plugin aims to consolidate those
formatters into a standard API so that beautifying can
be performed in a general way, similar to how the
SideKick plugin provides a general framework for code
browsers. Includes beautifiers for beanshell, css, csv, html, java, javacc, json, and jsp.
}}}
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/plugin-central-submission/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/plugin-central-submission/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: Eric Le L. <ker...@us...> - 2024-02-04 16:39:33
|
Hi, I see 2 issues with packaging the plugin: 1. It is mandatory that you list libraries bundled with the plugin in src/main/resources/BinEd.props: plugin.className.jars Contains a whitespace-separated list of JAR file names. Without this property, the plugin manager will leave behind the external JAR files when removing the plugin. See http://jedit.org/api/org/gjt/sp/jedit/EditPlugin.html 2. I prefer that you use ant and the build-support project so that I can build against chosen of jEdit, create the source code bundle and upload to plugin central , see http://jedit.org/users-guide/plugin-implement-building.html. I can help with setting up a working build.xml if needed. Deps would be then downloaded from maven repo using ivy. See https://gitlab.com/jedit/plugins/xml/-/blob/master/ivy.xml?ref_type=heads Please can you look into it? --- **[plugin-central-submission:#1078] BinEd 0.2.1** **Status:** open **Group:** None **Created:** Mon Jan 15, 2024 05:39 PM UTC by Miroslav Hajda **Last Updated:** Tue Jan 23, 2024 06:53 AM UTC **Owner:** Eric Le Lay {{{ BinEd 0.2.1 Source: https://github.com/exbin/bined-jedit-plugin tag v0.2.1 Announcement: initial Plugin Central release Requires Java 1.8 Requires jEdit 04.05.00.00 Short Description: Binary/hex editor plugin based on BinEd library. Long Description: <html> <p>Binary/hex editor plugin based on BinEd library.</p> </html> }}} Second release, but first time trying for central. Let me know if this is correct way how to do it. Binary is here https://bined.exbin.org/jedit-plugin/ but I can add it to GitHub release if required... --- Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/plugin-central-submission/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/plugin-central-submission/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: Marcelo V. <va...@us...> - 2024-02-03 06:51:06
|
- **status**: open --> closed-works-for-me --- **[bugs:#4131] JEdit Displaying Unicode characters ans Empty/Blank Boxes** **Status:** closed-works-for-me **Group:** normal bug **Labels:** unicode encoding / localization **Created:** Sun Jan 28, 2024 05:12 AM UTC by dbareis **Last Updated:** Wed Jan 31, 2024 02:17 AM UTC **Owner:** nobody Jedit is not displaying the unicode characters I paste in to files (say ".css" as UTF-8). It shows a blank box character. I don't know whether it works in other encodings. An example of a failing character is: **Black Rightwards Arrowhead - ➤** I searched the help but unicode is hardly mentioned. I'm on jedit 5.5.0 on Windows 11, the change history for the newer version doesn't mention unicode. --- Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/bugs/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: dbareis <db...@us...> - 2024-01-31 04:27:13
|
Thanks, The additional fonts settings seems to have fixed this. --- Thanks Dennis On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 13:17, Marcelo Vanzin <va...@us...> wrote: > Works for me. Maybe the font you have for your text area doesn't have that > glyph. Also try enabling "Additional fonst with font substitution" in the > Global Options -> Text Area pane. > ------------------------------ > > *[bugs:#4131] <https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/bugs/4131/> JEdit > Displaying Unicode characters ans Empty/Blank Boxes* > > *Status:* open > *Group:* normal bug > *Labels:* unicode encoding / localization > *Created:* Sun Jan 28, 2024 05:12 AM UTC by dbareis > *Last Updated:* Sun Jan 28, 2024 05:12 AM UTC > *Owner:* nobody > > Jedit is not displaying the unicode characters I paste in to files (say > ".css" as UTF-8). It shows a blank box character. I don't know whether it > works in other encodings. > > An example of a failing character is: *Black Rightwards