devil-linux-discuss — General Mailing List for all discussions

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] MD5 Sums for new 1.2.10 releases.

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

The checksums are on the website now.

-- 

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] MD5 Sums for new 1.2.10 releases.

[MightyMidget <mig...@ds...>]

Many thanks,

-----Original Message-----
From: dev...@li...
[mailto:dev...@li...]On Behalf Of
Bruce Smith
Sent: 13 July 2006 19:00
To: dev...@li...
Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] MD5 Sums for new 1.2.10 releases.


> Does anyone know what the correct MD5's should be?

We'll get them on the web site in the next couple days.
Until then, here they are:

c241a87b802082313fa2175bc1e6d73d  devil-linux-1.2.10-i486.tar.bz2
fcc68afcaf438402b9bf1c06f20be6ed  devil-linux-1.2.10-i586-SMP.tar.bz2
773324ef4551094f241a4ce67a1ed315  devil-linux-1.2.10-i686-SMP-server.tar.bz2

 - BS



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
Dev...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.10/385 - Release Date: 11/07/2006

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] MD5 Sums for new 1.2.10 releases.

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

> Does anyone know what the correct MD5's should be?

We'll get them on the web site in the next couple days.
Until then, here they are:

c241a87b802082313fa2175bc1e6d73d  devil-linux-1.2.10-i486.tar.bz2
fcc68afcaf438402b9bf1c06f20be6ed  devil-linux-1.2.10-i586-SMP.tar.bz2
773324ef4551094f241a4ce67a1ed315  devil-linux-1.2.10-i686-SMP-server.tar.bz2

 - BS

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] MD5 Sums for new 1.2.10 releases.

[MightyMidget <mig...@ds...>]

Does anyone know what the correct MD5's should be?

-----Original Message-----
From: dev...@li...
[mailto:dev...@li...]On Behalf Of
Heiko Zuerker
Sent: 13 July 2006 14:58
To: dev...@li...
Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] MD5 Sums for new 1.2.10 releases.



On Thu, July 13, 2006 05:48, MightyMidget wrote:
> Hi All, I'm new here so please excuse me if this has already been
> discussed/requested.
>
> Please could someone supply the MD5 signatures for the new 1.2.10
> releases. I checked on the download page and all I can see is the MD5's
> for 1.2.9 and below.
>
> Hope someone can help - Cheers Andy.

Oooops, guess we forgott to add those. ;-)

--

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
Dev...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.10/385 - Release Date: 11/07/2006

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Antw: Multicast Routing does not work - newstatus

[Alexander R. <Ale...@ar...>]

thanks for the reply!

we do not use NAT and the firewall is off. it's just a router between =
client-net and server-net. you say that zebra can do multicast routing and =
zebra is now quagga, right? i have quagga running, but perhaps with the =
wrong configuration?

<snip>
hostname a-rtr01
password 8 xxxxxxxxxxx
enable password 8 xxxxxxxxxxx
log stdout
service password-encryption
!
interface eth0 # server-net
 ip address x.x.x.x/24
 multicast
 ipv6 nd suppress-ra
!
interface eth1 # client-net
 ip address x.x.x.x/24
 multicast
 ipv6 nd suppress-ra
!
interface lo
!
interface sit0
 ipv6 nd suppress-ra
!
ip route 224.0.0.0/4 eth0
!
ip forwarding
ipv6 forwarding
!
line vty
!
end
</snip>

Greetings,
Alexander Roos

>>>=20
Von: 	ger...@gm...=20
An:	<dev...@li...>
Datum:	13.07.2006 13:21
Betreff:	Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Antw: Multicast Routing does not =
work - newstatus

Just trying to clarify previous post. Multicasting routing does not
work as unicast routing. This works a little different, depending if
you use NAT or not.
  No NAT involved: Use IGMP router like zebra, pimd, mrouted, xorp
  NAT: Requires setting up routes manually (use for instance smcroute)
or an IGMP Proxy
(http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-magma-igmp-proxy-06.txt)

Unfortunately, there are no good IGMP proxy available for *nix. There
should be some in closed projects, but I did not find much when
investigating a year and a half ago. I did find one hidden in the open
source embedded linux Texas Instruments routers. I have adapted this
IGMPproxy to work with normal linux kernels. There are some
limitations with this, I tried adapting pimd to make a proper
solution. However, I lost access to the test object before I could
finish. There are a little info here (I have modified pimd a little
since this):
http://hem.bredband.net/b382880/igmp=20

Note: you also need to modify the firewall. Some hints, using Shorewall:
http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/2004-August/014266.htm=
l=20
http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/2005-January/016793.ht=
ml=20

--=20
Gerhard
The sender address really contains .nospam.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job =
easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D1=
21642=20
_______________________________________________
Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
Dev...@li...=20
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] MD5 Sums for new 1.2.10 releases.

