You can subscribe to this list here.
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(41) |
May
(353) |
Jun
(133) |
Jul
(534) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(219) |
Oct
(86) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(61) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006 |
Jan
(200) |
Feb
(130) |
Mar
(345) |
Apr
(153) |
May
(247) |
Jun
(338) |
Jul
(222) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(76) |
Dec
(30) |
2007 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(6) |
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(7) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Sean M. <se...@sm...> - 2005-07-13 13:18:24
|
I will ask John Smith about this tomorrow at our internal bod meeting. s On 13 Jul 2005, at 11:09, Peter Crowther wrote: >> From: Paul Trafford >> Anyway, we certainly need to work on documentation and it is a big >> undertaking and needs a collective effort. I've started >> looking at general >> documentation, particularly for general use and >> administration, but I'm not a developer. >> > > Getting user documentation together would be a big start. Jon > Maber has > some on bodington.org, but the formatting isn't ideal and much of > it is > now out of date. Dunno whether John Smith at UHI has anything as part > of his material for use when teaching staff about Clan? > > >> So my first request is for someone to co-ordinate the development >> documentation. Anyone like to step forward and carry out >> this important and honourable role? >> > > <looks round> > > <steps back> > > Unfortunately not - we don't have the spare effort that would be > needed > to co-ordinate this. > > - Peter > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar > happening > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in > dual > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event > hosted by HP, > AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > > |
From: Alexis O'C. <ale...@co...> - 2005-07-13 13:12:15
|
Antony Corfield wrote: > Why are web.xml and context.xml in this directory and not WEB-INF? Or, > why doesn't build.xml put them there? > OK, here's a comprehensive answer! Both the web.xml and context.xml in /etc are never used *as-is*. Each contain tokens intended to be replaced with text strings that are more meaningful @DISPLAY_NAME@ and @DOC_BASE@ respectively. Therefore their use is entirely driven from the build.xml. The web.xml does indeed end up under ${build}/../WEB-INF/, having had it's display name set to something like 'bodington (v2.4.3)' (in Tomcat this appears in the HTML manager application). The context.xml is in particular required by the target deploy-local-5_5. In order to deploy a web-app from a local file system ('deploy local') that isn't under ${catalina.home}/webapps onto Tomcat 5.5 requires this jiggery-pokery. I came to this through trial and error, so I know that it is necessary, but that it does work(!). It *can* go under ${build}/../WEB-INF/ if you're deploying it as a war file), but that's not how I use it (it would be superfluous for a war deployed to JBoss say). Alexis |
From: Alistair Y. <ali...@sm...> - 2005-07-13 13:03:10
|
> Renaming the properties files? Removing the individual folders for > each template? why bother? hasta manyana babe. It looks good to me as is Alistair On 13 Jul 2005, at 13:54, Colin Tatham wrote: > > I was actually getting a bit confused there... I didn't mean to > suggest that the properties files all get added to the present > templates folder, although that was what I ended up suggesting... > > Renaming the properties files? Removing the individual folders for > each template? > > > Colin > ____________________________________ > Colin Tatham > VLE Team > Oxford University Computing Services > > http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/vle/ > http://bodington.org > > > Colin Tatham wrote: > >> Alistair Young wrote: >> >>> res/templates/style_default/default >>> -- each template has it's own directory under default, within >>> which, it's >>> strings file resides. >>> >> We had a discussion here, I'll try to summarise. >> (The ideas only came up when we started doing some work on the >> localisation.) >> - All the properties files have the same name, which makes editing >> a collection of them confusing. >> - Having additional folders within the folders makes it slightly >> more difficult to match templates to properties files. >> Would there be any problems if we: >> - name properties files with the same name as the template they >> refer to. >> - have the properties files in the same folder as the templates. >> They would appear in a listing along with the template, and any >> other properties files that relate to that template. >> Admittedly that means the style_default/default folder could have >> loads of files in it, but that's OK innit? >> Colin >> ____________________________________ >> Colin Tatham >> VLE Team >> Oxford University Computing Services >> http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/vle/ >> http://bodington.org >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar >> happening >> July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest >> in dual >> core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event >> hosted by HP, AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http:// >> www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar >> _______________________________________________ >> Bodington-developers mailing list >> Bod...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar > happening > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in > dual > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event > hosted by HP, AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/ > go/dualwebinar > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |
From: Alistair Y. <ali...@sm...> - 2005-07-13 13:00:44
|
Note to IE users: use Firefox! Alistair On 13 Jul 2005, at 13:42, Peter Crowther wrote: >> From: Antony Corfield [mailto:an...@sm...] >> how about Ian Dury's F%$k off Noddy http://www.azlyrics.us/116356 >> > > Note to IE users: attempts to download at least three trojans onto the > system. > > - Peter > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar > happening > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in > dual > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event > hosted by HP, > AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |
From: Alistair Y. <ali...@sm...> - 2005-07-13 12:57:44
|
> All the properties files have the same name, which makes editing a > collection of them confusing. not sure if I agree. Each properties file is distinguished by it's locale (language) and directory (template it's for) The properties files have to be in the classpath so there would have to be a lot of build.xml work if you want to keep them with the templates. I presume you mean the templates and not the template classes? I'd just say leave them where they are. It's neater and easy to find the strings for a template as the structure exactly mirrors the template dirs structure. What about the generic strings? Why have a res folder and also loads of properties scattered throughout style_* (not just default) folders? The plan was also to have entities (such as "Bodington") in the res folder too. Alistair On 13 Jul 2005, at 13:15, Colin Tatham wrote: > > Alistair Young wrote: > > >> res/templates/style_default/default >> -- each template has it's own directory under default, within >> which, it's >> strings file resides. >> > > We had a discussion here, I'll try to summarise. > > (The ideas only came up when we started doing some work on the > localisation.) > > - All the properties files have the same name, which makes editing > a collection of them confusing. > - Having additional folders within the folders makes it slightly > more difficult to match templates to properties files. > > Would there be any problems if we: > - name properties files with the same name as the template they > refer to. > - have the properties files in the same folder as the templates. > They would appear in a listing along with the template, and any > other properties files that relate to that template. > > Admittedly that means the style_default/default folder could have > loads of files in it, but that's OK innit? > > Colin > > > ____________________________________ > Colin Tatham > VLE Team > Oxford University Computing Services > > http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/vle/ > http://bodington.org > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar > happening > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in > dual > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event > hosted by HP, AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/ > go/dualwebinar > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |
From: Antony C. <an...@sm...> - 2005-07-13 12:56:40
|
don't use ie, get a mac... On 13 Jul 2005, at 13:42, Peter Crowther wrote: >> From: Antony Corfield [mailto:an...@sm...] >> how about Ian Dury's F%$k off Noddy http://www.azlyrics.us/116356 > > Note to IE users: attempts to download at least three trojans onto the > system. > > - Peter > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar > happening > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in > dual > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted > by HP, > AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers |
From: Colin T. <col...@co...> - 2005-07-13 12:52:47
|
I was actually getting a bit confused there... I didn't mean to suggest that the properties files all get added to the present templates folder, although that was what I ended up suggesting... Renaming the properties files? Removing the individual folders for each template? Colin ____________________________________ Colin Tatham VLE Team Oxford University Computing Services http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/vle/ http://bodington.org Colin Tatham wrote: > > Alistair Young wrote: > >> res/templates/style_default/default >> -- each template has it's own directory under default, within which, it's >> strings file resides. > > > We had a discussion here, I'll try to summarise. > > (The ideas only came up when we started doing some work on the > localisation.) > > - All the properties files have the same name, which makes editing a > collection of them confusing. > - Having additional folders within the folders makes it slightly more > difficult to match templates to properties files. > > Would there be any problems if we: > - name properties files with the same name as the template they refer to. > - have the properties files in the same folder as the templates. They > would appear in a listing along with the template, and any other > properties files that relate to that template. > > Admittedly that means the style_default/default folder could have loads > of files in it, but that's OK innit? > > Colin > > > ____________________________________ > Colin Tatham > VLE Team > Oxford University Computing Services > > http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/vle/ > http://bodington.org > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar > happening > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by > HP, AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |
