Menu
▾
▴
[Pcgen-trackers_Docs] [ pcgen-Documentation Feature Requests-1845541 ] Stable Pre-Release W3C Review
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-06-13 18:35:40
|
Documentation Feature Requests item #1845541, was opened at 2007-12-06 09:32 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by maredudd800 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=748235&aid=1845541&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Documentation New Formatting Group: For 5.14.1 Status: Open Resolution: None >Priority: 6 Private: No Submitted By: Maredudd (maredudd800) Assigned to: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Summary: Stable Pre-Release W3C Review Initial Comment: The following task will be performed just prior to the 5.14 Stable Release. Review all PCGen Documentation to ensure W3C compliance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2008-05-16 05:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Originator: NO Machine crashed :(, I did manage to run a few passes and the CS3 suite threw up *thousands* of warnings. I'm going to drop this into the 5.14.1 basket, the W3C validation was/is good enough for 5.14.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2008-04-18 05:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Originator: NO I have a home machine once more so will throw through Adobe Dreamweaver CS3 this weekend ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2008-03-12 06:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Originator: NO Stealing this off Eric :) I have gone through one massive sweep using the Eclipse parsers (they claim to feed in through W3C). I'll go through the Adobe Dreamweaver CS3 parsers next (which do browser compatibility checks as well) and then finally test against the validators on the W3C site itself (need a regular autobuild in order to throw a 'site' at the validator). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=748235&aid=1845541&group_id=25576 |