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

On Thu, July 13, 2006 05:48, MightyMidget wrote:
> Hi All, I'm new here so please excuse me if this has already been
> discussed/requested.
>
> Please could someone supply the MD5 signatures for the new 1.2.10
> releases. I checked on the download page and all I can see is the MD5's
> for 1.2.9 and below.
>
> Hope someone can help - Cheers Andy.

Oooops, guess we forgott to add those. ;-)

-- 

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Antw: Multicast Routing does not work - newstatus

[Gerhard O. <ger...@gm...>]

Just trying to clarify previous post. Multicasting routing does not
work as unicast routing. This works a little different, depending if
you use NAT or not.
  No NAT involved: Use IGMP router like zebra, pimd, mrouted, xorp
  NAT: Requires setting up routes manually (use for instance smcroute)
or an IGMP Proxy
(http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-magma-igmp-proxy-06.txt)

Unfortunately, there are no good IGMP proxy available for *nix. There
should be some in closed projects, but I did not find much when
investigating a year and a half ago. I did find one hidden in the open
source embedded linux Texas Instruments routers. I have adapted this
IGMPproxy to work with normal linux kernels. There are some
limitations with this, I tried adapting pimd to make a proper
solution. However, I lost access to the test object before I could
finish. There are a little info here (I have modified pimd a little
since this):
http://hem.bredband.net/b382880/igmp

Note: you also need to modify the firewall. Some hints, using Shorewall:
http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/2004-August/014266.html
http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/2005-January/016793.html

-- 
Gerhard
The sender address really contains .nospam.

[Devil-Linux-discuss] MD5 Sums for new 1.2.10 releases.

[MightyMidget <mig...@ds...>]

Hi All, I'm new here so please excuse me if this has already been
discussed/requested.

Please could someone supply the MD5 signatures for the new 1.2.10 releases.
I checked on the download page and all I can see is the MD5's for 1.2.9 and
below.

Hope someone can help - Cheers Andy.

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Antw: Multicast Routing does not work - newstatus

[<br...@ba...>]

hello Alexander.
There is no working mcast_forwarding support in neither kernel 2.4 nor =
2.6. If you would like to do that you have to use things like mrouted or =
an IGMP Proxy. After starting mrouted the value of =
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/mc_forwarding  will change to "1" (cheked =
this on a Debian, since DL does not contain mrouted) It's not a hardware =
problem. If you really need to use multicast-routing you could try to =
customize your DL (see documentation on =
http://www.devil-linux.org/documentation/1.2.x/ =
<http://www.devil-linux.org/documentation/1.2.x/>  for that).
=20
Greetings, Bj=F6rn
=20

=20
________________________________

Von: dev...@li... im Auftrag von =
Alexander Roos
Gesendet: Do 13.07.2006 10:25
An: dev...@li...
Betreff: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Antw: Multicast Routing does not work - =
newstatus



hello everybody!

after searching the net the whole day yesterday I know a bit more about =
devil-linux and multicasting. so the kernel supports multicast routing =
by having the flags CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST and CONFIG_IP_MROUTE set. And I =
played around with the quagga zebra demon, butt this didn't help me.

I found out that the file "/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/mc_forwarding" =
is set to "0", but I can't change this value to "1", because this file =
is "r--r--r--". Trying to change the value with sysctl doesn't work =
either, even not on a reboot with the wanted changes written in =
"/etc/sysctl.conf". Could this be a hardware problem (wrong NICs)?

so, any suggestions from your side?

Greetings,
Alexander Roos

>>>
Von:    ar...@ar...
An:     <dev...@li...>
Datum:  11.07.2006 21:57
Betreff:        [Devil-Linux-discuss] Multicast Routing does not work

Hello everybody!

I installed a Devil-Linux router (V. 1.2.9) in our Network an need
multicast-routing to run for our Novell-Clients. I googled the net for
solutions and found a hint to add a static route for the multicast-net
on the interface on which the novell-server resides.
(http://www.informatikserver.at/index.php?option=3Dcom_content&task=3Dvie=
w&id=3D10074&Itemid=3D99999999).


