cscmail-users Mailing List for CSCMail (Page 18)
Brought to you by:
countzer0
You can subscribe to this list here.
2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(167) |
Jul
(52) |
Aug
(80) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(38) |
Nov
(36) |
Dec
(17) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(11) |
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
(7) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Steven K. <st...@vo...> - 2000-06-26 13:40:33
|
On 26 Jun 2000 06:34:06 EDT, Lane Lester said: > > Count Zero said: > > CscHTML is GtkHTML without the GNOME dependancies, and I am hacking > > in new > > features... For example I am just now finishing up support for > <font > > face=> > > tags... Plus the option to do csc_html_set_default_font() and > > csc_html_allow_font_switch() so that users can force a specific > font > > (say > > fixed...) for viewing mail, even with the HTML widget. > > Will it be possible to select text for copying, as we can with > GtkText? Yes, GtkHTML (and therefore CscHTML) supports normal X style copy/paste operations. Right now the only differences between GtkHTML and CscHTML are the following: GtkHTML requires GNOME and several other libs (gnome-print, gconf, oaf, bonobo, corba, gdk-pixbuf, libart, gtk, and many more!) CscHTML requires gdk-pixbuf, libart, and gtk. Thats it! CscHTML has added support for <font face=fontname> tags, plus a programmers API for "set default font" and "allow font switch" This lets an application developer force a specific font on any HTML document, overriding the documents own font selections. (ie: in CSCMail, the "use this font to view messages" option now WORKS! hehe) CscHTML's perl bindings have been updated to support the new font features Some people have noticed that CscHTML seems to be a little faster than GtkHTML, but there is no concrete proof of this. -CZ -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Steve Kordik st...@vo... System Administrator Tel 212.332.5045 VOILA - France Telecom North America Fax 212.332.2362 1270 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020 USA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Customized Search Engines for your web site at: http://voilasearch.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |
From: Eric DE V. <de...@re...> - 2000-06-26 12:20:20
|
... There is missing one thing in v 1.7.x/1.8 : the BCC choice in tef context menu in the addressbook, to add the address directly in the BCC field. Now we have to add to CC and then do cut/paste to BCC. That should not be too dofficult to add ... . And also a warning when forgetting to add a subject to the email ;-) .. -- Eric DE VITO Ingénieur IPSN/SERAC Tél : 01 69 08 56 81 E-Mail : |
From: <ss....@st...> - 2000-06-26 12:17:28
|
Hi, is it possible to integrate cscmail/pronto and GkrellM somehow? what should be configured in GKrellM's configuration and how? ciao Sebastian |
From: Lane L. <ll...@si...> - 2000-06-26 11:12:20
|
Count Zero said: > CscHTML is GtkHTML without the GNOME dependancies, and I am hacking > in new > features... For example I am just now finishing up support for <font > face=> > tags... Plus the option to do csc_html_set_default_font() and > csc_html_allow_font_switch() so that users can force a specific font > (say > fixed...) for viewing mail, even with the HTML widget. Will it be possible to select text for copying, as we can with GtkText? -- Lane ____ Lane Lester / Madison County, Georgia USA ---- Using Linux to get where I want to go... |
From: Eric DE V. <de...@re...> - 2000-06-26 09:59:17
|
There is missing one thing in v 1.7.x/1.8 : the BCC choice in tef context menu in the addressbook, to add the address directly in the BCC field. Now we have to add to CC and then do cut/paste to BCC. That should not be too dofficult to add ... -- Eric DE VITO Ingénieur IPSN/SERAC Tél : 01 69 08 56 81 E-Mail : |
From: Count Z. <cou...@cy...> - 2000-06-26 05:30:08
|
Ok, to coincide with CscHTML's 1.1.0 release with support for default font specification and enhanced font stuff, I have updated CSCMail 1.7.x (CVS) to take advantage of the new features. So, go grab CscHTML 1.1.0 from http://www.cscmail.net/cschtml and then update CSCMail from CVS at http://sourceforge.net/projects/cscmail (Checkout module cscmail-1.7.x) Be sure you get the updated PERL bindings for CscHTML and install them otherwise it won't work right. -CZ -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GIT/CM d--(+) s+: a- C++++ UL++++$ P+++ L+++>++++ E--- W+++(--) N+ o? K? w---(++) O M->-- !V PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+@ 5? X+ R++ tv-- b+++ DI? D++ G e h r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ |
From: Count Z. <cou...@cy...> - 2000-06-26 01:50:41
|
rroberts was overheared mumbling something about this on 25 Jun 2000 13:39:45 EDT > copying over the pixmaps did solve the initial problem of getting the > program to load. Now the program will startup but when I go click a > message to view it, either html or plain text, I get: > > [root@homenet /root]# HTML Widget is: GtkHTML > Usage: Gtk::HTML::begin(html, url) at /usr/bin/cscmail line 1753. > > and the program dies with no other warnings. Ok, the api for the GtkHTML widget (and CscHTML widget for that matter) changed recently... I recommend you grab a copy of CscHTML from http://www.cscmail.net/cschtml or upgrade your current copy of GtkHTML (and the perl bindings...) CscHTML is GtkHTML without the GNOME dependancies, and I am hacking in new features... For example I am just now finishing up support for <font face=> tags... Plus the option to do csc_html_set_default_font() and csc_html_allow_font_switch() so that users can force a specific font (say fixed...) for viewing mail, even with the HTML widget. -CZ -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GIT/CM d--(+) s+: a- C++++ UL++++$ P+++ L+++>++++ E--- W+++(--) N+ o? K? w---(++) O M->-- !V PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+@ 5? X+ R++ tv-- b+++ DI? D++ G e h r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ |
From: Alexander S. <as...@di...> - 2000-06-25 18:42:43
|
I just finished installing CSC Mail using the Perl script installer. I installed CSC Mail as an RPM package on Linux Mandrake 7.1. The installer fetched and installed these packages: - DBD-CSV-0.1022.tar.gz - Lingua-Ispell-0.07.tar.gz - Text-CSV_XS-0.20.tar.gz - DateManip-5.38.tar.gz - MIME-Types-0.02.tar.gz - IO-1.20.tar.gz - SQL-Statement-0.1016.tar.gz I'm using perl 5.6. When I start CSC Mail with 'cscmail', I get this error message: [askwar 20:37:35 /usr/home/askwar]$ cscmail Errno architecture (i386-linux-2.2.15-0.16mdksmp) does not match executable architecture (i386-linux-2.2.15-4mdksmp) at /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux/Errno.pm line 11. Compilation failed in require at /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux/IO/Socket.pm line 17. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux/IO/Socket.pm line 17. Compilation failed in require at /usr/bin/cscmail line 35. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/cscmail line 35. What can I do against this error message? Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com Sichere Mail? PGP/GnuPG Keys als Antwort auf Mail mit Betr: Get GPG Key ICQ: 7328191 |
From: rroberts <rro...@ho...> - 2000-06-25 17:41:01
|
copying over the pixmaps did solve the initial problem of getting the program to load. Now the program will startup but when I go click a message to view it, either html or plain text, I get: [root@homenet /root]# HTML Widget is: GtkHTML Usage: Gtk::HTML::begin(html, url) at /usr/bin/cscmail line 1753. and the program dies with no other warnings. On 25 Jun 2000 12:08:58 CDT, Count Zero said: > rroberts was overheared mumbling something about this on 25 Jun 2000 > 03:29:53 > EDT > > > getting the follwing error while trying to start the 1.7.x latetst > from > > cvs: > > > > HTML Widget is: GtkHTML > > pixmap is not of type Gtk::Gdk::Pixmap at /usr/local/bin/cscmail > line > > 5054. > > > > 1.6.1 still works fine... > > > > Check your pixmap directory in ~/.cscmailrc > > Then look in that dir and make sure that you have a newm.xpm file in > that > directory. > > This error is caused by a missing .xpm file... You probably need to > re-run make > install; as root, and also adjust your PixmapDir in ~/.cscmailrc (for > both root > and the user, if you wish to run cscmail as both...) > > -CZ > -- > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > Version: 3.1 > GIT/CM d--(+) s+: a- C++++ UL++++$ P+++ L+++>++++ E--- W+++(--) N+ o? > K? > w---(++) O M->-- !V PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+@ 5? X+ R++ tv-- b+++ DI? D++ > G e h r- y+ > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > http://www.cscmail.net > csc...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/cscmail-users > |
From: Count Z. <cou...@cy...> - 2000-06-25 16:15:31
|
