Menu
▾
▴
[Plone-developers] Re: [Plone] 692/16 Comment "IE6 doesn't allow bad html rendering"
|
From: danielle.d-avout <dan...@wa...> - 2002-12-21 15:20:40
|
you know what http://collector.zope.org/CMF hangs with IE6 SP1 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Collector: Issue ..." <plo...@li...> To: "dancam" <dan...@wa...>; "geoff" <ge...@ge...>; "limi" <li...@pl...>; "runyaga" <ru...@th...>; "lalo" <la...@la...>; "tesdal" <he...@te...>; "dreamcatcher" <si...@x3...>; "magnus" <mag...@pl...>; "hamish" <dav...@br...>; "andym" <an...@ag...>; "spacemonkey" <jo...@cl...> Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 3:37 PM Subject: [Plone] 692/16 Comment "IE6 doesn't allow bad html rendering" > Issue #692 Update (Comment) "IE6 doesn't allow bad html rendering" > Status Deferred, HTML/bug low > To followup, visit: > http://plone.org/collector/692 > ______________________________________________________________ > > = Comment - Entry #16 by geoff on Dec 21, 2002 3:37 pm > > This is a CMF problem. Please report it to the CMF collector at http://collector.zope.org/CMF > ________________________________________ > = Comment - Entry #15 by dancam on Dec 21, 2002 3:34 pm > > url = '%s?came_from=%s&retry=%s' % ( > page.absolute_url(), quote(came_from), retry) > > in CMFCore/CookieCrumbler.py > > &retry has may be to be corrected to &retry ? > > ________________________________________ > = Comment - Entry #14 by Anonymous User on Dec 19, 2002 11:23 pm > > > = Comment - Entry #13 by Anonymous User on Dec 19, 2002 11:22 pm > > > > it happens with IE 6 + SP1 ! > > it happens with IE 6 + SP1 ! > > and it is not a plone matter, > > look every where people are complaining they can't check their mail, on > > Yahoo, Hotmail, Msn or their bank accounts, they can't log in to their > > intranet... > > I did this experiment on an asp site, I couldn't register > > until I give up my adresse dan...@wa... > > to choose da...@ne...! why? > > ________________________________________ > > = Comment - Entry #12 by geoff on Dec 18, 2002 4:47 pm > > > > cgi.escape is not directly accessible to ZPTs. In any case, that still > > doesn't tell me where the bad link occurs. > > > > Also, from RFC1808 it appears that using & in URLs will cause > > problems for people if they strip out the XHTML header. > > ________________________________________ > > = Comment - Entry #11 by dancam on Dec 18, 2002 4:40 pm > > > > is not possible to use from Python\lib\cgi.py > > > > def escape(s, quote=None): > > """Replace special characters '&', '<' and '>' by SGML entities.""" > > s = s.replace("&", "&") # Must be done first! > > s = s.replace("<", "<") > > s = s.replace(">", ">") > > if quote: > > s = s.replace('"', """) > > return s > > > > ________________________________________ > > = Comment - Entry #10 by geoff on Dec 18, 2002 3:52 pm > > > > I don't see where the link in question appears in plone. I have done a > > search of the RC1 source, and I don't see anything that will generate a > > link of the form described. In the future please provide more complete > > information when you report a bug. For example, in this case, the page > > on which the problem appears. > > ________________________________________ > > = Defer - Entry #9 by andym on Dec 18, 2002 2:57 pm > > > > Status: Pending => Deferred > > > > Defer to 1.1 > > ________________________________________ > > = Edit - Entry #8 by andym on Dec 18, 2002 2:56 pm > > > > Changes: submitter email, edited transcript, importance (critical => low) > > ________________________________________ > > = Comment - Entry #7 by Anonymous User on Dec 18, 2002 2:54 pm > > > > There you go, you learn something new every day: > > http://validator.w3.org/docs/errors.html#bad-entity > > > > This is because we specify we are XHTML 1.0. > > > > This a bug that will take a bit of work to fix as this is a) I believe in > > the core of the CMF and b) will likely occur in a few places. This is not > > important for most users since most browsers do not worry. > > > > Will be fixed in 1.1 > > ________________________________________ > > = Comment - Entry #6 by Anonymous User on Dec 18, 2002 2:41 pm > > > > > Must I quote W3C > > > reference to a URI that uses & as a separator between parameters, > > > > such as "http://example.org/prog?x=1&y=2". is not correct... > > > > Yes please. I am not aware of this, if this is a problem you will have a > > problem with most of the web. > > > > I would like to see where this is specified before making any change. > > > > Note your first link (the one you say causes a problem) works for me in > > IE 6, Mozilla, Phoenix and Opera. > > ________________________________________ > > = Comment - Entry #5 by dancam on Dec 18, 2002 12:34 pm > > > > sorry about that... I forgot... > > I thought I had point out the slight difference > > as I did in a previous message to Andy McKay <an...