But this did not work. On the router I can ping the multicast address
239.255.255.253 to reach the Novell Servers, on a client that resides in
another ip-segment than the server I can't ping. Tcpdump shows nothing
on the serverside interface. I'm wondering if the DL kernel supports
multicast routing and if not how I can compile a new kernel with
multicast routing support.

Additionally I found that for the Service Location Protocol (SLP) which
is used by the Novell client to look up the Novell servers "pim" is
needed. There's something like pimd for linux, is it included in DL? If
not, how can I include it? Or is obsolete, if the kernel supports
multicast routing?

Thanks in advance,
Alexander Roos


-------------------------------------------------------------------------=

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, =
security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job =
easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache =
Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D=
121642
_______________________________________________
Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
Dev...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss



-------------------------------------------------------------------------=

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, =
security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job =
easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache =
Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D=
121642
_______________________________________________
Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
Dev...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss



_________________________________________________________________________=
___

Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail ist vertraulich und ausschlie=DFlich f=FCr den =
bezeichneten Adressaten (dev...@li...) =
bestimmt.
Wenn Sie nicht der vorgesehene Adressat dieser E-Mail oder dessen =
Vertreter sein sollten,
so beachten Sie bitte, dass jede Form der Kenntnisnahme, =
Ver=F6ffentlichung,=20
Vervielf=E4ltigung oder Wiedergabe des Inhalts dieser E-Mail =
unzul=E4ssig ist.
Bitte setzen Sie sich in diesem Fall mit dem Absender der E-Mail in =
Verbindung (br...@ba...).

[Devil-Linux-discuss] Antw: Multicast Routing does not work - new status

[Alexander R. <Ale...@ar...>]

hello everybody!

after searching the net the whole day yesterday I know a bit more about =
devil-linux and multicasting. so the kernel supports multicast routing by =
having the flags CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST and CONFIG_IP_MROUTE set. And I =
played around with the quagga zebra demon, butt this didn't help me.=20

I found out that the file "/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/mc_forwarding" is =
set to "0", but I can't change this value to "1", because this file is =
"r--r--r--". Trying to change the value with sysctl doesn't work either, =
even not on a reboot with the wanted changes written in "/etc/sysctl.conf".=
 Could this be a hardware problem (wrong NICs)?

so, any suggestions from your side?

Greetings,
Alexander Roos

>>>=20
Von: 	ar...@ar...=20
An:	<dev...@li...>
Datum:	11.07.2006 21:57
Betreff:	[Devil-Linux-discuss] Multicast Routing does not work

Hello everybody!

I installed a Devil-Linux router (V. 1.2.9) in our Network an need=20
multicast-routing to run for our Novell-Clients. I googled the net for=20
solutions and found a hint to add a static route for the multicast-net=20
on the interface on which the novell-server resides.=20
(http://www.informatikserver.at/index.php?option=3Dcom_content&task=3Dview&=
id=3D10074&Itemid=3D99999999).=20


But this did not work. On the router I can ping the multicast address=20
239.255.255.253 to reach the Novell Servers, on a client that resides =
in=20
another ip-segment than the server I can't ping. Tcpdump shows nothing=20
on the serverside interface. I'm wondering if the DL kernel supports=20
multicast routing and if not how I can compile a new kernel with=20
multicast routing support.

Additionally I found that for the Service Location Protocol (SLP) which=20
is used by the Novell client to look up the Novell servers "pim" is=20
needed. There's something like pimd for linux, is it included in DL? If=20
not, how can I include it? Or is obsolete, if the kernel supports=20
multicast routing?

Thanks in advance,
Alexander Roos


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job =
easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D1=
21642=20
_______________________________________________
Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
Dev...@li...=20
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss

[Devil-Linux-discuss] Devil-Linux v1.2.10 released

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

I'm proud to announce v1.2.10 of Devil-Linux has been released.

This release includes many new packages, updates to newer versions for
many existing packages, and various bug fixes.

You may download it immediately from Sourceforge.net or the Devil-Linux
FTP mirror sites.

 - BS

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] compatible gigabit NIC?

[<br...@ba...>]

=20
Hi,=20
I have DL running with some onboard dualport bmc-NICs as well as =
Intel-Pros (Single and Dual) (it's called low profile for the =
"half-sized-backplate" ;-)) and never had any problems configuring each =
single nic.
So long, Bj=F6rn

________________________________

Von: dev...@li... im Auftrag von =
Frank Weis
Gesendet: Mi 12.07.2006 07:57
An: dev...@li...
Betreff: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] compatible gigabit NIC?