rroberts was overheared mumbling something about this on 25 Jun 2000 03:29:53 EDT > getting the follwing error while trying to start the 1.7.x latetst from > cvs: > > HTML Widget is: GtkHTML > pixmap is not of type Gtk::Gdk::Pixmap at /usr/local/bin/cscmail line > 5054. > > 1.6.1 still works fine... > Check your pixmap directory in ~/.cscmailrc Then look in that dir and make sure that you have a newm.xpm file in that directory. This error is caused by a missing .xpm file... You probably need to re-run make install; as root, and also adjust your PixmapDir in ~/.cscmailrc (for both root and the user, if you wish to run cscmail as both...) -CZ -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GIT/CM d--(+) s+: a- C++++ UL++++$ P+++ L+++>++++ E--- W+++(--) N+ o? K? w---(++) O M->-- !V PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+@ 5? X+ R++ tv-- b+++ DI? D++ G e h r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ |
From: rroberts <rro...@ho...> - 2000-06-25 12:57:43
|
Actually I got this error with v1.6.1 when I tried to run cscmail as a normal user but not as root. I had forgotten about that. But with this v1.7 I get the error either way as root or a normal user account. On Sun, 25 Jun 2000 12:20:20 +0200, Daniel Schregenberger said: > I recieved the same error when I tried to start 1.6.1 as root. > Starting it as a normal user works fine. > > Daniel > > rroberts wrote: > >getting the follwing error while trying to start the 1.7.x latetst > from > >cvs: > > > >HTML Widget is: GtkHTML > >pixmap is not of type Gtk::Gdk::Pixmap at /usr/local/bin/cscmail line > >5054. > > > >1.6.1 still works fine... > > _______________________________________________ > http://www.cscmail.net > csc...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/cscmail-users > |
From: Daniel S. <np...@gm...> - 2000-06-25 10:29:12
|
I recieved the same error when I tried to start 1.6.1 as root. Starting it as a normal user works fine. Daniel rroberts wrote: >getting the follwing error while trying to start the 1.7.x latetst from >cvs: > >HTML Widget is: GtkHTML >pixmap is not of type Gtk::Gdk::Pixmap at /usr/local/bin/cscmail line >5054. > >1.6.1 still works fine... |
From: rroberts <rro...@ho...> - 2000-06-25 07:31:05
|
getting the follwing error while trying to start the 1.7.x latetst from cvs: HTML Widget is: GtkHTML pixmap is not of type Gtk::Gdk::Pixmap at /usr/local/bin/cscmail line 5054. 1.6.1 still works fine... On 22 Jun 2000 12:52:45 CDT, Homer Parker said: > Unable to decode message. Please contact CSCMail maintainers at > cs...@cs.... |
From: Count Z. <cou...@cy...> - 2000-06-25 00:44:56
|
I just committed CSCMail 1.7.7 to cvs This version has support for CscHTML, GtkHTML, GtkXmHTML, and Text only. For all of you who have had problems in the past getting GtkHTML to work, I strongly urge you to grab a copy of CscHTML from http://www.cscmail.net/cschtml and install it. There are RPM's and Perl bindings there, so it should be a VERY easy install. CscHTML does not depend on GNOME... all you need is Gtk, Gdk-Pixbuf and LibArt. If you have ANY problems getting CscHTML installed, please let me know so I can help... One of my big goals with CscHTML is to make it EASY to use and install! Please hack on this a bit, because I am pretty certain this will be the last developer release prior to 1.8.0, unless people can find some bugs for me to fix! -CZ -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GIT/CM d--(+) s+: a- C++++ UL++++$ P+++ L+++>++++ E--- W+++(--) N+ o? K? w---(++) O M->-- !V PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+@ 5? X+ R++ tv-- b+++ DI? D++ G e h r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ |
From: unimaas <ss....@ST...> - 2000-06-24 22:51:06
|
Hi, I am by far not an expert, and through the most kind help on #IRC I got it running smoothly. ciao Sebastian |
From: Maher A. <mu...@mu...> - 2000-06-24 22:30:04
|
amen cz. well said. Maher On 24 Jun 2000 18:08:58 CDT, Count Zero said: > I have a few things to say regarding this whole thread (surprised? hehe) > > 1) I just wanted to extend my sincere thanks to Mahar Awamy and the > other > people who have helped me with the development of CSCMail. Prior to Muhri's > work on the installation script, CSCMail was much harder to install. Is the > script 100% accurate on 100% of the systems? No... Does it work on 90% of > the > systems? Yes. I would say that it works as well or better than the > installation scripts for most commercial grade applications, and although > there > is always room for improvement, I think Muhri has done a fine bit of work > with > this script, and again, I thank him. > > 2) Anyone who is having any problems getting CSCMail (or Pronto! for > that > matter) installed can always feel free to ask for help. If you feal that > the > mailing list is not giving you the help you need, then please, e-mail me > personally. I have always, and