From: Oswald <oas...@ya...> - 2004-03-21 18:50:56
|
Hi All, I have used Quincy2002 and Relo 0.9.6 IDEs with MinGW GCC 3.3.1. I have succeeded with such tools. Moreover, I have used DEV-C++ a couple of months ago. Could anyone, please, give me suggestions of better (free) IDEs for running MinGW? Thanks, Oswald Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. |
From: Miroslav F. <cx...@nt...> - 2004-03-21 18:58:33
|
www.ntllib.org/upp I is little bit more than just an IDE, but can be used this way. I hope this evening we will release 0.1.7. version - but then, webpage = will be moved to upp.sourceforge.net Mirek ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Oswald=20 To: min...@li...=20 Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 7:50 PM Subject: [Mingw-users] IDEs Hi All, I have used Quincy2002 and Relo 0.9.6 IDEs with MinGW GCC 3.3.1. I = have succeeded with such tools. Moreover, I have used DEV-C++ a couple = of months ago. Could anyone, please, give me suggestions of better (free) IDEs for = running MinGW? Thanks, Oswald Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. |
From: Daniel S. <da...@bi...> - 2004-03-21 19:22:28
|
Oswald: > Could anyone, please, give me suggestions of better (free) IDEs for running > MinGW? Eclipse (http://www.eclipse.org/) is nice. You probably also want the CDT plug-in for C/C++ development: http://www.eclipse.org/cdt/. Kind regards, Daniel Schlyder |
From: Bronek K. <br...@ru...> - 2004-03-22 06:27:37
|
Oswald <oas...@ya...> wrote: > I have used Quincy2002 and Relo 0.9.6 IDEs with MinGW GCC 3.3.1. I > have succeeded with such tools. Moreover, I have used DEV-C++ a > couple of months ago. Could anyone, please, give me suggestions of > better (free) IDEs for running MinGW? MinGW Developer Studio from http://www.parinya.ca/download.html . IMHO best free IDE for MinGW B. |
From: Dave M. <win...@nt...> - 2004-03-22 22:38:57
|
That looks really nice. I'm currently looking around for an IDE I can recommend for the cross compilers I've made available at http://homepage.ntlworld.com/wintermute2002/ for homebrew gamecube and gameboy advance development. Right now I'm using UltraEdit and Minimal System make/unix tools which does the job for me. MinGW developer Studio looks like an ideal solution for people who don't want to get involved with makefiles and related tools. How much work would it be to have per-project compiler settings with your IDE? Would it be permissible to distribute a copy of this with my cross compilers? One minor problem I've noticed is that the IDE doesn't understand msdev format errors. That one is my fault really as I've patched the gcc sources to output errors that the Visual Studio IDE will understand. I should really figure out a way to have thse switchable. Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: min...@li... > [mailto:min...@li...]On Behalf Of Bronek > Kozicki > Sent: 22 March 2004 06:27 > To: min...@li... > Subject: Re: [Mingw-users] IDEs > > > Oswald <oas...@ya...> wrote: > > I have used Quincy2002 and Relo 0.9.6 IDEs with MinGW GCC 3.3.1. I > > have succeeded with such tools. Moreover, I have used DEV-C++ a > > couple of months ago. Could anyone, please, give me suggestions of > > better (free) IDEs for running MinGW? > > MinGW Developer Studio from http://www.parinya.ca/download.html . IMHO > best free IDE for MinGW > > > B. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > MinGW-users mailing list > Min...@li... > > You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users |
From: Bronek K. <br...@ru...> - 2004-03-23 06:30:25
|
Dave Murphy <win...@nt...> wrote: > How much > work would it be to have per-project compiler settings with your IDE? > Would it be permissible to distribute a copy of this with my cross > compilers? It's not mine :) You need to email author. B. |
From: Earnie B. <ea...@us...> - 2004-03-27 16:24:53
|