Hi,

I have 30+ DL boxes with "Intel Pro 1000/MT dual port server adapter"s
and never had a problem so far. They're 64 bit PCI cards and some of =
them run
in 32 bit slots. They come with a regular and a half sized backplate (I =
don't
know if thats the right word), so they fit most anywhere.
I also have a quadport of the same family that works well.

Regarding your second question: yes, you can. The module will get loaded =
once
for each NIC, and thats it.


Have a nice day,

Frank

On Tuesday 11 July 2006 22:36, Roy Pittman wrote:
> Hi Everybody -
>
> I have searched the archives of this list and done some other searches
> and can't find a clear answer:  what gigabit NICs work well with
> devil-linux?
>
> I have a related question:  can a devil-linux gateway run two =
identical
> NICs or must they be different brands or models (I ran into trouble =
with
> this using Smoothwall - it saw two 3com 3c905b cards as one NIC only =
and
> would not let me configure them separately)?
>
> If anyone can recommend cards or direct me to good information I will =
be
> very grateful!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Roy
>
>
> =
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=

> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, =
security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on =
Apache
> Geronimo
> =
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D=
121642
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss

--
_______________________________________________
 Centre de Technologie de l'Education
 29 avenue John F. Kennedy
 L-1855 Luxembourg-Kirchberg
 email: Fra...@ct...
 t=E9l.: +352 478-5973
 fax: +352 333797
 _______________________________________________


-------------------------------------------------------------------------=

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, =
security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job =
easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache =
Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D=
121642
_______________________________________________
Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
Dev...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss



_________________________________________________________________________=
___

Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail ist vertraulich und ausschlie=DFlich f=FCr den =
bezeichneten Adressaten (dev...@li...) =
bestimmt.
Wenn Sie nicht der vorgesehene Adressat dieser E-Mail oder dessen =
Vertreter sein sollten,
so beachten Sie bitte, dass jede Form der Kenntnisnahme, =
Ver=F6ffentlichung,=20
Vervielf=E4ltigung oder Wiedergabe des Inhalts dieser E-Mail =
unzul=E4ssig ist.
Bitte setzen Sie sich in diesem Fall mit dem Absender der E-Mail in =
Verbindung (br...@ba...).

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] compatible gigabit NIC?

[Frank W. <Fra...@ct...>]

Hi,

I have 30+ DL boxes with "Intel Pro 1000/MT dual port server adapter"s
and never had a problem so far. They're 64 bit PCI cards and some of them r=
un=20
in 32 bit slots. They come with a regular and a half sized backplate (I don=
't=20
know if thats the right word), so they fit most anywhere.
I also have a quadport of the same family that works well.

Regarding your second question: yes, you can. The module will get loaded on=
ce=20
for each NIC, and thats it.


Have a nice day,

=46rank

On Tuesday 11 July 2006 22:36, Roy Pittman wrote:
> Hi Everybody -
>
> I have searched the archives of this list and done some other searches
> and can't find a clear answer:  what gigabit NICs work well with
> devil-linux?
>
> I have a related question:  can a devil-linux gateway run two identical
> NICs or must they be different brands or models (I ran into trouble with
> this using Smoothwall - it saw two 3com 3c905b cards as one NIC only and
> would not let me configure them separately)?
>
> If anyone can recommend cards or direct me to good information I will be
> very grateful!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Roy
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
> Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=
=3D121642
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss

=2D-=20
_______________________________________________
 Centre de Technologie de l'Education
 29 avenue John F. Kennedy
 L-1855 Luxembourg-Kirchberg
 email: Fra...@ct...
 t=E9l.: +352 478-5973
 fax: +352 333797
 _______________________________________________

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] best way to monitor traffic remotely

[Richard L. <sol...@gm...>]

FYI - I did a grep on iptraf in the most recent changes file, and the most
recent entry i saw related to it's removal, so I haven't installed a newer
version in a while.  I'm glad to hear that this has been put back in, so
thank you!

