Re: [Bibdesk-users] nightly build stability

[Rolf S. <rol...@al...>]

Hello Christiaan,

I was too quick: "=85I can open the preffile=85"

1.) using Terminal as suggested didn't change anything.
2.) where resides the preffile? I can find only the plist-file for =20
bibdesk. When I open that with Textwrangler it looks really strange: =20
one bib-entry ("unpublished") followed by the "not-to-use-for-=20
sorting"-words and =85 ??

What is the usual place fort the pref-file? Spotlite doen't find it =20
(or I'm too stupid to use it properly)

Thanks,
  Rolf



Am 31.10.2005 um 14:43 schrieb Christiaan Hofman:

>
> On 31 Oct 2005, at 2:13 PM, Rolf Schmolling wrote:
>
>
>> Hello Christiaan,
>>
>>  I am happy to try digging (wouldn't like to start from scratch, =20
>> had to set up lots of extra-fields because of jurabib.sty)
>>
>> BUT: where to start? I can open the preffile with TextWrangler but =20=

>> where to go from there?
>>
>> Greetings,
>>  Rolf
>>
>>
>
> Look at the pref called "Default Fields", the default value is an =20
> array with Keywords, Local-Url, and Url. (only change when BibDesk =20
> is not running). Or from the Terminal you can type
>
> defaults write edu.ucsd.cs.mmccrack.bibdesk "Default Fields" =20
> '(Keywords, "Local-Url", Url)'
>
> There is no real reason to add boolean and rating fields by =20
> default, as they are shown even when they are not present.
>
> HTH,
> Christiaan
>
>
>> Am 30.10.2005 um 19:55 schrieb Christiaan Hofman:
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On 30 Oct 2005, at 4:51 PM, Rolf Schmolling wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>> no stability problems with latest bult (29102005)
>>>>
>>>> Small, mere cosmetic: in previous builts (I cannot remember in =20
>>>> which this appeared first) I had to add a field "rating" to =20
>>>> defaults to get the corresponding field in the editor etc.
>>>>
>>>> NOW I have two of them in the prefpane defaults, I can mark them =20=

>>>> but cannot erase them, the "-" button is greyed out.
>>>>
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> Rolf
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ah, sorry. That is of course the danger of alpha testing (I think =20=

>>> none of the versions, including the latest, by themselves could =20
>>> have given these problems, but the combination of versions could =20
>>> have done this). I guess now the only thing you can do is dig =20
>>> into the prefs file (ask if you don't know what to do).
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
> Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course
> Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005
> Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information
> _______________________________________________
> Bibdesk-users mailing list
> Bib...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bibdesk-users
>
>


--
Rolf Schmolling M.A. Historian, Rolf.Schmolling@Alumni.TU-Berlin.DE
www.homepage.mac.com/rolf_schmolling