|
From: Dmitriy K. <dko...@ru...> - 2004-08-02 21:07:50
|
So is this the final vote? Are we getting rid of $Id$s then? Dmitriy. Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: > 3 in favor > 4 against > 2 neutral > > > William G. Thompson, Jr. wrote: > >> i'm not sure i feel strongly either way...traditionally I've always >> put $Id$ in every text file I management in CVS. This has also been >> the case in every open source project I have been involved in or >> used. That is not neccesarily a good enough reason to continue to do >> it... >> >> In web app dev $Id$ comes in really handy to verify the build process >> ran correctly and the thing you thought was deployed actually got >> deployed. for instance we put $Id$ in HTML comments for our Views so >> that we can view source in the running app to check the versions. >> >> however, I also understand the problem with branch/merge...but why >> doesn't the -kk solution work? >> >> +0 for $Id$ >> >> later. >> Bill >> >> >> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: >> >>> Let's give others a chance ;-) >>> >>> Alef, Keith, Mark, Bill.... what's your vote? >>> >>> >>> Rob Harrop wrote: >>> >>>> Nothing like a good old fashioned standoff :) >>>> >>>> Shootout at noon? >>>> >>>> Rob >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: spr...@li... >>>> [mailto:spr...@li...] On >>>> Behalf Of >>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko >>>> Sent: 29 July 2004 16:16 >>>> To: spr...@li... >>>> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags >>>> >>>> 3 for (Rod, Dmitriy, Rob) >>>> 3 against (Juergen, Thomas, Colin) >>>> 1 neutral (Darren) >>>> >>>> >>>> Colin Sampaleanu wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> I do like $Id tags to be able to look at files and see who to >>>>> blame for the last changes :-), but I would rather be able to >>>>> branch/merge comfortably in the future. With Tortoise and Eclipse, >>>>> I can see the revision history _very_ easily anyways, wherever I am. >>>>> >>>>> So -1 for using them from now on (i.e let's get rid of them)... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Well, let's take a vote. I'm for $Id tags (+1) >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Dmitriy. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> jürgen höller [werk3AT] wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'd actually prefer if we drop $Id tags from all files. I >>>>>>> personally don't think that they add much value. Of course, if a >>>>>>> democratic decision goes in favor of those tags, well, I'll >>>>>>> concede ;-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regarding @since tags, we're currently using them with the >>>>>>> creation date. That has been quite nice during our agile way >>>>>>> towards 1.0. We could indeed reconsider to use version numbers >>>>>>> there now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any suggestions on how to apply a consistent style for all >>>>>>> source files in a batch, without messing them up? $Id is >>>>>>> probably easy, @since nearly impossible, parameter alignment >>>>>>> easy again. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Juergen >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ________________________________ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Von: spr...@li... im >>>>>>> Auftrag von Colin Sampaleanu >>>>>>> Gesendet: Mi 28.07.2004 20:38 >>>>>>> An: spr...@li... >>>>>>> Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I like id keywords...they're mainly in the code through my >>>>>>>>> classes or >>>>>>>>> classes I've edited... (Damn, if it's standardized, I won't >>>>>>>>> know if I've >>>>>>>>> worked on a particular file any more :-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I also insert $Id:$ when I work on existing classes or create >>>>>>>> new ones >>>>>>>> ;-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dmitriy. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I personally like $Id tags. But they do suck big time when >>>>>>> trying to >>>>>>> merge files back in after a branch, causing a conflict/change to >>>>>>> exist >>>>>>> when there shouldn't be any... There seems to be a trend to >>>>>>> going away >>>>>>> from using them in files, by some people, for this reason. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Colin >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on >> Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, >> one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology >> Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Springframework-developer mailing list >> Spr...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on > Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, > one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology > Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com > _______________________________________________ > Springframework-developer mailing list > Spr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer |