devil-linux-discuss — General Mailing List for all discussions

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Routing

[Dick M. <di...@li...>]

Ross Petrie wrote:
>
> It's like the final step from the router to my pc isn't working, yet I
> can ping my machine from the router. 

The only other obvious thing to check is that ip_forward is set.

echo 1 >  /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward

Dick

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Routing

[Ross P. <Ros...@ca...>]

I=20couldn't=20get=20to=20a=20machine=20on=20the=20192.168.0=20subnet=20to=
=20see=20if=20it=20could
get=20back=20the=20other=20way.

Basically,=20the=20deal=20is=20that=20we=20have=20borrowed=20a=20couple=20=
Cisco=20routers=20to
get=20the=20link=20up=20to=20another=20building=20working,=20I'm=20looking=
=20at=20Devil=20Linux
as=20a=20cheap=20alternative!

From=20the=20DL=20box,=20I=20can=20ping=20192.128.10.1,=20192.128.11.2=20a=
nd=20192.168.0.18,
all=20valid=20machines=20on=20each=20respective=20subnet.

From=20my=20PC,=20which=20is=20on=20the=20192.128.10=20subnet,=20I=20can=20=
ping=20192.128.11.2
but=20get=20no=20reply=20from=20192.168.0.18.

It's=20like=20the=20final=20step=20from=20the=20router=20to=20my=20pc=20is=
n't=20working,=20yet=20I
can=20ping=20my=20machine=20from=20the=20router.=20

-----Original=20Message-----
From:=20d...@li...
[mailto:dev...@li...]=20On=20Behalf=20=
Of
Dick=20Middleton
Sent:=2027=20July=202006=2022:26
To:=20d...@li...
Subject:=20Re:=20[Devil-Linux-discuss]=20Routing

Ross=20Petrie=20wrote:
>=20Hopefully=20someone=20can=20help=20me=20with=20this=20query......
>=20=20
>=20I've=20got=20an=20old=20pc=20running=20devil=20linux.=20It=20has=202=20=
nics,=20each=20connected=20
>=20to=20a=20different=20subnet.
>=20=20
>=20eth0=20-=20192.128.10.12
>=20eth1=20-=20192.128.11.1
>=20=20
>=20I=20have=20also=20added=20a=20static=20route=20-=20
>=20192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0:192.128.11.6
>=20=20
>=20Now,=20the=20linux=20server=20can=20reach=20everything,=20no=20problem=
.=20Can=20ping=20
>=20192.128.10.xx,=20192.128.11.xx=20and=20192.168.0.xx=20without=20any=20=
trouble.
>=20=20
>=20=20From=20my=20PC=20though,=20on=20the=20192.128.10=20subnet,=20I=20ca=
n=20ping=20192.128.11.xx

>=20fine=20but=20not=20192.168.0.xx.
>=20=20
>=20I=20have=20set=20a=20route=20on=20the=20lan=20firewall=20to=20route=20=
192.128.11=20and=20
>=20192.168.0=20traffic=20to=20the=20devil=20linux=20box,=20which=20it=20c=
learly=20does=20before

>=20I=20can=20reach=20the=20192.128.11=20subnet.=20Why=20would=20I=20be=20=
unable=20to=20get=20to=20the
192.168.0=20subnet?

I=20don't=20know=20-=20what's=20supposed=20to=20respond=20to=20the=20ping?=
=20=20Does=20it=20know=20how
to=20get=20back=20to=20the=20PC.=20=20Can=20you=20ping=20the=20PC=20from=20=
whatever=20is=20on
192.168...

Dick

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Take=20Surveys.=20Earn=20Cash.=20Influence=20the=20Future=20of=20IT=20Join=

SourceForge.net's=20Techsay=20panel=20and=20you'll=20get=20the=20chance=20=
to=20share=20your
opinions=20on=20IT=20&=20business=20topics=20through=20brief=20surveys=20-=
-=20and=20earn=20cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3DD=
EVDE
V
_______________________________________________
Devil-linux-discuss=20mailing=20list
Dev...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss

________________________________________________________________________
This=20email=20has=20been=20scanned=20for=20all=20viruses=20by=20the=20Mes=
sageLabs=20Email
security=20system.=20For=20more=20information=20visit=20www.messagelabs.co=
m
________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________
IMPORTANT=20=96=20our=20=93canoffshore.ltd.uk=94=20address=20is=20schedule=
d=20for=20cancellation.=20=20Address=20books=20should=20be=20changed=20to=20=
use=20our=20=93cangroup.net=94=20address.=20=20Thank=20you=20for=20your=20=
cooperation.