--Steven


On 7/11/06, Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...> wrote:
>
> Dear Richard,
>
> Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 1:44:36 PM, you wrote:
>
> > A long time ago, I used IPTRAFto monitor traffic. Since iptraf has
> > been removed, what is the best way to do this now.
> Is iptraf absent in DL? I added it to DL some times ago. It should be part
>
> of current DL and it's working (I've checked it just now).
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Serge                            mailto:fi...@in...
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
>
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss
>

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] compatible gigabit NIC?

[Serge L. <fi...@in...>]

Dear Roy,

Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 1:36:33 PM, you wrote:

> I have searched the archives of this list and done some other searches
> and can't find a clear answer:  what gigabit NICs work well with 
> devil-linux?
Yes. I have a number of server board from intel with built-in gigabit
ethernet ( e1000 module ). Work fine.
The list of cards using e1000 module:
http://www.intel.com/support/network/sb/cs-009209.htm (at the bottom
of the page).

> I have a related question:  can a devil-linux gateway run two identical
> NICs
Yes.


-- 
Best regards,
 Serge                            mailto:fi...@in...

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] best way to monitor traffic remotely

[Serge L. <fi...@in...>]

Dear Richard,

Tuesday, July 11, 2006, 1:44:36 PM, you wrote:

> A long time ago, I used IPTRAFto monitor traffic.  Since iptraf has
> been removed, what is the best way to do this now. 
Is iptraf absent in DL? I added it to DL some times ago. It should be part
of current DL and it's working (I've checked it just now).

-- 
Best regards,
 Serge                            mailto:fi...@in...

[Devil-Linux-discuss] best way to monitor traffic remotely

[Richard L. <sol...@gm...>]

Hello,

A long time ago, I used IPTRAFto monitor traffic.  Since iptraf has been
removed, what is the best way to do this now.  For instance: I'd like to
know who's using the largest amount of bandwidth, who'd trying to access
certain ports, etc.

IPTRAF was nice because it was very simple to use and didn't require
configuration.  My time is limited, so the easier it would be to set up the
better.

Thanks!

--Steven

[Devil-Linux-discuss] compatible gigabit NIC?

[Roy P. <roy...@sb...>]

Hi Everybody -

I have searched the archives of this list and done some other searches 
and can't find a clear answer:  what gigabit NICs work well with 
devil-linux?

I have a related question:  can a devil-linux gateway run two identical 
NICs or must they be different brands or models (I ran into trouble with 
this using Smoothwall - it saw two 3com 3c905b cards as one NIC only and 
would not let me configure them separately)?

If anyone can recommend cards or direct me to good information I will be 
very grateful!

Thanks,

Roy

[Devil-Linux-discuss] Multicast Routing does not work

[<ar...@ar...>]

Hello everybody!

I installed a Devil-Linux router (V. 1.2.9) in our Network an need 
multicast-routing to run for our Novell-Clients. I googled the net for 
solutions and found a hint to add a static route for the multicast-net 
on the interface on which the novell-server resides. 
(http://www.informatikserver.at/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=10074&Itemid=99999999). 


But this did not work. On the router I can ping the multicast address 
239.255.255.253 to reach the Novell Servers, on a client that resides in 
another ip-segment than the server I can't ping. Tcpdump shows nothing 
on the serverside interface. I'm wondering if the DL kernel supports 
multicast routing and if not how I can compile a new kernel with 
multicast routing support.

Additionally I found that for the Service Location Protocol (SLP) which 
is used by the Novell client to look up the Novell servers "pim" is 
needed. There's something like pimd for linux, is it included in DL? If 
not, how can I include it? Or is obsolete, if the kernel supports 
multicast routing?

Thanks in advance,
Alexander Roos

[Devil-Linux-discuss] Truecrypt

[Oliver <suc...@gm...>]

Hello, using DSL now for a while i can state that it is a great system. I have installed it on the hdd of my laptops. The only point i missing is data security, especially on mobile systems. On my old win systems i have used the free truecrypt software for that purpose. Is it possible to install the linux version on DSL or is their a change to get it in the next release?

Oliver
-- 


Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*!
"Feel free" mit GMX DSL! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Feature Request!

