Re: [MinGW-dvlpr] w32api - Are we ready to release?

[Danny S. <dan...@cl...>]

1) Is the problem with not including <excpt.h> from windows.h still an
issue.?
2) I think I should expose the deprecated winsock 1 functions in
winsock2.h.
3) Casper has submitted two new winsock files.  I think the  ws2spi.h
should go in the w32api.  What about the wsahelp.h file?

Danny

----- Original Message -----
From: "Earnie Boyd" <ear...@ya...>
To: <min...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, 20 August 2002 00:53
Subject: [MinGW-dvlpr] w32api - Are we ready to release?


> Danny had stated:
>
> RE:[ mingw-Patches-582964 ] Cast OLE error codes to longs
> I'm not fussy about which way you go with this(long or HRESULT), but
> should get in before release.  HRESULT seems more consistent, since
the
> codes are used by such macros as HRESULT_SEVERITY
>
> Earnie said:
>
> HRESULT sounds good to me.
>
>
> So, can I release tomorrow?
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
> cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
> https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
> _______________________________________________
> MinGW-dvlpr mailing list
> Min...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-dvlpr