This=20transmission=20contains=20information=20which=20may=20be=20confiden=
tial=20and=20that=20may=20also=20be=20privileged.=20=20It=20is=20intended=20=
for=20the=20named=20addressee=20only.=20=20Unless=20you=20are=20the=20name=
d=20addressee,=20or=20authorised=20to=20receive=20it=20on=20behalf=20of=20=
the=20addressee,=20you=20may=20not=20copy=20or=20use=20it,=20or=20disclose=
=20it=20to=20anyone=20else.=20=20If=20you=20have=20received=20this=20trans=
mission=20in=20error=20please=20contact=20the=20sender.=20=20Thank=20you=20=
for=20your=20cooperation.

This=20email=20has=20been=20scanned=20for=20all=20viruses=20by=20the=20Mes=
sageLabs=20SkyScan=20service.=20=20CAN=20also=20uses=20the=20MessageLabs=20=
spam=20filtering=20service.=20=20This=20should=20not=20affect=20routine=20=
messages=20but=20in=20rare=20cases=20a=20bona-fide=20message=20could=20be=20=
blocked.=20=20Please=20contact=20CAN=20if=20you=20experience=20any=20diffi=
culties.
________________________________________________________________________

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Routing

[Moray M. <mmc...@ox...>]

Could it be firewalling issue? If so, please send the output of=20
=20
iptables -L
=20
It could also be that whatever is routing at 192.128.11.6 is blocking
traffic from 192.128.10.xx ?
=20
This could explain why  it works from your DL box, where ping traffic
will originate from 192.168.11.1, and not from your LAN (which will
originate from 192.168.10.xx unless you are doing any masquerading)
=20
Yours,
Moray
=20
=20

-------------------------------------
Moray McConnachie
IS Manager        +44 1865 261 600
Oxford Analytica  http://www.oxan.com <http://www.oxan.com/>=20


=20

________________________________

From: dev...@li...
[mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf Of
Ross Petrie
Sent: 27 July 2006 14:41
To: dev...@li...
Subject: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Routing


Hopefully someone can help me with this query......
=20
I've got an old pc running devil linux. It has 2 nics, each connected to
a different subnet.
=20
eth0 - 192.128.10.12
eth1 - 192.128.11.1
=20
I have also added a static route -
192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0:192.128.11.6
=20
Now, the linux server can reach everything, no problem. Can ping
192.128.10.xx, 192.128.11.xx and 192.168.0.xx without any trouble.
=20
>From my PC though, on the 192.128.10 subnet, I can ping 192.128.11.xx
fine but not 192.168.0.xx.
=20
I have set a route on the lan firewall to route 192.128.11 and 192.168.0
traffic to the devil linux box, which it clearly does before I can reach
the 192.128.11 subnet. Why would I be unable to get to the 192.168.0
subnet?
=20
Any clues?
=20
Thanks
=20
Ross Petrie
=20
IT Administrator
CAN Offshore Ltd
Hareness Road
Altens
Aberdeen
AB12 3LE
=20

________________________________________________________________________
IMPORTANT - our "canoffshore.ltd.uk" address is scheduled for
cancellation. Address books should be changed to use our "cangroup.net"
address. Thank you for your cooperation.

This transmission contains information which may be confidential and
that may also be privileged. It is intended for the named addressee
only. Unless you are the named addressee, or authorised to receive it on
behalf of the addressee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to
anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please
contact the sender. Thank you for your cooperation.

This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. CAN also uses the MessageLabs spam filtering service. This
should not affect routine messages but in rare cases a bona-fide message
could be blocked. Please contact CAN if you experience any difficulties.
________________________________________________________________________

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Routing

[Dick M. <di...@li...>]

Ross Petrie wrote:
> Hopefully someone can help me with this query......
>  
> I've got an old pc running devil linux. It has 2 nics, each connected to 
> a different subnet.
>  
> eth0 - 192.128.10.12
> eth1 - 192.128.11.1
>  
> I have also added a static route - 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0:192.128.11.6
>  
> Now, the linux server can reach everything, no problem. Can ping 
> 192.128.10.xx, 192.128.11.xx and 192.168.0.xx without any trouble.
>  
>  From my PC though, on the 192.128.10 subnet, I can ping 192.128.11.xx 
> fine but not 192.168.0.xx.
>  
> I have set a route on the lan firewall to route 192.128.11 and 192.168.0 
> traffic to the devil linux box, which it clearly does before I can reach 
> the 192.128.11 subnet. Why would I be unable to get to the 192.168.0 subnet?

