Menu
▾
▴
[Pcgen-trackers_Data] [ pcgen-Data Bugs-1450901 ] [RSRD] Craft Dorje error
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2010-09-24 15:48:07
|
Data Bugs item #1450901, was opened at 2006-03-15 22:06 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by papa_drb You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1450901&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Equipment List File Incorrect Information Group: Unscheduled >Status: Deleted Resolution: None Priority: 3 Private: No Submitted By: ltwally (ltwally) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: [RSRD] Craft Dorje error Initial Comment: The SRD has a limitation on dorje's: "The manifester level of a dorje cannot be more than five higher than the minimum manifester level to use the power it contains." Yet when you use PCGen to create a Dorje, it does not enforce this limit -- it will allow a 1st level power to go all the way up to 20th manifester level. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: David R. Bender (papa_drb) Date: 2010-09-24 11:48 Message: http://jira.pcgen.org/browse/CODE-224 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2009-05-03 15:16 Message: Reconciled with Code FREQ tracker: 2786234 Craft Dorje manifester level limit https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2786234&group_id=25576&atid=384722 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-08-23 05:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Frank, needs experimental then a code freq ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2006-04-05 15:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 This does need code support, currently no way to do this in the data. lowering to P3 meaning a spec will need to be created and submitted to the code team before it can move forward. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-03-23 06:15 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Does this need code support? If so I'll srop it out of the 5.10 roadmap - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-03-22 09:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Good plan. If we need code to enforce a limit, we'll need a House Rule checkbox to over-ride that as well. Like we do for Potions, etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2006-03-22 08:52 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 No, there was a separate issue with the price formula, looked like a simple typo. I'm also not sure if PCGen can currently enforce a limit, I'll look at the LST. If not, to answer you first question, I'd leave it to the user and make a notation in the help pages about it. I'll keep this for now and make a note in help if thats the case. If we need code support I'll lower priority and it can be speced after 5.10. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-03-22 08:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Eddy, didn't you fix this recently? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Michael Gray (mhgj) Date: 2006-03-17 10:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=291656 Dorje's are the psionic equivalent of wands and I coded them similar. I don't know if you can limit the caster level of a wand in pcgen. THe manifester level of a dorje would be the same. Thinking about the spell selector used to make wands, scrolls, dorjes and power stones, it's likely a code freq to limit but would need to support house rules for extended options. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-03-16 03:00 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Michael, this is in your area. Something we can do via data, or will we need a Code FReq? Is it something we want to enforce, or leave open for House Rules? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1450901&group_id=25576 |