From: Alex M. <ah...@st...> - 2005-02-15 19:06:57
|
Just wondering whether adding in this to the citekey format string as an option was still in the works or whether it had been put on the back burner. Thanks! -AHM On Jan 2, 2005, at 5:40 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote: > > I have some problems with this proposal, as %a. means: all authors > followed by one dot at the end. I would like to keep this, to have say > Auth1Auth2:2000xx. In other words: such things may be ambiguous, and > quite cumbersome to detect with the format parser. Maybe we can make > use of some characters to delimit them like braces (as those are not > allowed in cite-key formats). Say > %a{.}3{etal}; > would mean: 3 authors separated by . with etal as suffix for more > authors, and ; after all authors. I think this is relatively easy to > implement. Does this sound reasonble and not too cumbersome? > Christiaan > |