You can subscribe to this list here.
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(41) |
May
(353) |
Jun
(133) |
Jul
(534) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(219) |
Oct
(86) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(61) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006 |
Jan
(200) |
Feb
(130) |
Mar
(345) |
Apr
(153) |
May
(247) |
Jun
(338) |
Jul
(222) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(76) |
Dec
(30) |
2007 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(6) |
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(7) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Alistair Y. <ali...@sm...> - 2005-07-12 14:25:53
|
what is style 0? is it ever used? I've only ever seen style_default used. Alistair On 12 Jul 2005, at 15:16, Alexis O'Connor wrote: > Under the 'res' folder, it goes templates/default/index. > Presumably, that is style 'default'. Where is style '0' going? > > Alexis > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar > happening > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in > dual > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event > hosted by HP, AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/ > go/dualwebinar > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |
From: Alexis O'C. <ale...@co...> - 2005-07-12 14:16:11
|
Under the 'res' folder, it goes templates/default/index. Presumably, that is style 'default'. Where is style '0' going? Alexis |
From: Alexis O'C. <ale...@co...> - 2005-07-12 13:39:44
|
Antony Corfield wrote: >> I have been closely following this thread as certain people were >> suggesting that the build.xml was to blame ;-). > > Was the only way to get your attention ;-) > >> I've altered the DOCTYPE declaration in these files, as they can pick >> up the DTD via the CLASSPATH, rather than needing to be hard-wired to >> some location deep under /WEB-INF/. > > About time too! > >> I took the rather outrageous step of seeing if all the templates can >> compile and be deployed as a running installation. Bizarrely, they can >> ... > > > Are you crazy!! Never, ever try that again! > Steady now ;-). My sarcasm was primarily directly towards the buckster, for it seems as though it was he who thoughtfully introduced these breakages, but he's not around to defend himself in person today ... Alexis |
From: Antony C. <an...@sm...> - 2005-07-12 13:31:09
|
> I have been closely following this thread as certain people were > suggesting that the build.xml was to blame ;-). Was the only way to get your attention ;-) > I've altered the DOCTYPE declaration in these files, as they can pick > up the DTD via the CLASSPATH, rather than needing to be hard-wired to > some location deep under /WEB-INF/. About time too! > I took the rather outrageous step of seeing if all the templates can > compile and be deployed as a running installation. Bizarrely, they can > ... Are you crazy!! Never, ever try that again! |
From: Atif S. <BM...@bm...> - 2005-07-12 12:10:54
|
Alexis O'Connor wrote: > Alistair Young wrote: > >> any news on shibbadd coming out folks? >> >> the sooner the better as it will probably break guanxi due to common >> jars. Need to get it out now so I can put the gx jars in for 2.6 >> >> Alistair >> > > Indeed, indeed. > > I believe Atif is on the case. He thought that maybe the build.xml was > broken. *It* wasn't. It's been updated anyway. The possible underlying > problem he may have been experiencing to do with templates relying on > the xhtmltemplate1-frameset.dtd file, have now been fixed (see thread: > Re: [Bodington-developers] build.xml). Atif, you know what to do ;-). > Indeed I am on the case. Coming out very soon. Do testing before I commit the removal changes. I'll give you a shout when the deed is done. Ta Atif. |
From: Alexis O'C. <ale...@co...> - 2005-07-12 12:03:48
|
Alistair Young wrote: > any news on shibbadd coming out folks? > > the sooner the better as it will probably break guanxi due to common > jars. Need to get it out now so I can put the gx jars in for 2.6 > > Alistair > Indeed, indeed. I believe Atif is on the case. He thought that maybe the build.xml was broken. *It* wasn't. It's been updated anyway. The possible underlying problem he may have been experiencing to do with templates relying on the xhtmltemplate1-frameset.dtd file, have now been fixed (see thread: Re: [Bodington-developers] build.xml). Atif, you know what to do ;-). Alexis |