@ag...> > > http://danielle.zettai.net/New_plone/login_form?came_from=http%3A//danielle. > > zettai.net/New_plone/manage&retry= > > > > > > I meant why %3A and why not & ? > > Iexplore wouldn't find the page... > > but is happy with the clean > > http://danielle.zettai.net/New_plone/login_form?came_from=http%3A//danielle. > > zettai.net/New_plone/Members/dancam/folder_contents&retry= > > > > ________________________________________ > > = Comment - Entry #4 by limi on Dec 18, 2002 12:22 pm > > > > For it to qualify as "clear", you should atleast point out what the > > differences are, not leave it up to us to guess the difference between > > two different URLs. > > > > We will look into the problem. > > > > If you can't contain your attitude, please take your business elsewhere. > > We are not your employees, and you get Plone for free. We have put > > thousands of unpaid hours into this project. So treat us with some > > respect. > > ________________________________________ > > = Comment - Entry #3 by dancam on Dec 18, 2002 11:52 am > > > > it is very clear indeed... Must I quote W3C > > A reference to a URI that uses & as a separator between parameters, such > > as "http://example.org/prog?x=1&y=2". is not correct... > > To solve this problem, simply replace all the &'s in attribute values > > with & (user agents will convert them back before following the > > links.) > > > > Another way to get around this problem is for the author of the CGI > > program to allow a different value to be used between arguments, like ';' > > or '|', which would allow the link to be coded as e.g. <a > > href="http://example.org/prog?x=1;y=2"> > > > > So IExplore has excuses not to find the requested page! > > ________________________________________ > > = Comment - Entry #2 by limi on Dec 18, 2002 11:39 am > > > > Please provide more details when submitting bug reports. If we can't see > > what the error is without doing extensive digging, there's leess chace of > > it being fixed. > > ________________________________________ > > = Request - Entry #1 by dancam on Dec 18, 2002 11:03 am > > > > Iexplore wouldn't find the page > > http://danielle.zettai.net/New_plone/login_form?came_from=http%3A//danielle. zettai.net/New_plone/manage&retry= > > but is happy with the clean > > http://danielle.zettai.net/New_plone/login_form?came_from=http%3A//danielle. zettai.net/New_plone/Members/dancam/folder_contents&retry= > > > ________________________________________ > = Comment - Entry #13 by Anonymous User on Dec 19, 2002 11:22 pm > > it happens with IE 6 + SP1 ! > it happens with IE 6 + SP1 ! > and it is not a plone matter, > look every where people are complaining they can't check their mail, on Yahoo, Hotmail, Msn or their bank accounts, they can't log in to their intranet... > I did this experiment on an asp site, I couldn't register > until I give up my adresse dan...@wa... > to choose da...@ne...! why? > ________________________________________ > = Comment - Entry #12 by geoff on Dec 18, 2002 4:47 pm > > cgi.escape is not directly accessible to ZPTs. In any case, that still doesn't tell me where the bad link occurs. > > Also, from RFC1808 it appears that using & in URLs will cause problems for people if they strip out the XHTML header. > ________________________________________ > = Comment - Entry #11 by dancam on Dec 18, 2002 4:40 pm > > is not possible to use from Python\lib\cgi.py > > def escape(s, quote=None): > """Replace special characters '&', '<' and '>' by SGML entities.""" > s = s.replace("&", "&") # Must be done first! > s = s.replace("<", "<") > s = s.replace(">", ">") > if quote: > s = s.replace('"', """) > return s > > ________________________________________ > = Comment - Entry #10 by geoff