Arrowhead - ➤* > > I searched the help but unicode is hardly mentioned. I'm on jedit 5.5.0 on > Windows 11, the change history for the newer version doesn't mention > unicode. > ------------------------------ > > Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in > https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/bugs/4131/ > > To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit > https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/ > --- **[bugs:#4131] JEdit Displaying Unicode characters ans Empty/Blank Boxes** **Status:** open **Group:** normal bug **Labels:** unicode encoding / localization **Created:** Sun Jan 28, 2024 05:12 AM UTC by dbareis **Last Updated:** Wed Jan 31, 2024 02:17 AM UTC **Owner:** nobody Jedit is not displaying the unicode characters I paste in to files (say ".css" as UTF-8). It shows a blank box character. I don't know whether it works in other encodings. An example of a failing character is: **Black Rightwards Arrowhead - ➤** I searched the help but unicode is hardly mentioned. I'm on jedit 5.5.0 on Windows 11, the change history for the newer version doesn't mention unicode. --- Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/bugs/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: Marcelo V. <va...@us...> - 2024-01-31 02:17:10
|
Works for me. Maybe the font you have for your text area doesn't have that glyph. Also try enabling "Additional fonst with font substitution" in the Global Options -> Text Area pane. --- **[bugs:#4131] JEdit Displaying Unicode characters ans Empty/Blank Boxes** **Status:** open **Group:** normal bug **Labels:** unicode encoding / localization **Created:** Sun Jan 28, 2024 05:12 AM UTC by dbareis **Last Updated:** Sun Jan 28, 2024 05:12 AM UTC **Owner:** nobody Jedit is not displaying the unicode characters I paste in to files (say ".css" as UTF-8). It shows a blank box character. I don't know whether it works in other encodings. An example of a failing character is: **Black Rightwards Arrowhead - ➤** I searched the help but unicode is hardly mentioned. I'm on jedit 5.5.0 on Windows 11, the change history for the newer version doesn't mention unicode. --- Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/bugs/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: dbareis <db...@us...> - 2024-01-28 05:12:29
|
--- **[bugs:#4131] JEdit Displaying Unicode characters ans Empty/Blank Boxes** **Status:** open **Group:** normal bug **Labels:** unicode encoding / localization **Created:** Sun Jan 28, 2024 05:12 AM UTC by dbareis **Last Updated:** Sun Jan 28, 2024 05:12 AM UTC **Owner:** nobody Jedit is not displaying the unicode characters I paste in to files (say ".css" as UTF-8). It shows a blank box character. I don't know whether it works in other encodings. An example of a failing character is: **Black Rightwards Arrowhead - ➤** I searched the help but unicode is hardly mentioned. I'm on jedit 5.5.0 on Windows 11, the change history for the newer version doesn't mention unicode. --- Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/bugs/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: Eric Le L. <ker...@us...> - 2024-01-23 06:53:08
|
- **assigned_to**: Eric Le Lay
---
**[plugin-central-submission:#1078] BinEd 0.2.1**
**Status:** open
**Group:** None
**Created:** Mon Jan 15, 2024 05:39 PM UTC by Miroslav Hajda
**Last Updated:** Tue Jan 23, 2024 06:52 AM UTC
**Owner:** Eric Le Lay
{{{ BinEd 0.2.1
Source: https://github.com/exbin/bined-jedit-plugin tag v0.2.1
Announcement: initial Plugin Central release
Requires Java 1.8
Requires jEdit 04.05.00.00
Short Description: Binary/hex editor plugin based on BinEd library.
Long Description: <html>
<p>Binary/hex editor plugin based on BinEd library.</p>
</html>
}}}
Second release, but first time trying for central. Let me know if this is correct way how to do it.
Binary is here https://bined.exbin.org/jedit-plugin/ but I can add it to GitHub release if required...
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/plugin-central-submission/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/plugin-central-submission/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: Eric Le L. <ker...@us...> - 2024-01-23 06:52:52
|
Hi,
thank you for the plugin. I'll take a look next week at the earliest.
