From: Soren A. <so...@wo...> - 2000-11-19 18:42:39
|
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000 16:02:28 -0800, no...@so... wrote (Regarding [Mingw-users] SourceForge File Release Notice): > A new version of gcc has been released. > You can download it from SourceForge by following this link: > > <http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2435&release_id=16289> I have been trying over the last 12 hours to download this file; most generally it stalls out at 2% and never resumes. It currently has just failed again. Is this sort of server failure common with Sourceforge? Is there any alternate download site I can use to get this? I am having a problem with `protoize'. I am trying to use it to generate function declarations for a package that won't build under mingw-gcc 2.95.2 due to compiler errors. The package is "Benny's DL Quantizer v2.4:" - - `pngdl3' : http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Program/8979/color/index.htm a console program for doing color reduction on truecolor PNG files (outputs a GIF). The package includes something called `GIFsaver' which I have encountered before (and never been able to successfully build with mingw) before, and is source written for (as the author puts it, "oriented towards") the Watcom compiler. BTW, I am aware that apps using LZW for GIFs are encumbered legally. I'd love to rid Benny's code of the GIF aspect if I only knew how. If any reader knows of successful compilation of these sources, please help. Back to the main point: `Protoize' is behaving strangely; it at one point called `gcc' to build a file with an extension of 'X'. Then I did some tweaking (because gcc couldn't do it, returned a failure, so `protoize' wouldn't run). Now, `protoize' is for some reason *not* calling `gcc' but instead calling `cc1' and it fails because somewhere it (`cc1.exe') tries to write to `/dev/null' (which obviouly doesn't exist on DOS/Win32; instead, the equivalent is `nul'). This seems like a bug. I therefore am hoping that I am dealing with a known bug in that version of protoize.exe, and downloading a new gcc with fix it. Any help? Thanks, soren andersen -- "Dont shoot the messenger." - me |