From: Alexis O'C. <ale...@co...> - 2005-07-12 12:00:00
|
Antony Corfield wrote: >> We can either add the xhtmltemplate1-frameset and >> xhtmltemplate1-transitional to the new folder (probably the correct fix). > > > Yep, I think so too. I'll add these and update the dtd declaration. The > framset dtd wasn't in these templates before and was causing compilation > errors (no body element etc). > > Cheers, > Antony I have been closely following this thread as certain people were suggesting that the build.xml was to blame ;-). Close observers will now see that this is not the case. However, as I was started on that particular garden path I'd started updating it anyway before other matters came to light! I've observed that xhtmltemplate1-frameset.dtd and xhtmltemplate1-transitional.dtd have now been added to src/org/bodington/servlet/template. There are 8 templates that use xhtmltemplate1-frameset.dtd as the DTD. I've altered the DOCTYPE declaration in these files, as they can pick up the DTD via the CLASSPATH, rather than needing to be hard-wired to some location deep under /WEB-INF/. I took the rather outrageous step of seeing if all the templates can compile and be deployed as a running installation. Bizarrely, they can ... Alexis |
From: Alistair Y. <ali...@sm...> - 2005-07-12 11:55:34
|
any news on shibbadd coming out folks? the sooner the better as it will probably break guanxi due to common jars. Need to get it out now so I can put the gx jars in for 2.6 Alistair |
From: Brian P. C. <bm...@bm...> - 2005-07-12 11:28:57
|
> Brian Peter Clark wrote: > >>Brian Peter Clark wrote: > >> > >>>Could someone please advise me on some dtd/schema problems > >>>that I have. > >>>It's to do with the web.xml file for the latest version of bodington. > >> > >>Is this CVS HEAD or a 2.4.3 WAR? > > > > > > Atif downloaded from head on Friday afternoon; compiled OK; but > > failed to deploy on Sun App. > > In the short term can you disable validation on Sun App Server (tomcat > has an option in server.xml). > > Are you ok to fix web.xml and commit it back to CVS? Nope - CVS, wookies, xwookies are things I'll have to learn about. Anyway, I don't think I have developer superpowers. Brian > > -- > +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ > | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | > | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | > +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP, > AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |
From: Matthew B. <mat...@co...> - 2005-07-12 10:17:13
|
Brian Peter Clark wrote: >>Brian Peter Clark wrote: >> >>>Could someone please advise me on some dtd/schema problems >>>that I have. >>>It's to do with the web.xml file for the latest version of bodington. >> >>Is this CVS HEAD or a 2.4.3 WAR? > > > Atif downloaded from head on Friday afternoon; compiled OK; but > failed to deploy on Sun App. In the short term can you disable validation on Sun App Server (tomcat has an option in server.xml). Are you ok to fix web.xml and commit it back to CVS? -- +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ |
From: Antony C. <an...@sm...> - 2005-07-12 10:16:45
|
Servlet 2.3 deployment descriptor example (uses web-app_2_3.dtd): http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-5.0-doc/appdev/web.xml.txt On 11 Jul 2005, at 20:38, Brian Peter Clark wrote: > The Sun Java System App Server (sorry) gives a deployment error > when it looks at the web.xml file. > > Element type "listener" must be declared > > I think that it is objecting to a servlet element occurring before the > listener element is declared. Should the <listener> precede the > <servlet>? |
From: Brian P. C. <bm...@bm...> - 2005-07-12 10:01:06
|