Cheers,
---
**[plugin-central-submission:#1078] BinEd 0.2.1**
**Status:** open
**Group:** None
**Created:** Mon Jan 15, 2024 05:39 PM UTC by Miroslav Hajda
**Last Updated:** Mon Jan 15, 2024 05:39 PM UTC
**Owner:** nobody
{{{ BinEd 0.2.1
Source: https://github.com/exbin/bined-jedit-plugin tag v0.2.1
Announcement: initial Plugin Central release
Requires Java 1.8
Requires jEdit 04.05.00.00
Short Description: Binary/hex editor plugin based on BinEd library.
Long Description: <html>
<p>Binary/hex editor plugin based on BinEd library.</p>
</html>
}}}
Second release, but first time trying for central. Let me know if this is correct way how to do it.
Binary is here https://bined.exbin.org/jedit-plugin/ but I can add it to GitHub release if required...
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/plugin-central-submission/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/plugin-central-submission/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: Miroslav H. <ha...@us...> - 2024-01-15 17:39:56
|
---
**[plugin-central-submission:#1078] BinEd 0.2.1**
**Status:** open
**Group:** None
**Created:** Mon Jan 15, 2024 05:39 PM UTC by Miroslav Hajda
**Last Updated:** Mon Jan 15, 2024 05:39 PM UTC
**Owner:** nobody
{{{ BinEd 0.2.1
Source: https://github.com/exbin/bined-jedit-plugin tag v0.2.1
Announcement: initial Plugin Central release
Requires Java 1.8
Requires jEdit 04.05.00.00
Short Description: Binary/hex editor plugin based on BinEd library.
Long Description: <html>
<p>Binary/hex editor plugin based on BinEd library.</p>
</html>
}}}
Second release, but first time trying for central. Let me know if this is correct way how to do it.
Binary is here https://bined.exbin.org/jedit-plugin/ but I can add it to GitHub release if required...
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/plugin-central-submission/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/plugin-central-submission/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: funa t. <fun...@us...> - 2023-12-24 11:20:51
|
There is no problem with the red frame in the left window of the attached image. The red frame in the right window is extra space. --- **[bugs:#4130] Extra space appears around dockable button** **Status:** open **Group:** minor bug **Created:** Sun Dec 24, 2023 11:16 AM UTC by funa take **Last Updated:** Sun Dec 24, 2023 11:16 AM UTC **Owner:** nobody **Attachments:** - [04.png](https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/bugs/4130/attachment/04.png) (77.9 kB; image/png) Extra space appears around dockable button when maximized view. Java Version: openjdk 17.0.1 OS: Linux --- Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/bugs/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: funa t. <fun...@us...> - 2023-12-24 11:16:16
|
--- **[bugs:#4130] Extra space appears around dockable button** **Status:** open **Group:** minor bug **Created:** Sun Dec 24, 2023 11:16 AM UTC by funa take **Last Updated:** Sun Dec 24, 2023 11:16 AM UTC **Owner:** nobody **Attachments:** - [04.png](https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/bugs/4130/attachment/04.png) (77.9 kB; image/png) Extra space appears around dockable button when maximized view. Java Version: openjdk 17.0.1 OS: Linux --- Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/bugs/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: Michael D. <de...@us...> - 2023-11-27 18:44:30
|
Can conform. JEdit can not find Java 21, either. --- **[bugs:#4123] macOS Jedit cannot find Java engine** **Status:** open **Group:** severe bug **Created:** Fri Mar 17, 2023 09:04 AM UTC by Rene Vincent Jansen **Last Updated:** Fri Mar 17, 2023 09:04 AM UTC **Owner:** nobody I installed Jedit (latest) from a macOS .dmg on Ventura 13.2.1. It complains it requires a Java 11 or higher; I have Java 19 on the path. --- Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/bugs/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: Björn K. <vam...@us...> - 2023-11-24 16:24:25
|
