From: Jeroen L. <jl...@ca...> - 2002-08-21 14:03:45
|
At 08:48 21-8-2002 -0500, you wrote: >We have several large issues that will be sweeping through the system anyways >and this will take a lot of time. I think it's a better idea to target ADODB >for 0.19.0. Full support of other databases would be a much later endeavor, >probably even a 2.0 goal. Partially agreed, although I still would like to see the queries use Prepare and such, for the usual security reasons. As I said before, we shouldn't get a broken port. >What I would rather see is someone taking 0.17.4 or the current CVS and >porting that over to use ADODB. After it's fully working it would just >involve the process of merging changes back into 0.18.0 for 0.19.0. We are >not burndedned or dependant on ADODB for 0.18.0 release. Ehm, that would mean a lot of work to get it back in the tree I think. Especially if someone takes 0.17.4, and we start working on functionalising everything. >As a related aside, the databases that we eventually need to support are >Oracle, Postegres, and MSSQL. Fun to know, but we can do ADODB&MySQL for now. Jeroen |