Re: [MinGW-dvlpr] mingw-runtime version

[Earnie B. <ea...@us...>]

Luke Dunstan wrote:

>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Earnie Boyd" <ea...@us...>
>To: <min...@li...>
>Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 9:35 PM
>Subject: Re: [MinGW-dvlpr] mingw-runtime version
>
>  
>
>>Some projects use post versioning instead of pre versioning, i.e. the
>>versions as stored in CVS are the released version.  Should we think
>>about adopting that policy instead of what we do now, which is, update
>>to the new version after the release?
>>
>>Earnie
>>    
>>
>
>I think that depends on how much planning there is, because for example
>after we make a 3.3 release do we know whether then next one will be 3.4 or
>4.0?
>
>  
>
That was the point of my question and the reason for needing to revert 
the version.  We don't know the changes that will occur in the future.  
So should we wait or not?

Earnie

-- 
http://www.mingw.org
http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw
https://sourceforge.net/donate/index.php?user_id=15438