You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(11) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(21) |
Jun
(76) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(156) |
Sep
(117) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(122) |
Dec
(134) |
2003 |
Jan
(170) |
Feb
(214) |
Mar
(121) |
Apr
(36) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(69) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(17) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(40) |
2004 |
Jan
(34) |
Feb
(50) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(76) |
Jun
(126) |
Jul
(180) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(31) |
Nov
(25) |
Dec
(21) |
2005 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(75) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(31) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(16) |
2006 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(45) |
Apr
(64) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(40) |
2007 |
Jan
(47) |
Feb
(28) |
Mar
(89) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(58) |
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(103) |
Aug
(80) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(108) |
Nov
(45) |
Dec
(38) |
2008 |
Jan
(39) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(46) |
May
(39) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(38) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(49) |
Nov
(64) |
Dec
(31) |
2009 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(31) |
Mar
(28) |
Apr
(46) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(32) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(17) |
2010 |
Jan
(28) |
Feb
(55) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(78) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(70) |
Oct
(89) |
Nov
(55) |
Dec
(33) |
2011 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(66) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(40) |
May
(20) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
(199) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(76) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(29) |
Dec
(38) |
2012 |
Jan
(30) |
Feb
(52) |
Mar
(56) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(17) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(78) |
Nov
(59) |
Dec
(2) |
2013 |
Jan
(62) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(119) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(69) |
Oct
(128) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(11) |
2014 |
Jan
(232) |
Feb
(62) |
Mar
(67) |
Apr
(165) |
May
(82) |
Jun
(54) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(56) |
Oct
(59) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(16) |
2015 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(17) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(3) |
2016 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Paul R. <pa...@ma...> - 2016-07-19 07:39:53
|
Hello, Further to my previous emails on the topic, I would like to request that you cease re-distributing my code under the GPL until the GPL source is provided, or my code is removed from the project. Thanks Paul On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Paul Richards <pa...@ma...> wrote: > Rafik, > > Firstly, thank you for acknowledging that the theme files need to be > licensed under the GPL to be included. In terms of that PR, the minified > files are not consider source form. To quote from the information the GPL > provide regarding headers for minified files and the GPL: > > As additional permission under GNU GPL version 3 section 7, you > may distribute non-source (e.g., minimized or compacted) forms of > that code without the copy of the GNU GPL normally required by > section 4, provided you include this license notice and a URL > through which recipients can access the Corresponding Source. > > As you can see, from the above, it is considered the minimized/compacted > forms of the code are considered as non-source. > > Thanks > Paul > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Rafik Robeal <ra...@ma...> wrote: > >> Good News: >> >> Ace theme author, Mohsen, has agreed to license the files we are using in >> MantisBT under GPL. I’ve updated the PR - please review: >> >> https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/pull/805 >> >> Thanks >> Rafik >> >> >> On Jun 22, 2016, at 7:43 PM, Rafik Robeal <ra...@ma...> wrote: >> >> I just posted a PR with details on the extended license along with Ace >> Theme author's confirmation that MantisBT usage complies with the purchased >> extended license - Please review: >> >> https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/pull/805 >> >> Thanks, >> Rafik >> >> On Jun 22, 2016, at 3:00 AM, Robert Munteanu <rob...@gm...> >> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Paul Richards <pa...@ma...> >> wrote: >> >> And just to be clear, can you confirm if your response is an answer from >> the >> team, or just your personal opinion at this stage? >> >> >> >> My personal opinion. >> >> -- >> http://robert.muntea.nu/ >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San >> Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries >> present their vision of the future. This family event has something for >> everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. >> http://sdm.link/attshape >> _______________________________________________ >> mantisbt-dev mailing list >> man...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San >> Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries >> present their vision of the future. This family event has something for >> everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. >> http://sdm.link/attshape >> _______________________________________________ >> mantisbt-dev mailing list >> man...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev >> >> > |
