I was wondering what is the reason that most of the contributed packages are documented in the manual (pdf and html), but not all (e.g., gentran isn't), while a tex documentation is available.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I was wondering what is the reason that most of the contributed packages are documented in the manual (pdf and html), but not all (e.g., gentran isn't), while a tex documentation is available.
I was wondering what is the reason that most of the contributed packages are documented in the manual (pdf and html), but not all (e.g., gentran isn't), while a tex documentation is available.
At the top of doc/manual/user.tex are these comments, which I happened to notice recently:
%
% List of documentation/packages missing:
%
% crack/conlaw.tex
% crack/crack.tex
% crack/v3tools.tex
% eds/eds.tex
% gentran/gentran.tex -- too long!
% mathml/.tex
% misc/reset.tex
% occal/ocpaper.tex
% rtrace/rdebug.tex -- PSL only
% scope/scope.tex -- too long!
% susy2/susy2.tex
% tri/.tex -- too long!
That's all I know. I suspect these decisions were made a long time ago.
Francis
From: arpi lukacsarpad@users.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, 23 December 2020 3:43 pm
To: [reduce-algebra:discussion] 899365@discussion.reduce-algebra.p.re.sourceforge.net
Subject: [reduce-algebra:discussion] Contributed packages manuals
I was wondering what is the reason that most of the contributed packages are documented in the manual (pdf and html), but not all (e.g., gentran isn't), while a tex documentation is available.
Contributed packages manualshttps://sourceforge.net/p/reduce-algebra/discussion/899365/thread/6d9f61af47/?limit=25#baae
Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in https://sourceforge.net/p/reduce-algebra/discussion/899365/
To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/