will always, do my best to help a user get > our > program installed. Unix operating systems are known worldwide for their > diversity and flexibility. This comes at a price however. No two systems > are > alike. This makes a "single" installation script a near impossibility. I > will > do whatever I can to help a user of either CSCMail or Pronto! to get it > installed, as what this is ultimately about is allowing users to use the > best > tool for the job, and to respond to user requests and bug reports to > continue > to make improvements to our programs. > > I guess thats about it. Hope everyone is enjoying our programs, and please > let > us know if there are features missing or bugs to be squashed. Open Source > development is a two way street, and to be honest, I fix all the bugs I SEE, > but thats just on the two machines I run CSCMail on. There are hundreds of > other combinations that CSCMail/Pronto! can run on, and I am sure that there > are bugs... Help us out! Give us detailed feedback, and I think you will > find > that we are quick to respond. > > -CZ > -- > -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > Version: 3.1 > GIT/CM d--(+) s+: a- C++++ UL++++$ P+++ L+++>++++ E--- W+++(--) N+ o? K? > w---(++) O M->-- !V PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+@ 5? X+ R++ tv-- b+++ DI? D++ > G e h r- y+ > ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > http://www.cscmail.net > csc...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/cscmail-users > > -- mu...@mu... -- http://www.muhri.net |
From: Count Z. <cou...@cy...> - 2000-06-24 22:15:30
|
I have a few things to say regarding this whole thread (surprised? hehe) 1) I just wanted to extend my sincere thanks to Mahar Awamy and the other people who have helped me with the development of CSCMail. Prior to Muhri's work on the installation script, CSCMail was much harder to install. Is the script 100% accurate on 100% of the systems? No... Does it work on 90% of the systems? Yes. I would say that it works as well or better than the installation scripts for most commercial grade applications, and although there is always room for improvement, I think Muhri has done a fine bit of work with this script, and again, I thank him. 2) Anyone who is having any problems getting CSCMail (or Pronto! for that matter) installed can always feel free to ask for help. If you feal that the mailing list is not giving you the help you need, then please, e-mail me personally. I have always, and will always, do my best to help a user get our program installed. Unix operating systems are known worldwide for their diversity and flexibility. This comes at a price however. No two systems are alike. This makes a "single" installation script a near impossibility. I will do whatever I can to help a user of either CSCMail or Pronto! to get it installed, as what this is ultimately about is allowing users to use the best tool for the job, and to respond to user requests and bug reports to continue to make improvements to our programs. I guess thats about it. Hope everyone is enjoying our programs, and please let us know if there are features missing or bugs to be squashed. Open Source development is a two way street, and to be honest, I fix all the bugs I SEE, but thats just on the two machines I run CSCMail on. There are hundreds of other combinations that CSCMail/Pronto! can run on, and I am sure that there are bugs... Help us out! Give us detailed feedback, and I think you will find that we are quick to respond. -CZ -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GIT/CM d--(+) s+: a- C++++ UL++++$ P+++ L+++>++++ E--- W+++(--) N+ o? K? w---(++) O M->-- !V PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+@ 5? X+ R++ tv-- b+++ DI? D++ G e h r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ |
From: Maher A. <mu...@mu...> - 2000-06-24 21:41:07
|
On Sat, 24 Jun 2000 17:22:26 -0400 (EDT), Mark Neill MIDTIER said: > > CSCMail may be harder to install than, say, M$ Office, but it is by > far one of the easier software packages to install. Most software for > Linux comes in an RPM that simply complains that you don't have X, Y, or Z > installed on your system, offering no help in where to get X, Y, or Z, or > whether those packages themselves need M, N, or O to work. > > Maher has made the effort to write an installer that, were you to read > the directions (specify your 'get' program, have at least X already on > your system), installs just about flawlessly. I had probelms, but I have > problems with everything since I tried running the installer from behind a > firewall the first