From: Wu Y. <ad...@sh...> - 2004-03-21 03:38:06
|
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 03:09, Danny Smith wrote: > > > 1) has been done. Would you please have a look at it? > > > > Yes, I have. I see one small problem, but otherwise it looks good. You saw one small problem? Um, I have seen two now: one is the definition of __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_DEFAULT, the other a no-return-value branch in __gthread_mutex_unlock. Hope what you found is one of them :-). The updated patch is attached. Need I post it to gcc-patches again? Or wait till the FSF paper that I should sign reaches me? Best regards, Wu Yongwei |