From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2005-09-02 16:18:08
|
Bugs item #1219195, was opened at 2005-06-13 03:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by karianna You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384719&aid=1219195&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: 5.8.0 Stable Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) >Assigned to: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Summary: FEATALL token problem Initial Comment: I think I discovered a bug in some code... I tried to do: |FEATALL.%.!TYPE=Occupation.!TYPE=Background| for a Modern based set that has backgrounds in addition to Occupations done as feats. the docs say that should be able to use as many TYPE= as needed. However, playing with different combinations, I found it only looks at the first TYPE= it comes to, no matter how many more there are and ignores the rest. this is with 5.8 Thomas Clegg <TN_...@ly...> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2005-09-03 04:18 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Mrpph, OK, I'll take a look, no promises though! - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Chuck Pint (chuckpint) Date: 2005-09-03 04:10 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=901169 Confirmed that the code does seem to ignore any TYPE= statement after the first. This needs to be looked at by a code monkey. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2005-09-03 03:56 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 I'm redirecting this to Chuck Pint since it's an OS token and Chuck is the chief OS monkey. (not that I don't think Tir can't answer it, we just don't want to overload him ;-), Tir please feel free to comment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2005-09-03 03:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Hi Tir, is Thomas correct on his LST Syntax? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384719&aid=1219195&group_id=25576 |