RE: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags

SourceForge Headquarters 1320 Columbia Street Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

Sorry, forgot about this.

I'll add my +1 to removing them.

Just use @author and @since.

So the vote is:

3 for
5 against
1 neutral

Alef

> -----Original Message-----
> From: spr...@li...=20
> [mailto:spr...@li...]
>  On Behalf Of Dmitriy Kopylenko
> Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 11:15 PM
> To: spr...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags
>=20
> So is this the final vote? Are we getting rid of $Id$s then?
>=20
> Dmitriy.
>=20
> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
>=20
> > 3 in favor
> > 4 against
> > 2 neutral
> >
> >
> > William G. Thompson, Jr. wrote:
> >
> >> i'm not sure i feel strongly either way...traditionally=20
> I've always=20
> >> put $Id$ in every text file I management in CVS.  This has=20
> also been=20
> >> the case in every open source project I have been involved in or=20
> >> used.  That is not neccesarily a good enough reason to=20
> continue to do=20
> >> it...
> >>
> >> In web app dev $Id$ comes in really handy to verify the=20
> build process=20
> >> ran correctly and the thing you thought was deployed actually got=20
> >> deployed.  for instance we put $Id$ in HTML comments for=20
> our Views so=20
> >> that we can view source in the running app to check the versions.
> >>
> >> however, I also understand the problem with branch/merge...but why=20
> >> doesn't the -kk solution work?
> >>
> >> +0 for $Id$
> >>
> >> later.
> >> Bill
> >>
> >>
> >> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
> >>
> >>> Let's give others a chance ;-)
> >>>
> >>> Alef, Keith, Mark, Bill.... what's your vote?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Rob Harrop wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Nothing like a good old fashioned standoff :)
> >>>>
> >>>> Shootout at noon?
> >>>>
> >>>> Rob
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: spr...@li...
> >>>>=20
> [mailto:spr...@li...] On=20
> >>>> Behalf Of Dmitriy Kopylenko
> >>>> Sent: 29 July 2004 16:16
> >>>> To: spr...@li...
> >>>> Subject: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version tags
> >>>>
> >>>> 3 for (Rod, Dmitriy, Rob)
> >>>> 3 against  (Juergen, Thomas, Colin)
> >>>> 1 neutral (Darren)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Colin Sampaleanu wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> =20
> >>>>
> >>>>> I do like $Id tags to be able to look at files and see who to=20
> >>>>> blame for the last changes :-), but I would rather be able to=20
> >>>>> branch/merge comfortably in the future. With Tortoise=20
> and Eclipse,=20
> >>>>> I can see the revision history _very_ easily anyways,=20
> wherever I am.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So -1 for using them from now on (i.e let's get rid of them)...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> =20
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Well, let's take a vote. I'm for $Id tags (+1)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>> Dmitriy.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> j=FCrgen h=F6ller [werk3AT] wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>  =20
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'd actually prefer if we drop $Id tags from all files. I=20
> >>>>>>> personally don't think that they add much value. Of=20
> course, if a=20
> >>>>>>> democratic decision goes in favor of those tags, well, I'll=20
> >>>>>>> concede ;-)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regarding @since tags, we're currently using them with the=20
> >>>>>>> creation date. That has been quite nice during our agile way=20
> >>>>>>> towards 1.0. We could indeed reconsider to use=20
> version numbers=20
> >>>>>>> there now.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Any suggestions on how to apply a consistent style for all=20
> >>>>>>> source files in a batch, without messing them up? $Id is=20
> >>>>>>> probably easy, @since nearly impossible, parameter alignment=20
> >>>>>>> easy again.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Juergen
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Von: spr...@li... im=20
> >>>>>>> Auftrag von Colin Sampaleanu
> >>>>>>> Gesendet: Mi 28.07.2004 20:38
> >>>>>>> An: spr...@li...
> >>>>>>> Betreff: Re: [Springframework-developer] @since and @version=20
> >>>>>>> tags
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Dmitriy Kopylenko wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>    =20
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I like id keywords...they're mainly in the code through my=20
> >>>>>>>>> classes or classes I've edited... (Damn, if it's=20
> standardized,=20
> >>>>>>>>> I won't know if I've worked on a particular file=20
> any more :-)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>             =20
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I also insert $Id:$ when I work on existing classes=20
> or create=20
> >>>>>>>> new ones
> >>>>>>>> ;-)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Dmitriy.
> >>>>>>>> =20
> >>>>>>>>        =20
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I personally like $Id tags. But they do suck big time when=20
> >>>>>>> trying to merge files back in after a branch, causing a=20
> >>>>>>> conflict/change to exist when there shouldn't be any... There=20
> >>>>>>> seems to be a trend to going away from using them in=20
> files, by=20
> >>>>>>> some people, for this reason.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Colin
> >>>>>>>      =20
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>    =20
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------
> >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed=20
> the changes=20
> >> on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past=20
> few weeks?=20
> >> Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source=20
> >> Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site.=20
> >> www.ostg.com _______________________________________________
> >> Springframework-developer mailing list=20
> >> Spr...@li...
> >>=20
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-develope
> >> r
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed=20
> the changes=20
> > on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past=20
> few weeks?=20
> > Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source=20
> > Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site.=20
> > www.ostg.com _______________________________________________
> > Springframework-developer mailing list=20
> > Spr...@li...
> >=20
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the=20
> changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the=20
> past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are=20
> now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes=20
> on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com=20
> _______________________________________________
> Springframework-developer mailing list
> Spr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/springframework-developer
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20