springframework-developer Mailing List for Spring Framework (Page 248)

SourceForge Headquarters 1320 Columbia Street Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

OK, so how do we go about removing the @version tags then - in an =
automated fashion?
=20
Juergen
=20

________________________________

Von: spr...@li... im Auftrag =
von Alef Arendsen
Gesendet: Di 03.08.2004 10:18
An: spr...@li...
Betreff: RE: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags

Sorry, forgot about this.

I'll add my +1 to removing them.

Just use @author and @since.

So the vote is:

3 for
5 against
1 neutral

Alef

> -----Original Message-----
> From: spr...@li...
> [mailto:spr...@li...]
>  On Behalf Of Dmitriy Kopylenko
> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 11:15 PM
> To: spr...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags
>
> So is this the final vote? Are we getting rid of $Id$s then?
>
> Dmitriy.
>
> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
>
> > 3 in favor
> > 4 against
> > 2 neutral
> >
> >
> > William G. Thompson, Jr. wrote:
> >
> >> i'm not sure i feel strongly either way...traditionally
> I've always
> >> put $Id$ in every text file I management in CVS.  This has
> also been
> >> the case in every open source project I have been involved in or
> >> used.  That is not neccesarily a good enough reason to
> continue to do
> >> it...
> >>
> >> In web app dev $Id$ comes in really handy to verify the
> build process
> >> ran correctly and the thing you thought was deployed actually got
> >> deployed.  for instance we put $Id$ in HTML comments for
> our Views so
> >> that we can view source in the running app to check the versions.
> >>
> >> however, I also understand the problem with branch/merge...but why
> >> doesn't the -kk solution work?
> >>
> >> +0 for $Id$
> >>
> >> later.
> >> Bill
> >>
> >>
> >> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
> >>
> >>> Let's give others a chance ;-)
> >>>
> >>> Alef, Keith, Mark, Bill.... what's your vote?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Rob Harrop wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Nothing like a good old fashioned standoff :)
> >>>>
> >>>> Shootout at noon?
> >>>>
> >>>> Rob
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: spr...@li...
> >>>>
> [mailto:spr...@li...] On
> >>>> Behalf Of Dmitriy Kopylenko
> >>>> Sent: 29 July 2004 16:16
> >>>> To: spr...@li...
> >>>> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags
> >>>>
> >>>> 3 for (Rod, Dmitriy, Rob)
> >>>> 3 against  (Juergen, Thomas, Colin)
> >>>> 1 neutral (Darren)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Colin Sampaleanu wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>=20
> >>>>
> >>>>> I do like $Id tags to be able to look at files and see who to
> >>>>> blame for the last changes :-), but I would rather be able to
> >>>>> branch/merge comfortably in the future. With Tortoise
> and Eclipse,
> >>>>> I can see the revision history _very_ easily anyways,
> wherever I am.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So -1 for using them from now on (i.e let's get rid of them)...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>=20
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Well, let's take a vote. I'm for $Id tags (+1)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>> Dmitriy.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> =20
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'd actually prefer if we drop $Id tags from all files. I
> >>>>>>> personally don't think that they add much value. Of
> course, if a
> >>>>>>> democratic decision goes in favor of those tags, well, I'll
> >>>>>>> concede ;-)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regarding @since tags, we're currently using them with the
> >>>>>>> creation date. That has been quite nice during our agile way
> >>>>>>> towards 1.0. We could indeed reconsider to use
> version numbers
> >>>>>>> there now.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Any suggestions on how to apply a consistent style for all
> >>>>>>> source files in a batch, without messing them up? $Id is
> >>>>>>> probably easy, @since nearly impossible, parameter alignment
> >>>>>>> easy again.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Juergen
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Von: spr...@li... im
> >>>>>>> Auftrag von Colin Sampaleanu
> >>>>>>> Gesendet: Mi 28.07.2004 20:38
> >>>>>>> An: spr...@li...
> >>>>>>> Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version
> >>>>>>> tags
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>   =20
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I like id keywords...they're mainly in the code through my
> >>>>>>>>> classes or classes I've edited... (Damn, if it's
> standardized,
> >>>>>>>>> I won't know if I've worked on a particular file
> any more :-)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>            =20
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I also insert $Id:$ when I work on existing classes
> or create
> >>>>>>>> new ones
> >>>>>>>> ;-)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Dmitriy.
> >>>>>>>>=20
> >>>>>>>>       =20
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I personally like $Id tags. But they do suck big time when
> >>>>>>> trying to merge files back in after a branch, causing a
> >>>>>>> conflict/change to exist when there shouldn't be any... There
> >>>>>>> seems to be a trend to going away from using them in
> files, by
> >>>>>>> some people, for this reason.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Colin
> >>>>>>>     =20
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>   =20
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------
> >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed
> the changes
> >> on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past
> few weeks?
> >> Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source
> >> Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site.
> >> www.ostg.com _______________________________________________
> >> Springframework-developer mailing list
> >> Spr...@li...
> >>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-develope
> >> r
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed
> the changes
> > on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past
> few weeks?
> > Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source
> > Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site.
> > www.ostg.com _______________________________________________
> > Springframework-developer mailing list
> > Spr...@li...
> >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the
> changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the
> past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are
> now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes
> on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>
>
>
>

-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now,
one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology
Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com
_______________________________________________
Springframework-developer mailing list
Spr...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer

2003	Jan	Feb (55)	Mar (100)	Apr (203)	May (330)	Jun (190)	Jul (302)	Aug (323)	Sep (197)	Oct (245)	Nov (490)	Dec (330)
2004	Jan (194)	Feb (400)	Mar (416)	Apr (415)	May (359)	Jun (381)	Jul (491)	Aug (311)	Sep (291)	Oct (273)	Nov (355)	Dec (266)
2005	Jan (306)	Feb (303)	Mar (520)	Apr (346)	May (255)	Jun (221)	Jul (171)	Aug (247)	Sep (147)	Oct (125)	Nov (165)	Dec (65)
2006	Jan (90)	Feb (53)	Mar (121)	Apr (103)	May (113)	Jun (103)	Jul (104)	Aug (67)	Sep (78)	Oct (82)	Nov (78)	Dec (70)
2007	Jan (77)	Feb (76)	Mar (63)	Apr (30)	May (47)	Jun (41)	Jul (44)	Aug (44)	Sep (49)	Oct (33)	Nov (25)	Dec (21)
2008	Jan (45)	Feb (13)	Mar (15)	Apr (12)	May (9)	Jun (33)	Jul (30)	Aug (7)	Sep (20)	Oct (17)	Nov (20)	Dec (10)
2009	Jan (8)	Feb (5)	Mar (12)	Apr (17)	May (19)	Jun (97)	Jul (77)	Aug (33)	Sep (24)	Oct (41)	Nov (16)	Dec (32)
2010	Jan (24)	Feb (14)	Mar (50)	Apr (71)	May (70)	Jun (64)	Jul (45)	Aug (62)	Sep (32)	Oct (4)	Nov (12)	Dec (2)
2011	Jan (1)	Feb (3)	Mar (4)	Apr (3)	May (6)	Jun (1)	Jul (4)	Aug (3)	Sep (4)	Oct (6)	Nov (3)	Dec (3)
2012	Jan (4)	Feb (8)	Mar (6)	Apr (10)	May (2)	Jun (3)	Jul (11)	Aug (10)	Sep (4)	Oct	Nov (1)	Dec (1)
2013	Jan (4)	Feb (1)	Mar (9)	Apr (1)	May (8)	Jun (2)	Jul (5)	Aug (2)	Sep	Oct (3)	Nov (10)	Dec (8)
2014	Jan (3)	Feb (12)	Mar (9)	Apr (12)	May (2)	Jun	Jul (3)	Aug (1)	Sep (1)	Oct (4)	Nov	Dec (2)
2015	Jan (1)	Feb (3)	Mar (4)	Apr (9)	May (2)	Jun (2)	Jul	Aug (2)	Sep (7)	Oct (9)	Nov (7)	Dec (9)
2016	Jan (7)	Feb (5)	Mar (5)	Apr (5)	May (8)	Jun (4)	Jul (5)	Aug (4)	Sep (6)	Oct (7)	Nov (2)	Dec (3)
2017	Jan (7)	Feb (8)	Mar (7)	Apr (3)	May (4)	Jun (3)	Jul (5)	Aug (8)	Sep (4)	Oct (2)	Nov (3)	Dec
2018	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr (1)	May	Jun (1)	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov (1)	Dec
2019	Jan	Feb (1)	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec (1)
2021	Jan	Feb (1)	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2022	Jan	Feb (1)	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep (1)	Oct	Nov	Dec
2024	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov (1)	Dec
2025	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May (1)	Jun	Jul (2)	Aug (5)	Sep (2)	Oct	Nov	Dec (1)
2026	Jan (1)	Feb	Mar (1)	Apr	May	Jun	Jul (1)	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec

springframework-developer Mailing List for Spring Framework (Page 248)

springframework-developer — Spring Framework developers list