Menu
▾
▴
Re: [sbml-required] Release 0.5
|
From: Chris J. M. <my...@ec...> - 2013-05-31 18:08:02
|
Ok, I will look for it and implement support when released with libsbml. Chris On May 31, 2013, at 11:43 AM, Lucian Smith <lp...@sp...> wrote: > Basic libsbml support should not be a problem, with Sarah's code > generator; it will be a little more work to generate something that runs > through a model and automatically adds req elements to package-modified > elements, but even that won't be *too* hard, and until then, you could > add them yourself. > > I bet a function to gather a list of namespaces from req elements also > would not be difficult to implement. > > -Lucian > > * Chris J. Myers <my...@ec...> [2013-05-31 18:40] writes: >> We could implement if there is libsbml support. Basically, it would be nice to have a validation function that takes a list of the namespaces that ones tool supports and returns the objects that are changed by other names spaces as warnings when viable is true and errors otherwise. As for creation, is there support in libsbml to create these elements yet, or is that also still to come? >> >> Chris >> >> On May 30, 2013, at 3:40 PM, Lucian Smith <lp...@sp...> wrote: >> >>> Following some discussions at HARMONY, here's a new version of the >>> 'Required Elements' package: >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B71r5kLs3FliWGxFN3o0dnNrZE0/edit >>> >>> The main change here is the ability to reference custom annotations with >>> the 'ChangedMath' elements as well as packages, and the addition of some >>> validation rules. >>> >>> At this point, I think we can probably muster up enough tools to >>> *produce* these files; the trick is going to be finding a client that >>> wants to *use* the package. In other words, finding someone for whom >>> this package is actually useful, that wants to be able to be more >>> informed about packages and annotations they don't know about. >>> >>> Any takers? Should I troll for responses on sbml-discuss? >>> >>> (Any comments on this version of the spec are also welcome, of course.) >>> >>> -Lucian >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET >>> Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost. >>> Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead >>> Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sbml-required mailing list >>> sbm...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbml-required >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite >> It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production >> Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. >> Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2 >> _______________________________________________ >> sbml-required mailing list >> sbm...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbml-required > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite > It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production > Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. > Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap2 > _______________________________________________ > sbml-required mailing list > sbm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbml-required |