From: Alistair Y. <ali...@sm...> - 2005-07-13 12:50:09
|
> "Now at last I fall before the fountains of Lamneth. > I thought I would be singing, but I'm tired and out of breath." you want to get some exercise mate ;) Alistair On 13 Jul 2005, at 13:06, Peter Crowther wrote: >> From: Sean Mehan [mailto:se...@sm...] >> maybe the lady doth protest too much. If you can quote rather dated >> rush tracks, then methinks you may know the lyrics rather well as >> well!-) >> > > ... and if you know that they're dated, maybe you're tainted too (or a > dab hand with a lyric search). > > - Peter > > "Now at last I fall before the fountains of Lamneth. > I thought I would be singing, but I'm tired and out of breath." > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar > happening > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in > dual > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event > hosted by HP, > AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |
From: Antony C. <an...@sm...> - 2005-07-13 12:48:28
|
but the build target doesn't! Can build be updated so that it does? What's the reason for putting them in the etc directory? On 13 Jul 2005, at 13:33, Matthew Buckett wrote: > Antony Corfield wrote: >> Why are web.xml and context.xml in this directory and not WEB-INF? >> Or, why doesn't build.xml put them there? > > The webapp target drops them into the build directory. > > -- > +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ > | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | > | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | > +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar > happening > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in > dual > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted > by HP, AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit > http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers |
From: Peter C. <Pet...@me...> - 2005-07-13 12:42:30
|
> From: Antony Corfield [mailto:an...@sm...]=20 > how about Ian Dury's F%$k off Noddy http://www.azlyrics.us/116356 Note to IE users: attempts to download at least three trojans onto the system. - Peter |
From: Matthew B. <mat...@co...> - 2005-07-13 12:33:47
|
Antony Corfield wrote: > Why are web.xml and context.xml in this directory and not WEB-INF? Or, > why doesn't build.xml put them there? The webapp target drops them into the build directory. -- +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ |
From: Antony C. <an...@sm...> - 2005-07-13 12:29:51
|
how about Ian Dury's F%$k off Noddy http://www.azlyrics.us/116356 On 13 Jul 2005, at 13:13, Peter Crowther wrote: >> From: Alistair Young [mailto:ali...@sm...] >> hey, what's you favourite track Peter? I'm a bit partial to >> "I won't pay your price" from "Overkill" > > <Chuckle>. Motorhead's at the edge of what I listen to (unless it's > very noisy outside), so I know comparatively few. Favourite overall is > probably "Wish You Were Here", Pink Floyd - or any of the many live > versions of Comfortably Numb. At other ends of the scale, how about > Capercaillie, Jarre or Les Barker? > > ... why's everyone running away?... > > - Peter > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar > happening > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in > dual > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted > by HP, > AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers |
From: Antony C. <an...@sm...> - 2005-07-13 12:20:28
|
Why are web.xml and context.xml in this directory and not WEB-INF? Or, why doesn't build.xml put them there? |
From: Colin T. <col...@co...> - 2005-07-13 12:14:28
|
Alistair Young wrote: > res/templates/style_default/default > -- each template has it's own directory under default, within which, it's > strings file resides. We had a discussion here, I'll try to summarise. (The ideas only came up when we started doing some work on the localisation.) - All the properties files have the same name, which makes editing a collection of them confusing. - Having additional folders within the folders makes it slightly more difficult to match templates to properties files. Would there be any problems if we: - name properties files with the same name as the template they refer to. - have the properties files in the same folder as the templates. They would appear in a listing along with the template, and any other properties files that relate to that template. Admittedly that means the style_default/default folder could have loads of files in it, but that's OK innit? Colin ____________________________________ Colin Tatham VLE Team Oxford University Computing Services http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/vle/ http://bodington.org |
From: Peter C. <Pet...@me...> - 2005-07-13 12:13:09
|
> From: Alistair Young [mailto:ali...@sm...]=20 > hey, what's you favourite track Peter? I'm a bit partial to=20 > "I won't pay your price" from "Overkill" <Chuckle>. Motorhead's at the edge of what I listen to (unless it's very noisy outside), so I know comparatively few. Favourite overall is probably "Wish You Were Here", Pink Floyd - or any of the many live versions of Comfortably Numb. At other ends of the scale, how about Capercaillie, Jarre or Les Barker? ... why's everyone running away?... - Peter |
From: Peter C. <Pet...@me...> - 2005-07-13 12:06:12
|
