[Pcgen-trackers] [ pcgen-Feature Requests-1121874 ] [ 1037061 ] CHOOSE:NUMCHOICES vs. TEMPLATE:CHOOSE

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Feature Requests item #1121874, was opened at 2005-02-13 17:21
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by karianna
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384722&aid=1121874&group_id=25576

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: BONUS/CHOOSE/DEFINE tags
>Group: For 6.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Devon Jones (soulcatcher)
Assigned to: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith)
Summary: [ 1037061 ] CHOOSE:NUMCHOICES vs. TEMPLATE:CHOOSE

Initial Comment:
 ba...@vo...>
Subject: [TM] Re:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tir_gwaith [mailto:tho...@ly...]
> TEMPLATE:CHOOSE: is a chooser for templates. It
apparently isn't
> checking PRExxx in the process. I'm not sure whether
that is
> a "feature" or not. Barak, can you see a need for
not having it
> check PRExxx when doing a TEMPLATE:CHOOSE? I'm for a
PRExxx check
> myself. Something to think about.

Oh yes! :p

And to also not offer a template in the TEMPLATE:CHOOSE
list if you already
have it.

I forgot about that little gem until you mentioned the
PRExxx bit.

Oh TM! FREQ please!

[08:15] <[LM]Tir-Gwaith> Um, hold the thought on that FReq
[08:15] <TM_NotMousse> ok
[08:15] <[LM]Tir-Gwaith> Darn, Barak isn't online
[08:15] <[LM]Tir-Gwaith> I'm thinking about adding a
tag... Oh, ADD:TEMPLATE()
[08:16] <[LM]Tir-Gwaith> That way we get the standard
PRExxx, and keep the "automatically get this" type thing

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe)
Date: 2006-08-21 03:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1241568

Wow, this tracker is a mess. It certainly didn't help that
it was moved from another tracker. And the weird summary
title surely doesn't make it easier either. What does it
have to do with CHOOSE:NUMCHOICES?

Tir, can you clear this up please? Is this a request to
build the dynamic of FEAT and VFEAT, using ADD:TEMPLATE and
and TEMPLATE:CHOOSE, where ADD:TEMPLATE still needs to be
implemented? Or is it something different?

-- Frank

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna)
Date: 2005-09-26 16:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=252169

Still need? - K

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Paul W. King (kingpaul)
Date: 2005-02-14 01:18

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=277877

Moved from
[ 1037061 ] CHOOSE:NUMCHOICES vs. TEMPLATE:CHOOSE
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
func=detail&aid=1037061&group_id=25576&atid=384722

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Devon Jones (soulcatcher)
Date: 2005-02-13 17:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=107647

Note: this was one of notmousse's trackers, transfered at
his request.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Devon Jones (soulcatcher)
Date: 2005-02-13 17:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=107647

Date: 2004-09-29 20:45
Sender: barako
Logged In: YES 
user_id=607889

This sounds like an excellent approach to me.

Should this then become two FREQs?  One to modify 
TEMPLATE:CHOOSE to not offer a template if the character 
already has it and one for the ADD:TEAMPLATE()?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Devon Jones (soulcatcher)
Date: 2005-02-13 17:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=107647

Date: 2004-09-29 14:40
Sender: tir-gwaithSourceForge.net Subscriber
Logged In: YES 
user_id=208239

I think I'd be more inclinded for a new global ADD:TEMPLATE() 
tag, so we get some standard tags...  

The ADD:TEMPLATE() could check for PRExxx, and the 
TEMPLATE:CHOOSE could be the way to not check PRExxx.  I 
think the bit about if the character already has the ability to 
not display as a choice should still go away.

Opinion?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384722&aid=1121874&group_id=25576