- **status**: open --> closed-fixed - **assigned_to**: Björn Kautler - **Group**: --> - **Comment**: Should hopefully work fine by now. If not, please reopen or leave a comment. --- **[jeditlauncher-bugs:#41] JEdit.app starts a different Java app** **Status:** closed-fixed **Group:** **Created:** Wed Feb 15, 2012 03:55 PM UTC by Linden **Last Updated:** Wed Feb 15, 2012 03:55 PM UTC **Owner:** Björn Kautler Downloaded V4.5.0 yesterday, opened the archive, dragged jedit.app to application and ran it. It changed to an already running Java app \(Freemind in this case\). It seems to run fine when launched from the archive. V4.4.2 worked fine. MacBook Pro Max OS X V10.7.3 Lion Java 14.1.0 JEdit V4.5.0 --- Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/jeditlauncher-bugs/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/jeditlauncher-bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: Björn K. <vam...@us...> - 2023-11-24 16:20:55
|
- **status**: open --> closed-fixed - **Comment**: This should long be fixed already in the newer Mac OS Support 1.5 plugin, which will also be shipped with jEdit 5.7.0, but can also manually be installed through the plugin manager. --- **[bugs:#4068] NoSuchMethodException in OSXAdapter.java** **Status:** closed-fixed **Group:** normal bug **Created:** Tue May 08, 2018 02:36 AM UTC by Kohei Nozaki **Last Updated:** Sat Oct 06, 2018 08:32 PM UTC **Owner:** nobody Hello, After upgrading jEdit to 5.5.0, I've started getting the following error at every launching (I haven't seen any problem which caused by this though) java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: com.apple.eawt.Application.addApplicationListener(com.apple.eawt.ApplicationListener) at java.base/java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Unknown Source) at macosx.OSXAdapter.setHandler(OSXAdapter.java:121) at macosx.OSXAdapter.setQuitHandler(OSXAdapter.java:50) at macosx.MacOSXPlugin$1.run(MacOSXPlugin.java:67) at java.desktop/java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue.access$500(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(Unknown Source) at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.base/java.security.ProtectionDomain$JavaSecurityAccessImpl.doIntersectionPrivilege(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(Unknown Source) jEdit version: 5.5.0 platform: OSX 10.12.6 Java version: Oracle Java 9.0.4 step to reproduce: Simply launch jEdit with MacOSXPlugin enabled, and you'll see "7 error(s)" on the status bar Thanks, Kohei --- Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/bugs/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: Björn K. <vam...@us...> - 2023-11-24 16:20:17
|
- **status**: open --> closed-fixed - **Group**: --> - **Comment**: This should long be fixed already in the newer Mac OS Support 1.5 plugin, which will also be shipped with jEdit 5.7.0, but can also manually be installed through the plugin manager. --- **[plugin-bugs:#1875] Mac OS X Support plugin exception with Java 9-ea+157 ** **Status:** closed-fixed **Group:** **Created:** Fri Feb 24, 2017 12:32 PM UTC by Joern Huxhorn **Last Updated:** Sat Oct 06, 2018 08:29 PM UTC **Owner:** nobody jEdit 5.3.0 Plugin: Mac OS X Support 1.3 Platform: macOS 10.12.3 Java version: 9-ea+157 Just wanted to give you a little headstart regarding Java 9 bugfixes. Several exceptions are showing up during startup. Those are all related to com.apple.eawt being unavailable. Unfortunately, the implementation of those classes did also change so starting the JVM with `--add-exports java.desktop/com.apple.eawt=ALL-UNNAMED` option does not fix the problem. I took the easy way out in my application and got rid of the special OS X handling for now. Starting with Java 9, such support should be handled by http://download.java.net/java/jdk9/docs/api/java/awt/Desktop.html and http://download.java.net/java/jdk9/docs/api/java/awt/desktop/package-summary.html I'm unaware of any way to support both Java 9 and Java >= 8 at the same time. java.lang.IllegalAccessException: class macosx.OSXAdapter cannot access class com.apple.eawt.Application (in module java.desktop) because module java.desktop does not export com.apple.eawt to unnamed module @6074967a