The downfall of MinGW Developer Studio is that it is not Open Source!!!! Earnie Dave Murphy wrote: >That looks really nice. I'm currently looking around for an IDE I can >recommend for the cross compilers I've made available at >http://homepage.ntlworld.com/wintermute2002/ for homebrew gamecube and >gameboy advance development. Right now I'm using UltraEdit and Minimal >System make/unix tools which does the job for me. > >MinGW developer Studio looks like an ideal solution for people who don't >want to get involved with makefiles and related tools. How much work would >it be to have per-project compiler settings with your IDE? Would it be >permissible to distribute a copy of this with my cross compilers? > >One minor problem I've noticed is that the IDE doesn't understand msdev >format errors. That one is my fault really as I've patched the gcc sources >to output errors that the Visual Studio IDE will understand. I should really >figure out a way to have thse switchable. > >Dave > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: min...@li... >>[mailto:min...@li...]On Behalf Of Bronek >>Kozicki >>Sent: 22 March 2004 06:27 >>To: min...@li... >>Subject: Re: [Mingw-users] IDEs >> >> >>Oswald <oas...@ya...> wrote: >> >> >>> I have used Quincy2002 and Relo 0.9.6 IDEs with MinGW GCC 3.3.1. I >>> have succeeded with such tools. Moreover, I have used DEV-C++ a >>>couple of months ago. Could anyone, please, give me suggestions of >>>better (free) IDEs for running MinGW? >>> >>> >>MinGW Developer Studio from http://www.parinya.ca/download.html . IMHO >>best free IDE for MinGW >> >> >>B. >> >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials >>Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of >>GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system >>administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click >>_______________________________________________ >>MinGW-users mailing list >>Min...@li... >> >>You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at: >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users >> >> > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials >Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of >GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system >administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click >_______________________________________________ >MinGW-users mailing list >Min...@li... > >You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at: >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users > > > -- http://www.mingw.org http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw https://sourceforge.net/donate/index.php?user_id=15438 |
From: Manu <ma...@wa...> - 2004-03-27 17:23:42
|
Earnie Boyd wrote: > The downfall of MinGW Developer Studio is that it is not Open Source!!!! Maybe more cooperation could be done between MinGW and Visual-MinGW. For example, what would you think of a post-install "mingw.bat" generator. <main.c> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <io.h> int main() { const char *fname = "mingw.bat"; char dir[_MAX_PATH]; FILE *file; if (!_getcwd(dir, _MAX_PATH)){ perror("Cannot change directory.\n"); return -1; } if (_access("gcc.exe", 0) == -1){ perror("gcc.exe"); return -1; } file = fopen(fname,"w\n"); if (!file){ perror("Cannot open output file.\n"); fclose(file); return -1; } fprintf(file, "@echo off\n"); fprintf(file, "echo --------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n"); fprintf(file, "echo MinGW Box v1.0\n"); fprintf(file, "rem **************************************************************************** \n"); fprintf(file, "rem * Set path environment variable and makefile mode.\n"); fprintf(file, "rem *\n"); fprintf(file, "set PATH=%%PATH%%;\"%s\"\n", dir); fprintf(file, "set DOS=1\n"); fprintf(file, "echo Path variable: %%PATH%%\n"); fprintf(file, "echo Makefile mode: (normal=0, dos=1) %%DOS%%\n"); fprintf(file, "rem ****************************************************************************\n"); fprintf(file, "rem * Find the shell to run.\n"); fprintf(file, "rem *\n"); fprintf(file, "if EXIST Win95Cmd.exe goto WIN95CMD\n"); fprintf(file, "if EXIST cmd.exe goto CMD\n"); fprintf(file, "goto DEFAULT\n"); fprintf(file, ":WIN95CMD\n"); fprintf(file, "set SHELLCMD=Win95Cmd.exe\n"); fprintf(file, "echo Shell: %%SHELLCMD%%\n"); fprintf(file, "echo --------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n"); fprintf(file, "echo Running %%SHELLCMD%%...\n"); fprintf(file, "Win95Cmd.exe /K\n"); fprintf(file, "goto EOF\n"); fprintf(file, ":CMD\n"); fprintf(file, "set SHELLCMD=Running cmd.exe...\n"); fprintf(file, "echo Shell: %%SHELLCMD%%\n"); fprintf(file, "echo\n"); fprintf(file, "echo --------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n"); fprintf(file, "echo %%SHELLCMD%%\n"); fprintf(file, "cmd.exe /K\n"); fprintf(file, "goto EOF\n"); fprintf(file, ":DEFAULT\n"); fprintf(file, "set SHELLCMD=Running default %%COMSPEC%%...