I don't know - what's supposed to respond to the ping?  Does it know how 
to get back to the PC.  Can you ping the PC from whatever is on 192.168...

Dick

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] ssh or telnet

[Fred F. <ffr...@lo...>]

Telnet is BAD, because even though the machine will not have contact,
any other machine in your LAN that can see the traffic can see your root
password when you su root.

So, use SSH. For that you need to turn on the ssh service
(/etc/sysconfig/config) and open port 22 on your firewall which I can't
remember where the config file is, but if you find it that particular
example is there so you just need to uncomment it.

Fred Frigerio
Locust USA
=20
This electronic message transmission contains information from Locust
USA which may be confidential or privileged.  The information is
intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above.  If
you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure,
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is
prohibited.  If you have received this electronic transmission in error,
please notify us by telephone (305-889-5410) or by reply via electronic
mail immediately.
=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Petrie [mailto:Ros...@ca...]=20
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 4:14 AM
> To: dev...@li...
> Subject: [Devil-Linux-discuss] ssh or telnet
>=20
> Can someone please tell me how to configure a devil linux=20
> machine to accept ssh or telnet connections?
> =20
> I'm not worried about security as the machine has no contact=20
> with anything outside our lan, so basic telnet would do!
> =20
> Thanks
> =20
> Ross Petrie
> =20
> IT Administrator
> CAN Offshore Ltd
> Hareness Road
> Altens
> Aberdeen
> AB12 3LE
> =20
>=20
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
> IMPORTANT - our "canoffshore.ltd.uk" address is scheduled for=20
> cancellation. Address books should be changed to use our=20
> "cangroup.net" address. Thank you for your cooperation.
>=20
> This transmission contains information which may be=20
> confidential and that may also be privileged. It is intended=20
> for the named addressee only. Unless you are the named=20
> addressee, or authorised to receive it on behalf of the=20
> addressee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to=20
> anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error=20
> please contact the sender. Thank you for your cooperation.
>=20
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the=20
> MessageLabs SkyScan service. CAN also uses the MessageLabs=20
> spam filtering service. This should not affect routine=20
> messages but in rare cases a bona-fide message could be=20
> blocked. Please contact CAN if you experience any difficulties.
> ______________________________________________________________
> __________
>=20
>=20

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] ssh or telnet

[<br...@ba...>]

hi,
thats easy: just boot up the DL-Box and login
then type setup and configure the network.
next enable the SSH-Service.
Also you have to provide a password for root!
Save your config. (from setup or from bash with save-config)
Thats it! SSHv2 par default.
=20
Good Luck, Bj=F6rn

________________________________

Von: dev...@li... im Auftrag von =
Ross Petrie
Gesendet: Do 27.07.2006 10:13
An: dev...@li...
Betreff: [Devil-Linux-discuss] ssh or telnet


Can someone please tell me how to configure a devil linux machine to =
accept ssh or telnet connections?
=20
I'm not worried about security as the machine has no contact with =
anything outside our lan, so basic telnet would do!
=20
Thanks
=20
Ross Petrie
=20
IT Administrator
CAN Offshore Ltd
Hareness Road
Altens
Aberdeen
AB12 3LE
=20

________________________________________________________________________
IMPORTANT - our "canoffshore.ltd.uk" address is scheduled for =
cancellation. Address books should be changed to use our "cangroup.net" =
address. Thank you for your cooperation.

This transmission contains information which may be confidential and =
that may also be privileged. It is intended for the named addressee =
only. Unless you are the named addressee, or authorised to receive it on =
behalf of the addressee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to =
anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please =
contact the sender. Thank you for your cooperation.