time. I will try to come up with a lil faq on how to use the installer if you are behind a firewall :) > Maybe it could be easier, yes. Maybe someone could write the SQL to > create the database entries for you. But over all, for what the program > encompasses, it's no more difficult to install and set up than most > software I've built from source (which this essentially is, being all > Perl). I try most of the time to make migrationn-scripts for each accomplished step in CVS be it CSCMail or Pronto - sometimes I dont until further time after implemnting the feature because I am not so sure if I want to keep it that way :) but I'll try harder. Thanks for the nice comments everybody, It is refreshing to see that someone knows what they are talking about. Maher > --Mark > > > Mark Neill > Enterprise Backup & > UNIX Administrator > CSX Technology > Mar...@cs... > > On Sat, 24 Jun 2000, james g. keegan jr. wrote: > > > now maher, you need to be honest here, particularly when you are > commenting > > on something so recent. what i said, as i am sure you recall, is you game > me > > the same advice you had given a few months ago which didn't work then > > either. as you also recall, none of your suggestions worked. given that, i > > would say it is reasonable to conclude that cscmail installation is > > practically impossible, not just hard, for non-linux experts. your > attitude > > is very bad, particularly if it is associated with an application which > you > > hope that more than a few experts might use. installation, simple, easy, > > clean, installation is a most important characteristic of any application. > > > > > > > > At 03:11 PM 6/24/00 -0500, Maher Awamy wrote: > > >i have no comment to what you are trying to do here except say that I was > > >trying to help you yesterday and you bashed us and cscmail by saying that > > >cscmail installation is hard, etc... I do not remember you being the > moderator > > >of this list also... nor code cscmail nor have a say in this. Thanks for > your > > >silence. > > >On Sat, 24 Jun 2000 15:27:31 -0400, james g. keegan jr. said: > > > > > > > the message below is fairly old but i thought it called for comment. > > > > > > > > here we have someone asking the list for help and receiving the > following > > > > condescending and ugly response: > > > > > > > > hopefully, this was just a one-time ignorant error which won't be > > > > repeated... > > > > ] > > > > At 09:31 AM 5/5/00 -0500, Maher Awamy wrote: > > > > >pete, although this is something you should know and has ntohing to > do > > > > >with cscmail > > > > > > > > > >rpm -ivh blah --nodeps since you know you have the dep and even > better. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On Fri, 05 May 2000 23:45:30 +1200, Pete (Kiwi-Hawk) said: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > > > I just had to update my MySQL to 3.22 and the DigitalDJ program > was > > > > > > useing the earlier version > > > > > > that suppied this: libmysqlclient.so.4 ...now when I try to run > or > > > > > > reinstall I get: > > > > > > failed dependencies: > > > > > > libmysqlclient.so.4 is needed by DigitalDJ-0.5-1.rpm > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to know how I go about giving that lib back, can I get > way > > > > > > with > > > > > > rpm ivh and install it as well as what every has replaced it? > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > kiwi-Hawk (Pete) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > > > > >mu...@mu... -- http://www.muhri.net > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > http://www.cscmail.net > > > > csc...@li... > > > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/cscmail-users > > > > > > > > > >-- > > >mu...@mu... -- http://www.muhri.net > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > http://www.cscmail.net > > csc...@li... > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/cscmail-users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > http://www.cscmail.net > csc...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/cscmail-users > -- mu...@mu... -- http://www.muhri.net |
From: charlie s. <ish...@th...> - 2000-06-24 21:27:15
|