From: Paul R. <pa...@ma...> - 2016-07-17 17:36:03
|
Rafik, Firstly, thank you for acknowledging that the theme files need to be licensed under the GPL to be included. In terms of that PR, the minified files are not consider source form. To quote from the information the GPL provide regarding headers for minified files and the GPL: As additional permission under GNU GPL version 3 section 7, you may distribute non-source (e.g., minimized or compacted) forms of that code without the copy of the GNU GPL normally required by section 4, provided you include this license notice and a URL through which recipients can access the Corresponding Source. As you can see, from the above, it is considered the minimized/compacted forms of the code are considered as non-source. Thanks Paul On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Rafik Robeal <ra...@ma...> wrote: > Good News: > > Ace theme author, Mohsen, has agreed to license the files we are using in > MantisBT under GPL. I’ve updated the PR - please review: > > https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/pull/805 > > Thanks > Rafik > > > On Jun 22, 2016, at 7:43 PM, Rafik Robeal <ra...@ma...> wrote: > > I just posted a PR with details on the extended license along with Ace > Theme author's confirmation that MantisBT usage complies with the purchased > extended license - Please review: > > https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/pull/805 > > Thanks, > Rafik > > On Jun 22, 2016, at 3:00 AM, Robert Munteanu <rob...@gm...> > wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Paul Richards <pa...@ma...> > wrote: > > And just to be clear, can you confirm if your response is an answer from > the > team, or just your personal opinion at this stage? > > > > My personal opinion. > > -- > http://robert.muntea.nu/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San > Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries > present their vision of the future. This family event has something for > everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. > http://sdm.link/attshape > _______________________________________________ > mantisbt-dev mailing list > man...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San > Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries > present their vision of the future. This family event has something for > everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. > http://sdm.link/attshape > _______________________________________________ > mantisbt-dev mailing list > man...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev > > |
From: Saul il <il...@gm...> - 2016-07-11 14:16:11
|
Hi to all, I’m new on this mailing list, and I’m here for have some suggest and feedback on “my” request to add a path to mantis. “my” is in quotes because the starting modification is not my, you can see on bug #9716 https://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=9716. Here my request: https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/pull/814 in the last message vboctor write something to me, I think here is more appropriate for discussion, but if I’m wrong, I rewrite it on the PR. > I think we need to think about the experience all up for managing global and project specific tags. I’m sorry my english is not the best if I don’t understand wrong your meaning … sure the user experience is important and for avoid problem there is a setting that for default make all change transparent to the user. Only if you enable the setting the tags can split for projects. > If we are to add reporting/graphs based on tags, make sure that there are no complexities. I don’t think this change make any trouble for developer. The table tags have one column more “project_id” that can not considerate for tags report/graphs. The only thing that make a little uneasy is duplicate tag, because several project can have the same tags. > Filtering on tags, do we know what tags to show in case All Projects / specific project in the filter box. I tag show in a filter depend on what you are watch. 1) If you are on a specific project you can filter for project and global tags. 2) If you are on all projects you can filter for any tags. > We were deferring schema changes to make it easier to switch back and force for 2.0.0 and 1.3.x for the time being. Sorry I really don’t understand this. The change is one column, if you add this column and you don’t use don’t make any problem. The column have a default that the tags is global. If u roll-back mantis to a previous version you need only to remove the column and nothing happen. I just clean my brach on git I wait to push it because the only why I found to do that is to make an other pull-request. do you have any suggestion? I know my code is not very beautiful, and I’m sorry for that … I’m java developer and not php developer than if you have any suggest on the code is appreciate. bye Saul |
From: Rafik R. <ra...@ma...> - 2016-06-30 19:45:12
|