> Brian Peter Clark wrote: > > Could someone please advise me on some dtd/schema problems > > that I have. > > It's to do with the web.xml file for the latest version of bodington. > > Is this CVS HEAD or a 2.4.3 WAR? Atif downloaded from head on Friday afternoon; compiled OK; but failed to deploy on Sun App. Brian > > > With the latest tomcat it's servlet 2.4? This now validates against a > > schema rather than a dtd. The dtd is pointing to the 2.2 dtd in the > > web.xml file. > > Ok. We should probably update it to at least 2.3. > > > The Sun Java System App Server (sorry) gives a deployment error > > when it looks at the web.xml file. > > Ok. This is the sort of feedback we need. At the moment almost everyone > only uses Tomcat. > > > Element type "listener" must be declared > > > > I think that it is objecting to a servlet element occurring before the > > listener element is declared. Should the <listener> precede the > > <servlet>? > > Looking at the 2.3 DTD yep: > > <!ELEMENT web-app (icon?, display-name?, description?, distributable?, > context-param*, filter*, filter-mapping*, listener*, servlet*, > servlet-mapping*, session-config?, mime-mapping*, welcome-file-list?, > error-page*, taglib*, resource-env-ref*, resource-ref*, > security-constraint*, > login-config?, security-role*, env-entry*, ejb-ref*, ejb-local-ref*)> > > > I don't think they had listeners in 2.2, did they? > > Listeners came in 2.3 I think. > > -- > +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ > | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | > | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | > +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP, > AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |
From: Antony C. <an...@sm...> - 2005-07-12 09:50:02
|
Does anyone have the originals - we may use them for the buzz website up here... |
From: Antony C. <an...@sm...> - 2005-07-12 09:46:00
|
> We can either add the xhtmltemplate1-frameset and > xhtmltemplate1-transitional to the new folder (probably the correct > fix). Yep, I think so too. I'll add these and update the dtd declaration. The framset dtd wasn't in these templates before and was causing compilation errors (no body element etc). Cheers, Antony |
From: Matthew B. <mat...@co...> - 2005-07-12 09:17:38
|
Brian Peter Clark wrote: > Could someone please advise me on some dtd/schema problems > that I have. > It's to do with the web.xml file for the latest version of bodington. Is this CVS HEAD or a 2.4.3 WAR? > With the latest tomcat it's servlet 2.4? This now validates against a > schema rather than a dtd. The dtd is pointing to the 2.2 dtd in the > web.xml file. Ok. We should probably update it to at least 2.3. > The Sun Java System App Server (sorry) gives a deployment error > when it looks at the web.xml file. Ok. This is the sort of feedback we need. At the moment almost everyone only uses Tomcat. > Element type "listener" must be declared > > I think that it is objecting to a servlet element occurring before the > listener element is declared. Should the <listener> precede the > <servlet>? Looking at the 2.3 DTD yep: <!ELEMENT web-app (icon?, display-name?, description?, distributable?, context-param*, filter*, filter-mapping*, listener*, servlet*, servlet-mapping*, session-config?, mime-mapping*, welcome-file-list?, error-page*, taglib*, resource-env-ref*, resource-ref*, security-constraint*, login-config?, security-role*, env-entry*, ejb-ref*, ejb-local-ref*)> > I don't think they had listeners in 2.2, did they? Listeners came in 2.3 I think. -- +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ |
From: Alexis O'C. <ale...@co...> - 2005-07-12 08:52:13
|
Brian Peter Clark wrote: > > I don't think they had listeners in 2.2, did they? > > Regards, > > Brian > Correct. They were first introduced in v2.3. Alexis |
From: Alistair Y. <ali...@sm...> - 2005-07-11 20:53:01
|
http://www.weblogs.uhi.ac.uk/sm00ay/?p=3D90 I mirrored the template structure in the res dir: res/templates/default/login_step2/strings_en.properties etc. I think in the first instance we can forget about picking out duplicates as we don't have much time. The first release will tell us what needs doing better. Don't forget this is nothing - 60 out of about 500, so let'= s get it right over a couple of iterations before we do the whole lot for 2.8 Let's aim to finish these for the end of this week. It's about 10-15mins per template but it's exceeeeeeedingly boring! Any queries drop me a line, if I'm still awake/sane ;) Leeds: building/main.html floor/main.html mediadocument/menu.html password/x509check.html room/main.html site/main.html suite/main.html directory/consentconfirm.html directory/consentform.html UHI: default/applettop.html * default/error403.html * default/index.html * default/left.html * default/login.html * default/login_anon.html * default/login_basic.html * default/login_logout_confirm.html * default/login_step1.html * default/login_step1big.html * default/login_step2.html * default/login_step3.html default/login_step4.html default/logout.html default/logout_confirm.html default/menu.html default/properties.html default/styletest.html default/top.html default/useroption1.html default/useroptions.html UHI: mcq/abouttool.html mcq/mcqdebrief.html mcq/mcqdebrieftech.html mcq/mcqhelp.html mcq/mcqhelp1.html mcq/mcqhelp2.html mcq/mcqhelp3.html mcq/mcqhelp4.html mcq/mcqhelp5.html mcq/mcqhelp6.html mcq/mcqtutorial.html Oxford: messagingroom/flatcontents1.html messagingroom/flatcontents2.html messagingroom/flatcontents3.html messagingroom/index.html messagingroom/messagetext.html messagingroom/newcontents.html messagingroom/newparticipants1.html messagingroom/newparticipants2.html messagingroom/newparticipants3.html messagingroom/newparticipants4.html messagingroom/newparticipants5.html messagingroom/newparticipants6.html messagingroom/newparticipantsm.html messagingroom/newreaders.html messagingroom/newreaders2.html messagingroom/newreaders3.html messagingroom/useroption2.html messagingroom/useroptions.html messagingroom/useroptiontest.html Alistair --=20 Alistair Young Senior Software Engineer UHI@Sabhal M=F2r Ostaig Isle of Skye Scotland |
From: Brian P. C. <bm...@bm...> - 2005-07-11 19:41:45
|
Could someone please advise me on some dtd/schema problems that I have. It's to do with the web.xml file for the latest version of bodington. With the latest tomcat it's servlet 2.4? This now validates against a schema rather than a dtd. The dtd is pointing to the 2.2 dtd in the web.xml file. The Sun Java System App Server (sorry) gives a deployment error when it looks at the web.xml file. Element type "listener" must be declared I think that it is objecting to a servlet element occurring before the listener element is declared. Should the <listener> precede the <servlet>? I don't think they had listeners in 2.2, did they? Regards, Brian |
From: Matthew B. <mat...@co...> - 2005-07-11 18:08:31
|
Antony Corfield wrote: > Ok the error was file not found i.e. the dtd -thought this may have > been in build.xml > > However because the dtd files have moved (and > xhtmltemplate1-frameset.dtd is not there anymore) I've changed the > doctype declaration to: > > <!DOCTYPE template PUBLIC > "http://bodington.org/dtd/xhtml1-frameset.dtd" > "../../../WEB-INF/classes/org/bodington/servlet/template/xhtml1- > frameset.dtd"> > > this builds now thanks. I just noticed this too.... Yeah because the xhtml1-frameset wasn't used on the WebLearn build so I didn't add it to the new location. Because of the way I work I created a patch from the weblearn tree to push the changes across to Bodington and this patch didn't have the extra DTDs. Then when you commited your new templates you changed to using the DTD that I didn't move and hence the break. We can either add the xhtmltemplate1-frameset and xhtmltemplate1-transitional to the new folder (probably the correct fix). Or we can change the templates to all use the same DTD. The reason I orginally created the extra DTDs was to get rid of lots of compiler warnings from the XML template compiler about templates having elements not defined in the DTDs (frameset). I think adding the extra DTDs is probably the better way to go as it keeps the XML compiler warnings to a minimum. >> >> What's the build error people are getting? I don't have any problems >> with my build. The reason I wasn't getting any problems was I hadn't pulled in your changes. Sorry about the confusion. -- +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ |
From: Antony C. <an...@sm...> - 2005-07-11 17:53:29
|