[Fuchs J. <Jos...@le...>]
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Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] unknown via southbridge

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Fri, July 7, 2006 10:57, jo...@im... wrote:
> I've been using Devil Linux since v1.2 on my old and formerly trusty
> Pentium 233 which breathed its last breath this weekend. So, being
> firewall'less I purchased a new motherboard processor and RAM to replace
> the old box. I was very excited to get some new gear and all of that, so
> imagine my surprise when the box would not boot! The error that i'm
> getting is "VP_IDE: Unknown VIA SouthBridge, disabling DMA". This error
> prevents the box from booting any further (obviously).
>
> Hardware Spec:
> Motherboard: Asus P5V800-MX
> CPU: Celeron
> Memory: 512MB
> No Hard Disk
> CD ROM
> Floppy
>
>
> Pretty basic setup.
>
>
> I'm not a *nix ninja by any means. I can install it, mostly configure it
> but I dont know alot about what goes on under the covers. However doing
> some basic searches I found that other people have had the same issue
> with other distros, notably the person with the same motherboard that
> posted this thread.
>
> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions//showthread.php?t=441424
>
>
> I've talked to a few friends who have mentioned that this version of
> devil linux probably just doesnt have support for this hardware yet. If
> that is the case, will it support this any time soon or is there a way
> that I can patch this to make it work.
>
> My other option is to return the hardware and pick up a new motherboard,
> CPU and Memory that will hopefully be compatible.
>
>
> Anyone have any suggestions?
>
>
> Thanks a ton for your time :)

This is a question for the Kernel folks.
We always use the current 2.4 Kernel and support whatever they include as
drivers.

Worst case, get a $40 Promise IDE card, they're supported.

- -- 

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkSuh7QACgkQUcytMSbs+YXwagCfZbw0Vy5vnQin7FQYohzKyyeq
xVYAni+l+QiIkA4IHuIpftPa0jLx3++S
=e9xZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Devil-Linux-discuss] unknown via southbridge

[<jo...@im...>]

I've been using Devil Linux since v1.2 on my old and formerly trusty Pent=
ium 233 which breathed its last breath this weekend. So, being firewall'l=
ess I purchased a new motherboard processor and RAM to replace the old bo=
x. I was very excited to get some new gear and all of that, so imagine my=
 surprise when the box would not boot! The error that i'm getting is "VP_=
IDE: Unknown VIA SouthBridge, disabling DMA". This error prevents the box=
 from booting any further (obviously).

Hardware Spec:
Motherboard: Asus P5V800-MX
CPU: Celeron
Memory: 512MB
No Hard Disk
CD ROM
Floppy

Pretty basic setup.

I'm not a *nix ninja by any means. I can install it, mostly configure it =
but I dont know alot about what goes on under the covers. However doing s=
ome basic searches I found that other people have had the same issue with=
 other distros, notably the person with the same motherboard that posted =
this thread.

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions//showthread.php?t=3D441424

I've talked to a few friends who have mentioned that this version of devi=
l linux probably just doesnt have support for this hardware yet. If that =
is the case, will it support this any time soon or is there a way that I =
can patch this to make it work.

My other option is to return the hardware and pick up a new motherboard, =
CPU and Memory that will hopefully be compatible.

Anyone have any suggestions?

Thanks a ton for your time :)

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Realtek Network Card Drivers

[<tar...@r-...>]

Basicly, you have to find out exactly what chipset your card is built =
aroud. There are a bunch of drivers in DL but they are for chipsets not =
for individual cards. There was a page on www.scyld.com about linux =
network drivers, but they seem to be reworking that page, so I looked up =
a previous snapshot of it on web.archives.org. Here it is:=20

http://web.archive.org/web/20041125084258/http://www.scyld.com/network.ht=
ml

Godspeed...

George Tarnai
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: John Bridleman=20
  To: dev...@li...=20
  Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 2:20 PM
  Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Realtek Network Card Drivers


  On 7/7/06, Neobyte <neo...@gm...> wrote:
    Hi All,
              I've just been testing out some different flavours of =
Linux as a router and I'm fairly impressed with the "Devil" distro.
    My only problem is that I need to add realtek drivers for my cards.

    Can someone please direct me as where to put them so they come up on =
the setup list?

  Try the 8139cp or the 8139too drivers.
  --=20
  John Bridleman=20


-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----


  Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, =
security?
  Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job =
easier
  Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache =
Geronimo
  =
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D=
121642



-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----


  _______________________________________________
  Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
  Dev...@li...
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Realtek Network Card Drivers

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

>           I've just been testing out some different flavours of Linux
> as a router and I'm fairly impressed with the "Devil" distro.
> My only problem is that I need to add realtek drivers for my cards.
>  
> Can someone please direct me as where to put them so they come up on
> the setup list?

I've used realtek cards before in DL.  The drivers should be there.

What's the name of the module?  Is this a proprietary driver?

 - BS