o come on. this is not the place to have such a petty dispute. the simple facts are: 1) cscmail|pronto is easy to install, in general if you have everything (and most people do) it is _very_ easy, and works without problems 2) cscmail|pronto is perhaps the best gui email client available. 3) dont fight this out on the list, keep it private, I for one dont care, and i doubt the rest of the list does either 4) james, you were quite out of line to bring it up again no mud slinging is appropriate. _NONE_. now, lets get back to more important things On Sat, 24 Jun 2000, james g. keegan jr. wrote: >now maher, you need to be honest here, particularly when you are commenting >on something so recent. what i said, as i am sure you recall, is you game me >the same advice you had given a few months ago which didn't work then >either. as you also recall, none of your suggestions worked. given that, i >would say it is reasonable to conclude that cscmail installation is >practically impossible, not just hard, for non-linux experts. your attitude >is very bad, particularly if it is associated with an application which you >hope that more than a few experts might use. installation, simple, easy, >clean, installation is a most important characteristic of any application. > > > >At 03:11 PM 6/24/00 -0500, Maher Awamy wrote: >>i have no comment to what you are trying to do here except say that I was >>trying to help you yesterday and you bashed us and cscmail by saying that >>cscmail installation is hard, etc... I do not remember you being the moderator >>of this list also... nor code cscmail nor have a say in this. Thanks for your >>silence. >>On Sat, 24 Jun 2000 15:27:31 -0400, james g. keegan jr. said: >> >> > the message below is fairly old but i thought it called for comment. >> > >> > here we have someone asking the list for help and receiving the following >> > condescending and ugly response: >> > >> > hopefully, this was just a one-time ignorant error which won't be >> > repeated... >> > ] >> > At 09:31 AM 5/5/00 -0500, Maher Awamy wrote: >> > >pete, although this is something you should know and has ntohing to do >> > >with cscmail >> > > >> > >rpm -ivh blah --nodeps since you know you have the dep and even better. >> > > >> > > >> > >On Fri, 05 May 2000 23:45:30 +1200, Pete (Kiwi-Hawk) said: >> > > >> > > > Hi >> > > > >> > > > I just had to update my MySQL to 3.22 and the DigitalDJ program was >> > > > useing the earlier version >> > > > that suppied this: libmysqlclient.so.4 ...now when I try to run or >> > > > reinstall I get: >> > > > failed dependencies: >> > > > libmysqlclient.so.4 is needed by DigitalDJ-0.5-1.rpm >> > > > >> > > > I'd like to know how I go about giving that lib back, can I get way >> > > > with >> > > > rpm ivh and install it as well as what every has replaced it? >> > > > >> > > > Cheers >> > > > kiwi-Hawk (Pete) >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >-- >> > >mu...@mu... -- http://www.muhri.net >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > http://www.cscmail.net >> > csc...@li... >> > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/cscmail-users >> > >> >>-- >>mu...@mu... -- http://www.muhri.net > > >_______________________________________________ >http://www.cscmail.net >csc...@li... >http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/cscmail-users > - charlie schmidt - ish...@th... Senior Editor & AfterStep Themes - http://themes.org AfterStep FAQ - http://afterstep.davidv.net "You are not your f***ing kahkis" - Tyler Durden |
From: Mark N. M. <f8...@cs...> - 2000-06-24 21:26:35
|
CSCMail may be harder to install than, say, M$ Office, but it is by far one of the easier software packages to install. Most software for Linux comes in an RPM that simply complains that you don't have X, Y, or Z installed on your system, offering no help in where to get X, Y, or Z, or whether those packages themselves need M, N, or O to work. Maher has made the effort to write an installer that, were you to read the directions (specify your 'get' program, have at least X already on your system), installs just about flawlessly. I had probelms, but I have problems with everything since I tried running the installer from behind a firewall the first time. Maybe it could be easier, yes. Maybe someone could write the SQL to create the database entries for you. But over all, for what the program encompasses, it's no more difficult to install and set up than most software I've built from source (which this essentially is, being all Perl). --Mark Mark Neill Enterprise Backup & UNIX Administrator CSX Technology Mar...