on Dec 18, 2002 3:52 pm > > I don't see where the link in question appears in plone. I have done a search of the RC1 source, and I don't see anything that will generate a link of the form described. In the future please provide more complete information when you report a bug. For example, in this case, the page on which the problem appears. > ________________________________________ > = Defer - Entry #9 by andym on Dec 18, 2002 2:57 pm > > Status: Pending => Deferred > > Defer to 1.1 > ________________________________________ > = Edit - Entry #8 by andym on Dec 18, 2002 2:56 pm > > Changes: submitter email, edited transcript, importance (critical => low) > ________________________________________ > = Comment - Entry #7 by Anonymous User on Dec 18, 2002 2:54 pm > > There you go, you learn something new every day: http://validator.w3.org/docs/errors.html#bad-entity > > This is because we specify we are XHTML 1.0. > > This a bug that will take a bit of work to fix as this is a) I believe in the core of the CMF and b) will likely occur in a few places. This is not important for most users since most browsers do not worry. > > Will be fixed in 1.1 > ________________________________________ > = Comment - Entry #6 by Anonymous User on Dec 18, 2002 2:41 pm > > > Must I quote W3C > > A reference to a URI that uses & as a separator between parameters, > such as "http://example.org/prog?x=1&y=2". is not correct... > > Yes please. I am not aware of this, if this is a problem you will have a problem with most of the web. > > I would like to see where this is specified before making any change. > > Note your first link (the one you say causes a problem) works for me in IE 6, Mozilla, Phoenix and Opera. > ________________________________________ > = Comment - Entry #5 by dancam on Dec 18, 2002 12:34 pm > > sorry about that... I forgot... > I thought I had point out the slight difference > as I did in a previous message to Andy McKay <an...@ag...> > http://danielle.zettai.net/New_plone/login_form?came_from=http%3A//danielle. > zettai.net/New_plone/manage&retry= > > > I meant why %3A and why not & ? > Iexplore wouldn't find the page... > but is happy with the clean > http://danielle.zettai.net/New_plone/login_form?came_from=http%3A//danielle. > zettai.net/New_plone/Members/dancam/folder_contents&retry= > > ________________________________________ > = Comment - Entry #4 by limi on Dec 18, 2002 12:22 pm > > For it to qualify as "clear", you should atleast point out what the differences are, not leave it up to us to guess the difference between two different URLs. > > We will look into the problem. > > If you can't contain your attitude, please take your business elsewhere. We are not your employees, and you get Plone for free. We have put thousands of unpaid hours into this project. So treat us with some respect. > ________________________________________ > = Comment - Entry #3 by dancam on Dec 18, 2002 11:52 am > > it is very clear indeed... Must I quote W3C > A reference to a URI that uses & as a separator between parameters, such as "http://example.org/prog?x=1&y=2". is not correct... > To solve this problem, simply replace all the &'s in attribute values with & (user agents will convert them back before following the links.) > > Another way to get around this problem is for the author of the CGI program to allow a different value to be used between arguments, like ';' or '|', which would allow the link to be coded as e.g. <a href="http://example.org/prog?x=1;y=2"> > > So IExplore has excuses not to find the requested page! > ________________________________________ > = Comment - Entry #2 by limi on Dec 18, 2002 11:39 am > > Please provide more details when submitting bug reports. If we can't see what the error is without doing extensive digging, there's leess chace of it being fixed. > ________________________________________ > = Request - Entry #1 by dancam on Dec 18, 2002 11:03 am > > Iexplore wouldn't find the page > http://danielle.zettai.net/New_plone/login_form?came_from=http%3A//danielle. zettai.net/New_plone/manage&retry= > but is happy with the clean > http://danielle.zettai.net/New_plone/login_form?came_from=http%3A//danielle. zettai.net/New_plone/Members/dancam/folder_contents&retry= > > ______________________________________________________________ |