at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.Reflection.throwIllegalAccessException(Unknown Source) at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.Reflection.throwIllegalAccessException(Unknown Source) at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.Reflection.ensureMemberAccess(Unknown Source) at java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.slowCheckMemberAccess(Unknown Source) at java.base/java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.checkAccess(Unknown Source) at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Unknown Source) at macosx.OSXAdapter.setHandler(OSXAdapter.java:118) at macosx.OSXAdapter.setQuitHandler(OSXAdapter.java:50) at macosx.MacOSXPlugin$1.run(MacOSXPlugin.java:67) at java.desktop/java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue.access$500(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(Unknown Source) at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.base/java.security.ProtectionDomain$JavaSecurityAccessImpl.doIntersectionPrivilege(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source) at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(Unknown Source) Similar exceptions are thrown for other setXyzHandler methods. There are also some NPEs but those seem to have the same root cause. --- Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/plugin-bugs/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/plugin-bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: Björn K. <vam...@us...> - 2023-11-24 16:18:14
|
- **status**: unread --> closed-fixed - **assigned_to**: Björn Kautler - **Comment**: This should long be fixed already. --- **[bugs:#4085] Cannot launch jEdit when installed with OS X package installer** **Status:** closed-fixed **Group:** severe bug **Labels:** MacOSX specific **Created:** Sat Nov 09, 2019 05:40 PM UTC by Damien **Last Updated:** Tue Feb 18, 2020 05:05 PM UTC **Owner:** Björn Kautler The application launcher provided by the Mac OS package installer doesn't work. When I try to open jEdit.app, I just get an error window that just says "JRELoadError", even though Java is installed. I can open jEdit by running `java -jar /Applications/jEdit.app/Contents/Java/jedit.jar`, so it looks like it's just an issue with the implementation of the `Contents/MacOS/jedit` executable. --- Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/bugs/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: Dale A. <dal...@us...> - 2023-10-31 23:23:00
|
Just an FYI, this is fixed in beanshell 2.1.1, which requires moving jedit to GPL 3 before we can use it.
---
**[bugs:#4118] BeanShell error: module java.base does not "opens java.lang" to unnamed module**
**Status:** closed-fixed
**Group:** normal bug
**Labels:** macro
**Created:** Fri Apr 22, 2022 04:03 PM UTC by blurredd
**Last Updated:** Sat Oct 14, 2023 11:43 AM UTC
**Owner:** Björn Kautler
I see the following BeanShell error when running a macro that appends to a StringBuilder:
```text
Sourced file: C:\Users\User\AppData\Roaming\jEdit\macros\StringBuilderTest.bsh unknown error: Unable to make public java.lang.AbstractStringBuilder java.lang.AbstractStringBuilder.append(java.lang.String) accessible: module java.base does not "opens java.lang" to unnamed module @7c75222b : at Line: 2 :
in file: C:\Users\User\AppData\Roaming\jEdit\macros\StringBuilderTest.bsh
: sb .append ( "test" )
at org.gjt.sp.jedit.bsh.Interpreter.eval(Interpreter.java:696)
at org.gjt.sp.jedit.BeanShell._runScript(BeanShell.java:343)
at org.gjt.sp.jedit.BeanShell._runScript(BeanShell.java:291)
at org.gjt.sp.jedit.BeanShell.runScript(BeanShell.java:217)
at org.gjt.sp.jedit.Macros$BeanShellHandler.runMacro(Macros.java:1108)
at org.gjt.sp.jedit.Macros$Macro.invoke(Macros.java:530)
at org.gjt.sp.jedit.gui.InputHandler.invokeAction(InputHandler.java:343)
at org.gjt.sp.jedit.jEdit$3.invokeAction(jEdit.java:3417)
at org.gjt.sp.jedit.jEdit$3.invokeAction(jEdit.java:3399)
at org.gjt.sp.jedit.EditAction$Wrapper.actionPerformed(EditAction.java:225)
at java.desktop/javax.swing.AbstractButton.fireActionPerformed(AbstractButton.java:1972)
...