@cs... On Sat, 24 Jun 2000, james g. keegan jr. wrote: > now maher, you need to be honest here, particularly when you are commenting > on something so recent. what i said, as i am sure you recall, is you game me > the same advice you had given a few months ago which didn't work then > either. as you also recall, none of your suggestions worked. given that, i > would say it is reasonable to conclude that cscmail installation is > practically impossible, not just hard, for non-linux experts. your attitude > is very bad, particularly if it is associated with an application which you > hope that more than a few experts might use. installation, simple, easy, > clean, installation is a most important characteristic of any application. > > > > At 03:11 PM 6/24/00 -0500, Maher Awamy wrote: > >i have no comment to what you are trying to do here except say that I was > >trying to help you yesterday and you bashed us and cscmail by saying that > >cscmail installation is hard, etc... I do not remember you being the moderator > >of this list also... nor code cscmail nor have a say in this. Thanks for your > >silence. > >On Sat, 24 Jun 2000 15:27:31 -0400, james g. keegan jr. said: > > > > > the message below is fairly old but i thought it called for comment. > > > > > > here we have someone asking the list for help and receiving the following > > > condescending and ugly response: > > > > > > hopefully, this was just a one-time ignorant error which won't be > > > repeated... > > > ] > > > At 09:31 AM 5/5/00 -0500, Maher Awamy wrote: > > > >pete, although this is something you should know and has ntohing to do > > > >with cscmail > > > > > > > >rpm -ivh blah --nodeps since you know you have the dep and even better. > > > > > > > > > > > >On Fri, 05 May 2000 23:45:30 +1200, Pete (Kiwi-Hawk) said: > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > I just had to update my MySQL to 3.22 and the DigitalDJ program was > > > > > useing the earlier version > > > > > that suppied this: libmysqlclient.so.4 ...now when I try to run or > > > > > reinstall I get: > > > > > failed dependencies: > > > > > libmysqlclient.so.4 is needed by DigitalDJ-0.5-1.rpm > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to know how I go about giving that lib back, can I get way > > > > > with > > > > > rpm ivh and install it as well as what every has replaced it? > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > kiwi-Hawk (Pete) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > > > >mu...@mu... -- http://www.muhri.net > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > http://www.cscmail.net > > > csc...@li... > > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/cscmail-users > > > > > > >-- > >mu...@mu... -- http://www.muhri.net > > > _______________________________________________ > http://www.cscmail.net > csc...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/cscmail-users > |
From: Michael C. <mi...@et...> - 2000-06-24 21:24:52
|
On Sat, 24 Jun 2000 17:05:01 -0400, james g. keegan jr. said: > now maher, you need to be honest here, particularly when you are commenting > on something so recent. what i said, as i am sure you recall, is you game me > the same advice you had given a few months ago which didn't work then > either. as you also recall, none of your suggestions worked. given that, i > would say it is reasonable to conclude that cscmail installation is > practically impossible, not just hard, for non-linux experts. Practically impossible? FYI I know many non-linux experts who have gone to Maher and many others in this list and they have been quite helpful in helping them succesfully install and run pronto. Now I consider that far from impossible... > your attitude > is very bad, particularly if it is associated with an application which you > hope that more than a few experts might use. installation, simple, easy, > clean, installation is a most important characteristic of any application. Your attitude, kind sir, is quite pessimistic. Cliffom -- Michael Clifford http://www.eternal-bliss.com |
From: james g. k. jr. <jgk...@co...> - 2000-06-24 21:10:23
|
now maher, you need to be honest here, particularly when you are commenting on something so recent. what i said, as i am sure you recall, is you game me the same advice you had given a few months ago which didn't work then either. as you also recall, none of your suggestions worked. given that, i would say it is reasonable to conclude that cscmail installation is practically impossible, not just hard, for non-linux experts. your attitude is very bad, particularly if it is associated with an application which you hope that more than a few experts might use. installation, simple, easy, clean, installation is a most important characteristic of any application. At 03:11 PM 6/24/00 -0500, Maher Awamy wrote: >i have no comment to what you are trying to do here except say that I was >trying to help you yesterday and you bashed us and cscmail by saying that >cscmail installation is hard, etc... I do not remember you being the moderator >of