Good News: Ace theme author, Mohsen, has agreed to license the files we are using in MantisBT under GPL. I’ve updated the PR - please review: https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/pull/805 Thanks Rafik On Jun 22, 2016, at 7:43 PM, Rafik Robeal <ra...@ma...<mailto:ra...@ma...>> wrote: I just posted a PR with details on the extended license along with Ace Theme author's confirmation that MantisBT usage complies with the purchased extended license - Please review: https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/pull/805 Thanks, Rafik On Jun 22, 2016, at 3:00 AM, Robert Munteanu <rob...@gm...<mailto:rob...@gm...>> wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Paul Richards <pa...@ma...<mailto:pa...@ma...>> wrote: And just to be clear, can you confirm if your response is an answer from the team, or just your personal opinion at this stage? My personal opinion. -- http://robert.muntea.nu/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries present their vision of the future. This family event has something for everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. http://sdm.link/attshape _______________________________________________ mantisbt-dev mailing list man...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev |
From: Rafik R. <ra...@ma...> - 2016-06-23 06:14:36
|
I just posted a PR with details on the extended license along with Ace Theme author's confirmation that MantisBT usage complies with the purchased extended license - Please review: https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/pull/805 Thanks, Rafik On Jun 22, 2016, at 3:00 AM, Robert Munteanu <rob...@gm...<mailto:rob...@gm...>> wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Paul Richards <pa...@ma...<mailto:pa...@ma...>> wrote: And just to be clear, can you confirm if your response is an answer from the team, or just your personal opinion at this stage? My personal opinion. -- http://robert.muntea.nu/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries present their vision of the future. This family event has something for everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. http://sdm.link/attshape _______________________________________________ mantisbt-dev mailing list man...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev |
From: Robert M. <rob...@gm...> - 2016-06-22 10:00:15
|
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Paul Richards <pa...@ma...> wrote: > And just to be clear, can you confirm if your response is an answer from the > team, or just your personal opinion at this stage? My personal opinion. -- http://robert.muntea.nu/ |
From: Paul R. <pa...@ma...> - 2016-06-22 09:26:49
|
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Thomas Charron <tw...@gm...> wrote: > > On Jun 22, 2016 4:49 AM, "Paul Richards" <pa...@ma...> wrote: > > > > Hi Robert, > > > > When I asked: > > > > > As someone that contributed to the original project, my understanding > > > was that these javascript files could not be added unless they were > > > also licensed under the GPL, or licensed under a GPL compatible > > > license - is this correct? > > > > The response received was: > > > > > Yes, that is generally the case. > > And, they are, which is what it states. I.e., they are licensed under > GPL when included as GPL. > > > In this case, the code I've contributed to mantis has been modified to > add a non-free theme - I may or may not now need to purchase a license > myself to continue to use the code. > > Well, since this is email, and we know that you can read..... go read > the part about it being included in GPL code and, granting the GPL license > for inclusion in GPL code..... > > > Thomas, which part? The license for the admin theme only refers to the GPL once: If the item was created using materials which are the subject of a GNU General Public License (GPL), your use of the item is subject to the terms of the GPL in place of the foregoing conditions (to the extent the GPL applies)." In this context, "the item" relates to the theme being purchased. And if the theme being purchased is under the GPL. I'm reading that as it is not a grant to license the theme under the GPL. If the theme was under the GPL, you could use the files from mantis in another GPL project without ever buying a license from the original theme author.. Paul |
From: Thomas C. <tw...@gm...> - 2016-06-22 08:57:53
|
On Jun 22, 2016 4:49 AM, "Paul Richards" <pa...@ma...> wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > When I asked: > > > As someone that contributed to the original project, my understanding > > was that these javascript files could not be added unless they were > > also licensed under the GPL, or licensed under a GPL compatible > > license - is this correct? > > The response received was: > > > Yes, that is generally the case. And, they are, which is what it states. I.e., they are licensed under GPL when included as GPL. > In this case, the code I've contributed to mantis has been modified to add a non-free theme - I may or may not now need to purchase a license myself to continue to use the code. Well, since this is email, and we know that you can read..... go read the part about it being included in GPL code and, granting the GPL license for inclusion in GPL code..... |
From: Paul R. <pa...@ma...> - 2016-06-22 08:47:39
|