This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan =
service. CAN also uses the MessageLabs spam filtering service. This =
should not affect routine messages but in rare cases a bona-fide message =
could be blocked. Please contact CAN if you experience any difficulties.
________________________________________________________________________


_________________________________________________________________________=
___

Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail ist vertraulich und ausschlie=DFlich f=FCr den =
bezeichneten Adressaten (dev...@li...) =
bestimmt.
Wenn Sie nicht der vorgesehene Adressat dieser E-Mail oder dessen =
Vertreter sein sollten,
so beachten Sie bitte, dass jede Form der Kenntnisnahme, =
Ver=F6ffentlichung,=20
Vervielf=E4ltigung oder Wiedergabe des Inhalts dieser E-Mail =
unzul=E4ssig ist.
Bitte setzen Sie sich in diesem Fall mit dem Absender der E-Mail in =
Verbindung (br...@ba...).

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] ssh or telnet

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Thu, July 27, 2006 03:13, Ross Petrie wrote:
> Can someone please tell me how to configure a devil linux machine to
> accept ssh or telnet connections?
>
> I'm not worried about security as the machine has no contact with
> anything outside our lan, so basic telnet would do!

You can use the setup program to enable SSH.
Don't forgett to save your config after you enabled it.

- -- 

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkTJGEkACgkQUcytMSbs+YUH7gCeI7x/1y9UfJcni5emSFUUSDFF
cKEAn1H2eeoy1zfe1eyv+Af7nBT+uJWs
=maqH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] ssh or telnet

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

> Can someone please tell me how to configure a devil linux machine to
> accept ssh or telnet connections?
>  
> I'm not worried about security as the machine has no contact with
> anything outside our lan, so basic telnet would do!

We don't include telnetd because of security implications.

Enabling SSH is easy, simply tell it to start the service in 'setup'.
If you're running a firewall (I don't know why you would be, since
you're not concerned about security), you have to edit the firewall
config (/etc/init.d/firewall.rules) and uncomment some lines to open up
port 22 (comments in the file explain what to do).  save-config, reboot.

 - BS

[Devil-Linux-discuss] Routing

[Ross P. <Ros...@ca...>]

Hopefully=20someone=20can=20help=20me=20with=20this=20query......
=20
I've=20got=20an=20old=20pc=20running=20devil=20linux.=20It=20has=202=20nic=
s,=20each=20connected=20to
a=20different=20subnet.
=20
eth0=20-=20192.128.10.12
eth1=20-=20192.128.11.1
=20
I=20have=20also=20added=20a=20static=20route=20-
192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0:192.128.11.6
=20
Now,=20the=20linux=20server=20can=20reach=20everything,=20no=20problem.=20=
Can=20ping
192.128.10.xx,=20192.128.11.xx=20and=20192.168.0.xx=20without=20any=20trou=
ble.
=20
From=20my=20PC=20though,=20on=20the=20192.128.10=20subnet,=20I=20can=20pin=
g=20192.128.11.xx
fine=20but=20not=20192.168.0.xx.
=20
I=20have=20set=20a=20route=20on=20the=20lan=20firewall=20to=20route=20192.=
128.11=20and=20192.168.0
traffic=20to=20the=20devil=20linux=20box,=20which=20it=20clearly=20does=20=
before=20I=20can=20reach
the=20192.128.11=20subnet.=20Why=20would=20I=20be=20unable=20to=20get=20to=
=20the=20192.168.0
subnet?
=20
Any=20clues?
=20
Thanks
=20
Ross=20Petrie
=20
IT=20Administrator
CAN=20Offshore=20Ltd
Hareness=20Road
Altens
Aberdeen
AB12=203LE
=20

________________________________________________________________________
IMPORTANT=20=96=20our=20=93canoffshore.ltd.uk=94=20address=20is=20schedule=
d=20for=20cancellation.=20=20Address=20books=20should=20be=20changed=20to=20=
use=20our=20=93cangroup.net=94=20address.=20=20Thank=20you=20for=20your=20=
cooperation.

This=20transmission=20contains=20information=20which=20may=20be=20confiden=
tial=20and=20that=20may=20also=20be=20privileged.=20=20It=20is=20intended=20=
for=20the=20named=20addressee=20only.=20=20Unless=20you=20are=20the=20name=
d=20addressee,=20or=20authorised=20to=20receive=20it=20on=20behalf=20of=20=
the=20addressee,=20you=20may=20not=20copy=20or=20use=20it,=20or=20disclose=
=20it=20to=20anyone=20else.=20=20If=20you=20have=20received=20this=20trans=
mission=20in=20error=20please=20contact=20the=20sender.=20=20Thank=20you=20=
for=20your=20cooperation.

