-
hofman committed revision 16015 to the BibDesk SVN repository, changing 6 files.
2009-11-10 01:02:23 UTC by hofman
-
I know very little about biblatex myself. But I don't think having only the required fields is reasonable.
2009-11-09 15:43:48 UTC by hofman
-
amaxwell committed revision 16014 to the BibDesk SVN repository, changing 1 files.
2009-11-09 06:59:12 UTC by amaxwell
-
Thanks for the quick reply!
Still, BibDesk is (for me at least) by far the best choice for managing LaTeX bibliographies on Mac OS. On the other hand, biblatex is going to replace BibTeX in the not too-distant future, if I understand it correctly. So I think it would be great if BibDesk and biblatex would work together.
Isn‘t it feasible to implement at least the standard biblatex entry...
2009-11-09 06:58:22 UTC by simon37
-
hofman committed revision 16013 to the BibDesk SVN repository, changing 2 files.
2009-11-08 21:18:03 UTC by hofman
-
hofman committed revision 16012 to the BibDesk SVN repository, changing 4 files.
2009-11-08 21:07:10 UTC by hofman
-
hofman committed revision 16011 to the BibDesk SVN repository, changing 6 files.
2009-11-08 20:47:23 UTC by hofman
-
The problem is that biblatex has far too many optional fields to add that in any reasonable way. It would give you a huge and almost useless table of fields in the detail window.
2009-11-08 19:28:33 UTC by hofman
-
hofman committed revision 16010 to the BibDesk SVN repository, changing 2 files.
2009-11-08 19:13:49 UTC by hofman
-
Hi,
I was wondering if you could implement more of the standard biblatex entry types into BibDesk, e.g. ‘online‘, ‘patent‘ and others. BibDesk 1.3.22 offers ‘webpage‘ and ‘url‘ for entering web-based sources, but neither of them is implemented in the standard biblatex style files. It would be great to have an out-of-the-box possibility to enter web-based sources.
Regards...
2009-11-08 18:04:13 UTC by simon37