Hi Robert, When I asked: > As someone that contributed to the original project, my understanding > was that these javascript files could not be added unless they were > also licensed under the GPL, or licensed under a GPL compatible > license - is this correct? The response received was: > Yes, that is generally the case. I was also told that: > if you and others have GPL'd contributions in the project then > you have the legal power to enforce the terms of the software and refuse > to let anyone distribute your code linked to proprietary/non-free > software. The advice received (as they are not lawyers) was to reach out to the project about the inclusion of non-free software in the project, and try to reach a suitable agreement with the community. If that fails, to contact https://www.softwarefreedom.org/ and their legal team for further advice. In this case, the code I've contributed to mantis has been modified to add a non-free theme - I may or may not now need to purchase a license myself to continue to use the code. And just to be clear, can you confirm if your response is an answer from the team, or just your personal opinion at this stage? Thanks Paul On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Robert Munteanu <rob...@gm...> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Thomas Charron <tw...@gm...> wrote: > > I'm not sure where there is a violation here. And your pointing to the > > GPL v3, when mantis is v2. > > IANAL but I am pretty certain there is no violation here. > > Paul, you might want to clarify this, and it would be very useful to > include the specific reasons from your conversation with the > lic...@fs... team. > > At the moment I see no reason for us to perform any action. > > Best, > > Robert > > -- > http://robert.muntea.nu/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San > Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries > present their vision of the future. This family event has something for > everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. > http://sdm.link/attshape > _______________________________________________ > mantisbt-dev mailing list > man...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev > |
From: Robert M. <rob...@gm...> - 2016-06-22 08:15:08
|
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Thomas Charron <tw...@gm...> wrote: > I'm not sure where there is a violation here. And your pointing to the > GPL v3, when mantis is v2. IANAL but I am pretty certain there is no violation here. Paul, you might want to clarify this, and it would be very useful to include the specific reasons from your conversation with the lic...@fs... team. At the moment I see no reason for us to perform any action. Best, Robert -- http://robert.muntea.nu/ |
From: Thomas C. <tw...@gm...> - 2016-06-21 02:35:15
|
I'm not sure where there is a violation here. And your pointing to the GPL v3, when mantis is v2. Commercial companies are welcome to dual license their products without issue. Also, as the owner of said license has not signed over his rights to his software to the fsf, they have no standing. The violations list is an open list that anyone can join, I used to be on it. So to summarize, what's your point? On Jun 20, 2016 6:42 PM, "Paul Richards" <gra...@bl...> wrote: > Hello, > > > > I have been in discussion with the GPL/FSF licensing team for the last > week regarding a recent commit to mantisbt. > > > > The following files were added to the open source mantisbt project which > is GPL licensed: > > > > 1) https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/blob/master/js/ace-elements.min.js > > 2) https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/blob/master/js/ace-extra.min.js > > 3) https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/blob/master/js/ace.min.js > > 4) https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/blob/master/css/ace.min.css > > 5) https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/blob/master/css/ace-ie.min.css > > 6) https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/blob/master/css/ace-rtl.min.css > > > > These files are licensed under a commercial license ( > https://wrapbootstrap.com/theme/ace-responsive-admin-template-WB0B30DGR ) > for which a fee may be payable by the end user. > > > > The license options are available at > http://support.wrapbootstrap.com/knowledge_base/topics/usage-licenses. > > > > Item 6 of the licenses state that "If the item was created using materials > which are the subject of a GNU General Public License (GPL), your use of > the item is subject to the terms of the GPL in place of the foregoing > conditions (to the extent the GPL applies)." > > > > A copy of the GPL license is available at > https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html. > > > > My understanding and suggested by the lic...@fs... team (although > they are not lawyers) is that would be a violation of the GPL to add these > files in this way. > > > > The advice received from their team in instances like this was to have a > look at http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-violation.html, and reach out to > the GPL project, and try to resolve the issue within the community. If that > fails, their advice is to contact http://softwarefreedom.org/ who may > offer free legal services to open developers. > > > > My reason for a number of years for contributing to the MantisBT project > was it was an open source project, and the original authors when i joined > had said would not make money from the project. From a personal point of > view, I did not want to spend my time to aid a commercial company, so that > was an important goal. > > > > Whilst I've been doing some research into the situation, badfiles asked > the question of > https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/pull/795#discussion_r67747346 . The > reply from syncguru seems to confirm that the files listed in lines 1-6 > above, which I believed were from the commercial licensed ace admin > template, are indeed from the commercial template, as indicated at > https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/pull/795#discussion_r67768649 > > > > He states: > > "1- Mantishub has extended license > > 2- Admin themes are very good fit for bug-tracker app. Ace was top seller > back then when this effort started (around May 2014) > > 3- We have full source code control. Also the author is reachable on > twitter." > > > > This would seem to confirm that the code is indeed commercial, and equally > that the license is owned by a separate commercial company "Mantishub". > > > > My questions to the FSF and their responses suggested that the first step > is to reach out in a friendly manner and explain the problem - hopefully > the above achieve this. > > > > They then suggest proposing a solution, and that if that fails the next > step should be contacting the Software Freedom Law Center, which provides > pro-bono legal services to developers of Free, Libre, and Open Source > Software (http://softwarefreedom.org/). > > > > I'd like to firstly provide the option for the developers of the mantisbt > project to provide an explanation if I've misunderstood anything in the GPL > in relation to this, but having asked various linux licensing groups/people > over the last week, I suspect this is unlikely. > > > > In terms of workable solutions, I see two options: > > > > a) The files listed in 1-6 above (and there are a couple of extra files > which i've not yet evaluated) are removed from the mantisbt project. > > > > b) Any contributions that I (and any other contributor that feels the > same) have made to the mantisbt project are removed, such that they no > longer have any code in the project. > > > > At this stage, I'm going to await other responses, and do nothing else > apart from send this email and reply as appropriately. > > > > I've been informed of the following: "However if you and others have GPL'd > contributions in the project then you have the legal power to enforce the > terms of the software and refuse to let anyone distribute your code linked > to proprietary/non-free software." > > > > On that basis, and in case users read this and are concerned - I'd like to > make clear that at this point, that the released versions of mantisBT only > contain GPL compatible code, and therefore there is no issues with > distribution of that code. The code i'm emailing about only exists in the > github repository. > > > > Thanks > > Paul > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San > Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries > present their vision of the future. This family event has something for > everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. > http://sdm.link/attshape > _______________________________________________ > mantisbt-dev mailing list > man...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev > > |
From: Paul R. <gra...@bl...> - 2016-06-20 22:41:14
|
Hello, I have been in discussion with the GPL/FSF licensing team for the last week regarding a recent commit to mantisbt. The following files were added to the open source mantisbt project which is GPL licensed: 1) <https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/blob/master/js/ace-elements.min.js> https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/blob/master/js/ace-elements.min.js 2) <https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/blob/master/js/ace-extra.min.js> https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/blob/master/js/ace-extra.min.js 3) <https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/blob/master/js/ace.min.js> https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/blob/master/js/ace.min.js 4) <https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/blob/master/css/ace.min.css> https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/blob/master/css/ace.min.css 5) <https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/blob/master/css/ace-ie.min.css> https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/blob/master/css/ace-ie.min.css 6) <https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/blob/master/css/ace-rtl.min.css> https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/blob/master/css/ace-rtl.min.css These files are licensed under a commercial license ( <https://wrapbootstrap.com/theme/ace-responsive-admin-template-WB0B30DGR> https://wrapbootstrap.com/theme/ace-responsive-admin-template-WB0B30DGR ) for which a fee may be payable by the end user. The license options are available at <http://support.wrapbootstrap.com/knowledge_base/topics/usage-licenses> http://support.wrapbootstrap.com/knowledge_base/topics/usage-licenses. Item 6 of the licenses state that "If the item was created using materials which are the subject of a GNU General Public License (GPL), your use of the item is subject to the terms of the GPL in place of the foregoing conditions (to the extent the GPL applies)." A copy of the GPL license is available at <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html> https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html. My understanding and suggested by the <mailto:lic...@fs...> lic...