This=20email=20has=20been=20scanned=20for=20all=20viruses=20by=20the=20Mes=
sageLabs=20SkyScan=20service.=20=20CAN=20also=20uses=20the=20MessageLabs=20=
spam=20filtering=20service.=20=20This=20should=20not=20affect=20routine=20=
messages=20but=20in=20rare=20cases=20a=20bona-fide=20message=20could=20be=20=
blocked.=20=20Please=20contact=20CAN=20if=20you=20experience=20any=20diffi=
culties.
________________________________________________________________________

[Devil-Linux-discuss] ssh or telnet

[Ross P. <Ros...@ca...>]

Can=20someone=20please=20tell=20me=20how=20to=20configure=20a=20devil=20li=
nux=20machine=20to
accept=20ssh=20or=20telnet=20connections?
=20
I'm=20not=20worried=20about=20security=20as=20the=20machine=20has=20no=20c=
ontact=20with
anything=20outside=20our=20lan,=20so=20basic=20telnet=20would=20do!
=20
Thanks
=20
Ross=20Petrie
=20
IT=20Administrator
CAN=20Offshore=20Ltd
Hareness=20Road
Altens
Aberdeen
AB12=203LE
=20

________________________________________________________________________
IMPORTANT=20=96=20our=20=93canoffshore.ltd.uk=94=20address=20is=20schedule=
d=20for=20cancellation.=20=20Address=20books=20should=20be=20changed=20to=20=
use=20our=20=93cangroup.net=94=20address.=20=20Thank=20you=20for=20your=20=
cooperation.

This=20transmission=20contains=20information=20which=20may=20be=20confiden=
tial=20and=20that=20may=20also=20be=20privileged.=20=20It=20is=20intended=20=
for=20the=20named=20addressee=20only.=20=20Unless=20you=20are=20the=20name=
d=20addressee,=20or=20authorised=20to=20receive=20it=20on=20behalf=20of=20=
the=20addressee,=20you=20may=20not=20copy=20or=20use=20it,=20or=20disclose=
=20it=20to=20anyone=20else.=20=20If=20you=20have=20received=20this=20trans=
mission=20in=20error=20please=20contact=20the=20sender.=20=20Thank=20you=20=
for=20your=20cooperation.

This=20email=20has=20been=20scanned=20for=20all=20viruses=20by=20the=20Mes=
sageLabs=20SkyScan=20service.=20=20CAN=20also=20uses=20the=20MessageLabs=20=
spam=20filtering=20service.=20=20This=20should=20not=20affect=20routine=20=
messages=20but=20in=20rare=20cases=20a=20bona-fide=20message=20could=20be=20=
blocked.=20=20Please=20contact=20CAN=20if=20you=20experience=20any=20diffi=
culties.
________________________________________________________________________

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] RV: Gigabit ethernet driver

[Matthew H. <mat...@va...>]

What's the output from modprobe tg3 like, as in anything useful in dmesg =
after?

Cheers

Mat Hattersley

-----Original Message-----
From: dev...@li... =
[mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf Of =
Carlos Burguillo Rodr=EDguez
Sent: 25 July 2006 12:51
To: dev...@li...
Subject: [Devil-Linux-discuss] RV: Gigabit ethernet driver

=20

Hi all,

=20

            My boss wants to mount a firewall but he want it to boot =
from CD, so I decided to use devil linux. I've got an Fujitsu-Siemens =
PRIMERGY RX220 with what appears to be a Broadcom BCM5780. The problem =
is that the driver tg3 (wich is the driver used in other distros like =
endian firewall) doesn't work here. The output from lspci is: Ethernet =
controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5780 Gigabit Ethernet (rev =
03).

=20

Any help would be appreciated.

=20

Thanks in advance.

Carlos

[Devil-Linux-discuss] RV: Gigabit ethernet driver

[<cbu...@pc...>]

=20

Hi all,

=20

            My boss wants to mount a firewall but he want it to boot =
from CD, so I decided to use devil linux. I've got an Fujitsu-Siemens =
PRIMERGY RX220 with what appears to be a Broadcom BCM5780. The problem =
is that the driver tg3 (wich is the driver used in other distros like =
endian firewall) doesn't work here. The output from lspci is: Ethernet =
controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5780 Gigabit Ethernet (rev =
03).

