From: <luc...@us...> - 2015-06-25 16:24:57
|
Revision: 22311 http://sourceforge.net/p/sbml/code/22311 Author: luciansmith Date: 2015-06-25 16:24:55 +0000 (Thu, 25 Jun 2015) Log Message: ----------- Missing 'of'; noticed by Robert Muetzelfeldt. Modified Paths: -------------- trunk/specifications/sbml-level-3/version-2/comp/spec/intro.tex Modified: trunk/specifications/sbml-level-3/version-2/comp/spec/intro.tex =================================================================== --- trunk/specifications/sbml-level-3/version-2/comp/spec/intro.tex 2015-06-25 07:13:10 UTC (rev 22310) +++ trunk/specifications/sbml-level-3/version-2/comp/spec/intro.tex 2015-06-25 16:24:55 UTC (rev 22311) @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ \label{fig1} \end{figure} -The effort to create a hierarchical model composition mechanism in SBML has a long history, which we summarize in \sec{background}. It has also been known by different names. In the beginning, it was called \emph{modularity} because it allows a model to be divided into structural and conceptual modules. It was renamed \emph{model composition} when it became apparent that the name ``modularity'' was easily confused with other notions modularity, particularly XHTML~1.1~\citep{xhtml} modularity, which concerns decomposition into separate files. To make clear that the purpose is structural \emph{model} composition, regardless of whether the components are stored in separate files, the SBML community adopted the name SBML \emph{Hierarchical Model Composition}. +The effort to create a hierarchical model composition mechanism in SBML has a long history, which we summarize in \sec{background}. It has also been known by different names. In the beginning, it was called \emph{modularity} because it allows a model to be divided into structural and conceptual modules. It was renamed \emph{model composition} when it became apparent that the name ``modularity'' was easily confused with other notions of modularity, particularly XHTML~1.1~\citep{xhtml} modularity, which concerns decomposition into separate files. To make clear that the purpose is structural \emph{model} composition, regardless of whether the components are stored in separate files, the SBML community adopted the name SBML \emph{Hierarchical Model Composition}. To support a variety of composition scenarios, this package provides for optional black-box encapsulation by means of defined data communication interfaces (here called \emph{ports}). In addition, it also separates model \emph{definitions} (i.e., blueprints, or templates) from \emph{instances} of those definitions, it supports optional external file storage, and it allows recursive model decomposition with arbitrary submodel nesting. |