@fs... team (although they are not lawyers) is that would be a violation of the GPL to add these files in this way. The advice received from their team in instances like this was to have a look at <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-violation.html> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-violation.html, and reach out to the GPL project, and try to resolve the issue within the community. If that fails, their advice is to contact <http://softwarefreedom.org/> http://softwarefreedom.org/ who may offer free legal services to open developers. My reason for a number of years for contributing to the MantisBT project was it was an open source project, and the original authors when i joined had said would not make money from the project. From a personal point of view, I did not want to spend my time to aid a commercial company, so that was an important goal. Whilst I've been doing some research into the situation, badfiles asked the question of <https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/pull/795#discussion_r67747346> https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/pull/795#discussion_r67747346 . The reply from syncguru seems to confirm that the files listed in lines 1-6 above, which I believed were from the commercial licensed ace admin template, are indeed from the commercial template, as indicated at <https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/pull/795#discussion_r67768649> https://github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt/pull/795#discussion_r67768649 He states: "1- Mantishub has extended license 2- Admin themes are very good fit for bug-tracker app. Ace was top seller back then when this effort started (around May 2014) 3- We have full source code control. Also the author is reachable on twitter." This would seem to confirm that the code is indeed commercial, and equally that the license is owned by a separate commercial company "Mantishub". My questions to the FSF and their responses suggested that the first step is to reach out in a friendly manner and explain the problem - hopefully the above achieve this. They then suggest proposing a solution, and that if that fails the next step should be contacting the Software Freedom Law Center, which provides pro-bono legal services to developers of Free, Libre, and Open Source Software ( <http://softwarefreedom.org/> http://softwarefreedom.org/). I'd like to firstly provide the option for the developers of the mantisbt project to provide an explanation if I've misunderstood anything in the GPL in relation to this, but having asked various linux licensing groups/people over the last week, I suspect this is unlikely. In terms of workable solutions, I see two options: a) The files listed in 1-6 above (and there are a couple of extra files which i've not yet evaluated) are removed from the mantisbt project. b) Any contributions that I (and any other contributor that feels the same) have made to the mantisbt project are removed, such that they no longer have any code in the project. At this stage, I'm going to await other responses, and do nothing else apart from send this email and reply as appropriately. I've been informed of the following: "However if you and others have GPL'd contributions in the project then you have the legal power to enforce the terms of the software and refuse to let anyone distribute your code linked to proprietary/non-free software." On that basis, and in case users read this and are concerned - I'd like to make clear that at this point, that the released versions of mantisBT only contain GPL compatible code, and therefore there is no issues with distribution of that code. The code i'm emailing about only exists in the github repository. Thanks Paul |
From: Julien S. <sch...@gm...> - 2016-04-08 15:50:54
|
Hello, Here is a new plugin for mantis : https://github.com/grostarin/RelationshipEasyManagement/ It adds some features on relationship management : [image: Images intégrées 1] I'm the only one contributor. Maybe code and GitHub Repo could be improved. (first time i use github) I think github repo is not totally clean but you could find working plugin in " https://github.com/grostarin/RelationshipEasyManagement/tree/master/RelationshipEasyManagement/RelationshipEasyManagement ". Regards, -- Julien Schneider -- Julien Schneider |
From: Victor B. <vb...@gm...> - 2016-04-03 23:03:35
|
Thanks Koen for reaching out. That would be a great addition to MantisBT. I think we can take this as a goal as part of our new UI effort. We can make sure it is automation test friendly. @syncguru has the latest version of the modern UI at http://github.com/mantishub/mantisbt (modern-ui) branch. I would encourage you to submit pull requests against that to make your life easier for automated tests. I agree that ids are a much better than having to use methods like xpath. On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Koen Prins <ke...@gm...