From: Omari S. <xs...@xs...> - 2014-03-21 08:52:54
|
Howdy, y'all I'm planning on picking up a Fuji X-T1 soon, and so I'm trying to figure out what my workflow will look like. So, current state of affairs: I downloaded this as a test file: http://img.photographyblog.com/reviews/fujifilm_x_t1/photos/fujifilm_x_t1_11.raf From here: http://www.photographyblog.com/previews/fujifilm_x_t1_photos/ I have installed the latest dcraw and the latest ufraw from Debian's unstable repository: $apt-cache policy ufraw ufraw: Installed: 0.19.2-2 Candidate: 0.19.2-2 Version table: *** 0.19.2-2 0 500 http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages 500 http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status $apt-cache policy dcraw dcraw: Installed: 9.19-1.1 Candidate: 9.19-1.1 Version table: *** 9.19-1.1 0 500 http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages 500 http://mirrors.kernel.org/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status WHAT HAPPENS: If I try to open the sample file with ufraw, ufraw segfaults. If I try to open the sample file with dcraw, it works fine and spits out an image I then compiled the CVS version of ufraw. If I try to open the sample file with the CVS ufraw, it opens, but I see zipper artifacts. I'm confused, though, since dcraw.cc has #define DCRAW_VERSION "9.20" So first things first, how do I get rid of the zipper? Beyond that, it looks like everything other than full-res has a strong color cast (Green, in my case). I presume that is the issue mentioned here: http://sourceforge.net/p/ufraw/discussion/434060/thread/99c10c54/#1539 I note that dcraw's half-scale output works fine. i.e., the following commands produce images that appear identical, but have different scales: $dcraw -v -T -w fujifilm_x_t1_11.raf $dcraw -v -T -w -h fujifilm_x_t1_11.raf --xsdg |