```
StringBuilderTest.bsh:
```java
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder():
sb.append("test");
```
I'm using jEdit 5.6.0, java version 17.0.2 on Windows 10 Enterprise.
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because jed...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/bugs/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/admin/bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |
|
From: Dale A. <da...@da...> - 2023-10-31 22:30:08
|
I'm not a lawyer either, so I asked the experts at gnu.org, since it is their license. Below are my questions and answers, which are pretty much as Björn mentioned. Bottom line is all we need to do to change to GPL 3 is go through the code and documentation and change all the license headers to GPL 3. Then the beanshell code can be upgraded, but of course, it will have its Apache license as a header in each of the beanshell files. > I'm hoping you can help us sort out a licensing issue, I think it's > straightforward, but would like some confirmation. > I'm one of the admins for the jEdit project (www.jedit.org), an editor > for programmers. The project is over 20 years old now, and has been > licensed under GPLv2 with the "or later version" clause. The project > has incorporated beanshell (www.beanshell.org) since nearly the > beginning, which was also licensed under GPLv2. In the intervening > years, beanshell has moved to Apache and currently has Apache 2.0 > license. We would like to upgrade to a newer version of beanshell, and > this is where my question comes in. I think we need to change to GPLv3 > to do that as GPLv2 isn't compatible with the Apache license. Correct: GPLv2 is incompatible with the Apache License version 2.0, but GPLv3 is compatible with the Apache License version 2.0: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#apache2 > To change our project to GPLv3, is it simply a matter of changing the > license as mentioned in your FAQ? Yes. As per section 9 of GPLv2, which states: "If the Program specifies a version number of this License which applies to it and ``any later version'', you have the option of following the terms and conditions either of that version or of any later version published by the Free Software Foundation." > Then we can use the newer beanshell code with the Apache 2.0 license? Yes, because of the compatibility between GPLv3 and the Apache License version 2.0, as above. > Do we need to get permission from the hundreds of individual > developers that have worked on the project over the years? No, because by licensing the work with the "or later" language, they have already given you that permission. > Thanks for your help, Thank you for developing free software. On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 4:04 PM Vampire <Va...@je...> wrote: > You understood a bit wrong then. > > I'm sorry, I just found that my last answer to that license thread two > years ago was somehow not sent, but still hung as draft here, though I was > sure I sent it. > Anyway, I'll incorporate it here. > > If jEdit would be under GPLv2, there were no way whatsover to upgrade to > GPL3, > other than asking each and every contributor for permission to do so, or > rewriting all code so that no other contributor's code is present anymore, > which both are pretty impossible tasks. Someone could get the idea to ask > for example on the devel mailing list for objections and just do it if no > objections come in, but that would **not** be legally sufficient. > > Luckily, jEdit is **not** under GPLv2. It is under GPLv2+ with plugin > exception. > The plugin exception makes it possible to have plugins with other licenses > or to create Isabelle as long as the conditions are met. > The "+" in GPLv2+ means, that you can update to a newer GPL version any > time. > You cannot simply "commit one GPLv3 class and magically have everything > GPLv3". But you also don't need to. You can simply update all mentions, > documentation, copyright headers in files, and so on to have the new header > for GPLv3+ instead of the current GPLv2+ (copied from the GPLv3+ usage > instructions, not just exchanging 2 by 3 in case something changed there). > > That would be enough to make the GPLv2+ code GPLv3+ code in the future. > I'll second that change, wouldn't be a problem to me. > > It is also correct, that once we switched to GPLv3+, we could > **theoretically** incorporate ASLv2 code as these two licenses were > specifically designed to be compatible. > > But compatible does **not** mean that you can simply copy in the ASLv2 > code and release it as GPLv3+ code and be done. > For that code you would need to then follow all terms of GPLv3+ AND ASLv2, > like prominent notices of what was changed in each file and so on and so > forth. > > I am not a lawyer and I never did this. > So I cannot tell you what we exactly would need to do to make this legally > correct. > So even if we switch to GPLv3+, before you stuff in any ASLv2 code, I > would recommend you ask a lawyer that is specialized to open source > licenses about what is necessary to make this legally correct so that none > of us can get into trouble for copyright infringement. > > Cheers > Björn > > Am 04.10.2023 23:48, schrieb Dale Anson: > > Yes, that's what I understand. There was a conversation about this some > time ago and that was the consensus at the time. The newer beanshell code > is licensed under Apache license, where the version in jEdit right now is > GPL, and GPL3 would let us include the newer beanshell code even though > it's using the Apache license. I'd be happy to update the beanshell code to > the newer version, but not for this release since it would need some pretty > good testing to make sure we don't break existing macros. > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 3:05 PM Matthieu Casanova <cho...@gm...> > wrote: > >> I am not sure I understand well (but I am not a licence expert). >> But today jEdit is GPL 2. And you say that adding some GPL 3 code would >> change all jEdit to GPL 3 automatically ? >> Any new code or it has to be specific ? >> Because if it is any new code I committed a few weeks ago that new class >> which comes with no dependencies to any other part of jEdit and since I am >> the only committer I suppose I can change it's licence to any licence right >> ? >> >> https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/svn/25686/tree//jEdit/trunk/org/jedit/util/SystemManager.java >> >> Matthieu >> >> Mer 04 oct 2023, à 22:47, Dale Anson a écrit : >> >> The license issue shouldn't be hard to resolve, GPL 3 would allow Apache >> licensed code to be mixed in. We just need some new code with a GPL 3 >> license committed to the project, then the rest is automatic. >> >> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 2:10 PM Matthieu Casanova <kp...@fa...> >> wrote: >> >> >> Hey, >> are you able to reproduce it today ? >> I tried with a macro >> >> sb.bsh containing >> >> StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); >> sb.append("test"); >> System.out.println(sb.toString()); >> >> I run it with Java 17.0.8.1 (Adoptium) and it works. >> I tried to recompile jEdit with that same JDK and ran jEdit and the test >> and it also worked. >> Did I miss something or maybe someone fixed the bug already? >> >> As Dale told it seems we will not be able to upgrade Beanshell because of >> their licence change so we have the choice to find another alternative that >> would be compatible with GPL (I don't know any), otherwise we might try to >> solve the problem ourselves in our version of Beanshell. >> >> -- >> Matthieu Casanova >> cho...@gm... >> >> >> Mer 04 oct 2023, à 22:03, Dale Anson a écrit : >> >> I believe it's in the same place it was last year. It isn't hard to >> upgrade the integrated beanshell to a newer, java 17+ compatible version, >> but there is still the GPL vs Apache license issue which hasn't been worked >> out. >> >> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 1:40 PM Robert Schwenn < >> Rob...@ka...> wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> do You have in mind that there's a issue with integrated beanshell ( >> https://sourceforge.net/p/jedit/bugs/4118/) not being compatible with >> java 17 (and presumably later)? Or is it fixed already (or a mistake)? >> >> Robert >> >> >> >> Am 02.10.2023 um 23:27 schrieb Matthieu Casanova: >> >> Hey, >> we missed java 17 and are still on java 11. Java 21 arrived and it is >> LTS, I think it would be nice that the next version of jEdit (after 5.7 >> release) would be java 21 which brings a lot of nice features especially >> virtual threads. >> Anyone against it ? >> >> Matthieu >> >> >> -- >> ----------------------------------------------- >> jEdit Developers' List >> jEd...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel >> >> >> -- >> ----------------------------------------------- >> jEdit Developers' List >> jEd...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel >> >> >> >> -- >> ----------------------------------------------- >> jEdit Developers' List >> jEd...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jedit-devel >> >> >> > > > > > |
|
From: Eric Le L. <ker...@us...> - 2023-10-17 06:29:20
|
Le Fri, 13 Oct 2023 23:09:03 +0200, Vampire <Va...@jE...> a écrit : > @Eric > I see you have committed for it, so is that sufficiently fixed now? Hi, yes, it fixes the issue. We'll remove the version test after we depend on >= java 20. Cheers, |
3055 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
){kind=link}