=20

Any help would be appreciated.

=20

Thanks in advance.

Carlos

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] glibc

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

On Mon, July 24, 2006 16:20, Mike Smith wrote:
> Hello,
> So far just replacing the old glibc files is working. I hit another
> problem though. Here's the situation. I've created a PXE bootable version
> of devil-linux so that no cdrom is needed and everything is in RAM, some
> of the programs I have to run require write access though, I tried adding
> "rw" to the kernel append line before booting and while
> that worked for some directories like /root it did not work for other
> directories like /opt. The bad news is the program needs write access to
> /opt. I know it compromises security but is it possible to mount the
> file system as read/write?

No you can't, the ISO file system is Read-Only by design.
BUT, you could mount /opt to some other location, even the ramdisk/tmpfs.
Just add it to /etc/fstab.

-- 

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] glibc

[Mike S. <Mik...@am...>]

Hello,
So far just replacing the old glibc files is working. I hit another 
problem though. Here's the situation. I've created a PXE bootable 
version of devil-linux so that no cdrom is needed and everything is in 
RAM, some of the programs I have to run require write access though, I 
tried adding "rw" to the kernel append line before booting and while 
that worked for some directories like /root it did not work for other 
directories like /opt. The bad news is the program needs write access to 
/opt. I know it compromises security but is it possible to mount the 
file system as read/write?

Heiko Zuerker wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
>On Wed, July 19, 2006 15:50, Mike Smith wrote:
>  
>
>>Hello,
>>I recently downloaded devil linux 1.2.10-i686-SMP. I've been adding
>>files to it over the last couple of days to create a custom version but
>>I've run into a problem. A program that I would like to run requires
>>libraries which use glibc 2.3.4  or higher, and this version of devil linux
>>has glibc version 2.3.2. I really would like to continue using devil linux
>>since I've had success with it up until this point but I can't do without
>>glibc 2.3.4. It looks like devil linux 1.3 uses glibc 2.3.6 but I couldn't
>>find any development downloads besides the source of all the packages it
>>uses. Is there an easy way to get or create a devil linux version with a
>>newer glibc?
>>    
>>
>
>DL 1.3 uses Kernel 2.6 and all the latest libraries and tools.
>Unfortunately Kernel 2.6 has a lot of security and is still heavily
>modified. This is the reason why we don't use it.
>
>You can try and build a DL with the glibc 2.3.4, but many other things may
>break. Just replace the files and give it a try. Unfortunately we can't
>support you much on this topic.
>
>It would be great if you could report your findings, maybe we can include
>some of them in DL 1.2.11.
>
>- -- 
>
>Regards
>  Heiko Zuerker
>  http://www.devil-linux.org
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
>iEYEARECAAYFAkS/jH8ACgkQUcytMSbs+YUKkwCfTwOB/ZDpkbAu7ircRsocgwUu
>jucAniYxEB9aCT9+xs8CNZuJojn1aw6K
>=Ybbj
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
>opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
>http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>_______________________________________________
>Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
>Dev...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss
>
>
>  
>

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] DL 1.2.10 and Freeradius

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


I was hoping to get a chance to look at this this weekend, but
unfortunately I didn't have time.
I won't be mad if somebody else can figure out what's going on. ;-)

- -- 

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkTEAOwACgkQUcytMSbs+YXGlwCfefPKbd3cqTlb1+cJ7jpoH3ya
0XUAnRWeADVt7TihSGdG6Ps+OULgpzeD
=t6fG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] DL 1.2.10 and Freeradius

[Serge L. <fi...@in...>]

Dear ferris,

Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 12:22:38 AM, you wrote:

> It seems some lib are missing for Freeradius.
> When I start Freeradius in debug mode, I have the following message:

> Module: Library search path is /usr/lib 
> radiusd.conf[1545] Failed to link to module 'rlm_exec': rlm_exec.so: cannot
> open shared object file: No such file or directory 

> Is there a way to easily correct it?
I think you can put rlm_exec.so to rewritable place
(mkdir /etc/mylib/; cp ./rlm_exec.so /etc/mylib/ ) and either add path
to /etc/ld.so.conf && ldconfig  or use LD_PRELOAD.

The question is - where seek this lib? In my environment it's absent.

-- 
Best regards,
 Serge                            mailto:fi...@in...

