Re: [sbml-qual] Specification for re-review

[Aurélien N. <aur...@gm...>]

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Lucian Smith <lp...@sp...>wrote:

> >
> > Exactly, the functionterm will define a resultlevel, and each output then
> > has its own modifier defined in outputlevel.
> > In logical models, the transition directly sets a level and should have a
> > single output in most cases (one can image defining a single transition
> for
> > several species which have the exact same function though))
>
> So, would it indeed be possible to add the rule, 'if the transitionEffect
> is 'production', you must provide a value for the outputLevel'?  That
> wouldn't mess up anyone's existing models/software?


at least not ours, as we don't use "productive" transitions. Beside this, I
would say that it makes sense (or better to assign a default of 1 if
undefined)

Best

-- 
Aurélien Naldi