Re: [MinGW-dvlpr] OBJBASE_H_?

[Dimitri Papadopoulos-O. <pap...@sh...>]

Hi,

>>>Your patch was a correct fix to the problem caused by Dimitri's patch.
>>
>>The reason for my patch was that MinGW is currently using standard _*_H 
>>header guards everywhere, except for <objbase.h> I felt defining 
>>Microsoft's _OBJBASE_H_ in addition to MinGW's _OBJBASE_H for 
>><objbase.h> only was just a hack.
>>
> 
> 
> And your patch to remove _OBJBASE_H  was just careless

Thank you, Danny. That was what one might call an error, the intent was 
to remove _OBJBASE_H_. I wasn't actually aware I had removed _OBJBASE_H 
until I looked at the CVS log a few minutes ago.

What about the proposal for maintaining both MinGW's _*_H and 
Microsoft's headers guards? I think Luke was right and I was wrong about 
that.

Dimitri