> From: Sean Mehan [mailto:se...@sm...]=20 > maybe the lady doth protest too much. If you can quote rather dated =20 > rush tracks, then methinks you may know the lyrics rather well as =20 > well!-) ... and if you know that they're dated, maybe you're tainted too (or a dab hand with a lyric search). - Peter "Now at last I fall before the fountains of Lamneth. I thought I would be singing, but I'm tired and out of breath." |
From: Sean M. <se...@sm...> - 2005-07-13 12:00:33
|
maybe the lady doth protest too much. If you can quote rather dated =20 rush tracks, then methinks you may know the lyrics rather well as =20 well!-) s.fc On 12 Jul 2005, at 18:17, Antony Corfield wrote: > That's it, I'm going home before we get the complete lyrics to =20 > (Rush 2112) the temples of syrinx... > > On 12 Jul 2005, at 17:59, Alistair Young wrote: > > >> hey, what's you favourite track Peter? I'm a bit partial to "I =20 >> won't pay >> your price" from "Overkill" >> >> Alistair >> >> >> --=20 >> Alistair Young >> Senior Software Engineer >> UHI@Sabhal M=F2r Ostaig >> Isle of Skye >> Scotland >> >> >>>> From: Alexis O'Connor >>>> I'd have to say that my brain was being affected by the rather warm >>>> office, punctuated by a work-man next door with a drill that made a >>>> sound like a scream from hades! >>>> >>> >>> Computer. Headphones. Nice bit of Motorhead. Works a treat to =20 >>> fend >>> off screaming drill noises, chief execs.... >>> >>> - Peter >>> |
From: Sean M. <se...@sm...> - 2005-07-13 11:56:40
|
Super. Ta, Atif! s On 12 Jul 2005, at 19:10, Atif Suleman wrote: > Atif Suleman wrote: > > >> Indeed I am on the case. Coming out very soon. Do testing before I >> commit the removal changes. I'll give you a shout when the deed is >> done. >> >> Ta >> Atif. >> > > > Quick Update before I make for the long journey home to my > kids ...................... > > Shibadd has been removed and committed > > Got one hook removal to commit before a quick test tomorrow: > bodington/src/org/bodington/server/realm/shibboleth/ > QuickNDirtyShibbolethBodingtonConnector.java > > Got to modifier the wonderful ant build.xml file regrading the > shibadd Then I am finished. > > I'll let the list KNOW when the deed IS completed DONE. > > Ta > Atif. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar > happening > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in > dual > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event > hosted by HP, AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/ > go/dualwebinar > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > > |
From: Brian P. C. <bm...@bm...> - 2005-07-13 11:54:48
|
> Brian Peter Clark wrote: > > Ah, right - 2.4 goes fine. > > Yeah, sorry I didn't check the 2.4 tree before asking which you were > running. > > > I'll also knock out a little doclet for loading Bods onto Sun Java App > > Server - how to create a domain and use the deploy tool. > > Great. > > > There are > > some bonzer security paradiddles - it really objects to a lot of Bod > > ClassLoader activity and util.PropertyPermissions. The Platform > > Edition is free for redistribution at the moment and is now an OS > > project, so - you never know - there might be a few adopters. > > I take it you are running Bodington with the security manager enabled? > If so then your current security permissions would be very helpful for > those who want to run Bod in a locked down enviroment). Each domain that is created in the app server has its own security policy file. It needs to give the appropriate permissions to all the various different sections of its code, and there's a basic set of permissions granted to application code in the context. If you want anything exotic (or even dangerous like offering permission to create your own classloaders) then you have to edit the policy file. I'll include this in the doc. Brian > > -- > +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ > | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | > | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | > +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP, > AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |
From: Matthew B. <mat...@co...> - 2005-07-13 11:39:51
|
Brian Peter Clark wrote: > Ah, right - 2.4 goes fine. Yeah, sorry I didn't check the 2.4 tree before asking which you were running. > I'll also knock out a little doclet for loading Bods onto Sun Java App > Server - how to create a domain and use the deploy tool. Great. > There are > some bonzer security paradiddles - it really objects to a lot of Bod > ClassLoader activity and util.PropertyPermissions. The Platform > Edition is free for redistribution at the moment and is now an OS > project, so - you never know - there might be a few adopters. I take it you are running Bodington with the security manager enabled? If so then your current security permissions would be very helpful for those who want to run Bod in a locked down enviroment). -- +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ |
From: Alexis O'C. <ale...@co...> - 2005-07-13 11:36:54
|
Alistair Young wrote: > hmm, what compile error do you get Alexis? I tested this with the > "Enter web site" text with a Facility call and it was ok. What is that > literal for? I noticed that a lot of Facility calls have a literal > element but it's not localised text, it's some sort of #define if you > know what I mean. > Well running the compile-templates target I get the following error message on those 4 files I mentioned: "Technical error trying to insert iteractive item." This is the message of the exception thrown at: org.bodington.servlet.template.XmlTemplate.java:1341 As an aside, yes, it occured to me that most calls to Facility will be using strings as arguments, not as strings that are displayed to the user. Alexis |