> wrote: > Hi All, > > For training purposes I have been writing a test automation suit on the > MantisBT application using Selenium Webdriver in a Java binding. Currently > about 40% of the functionality has been covered and I have a question about > screen element naming. > > Thing is, in Selenium you can use any locator using the following priority: > > 1. id > 2. Name > 3. Linktext > 4. Partial Linktext > 5. Tag Name > 6. class name > 7. Css > 8. xpath > > And now I find myself using xpath a whole bunch as there is nothing else. > Let me tell you, I hate XPath with a passion already as it is certain to > change often and not even waiting for a version upgrade. I find myself > needing to use XPath most often with buttons for some reason. Sometimes I > am lucky and I can use the css selector but honestly id or name would be > much better. > > The end goal for me is to have a working Continuous Integration setup that > will use Jenkins to grab the latest build, set it up in a new database > (VirtualBox?), run the upgrade and run all the tests giving me a rundown of > the results. Local I will then XML all the defects cause there will be a > bunch that are tests failing for reasons of GUI upgrade, allowing me to > learn that as well. > > What are the efforts in version 2 for naming everything with an id or at > least a name? Would the dev community be interested in an automated > regression set written in java (and check my effort so far over at github)? > Does anyone read this mailing list? > > Grtz, > Koen > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Transform Data into Opportunity. > Accelerate data analysis in your applications with > Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. > Click to learn more. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785471&iu=/4140 > _______________________________________________ > mantisbt-dev mailing list > man...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev > > |
From: Koen P. <ke...@gm...> - 2016-04-03 05:42:47
|
Hi All, For training purposes I have been writing a test automation suit on the MantisBT application using Selenium Webdriver in a Java binding. Currently about 40% of the functionality has been covered and I have a question about screen element naming. Thing is, in Selenium you can use any locator using the following priority: 1. id 2. Name 3. Linktext 4. Partial Linktext 5. Tag Name 6. class name 7. Css 8. xpath And now I find myself using xpath a whole bunch as there is nothing else. Let me tell you, I hate XPath with a passion already as it is certain to change often and not even waiting for a version upgrade. I find myself needing to use XPath most often with buttons for some reason. Sometimes I am lucky and I can use the css selector but honestly id or name would be much better. The end goal for me is to have a working Continuous Integration setup that will use Jenkins to grab the latest build, set it up in a new database (VirtualBox?), run the upgrade and run all the tests giving me a rundown of the results. Local I will then XML all the defects cause there will be a bunch that are tests failing for reasons of GUI upgrade, allowing me to learn that as well. What are the efforts in version 2 for naming everything with an id or at least a name? Would the dev community be interested in an automated regression set written in java (and check my effort so far over at github)? Does anyone read this mailing list? Grtz, Koen |
From: Thomas M. <tho...@gm...> - 2016-03-14 11:21:06
|
Hallo People! I created a new Plugin for Mantis. This Plugin is a Bridge-System/SSO for Joomla 3.x. Mantis will take the login info's from Joomla and log the user in. The plugin also automatically sync the user informations if changed. The Repository holds both needed Mantis and Joomla plugins. Both are needed for the system. More details are in the readme file The GitHub repository is : https://github.com/munzili/Joomla2Mantis Download link: https://github.com/munzili/Joomla2Mantis/archive/master.zip Have a nice day! |
From: Robert M. <rob...@gm...> - 2016-03-11 13:49:11
|
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Damien Regad <dr...@ma...> wrote: > In case you didn't know, Microsoft announced availability of MSSQL on Linux > platform by mid 2017 > > https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2016/03/07/announcing-sql-server-on-linux/ It would make it much simpler to test SQL Server conformance using Travis, so looking forward to that. Robert > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Transform Data into Opportunity. > Accelerate data analysis in your applications with > Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. > Click to learn more. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785111&iu=/4140 > _______________________________________________ > mantisbt-dev mailing list > man...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev -- http://robert.muntea.nu/ |
From: Damien R. <dr...@ma...> - 2016-03-11 08:14:17
|
In case you didn't know, Microsoft announced availability of MSSQL on Linux platform by mid 2017 https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2016/03/07/announcing-sql-server-on-linux/ |
From: Louis B. <lba...@gm...> - 2016-03-08 17:10:34
|
You convinced me, i'll switch to RC1... thank you ! Louis BAYLE Tel: +33 (0)4.42.604.734 lba...@gm... On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Victor Boctor <vb...@gm...> wrote: > Given the timeline you provided, I would say within the 2 months. > > Here is the changelog since 1.3.0-rc.1 > https://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/changelog_page.php?version_id=249 > > I’ve a lot more confidence in 1.3.x release compared to previous ones given > the fact that MantisHub has been based on 1.3.x for just over a year now. > So at least for the MySQL case, it has been well exercised. But as usual, > installing releases not marked as stable does require you to be able to > handle issues if they come up. > > On March 8, 2016 at 8:23:02 AM, Louis BAYLE (lba...@gm...) wrote: > > Hi all, > > I know that the standard open-source answer to "when does the next > release come out ?" is "when it'll be ready..." but would it be > possible to have an estimation date for the next RC2 (2 month ? 