From: <dan...@ya...> - 2001-10-05 00:56:17
|
--- "Paul G." <pga...@qw...> wrote: > Hi folks, > > Forgive any duplications. Had some problems with a firewall...;-) > > <snip> > > > > > I don't know how to send this to the appropriate person, so it > would > > > be great if anyone can light me on that. > > > > > > > Thanks. > > I've committed this to SF CVS repository. In future, please submit > > patches to the mingw patch tracker page at SF: > > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=2435&atid=302435 > > > > They may not be processed straight away, but that way, at least, > they > > won't get lost :\ > > Ok. > > Just wanted to say, for the record, that I have no problem > implementing these sorts of > things (constants) as they are pretty straight-forward, at least on > the surface. The post I sent was actually to encourage the OP to use the patch tracker system in future. I cc'd to dvlpr list just to say that it had been fixed. Also > "IsProcessorFeature()" is an NT4/Win2k(?)/XP specific api call and > won't work for Me/Win9x > systems since they have no such api call. At least they didn't last > time I checked. > IsProcessorFeaturePresent() is already declared in winbase.h. However, it is not protected by any WINVER or _WIN32_WINNT guard. In fact, winbase.h may have a lot of NT4 or above declarations which probably should be protected to get compile time rather than runtime errors. Any volunteers? Danny > Paul G. > > _______________________________________________ > MinGW-dvlpr mailing list > Min...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-dvlpr http://travel.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Travel - Got Itchy feet? Get inspired! |