From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-23 14:06:27
|
Feature Requests item #1027142, was opened at 2004-09-13 22:22 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by karianna You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384722&aid=1027142&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Equipment/WeaponProf Support Group: None >Status: Deleted Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Paul W. King (kingpaul) Assigned to: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Summary: BASEITEM copies equipment information over Initial Comment: Per http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCGenListFileHelp/messa ge/6836 > I've been creating some specific weapons and armors, > and I just want to make sure I'm understanding > something correctly. The BASEITEM tag doesn't > actually grab the stats of the item in question > (damage, armor check, spell failure, weight, etc), > correct? If so, what be required so it does? This way, > duplication of information does not happen (at least in > this case). For a long time BASEITEM was believed by the data crew to copy all the elements of the referred item, and then tags in the specific item were replaced in the new object if present. When we figured out it didn't do that and it had been designed to not, we just moved on to make PCGen work. It would be nice, and IIRC there was a FReq once upon a time, but there have been several "FReq flushes" since then.... As to what is required? In a nutshell, a nice tracker and a Code Monkey with an itch. === Paul W. King TM SB, OGL/PL Chimp, Data Tamarin, BoD ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2005-09-24 02:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 OK, BASEITEM (according to the docs) seems to start an item off as another item minus any EQMODs. Deleting this FREQ, a new one can be raised for a CLONE or something similar. - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-09-24 01:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 It would be nice. Either that or deprecate the tag. Quite honestly I don't know what this tag is used for since it does not do this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2005-09-24 01:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Eddy, we need this for future equipment support? - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384722&aid=1027142&group_id=25576 |