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] DL 1.2.10 and Freeradius

[<fe...@fr...>]

It is the devil-linux-1.2.10-i586-SMP.tar.bz2

> Hello,
>
>
> It seems some lib are missing for Freeradius.
> When I start Freeradius in debug mode, I have the following message:
>
>
> Module: Library search path is /usr/lib
> radiusd.conf[1545] Failed to link to module 'rlm_exec': rlm_exec.so:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
>
> Is there a way to easily correct it?

Probably not.
Which of the various DL versions are you using?



Nouveau: le premier abonnement ADSL sans taxe mensuelle!
Changez d=E8s =E0 pr=E9sent pour sunrise ADSL free.
http://www.sunrise.ch/fr/privatkunden/iminternetsurfen/adsl/adsl_abosundp=
reise/adsl_gelegenheitssurfer/adsl_free.htm

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] glibc

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On Wed, July 19, 2006 15:50, Mike Smith wrote:
> Hello,
> I recently downloaded devil linux 1.2.10-i686-SMP. I've been adding
> files to it over the last couple of days to create a custom version but
> I've run into a problem. A program that I would like to run requires
> libraries which use glibc 2.3.4  or higher, and this version of devil linux
> has glibc version 2.3.2. I really would like to continue using devil linux
> since I've had success with it up until this point but I can't do without
> glibc 2.3.4. It looks like devil linux 1.3 uses glibc 2.3.6 but I couldn't
> find any development downloads besides the source of all the packages it
> uses. Is there an easy way to get or create a devil linux version with a
> newer glibc?

DL 1.3 uses Kernel 2.6 and all the latest libraries and tools.
Unfortunately Kernel 2.6 has a lot of security and is still heavily
modified. This is the reason why we don't use it.

You can try and build a DL with the glibc 2.3.4, but many other things may
break. Just replace the files and give it a try. Unfortunately we can't
support you much on this topic.

It would be great if you could report your findings, maybe we can include
some of them in DL 1.2.11.

- -- 

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkS/jH8ACgkQUcytMSbs+YUKkwCfTwOB/ZDpkbAu7ircRsocgwUu
jucAniYxEB9aCT9+xs8CNZuJojn1aw6K
=Ybbj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] (no subject)

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

Is it the -server -i486 or i586 version?

Heiko

On Wed, July 19, 2006 02:34, fe...@fr... wrote:
> It is the last one 1.2.10
>
>
> On Mit Jul 19 3:49 , 'Heiko Zuerker'  sent:
>
>
> On Tue, July 18, 2006 02:22, fe...@fr... wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> It seems some lib are missing for Freeradius.
>> When I start Freeradius in debug mode, I have the following message:
>>
>>
>>
>> Module: Library search path is /usr/lib
>> radiusd.conf[1545] Failed to link to module 'rlm_exec': rlm_exec.so:
>> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
>>
>> Is there a way to easily correct it?
>>
>
> Probably not.
> Which of the various DL versions are you using?
>
>
> --
>
>
> Regards
> Heiko Zuerker
> http://www.devil-linux.org
>
>
>
> Nouveau: le premier abonnement ADSL sans taxe mensuelle!
> Changez dès à présent pour sunrise ADSL free.
> http://www.sunrise.ch/fr/privatkunden/iminternetsurfen/adsl/adsl_abosundpr
> eise/adsl_gelegenheitssurfer/adsl_free.htm
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn
> cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>  _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss
>
>


-- 

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org

[Devil-Linux-discuss] glibc

[Mike S. <Mik...@am...>]

Hello,
    I recently downloaded devil linux 1.2.10-i686-SMP. I've been adding 
files to it over the last couple of days to create a custom version but 
I've run into a problem. A program that I would like to run requires 
libraries which use glibc 2.3.4  or higher, and this version of devil 
linux has glibc version 2.3.2. I really would like to continue using 
devil linux since I've had success with it up until this point but I 
can't do without glibc 2.3.4. It looks like devil linux 1.3 uses glibc  
2.3.6 but I couldn't find any development downloads besides the source 
of all the packages it uses. Is there an easy way to get or create a 
devil linux version with a newer glibc?