\n"); fprintf(file, "echo Shell: %%SHELLCMD%%\n"); fprintf(file, "echo \n"); fprintf(file, "echo --------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n"); fprintf(file, "echo %%SHELLCMD%%\n"); fprintf(file, "%%COMSPEC%% /K\n"); fprintf(file, "goto EOF\n"); fprintf(file, ":EOF\n"); fprintf(file, "echo Terminated\n"); fclose(file); return 0; } </main.c> <setup.iss> ; Inno Setup Script for batch.exe. [Setup] AppName=Test AppVerName=Test 1.0 DefaultDirName={pf}\MinGW OutputBaseFilename=test OutputDir=. UninstallFilesDir={app}\uninstall [Files] Source: "bin\batch.exe"; DestDir: "{app}\bin"; Flags: ignoreversion [Run] Filename: "{app}\bin\batch.exe"; Flags: nowait runhidden skipifsilent [UninstallDelete] Type: dirifempty; Name: "{app}" </setup.iss> Other things: I have ported xfree86 makedepend program to MinGW. What do you think? Manu. |
From: Earnie B. <ea...@us...> - 2004-03-28 14:53:12
|
Manu wrote: >Earnie Boyd wrote: > > > > >>The downfall of MinGW Developer Studio is that it is not Open Source!!!! >> >> > >Maybe more cooperation could be done between MinGW and Visual-MinGW. > >For example, what would you think of a post-install "mingw.bat" generator. > > > > <snip> >Other things: >I have ported xfree86 makedepend program to MinGW. > > > GCC provides a method to do this already and examples are given in the GNU make documentation. >What do you think? > > I need to make a new MinGW bundle soon. The details will need to work to move the now Candidate GCC and binutils to Current. At that time I would like to provide the option to install Visual-MinGW creating the appropriate icons. I tend to loath using IDE at all and have only started and exited Visual-MinGW. The reasons for my loath go beyond this email and are off topic but if you wish to hear them let me know. Earnie -- http://www.mingw.org http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw https://sourceforge.net/donate/index.php?user_id=15438 |
From: Manu <ma...@wa...> - 2004-03-28 16:25:55
|
Earnie Boyd wrote: [...] > I need to make a new MinGW bundle soon. The details will need to work > to move the now Candidate GCC and binutils to Current. At that time I > would like to provide the option to install Visual-MinGW creating the > appropriate icons. I tend to loath using IDE at all and have only > started and exited Visual-MinGW. The reasons for my loath go beyond > this email and are off topic but if you wish to hear them let me know. Yes please, I'll take your opinion into account. Manu. |
From: Bronek K. <br...@ru...> - 2004-03-28 20:26:59
|
Earnie Boyd <ea...@us...> wrote: > The downfall of MinGW Developer Studio is that it is not Open > Source!!!! hm, whan about Eclipse? I think that it is, and it works with Mingw. B. |
From: Dave M. <win...@nt...> - 2004-03-28 21:08:38
|
Eclipse is written in Java, is slow, huge and generally a pain in the neck. Personally I have a great deal of trouble understanding why an IDE needs to be bigger than the compiler toolchain. I'm pretty much with Earnie in that I loathe IDEs - a source editor that can call make and capture the output is pretty much all I've ever needed so far. Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: min...@li... > [mailto:min...@li...]On Behalf Of Bronek > Kozicki > Sent: 28 March 2004 21:27 > To: min...@li... > Subject: Re: [Mingw-users] IDEs > > > Earnie Boyd <ea...@us...> wrote: > > The downfall of MinGW Developer Studio is that it is not Open > > Source!!!! > > > hm, whan about Eclipse? I think that it is, and it works with Mingw. > > > > B. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > MinGW-users mailing list > Min...@li... > > You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users > |
From: Chris S. <is...@sy...> - 2004-03-29 01:33:40
|
'lo, >I'm pretty much with Earnie in that I loathe IDEs - a source editor that can >call make and capture the output is pretty much all I've ever needed so far. > > Long live vim! :) Seriously, I don't know what it is, but a lot of people seem more comfortable with an IDE. I've written several Open Source applications for windows, and a common request that I get is to create 'project' files for them (I distribute Makefiles). The problem I have with most of the 'project' files created by the IDE's I've played with (I haven't tested them all), is that they are far from optimized and seem to prefer using hard coded paths as opposed to relative ones (which tends to be a problem if you want to distribute them). Chris |