6 > month ? 1 year ?). > > Also, I'd like to know if you found/fixed some show-stopper issues > since RC1. I'd like to use the new SOAP API, and I try to figure out > how risky it is to switch from 1.2 to 1.3_RC1. > > Thanks for your concern, I know nobody wants to answer such questions > in the open-source world ! > > Louis BAYLE > http://codevtt.org > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Transform Data into Opportunity. > Accelerate data analysis in your applications with > Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. > Click to learn more. > http://makebettercode.com/inteldaal-eval > _______________________________________________ > mantisbt-dev mailing list > man...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev |
From: Victor B. <vb...@gm...> - 2016-03-08 16:45:53
|
Given the timeline you provided, I would say within the 2 months. Here is the changelog since 1.3.0-rc.1 https://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/changelog_page.php?version_id=249 I’ve a lot more confidence in 1.3.x release compared to previous ones given the fact that MantisHub has been based on 1.3.x for just over a year now. So at least for the MySQL case, it has been well exercised. But as usual, installing releases not marked as stable does require you to be able to handle issues if they come up. On March 8, 2016 at 8:23:02 AM, Louis BAYLE (lba...@gm...) wrote: Hi all, I know that the standard open-source answer to "when does the next release come out ?" is "when it'll be ready..." but would it be possible to have an estimation date for the next RC2 (2 month ? 6 month ? 1 year ?). Also, I'd like to know if you found/fixed some show-stopper issues since RC1. I'd like to use the new SOAP API, and I try to figure out how risky it is to switch from 1.2 to 1.3_RC1. Thanks for your concern, I know nobody wants to answer such questions in the open-source world ! Louis BAYLE http://codevtt.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://makebettercode.com/inteldaal-eval _______________________________________________ mantisbt-dev mailing list man...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev |
From: Louis B. <lba...@gm...> - 2016-03-08 09:29:56
|
Hi all, I know that the standard open-source answer to "when does the next release come out ?" is "when it'll be ready..." but would it be possible to have an estimation date for the next RC2 (2 month ? 6 month ? 1 year ?). Also, I'd like to know if you found/fixed some show-stopper issues since RC1. I'd like to use the new SOAP API, and I try to figure out how risky it is to switch from 1.2 to 1.3_RC1. Thanks for your concern, I know nobody wants to answer such questions in the open-source world ! Louis BAYLE http://codevtt.org |
From: Damien R. <dr...@ma...> - 2016-02-10 08:33:48
|
Максим Кузьмин <maxriderg@...> writes: > This is just a friendly gentle reminder about our submission. Is there > are any issues left preventing our plug-in publishing? What else should > be accomplished to get our extension published? Apologies, this fell off the radar. I forked the plugin and invited you to the mantisbt-plugins org. Once you accept the invitation, you should have push access to the repo. Damien |
From: Максим К. <max...@gm...> - 2016-02-09 20:40:08
|
Hi All! This is just a friendly gentle reminder about our submission. Is there are any issues left preventing our plug-in publishing? What else should be accomplished to get our extension published? Thank you in advance. Regards, Maxim |
From: Louis B. <lba...@gm...> - 2016-02-01 17:03:35
|
thank you ! Louis BAYLE Tel: +33 (0)4.42.604.734 lba...@gm... On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Roland Becker <ro...@at...> wrote: > I promoted you to teeam maintainer. > You should now be able to add other users for write access. > >> Louis BAYLE <lba...@gm...> hat am 1. Februar 2016 um 16:44 >> geschrieben: >> >> >> Hi, >> I would like to add some contributors to the CodevTT github >> repository, hosted on mantisbt-plugins. >> How can I do that ? (the 'Settings' icon is not displayed). >> >> Contributors: Nikerabbit and siebrand (people from translatewiki.net) >> >> https://github.com/mantisbt-plugins/codev >> >> Best regards >> >> Louis BAYLE >> http://CodevTT;org >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance >> APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month >> Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now >> Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 >> _______________________________________________ >> mantisbt-dev mailing list >> man...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev |
From: Roland B. <ro...@at...> - 2016-02-01 16:18:03
|
I promoted you to teeam maintainer. You should now be able to add other users for write access. > Louis BAYLE <lba...@gm...> hat am 1. Februar 2016 um 16:44 > geschrieben: > > > Hi, > I would like to add some contributors to the CodevTT github > repository, hosted on mantisbt-plugins. > How can I do that ? (the 'Settings' icon is not displayed). > > Contributors: Nikerabbit and siebrand (people from translatewiki.net) > > https://github.com/mantisbt-plugins/codev > > Best regards > > Louis BAYLE > http://CodevTT;org > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 > _______________________________________________ > mantisbt-dev mailing list > man...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mantisbt-dev |