[Devil-Linux-discuss] (no subject)

[<fe...@fr...>]

It is the last one 1.2.10

On Mit Jul 19 3:49 , 'Heiko Zuerker'  sent:

    On Tue, July 18, 2006 02:22, fe...@fr... wrote:
    > Hello,
    >
    >
    > It seems some lib are missing for Freeradius.
    > When I start Freeradius in debug mode, I have the following message=
:
    >
    >
    > Module: Library search path is /usr/lib
    > radiusd.conf[1545] Failed to link to module 'rlm_exec': rlm_exec.so=
:
    > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    >
    > Is there a way to easily correct it?

    Probably not.
    Which of the various DL versions are you using?

    -- 

    Regards
    Heiko Zuerker
    http://www.devil-linux.org


Nouveau: le premier abonnement ADSL sans taxe mensuelle!
Changez d=E8s =E0 pr=E9sent pour sunrise ADSL free.
http://www.sunrise.ch/fr/privatkunden/iminternetsurfen/adsl/adsl_abosundp=
reise/adsl_gelegenheitssurfer/adsl_free.htm

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] DL 1.2.10 and Freeradius

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

On Tue, July 18, 2006 02:22, fe...@fr... wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> It seems some lib are missing for Freeradius.
> When I start Freeradius in debug mode, I have the following message:
>
>
> Module: Library search path is /usr/lib
> radiusd.conf[1545] Failed to link to module 'rlm_exec': rlm_exec.so:
> cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
>
> Is there a way to easily correct it?

Probably not.
Which of the various DL versions are you using?

-- 

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org


-- 

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org


-- 

Regards
  Heiko Zuerker
  http://www.devil-linux.org

[Devil-Linux-discuss] DL 1.2.10 and Freeradius

[<fe...@fr...>]

Hello,

It seems some lib are missing for Freeradius.
When I start Freeradius in debug mode, I have the following message:

Module: Library search path is /usr/lib 
radiusd.conf[1545] Failed to link to module 'rlm_exec': rlm_exec.so: cann=
ot
open shared object file: No such file or directory 

Is there a way to easily correct it?

Thanks

Nouveau: le premier abonnement ADSL sans taxe mensuelle!
Changez d=E8s =E0 pr=E9sent pour sunrise ADSL free.
http://www.sunrise.ch/fr/privatkunden/iminternetsurfen/adsl/adsl_abosundp=
reise/adsl_gelegenheitssurfer/adsl_free.htm

[Devil-Linux-discuss] PCMCIA and eth0 problems at boot

[Gerhard O. <ger...@gm...>]

After upgrading from 1.2.7 to 1.2.10, the network no longer
initialised correctly. The log is shown below. The core problem seems
to be that cardmgr exits before it is completely finished so the
interface cannot be started correctly.

I got around this by adding a delay in /etc/init.d/pcmcia after start.

The workaround is fine for me, but a solution in the distro should
possibly be different.
Any suggestions?



INIT: Entering runlevel: 3
Starting PCMCIA services: cardmgr[455]: watching 2 sockets
done.
cardmgr[456]: socket 0: 3Com 589 Ethernet
Starting interface eth0 [IPv4]SIOCSIFADDR: No such device
SIOCSIFBRDADDR: Cannot assign requested address
SIOCSIFNETMASK: Cannot assign requested address
[FAILED]
   adding route to net default/0.0.0.0 via gateway 1.1.1.1 on eth0
SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable
Starting interface eth1 [IPv4][  OK  ]

-- 
Gerhard
The sender address really contains .nospam.

Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Antw: Multicast Routing does not work - newstatus

[Gerhard O. <ger...@gm...>]

quagga is a fork/development of zebra, the original zebra project may
not even exist

I just looked briefly at quagga/zebra some time ago, before I relized
that what I needed was a IGMP proxy. From what I remember, it was
sufficient to specify "multicast" for the interface in the
configuration.

smcroute (http://www.cschill.de/smcroute/) is useful when
troubleshooting multicast setup (instead of running the deamon). (The
manpage has a few hints of files as well)

quagga may not be handling multicast correctly?
http://lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-users/2005-March/004054.html

Note: There is a kernel message at startup about "Multicast router
0.06 plus PIM-SM", but I believe this is just the kernel support for
the service, though this may have been added after I last took a look
at this.

On 7/13/06, Alexander Roos <Ale...@ar...> wrote:
> thanks for the reply!
>
> we do not use NAT and the firewall is off. it's just a router between client-net and server-net. you say that zebra can do multicast routing and zebra is now quagga, right? i have quagga running, but perhaps with the wrong configuration?