From: Alistair Y. <ali...@sm...> - 2005-07-13 10:51:53
|
hmm, what compile error do you get Alexis? I tested this with the "Enter web site" text with a Facility call and it was ok. What is that literal for? I noticed that a lot of Facility calls have a literal element but it's not localised text, it's some sort of #define if you know what I mean. I'm updating i81n.Localiser to strip whitespace from the resources attribute - line breaks for legibility cause problems! Alistair On 13 Jul 2005, at 11:31, Alexis O'Connor wrote: > Alistair Young wrote: > >> I've also committed all the localised templates from style_default/ >> default. >> > > The following templates do not compile at the moment: > > style_default\default\applettop.html > style_default\default\error403.html > style_default\default\login_anon.html > style_default\default\login_step4.html > > The commonality seems to be that they contain localized calls to > Facility methods, e.g. > > <target method="variable"><variable name="facility"/></target> > <parameters> > <variable name="request"/> > <variable name="writer"/> > <literal type="String"><localise id="page.title.text"></ > localise></literal> > </parameters> > > I tried de-localizing such markup and it compiled OK. Is there some > code missing to handle these cases? > > > Alexis > > > P.S. The 'compile-templates' target of the build.xml is very handy > in this regard. Adding the attribute 'failonerror=no' to the > template-compiler element will show all these up, otherwise it just > baulks at the first failure. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar > happening > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in > dual > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event > hosted by HP, AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/ > go/dualwebinar > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |
From: Brian P. C. <bm...@bm...> - 2005-07-13 10:43:38
|
> Brian Peter Clark wrote: > >>Brian Peter Clark wrote: > >> > >>>>Brian Peter Clark wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Could someone please advise me on some dtd/schema problems > >>>>>that I have. > >>>>>It's to do with the web.xml file for the latest version of bodington. > >>>> > >>>>Is this CVS HEAD or a 2.4.3 WAR? > >>> > >>> > >>>Atif downloaded from head on Friday afternoon; compiled OK; but > >>>failed to deploy on Sun App. > >> > >>In the short term can you disable validation on Sun App Server (tomcat > >>has an option in server.xml). > >> > >>Are you ok to fix web.xml and commit it back to CVS? > > > > > > Nope - CVS, wookies, xwookies are things I'll have to learn about. > > Anyway, I don't think I have developer superpowers. > > Ok. I've updated to 2.3 and fixed the ordering on HEAD. > This bug isn't on the stable branch as the context listener isn't in 2.4. Ah, right - 2.4 goes fine. I'll also knock out a little doclet for loading Bods onto Sun Java App Server - how to create a domain and use the deploy tool. There are some bonzer security paradiddles - it really objects to a lot of Bod ClassLoader activity and util.PropertyPermissions. The Platform Edition is free for redistribution at the moment and is now an OS project, so - you never know - there might be a few adopters. Thanks, Brian > > -- > +--Matthew Buckett-----------------------------------------+ > | VLE Developer, Learning Technologies Group | > | Tel: +44 (0) 1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ | > +------------Computing Services, University of Oxford------+ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP, > AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |
From: Alexis O'C. <ale...@co...> - 2005-07-13 10:31:45
|
Alistair Young wrote: > I've also committed all the localised templates from style_default/default. > The following templates do not compile at the moment: style_default\default\applettop.html style_default\default\error403.html style_default\default\login_anon.html style_default\default\login_step4.html The commonality seems to be that they contain localized calls to Facility methods, e.g. <target method="variable"><variable name="facility"/></target> <parameters> <variable name="request"/> <variable name="writer"/> <literal type="String"><localise id="page.title.text"></localise></literal> </parameters> I tried de-localizing such markup and it compiled OK. Is there some code missing to handle these cases? Alexis P.S. The 'compile-templates' target of the build.xml is very handy in this regard. Adding the attribute 'failonerror=no' to the template-compiler element will show all these up, otherwise it just baulks at the first failure. |
From: Peter C. <Pet...@me...> - 2005-07-13 10:09:12
|
> From: Paul Trafford=20 > Anyway, we certainly need to work on documentation and it is a big=20 > undertaking and needs a collective effort. I've started=20 > looking at general=20 > documentation, particularly for general use and=20 > administration, but I'm not a developer. Getting user documentation together would be a big start. Jon Maber has some on bodington.org, but the formatting isn't ideal and much of it is now out of date. Dunno whether John Smith at UHI has anything as part of his material for use when teaching staff about Clan? > So my first request is for someone to co-ordinate the development=20 > documentation. Anyone like to step forward and carry out=20 > this important and honourable role? <looks round> <steps back> Unfortunately not - we don't have the spare effort that would be needed to co-ordinate this. - Peter |