Menu
▾
▴
[Pcgen-trackers] [ pcgen-Feature Requests-1037061 ] CHOOSE:NUMCHOICES vs. TEMPLATE:CHOOSE
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-02-13 17:26:16
|
Feature Requests item #1037061, was opened at 2004-09-29 09:30 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by soulcatcher You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384722&aid=1037061&group_id=25576 Category: None Group: None >Status: Deleted >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: samuel (notmousse) Assigned to: Eric Beaudoin (ericbeaudoin) Summary: CHOOSE:NUMCHOICES vs. TEMPLATE:CHOOSE Initial Comment: ba...@vo...> Subject: [TM] Re: > -----Original Message----- > From: tir_gwaith [mailto:tho...@ly...] > TEMPLATE:CHOOSE: is a chooser for templates. It apparently isn't > checking PRExxx in the process. I'm not sure whether that is > a "feature" or not. Barak, can you see a need for not having it > check PRExxx when doing a TEMPLATE:CHOOSE? I'm for a PRExxx check > myself. Something to think about. Oh yes! :p And to also not offer a template in the TEMPLATE:CHOOSE list if you already have it. I forgot about that little gem until you mentioned the PRExxx bit. Oh TM! FREQ please! [08:15] <[LM]Tir-Gwaith> Um, hold the thought on that FReq [08:15] <TM_NotMousse> ok [08:15] <[LM]Tir-Gwaith> Darn, Barak isn't online [08:15] <[LM]Tir-Gwaith> I'm thinking about adding a tag... Oh, ADD:TEMPLATE() [08:16] <[LM]Tir-Gwaith> That way we get the standard PRExxx, and keep the "automatically get this" type thing ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chris Chandler (barako) Date: 2004-09-29 20:45 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=607889 This sounds like an excellent approach to me. Should this then become two FREQs? One to modify TEMPLATE:CHOOSE to not offer a template if the character already has it and one for the ADD:TEAMPLATE()? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2004-09-29 14:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 I think I'd be more inclinded for a new global ADD:TEMPLATE() tag, so we get some standard tags... The ADD:TEMPLATE() could check for PRExxx, and the TEMPLATE:CHOOSE could be the way to not check PRExxx. I think the bit about if the character already has the ability to not display as a choice should still go away. Opinion? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384722&aid=1037061&group_id=25576 |