Menu
▾
▴
[Mingw-notify] [ mingw-Bugs-936165 ] virtual baseclass botch
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-04-19 09:13:29
|
Bugs item #936165, was opened at 2004-04-16 16:33 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by infidel You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=102435&aid=936165&group_id=2435 Category: gdb Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Eugene (jesaul) Assigned to: Chris Johns (cjohns) Summary: virtual baseclass botch Initial Comment: I have a program compiled by gcc version 3.2.3 (mingw special 20030504-1). I use gdb 6.0 taken grom SF and I recompiled gdb 6.0.90 under mingw. When I have a pointer to class and make print *class I have a message - "virtual baseclass botch" It's happens viewing any class. With structures it works fine. What can be done here? Can a change gdb or gcc version help? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Luke Dunstan (infidel) Date: 2004-04-19 17:13 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=30442 That's okay, you don't have to make the test case simple if it's too difficult. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eugene (jesaul) Date: 2004-04-19 16:47 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1022506 I've compiled with gcc 3.3.3. And tryed to make a simple reproducible case. There are no simple cases for this bug... I'll try to make it anyway. I can give you not simple but reproducible case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Luke Dunstan (infidel) Date: 2004-04-16 23:37 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=30442 Actually the latest release of MinGW GCC is 3.3.3. See the Candidate section at the top of this list: http://www.mingw.org/download.shtml ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eugene (jesaul) Date: 2004-04-16 22:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1022506 I've tryed newer gcc ver 3.2.1. About a small program... I'll try now to make a small reproducible case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Luke Dunstan (infidel) Date: 2004-04-16 21:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=30442 You should probably try a newer release of GCC first. If that doesn't help, could you provide a small example program that demonstrates the problem? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=102435&aid=936165&group_id=2435 |