this list also... nor code cscmail nor have a say in this. Thanks for your >silence. >On Sat, 24 Jun 2000 15:27:31 -0400, james g. keegan jr. said: > > > the message below is fairly old but i thought it called for comment. > > > > here we have someone asking the list for help and receiving the following > > condescending and ugly response: > > > > hopefully, this was just a one-time ignorant error which won't be > > repeated... > > ] > > At 09:31 AM 5/5/00 -0500, Maher Awamy wrote: > > >pete, although this is something you should know and has ntohing to do > > >with cscmail > > > > > >rpm -ivh blah --nodeps since you know you have the dep and even better. > > > > > > > > >On Fri, 05 May 2000 23:45:30 +1200, Pete (Kiwi-Hawk) said: > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > I just had to update my MySQL to 3.22 and the DigitalDJ program was > > > > useing the earlier version > > > > that suppied this: libmysqlclient.so.4 ...now when I try to run or > > > > reinstall I get: > > > > failed dependencies: > > > > libmysqlclient.so.4 is needed by DigitalDJ-0.5-1.rpm > > > > > > > > I'd like to know how I go about giving that lib back, can I get way > > > > with > > > > rpm ivh and install it as well as what every has replaced it? > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > kiwi-Hawk (Pete) > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > > >mu...@mu... -- http://www.muhri.net > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > http://www.cscmail.net > > csc...@li... > > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/cscmail-users > > > >-- >mu...@mu... -- http://www.muhri.net |
From: Maher A. <mu...@mu...> - 2000-06-24 20:08:31
|
i have no comment to what you are trying to do here except say that I was trying to help you yesterday and you bashed us and cscmail by saying that cscmail installation is hard, etc... I do not remember you being the moderator of this list also... nor code cscmail nor have a say in this. Thanks for your silence. On Sat, 24 Jun 2000 15:27:31 -0400, james g. keegan jr. said: > the message below is fairly old but i thought it called for comment. > > here we have someone asking the list for help and receiving the following > condescending and ugly response: > > hopefully, this was just a one-time ignorant error which won't be > repeated... > ] > At 09:31 AM 5/5/00 -0500, Maher Awamy wrote: > >pete, although this is something you should know and has ntohing to do > >with cscmail > > > >rpm -ivh blah --nodeps since you know you have the dep and even better. > > > > > >On Fri, 05 May 2000 23:45:30 +1200, Pete (Kiwi-Hawk) said: > > > > > Hi > > > > > > I just had to update my MySQL to 3.22 and the DigitalDJ program was > > > useing the earlier version > > > that suppied this: libmysqlclient.so.4 ...now when I try to run or > > > reinstall I get: > > > failed dependencies: > > > libmysqlclient.so.4 is needed by DigitalDJ-0.5-1.rpm > > > > > > I'd like to know how I go about giving that lib back, can I get way > > > with > > > rpm ivh and install it as well as what every has replaced it? > > > > > > Cheers > > > kiwi-Hawk (Pete) > > > > > > > > > >-- > >mu...@mu... -- http://www.muhri.net > > > _______________________________________________ > http://www.cscmail.net > csc...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/cscmail-users > -- mu...@mu... -- http://www.muhri.net |
From: james g. k. jr. <jgk...@co...> - 2000-06-24 19:32:41
|
the message below is fairly old but i thought it called for comment. here we have someone asking the list for help and receiving the following condescending and ugly response: hopefully, this was just a one-time ignorant error which won't be repeated... ] At 09:31 AM 5/5/00 -0500, Maher Awamy wrote: >pete, although this is something you should know and has ntohing to do >with cscmail > >rpm -ivh blah --nodeps since you know you have the dep and even better. > > >On Fri, 05 May 2000 23:45:30 +1200, Pete (Kiwi-Hawk) said: > > > Hi > > > > I just had to update my MySQL to 3.22 and the DigitalDJ program was > > useing the earlier version > > that suppied this: libmysqlclient.so.4 ...now when I try to run or > > reinstall I get: > > failed dependencies: > > libmysqlclient.so.4 is needed by DigitalDJ-0.5-1.rpm > > > > I'd like to know how I go about giving that lib back, can I get way > > with > > rpm ivh and install it as well as what every has replaced it? > > > > Cheers > > kiwi-Hawk (Pete) > > > > > >-- >mu...@mu... -- http://www.muhri.net |
From: Ken S. <ken...@pi...> - 2000-06-24 18:24:27
|
Does version 1.6.1 support mbox standardized mailboxes?? Thanks! Ken |