Ok the error was file not found i.e. the dtd -thought this may have been in build.xml However because the dtd files have moved (and xhtmltemplate1-frameset.dtd is not there anymore) I've changed the doctype declaration to: <!DOCTYPE template PUBLIC "http://bodington.org/dtd/xhtml1-frameset.dtd" "../../../WEB-INF/classes/org/bodington/servlet/template/xhtml1- frameset.dtd"> this builds now thanks. On 11 Jul 2005, at 18:04, Matthew Buckett wrote: > Alexis O'Connor wrote: >> Antony Corfield wrote: >>> Should this be updated on head with new location for dtds? >>> >> I'm on the case (as per this mail and the recent video-conference!). > > What's the build error people are getting? I don't have any problems > with my build. > > -- > +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ > | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | > | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | > +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar > happening > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in > dual > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted > by HP, AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit > http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers |
From: Matthew B. <mat...@co...> - 2005-07-11 17:10:14
|
Atif Suleman wrote: > Hi > >> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1230375&group_id=87659&atid=583929 >> >> >> Does anyone have a recent copy of Bodington running with Oracle? >> As it seems that Bodington is searching for table in the whole >> database when it should only be looking in a specific schema. This is >> then causing problems with a conflict of of the jobs table (both >> bodington and oracle want one). >> > Sorry I don't have Oracle running on my Guanxi Linux WORK machine. > The last time I worked with Oracle was 10 months ago at my previous > contract at the Department of Health (DOH). > I have GOOD memories of my first job after graduation at the DOH. I > learnt allot at the DOH. > > If you want I could look at this sometime in August, when my Guanxi > workload will be little lighter. Thanks for the offer. I managed to grab another PC and now have PostgreSQL 8, SQL Server 2000 and Oracle 9i running on it. So I managed to fix (I think) the Oracle bugs. More testing on Oracle is probably still needed if we are going to be saying this is a "supported platform". -- +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ |
From: Matthew B. <mat...@co...> - 2005-07-11 17:05:00
|
Alexis O'Connor wrote: > Antony Corfield wrote: > >> Should this be updated on head with new location for dtds? >> > > I'm on the case (as per this mail and the recent video-conference!). > What's the build error people are getting? I don't have any problems with my build. -- +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ |
From: Adam M. <ada...@co...> - 2005-07-11 16:49:54
|
We are considering hosting a website on source forge. We would probably require PHP and a database (MySQL). Does anybody have any negative experiences of source forge hosting? I'm thinking of speed / availability problems or issues with running PHP / MySQL or issues with space allocation? Anybody have positive issues? adam -- Adam Marshall: OUCS, 13, Banbury Rd. Oxford OX2 6NN. Shameless plug: Use the Bodington VLE http://bodington.org Blog: http://ramble.oucs.ox.ac.uk/blog/adamm/ Cheese of the month: Cheshire (not to be underestimated) |
From: Antony C. <an...@sm...> - 2005-07-11 16:34:15
|
email when it's done... On 11 Jul 2005, at 16:00, Alexis O'Connor wrote: > Antony Corfield wrote: >> Should this be updated on head with new location for dtds? > > I'm on the case (as per this mail and the recent video-conference!). > > -- > + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + > | Alexis O'Connor, VLE Developer (http://bodington.org) | > | OUCS, 13 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6NN, UK. | > | Tel. +44 (0)1865 283661 | > + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar > happening > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in > dual > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted > by HP, AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit > http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers |
From: Adam M. <ada...@co...> - 2005-07-11 16:02:13
|
We've just had a chat here and have decided that if anything is not to make it in v2.6 then it should be webauth. We're going to leave that 'til the end which will probably mean it will have to wait for 2.8 (like MVN forum). Hope that's OK. We're all poised for template translation mayhem tomorrow! adam -- Adam Marshall: OUCS, 13, Banbury Rd. Oxford OX2 6NN. Shameless plug: Use the Bodington VLE http://bodington.org Blog: http://ramble.oucs.ox.ac.uk/blog/adamm/ Cheese of the month: Cheshire (not to be underestimated) |